Cited by 211Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsRenal and related cancers

Single cell census of human kidney organoids shows reproducibility and diminished off-target cells after transplantation

Open access
Subramanian, Ayshwarya, Sidhom, Eriene-Heidi, Emani, Maheswarareddy, Vernon, Katherine, Sahakian, Nareh, Zhou, Yiming, Kost-Alimova, Maria, Slyper, Michal +8 more·2019·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Human iPSC-derived kidney organoids have the potential to revolutionize discovery, but assessing their consistency and reproducibility across iPSC lines, and reducing the generation of off-target cells remain an open challenge. Here, we profile four human iPSC lines for a total of 450,118 single cells to show how organoid composition and development are comparable to human fetal and adult kidneys. Although cell classes are largely reproducible across time points, protocols, and replicates, we detect variability in cell proportions between different iPSC lines, largely due to off-target cells. To address this, we analyze organoids transplanted under the mouse kidney capsule and find diminished off-target cells. Our work shows how single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) can score organoids for reproducibility, faithfulness and quality, that kidney organoids derived from different iPSC lines are comparable surrogates for human kidney, and that transplantation enhances their formation by diminishing off-target cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-13382-0

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Melanoma-like, neuronal-like, and muscle-like cells were found using scRNA-seq of kidney organoids, which were consistent with previous observations using conventional methods in this system.

    “melanoma-like, neuronal-like, and muscle-like cells were found using scRNA-seq of kidney organoids,72 which were consistent with previous observations using conventional methods in this system.”

    From Single-cell transcriptomics of human-skin-equivalent organoids (2023) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Results section on the 49 kidney organoid states reports melanoma-like, neuron-like, and muscle-like cells in single-cell profiles and says these populations had been reported previously. Our copy does not specify that the previous observations used conventional methods, so that detail is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies using scRNA-seq to characterize organoid cultures of other tissue types have also identified abnormal cell populations present in their organoid cultures.

    “Recent studies using scRNA-seq to characterize organoid cultures of other tissue types have also identified abnormal cell populations present in their organoid cultures.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subramanian, A., Sidhom, E.-H., Emani, M., Vernon, K., Sahakian, N., Zhou, Y., Kost-Alimova, M., Slyper, M., Waldman, J., Dionne, D., Nguyen, L. T., Weins, A., Marshall, J. L., Rosenblatt-Rosen, O., Regev, A., & Greka, A.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Greka, Anna
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-11-29
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
5462-5462
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990026706
Cited by
211
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Nature
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK099465, DK095045)
  • the Slim Initiative for Genomic Medicine in the Americas (SIGMA), and an NDSEG fellowship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Renal and related cancers
Keywords
kidney organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells, single-cell RNA sequencing, reproducibility, organoid transplantation, kidney capsule transplantation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Humans, Kidney, Organoids, Transplantation, Heterologous, Reproducibility of Results, Kidney Transplantation, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review