PreprintCited by 385Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

MultiVI: deep generative model for the integration of multi-modal data

Open access
Ashuach, Tal, Gabitto, Mariano I., Jordan, Michael I., Yosef, Nir·2021·Nature Methods

Abstract

Jointly profiling the transcriptional and chromatin accessibility landscapes of single-cells is a powerful technique to characterize cellular populations. Here we present MultiVI, a probabilistic model to analyze such multiomic data and integrate it with single modality datasets. MultiVI creates a joint representation that accurately reflects both chromatin and transcriptional properties of the cells even when one modality is missing. It also imputes missing data, corrects for batch effects and is available in the scvi-tools framework: https://docs.scvi-tools.org/ .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.08.20.457057

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study extended transcriptionally defined supertypes across snRNA-seq, snATAC-seq and snMultiome datasets to construct a joint multiomic representation from both neurotypical reference donors and donors with disease.

    “We then extended our transcriptionally defined supertypes across snRNA-seq, snATAC–seq and snMultiome datasets to construct a joint multiomic representation49 from both neurotypical reference donors and donors with the disease (Extended Data Fig. 6a–e).”

    From Integrated multimodal cell atlas of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

  • StabMap, Cobolt, MultiVI and Bridge Integration in Seurat v5 integrate unmatched datasets using separately collected multi-omics datasets.

    “These methods include StabMap170, Cobolt171, MultiVI172 and ‘Bridge Integration’ in Seurat v5 (ref. 173).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [22]Lopez, R. et al. Decision-making with auto-encoding variational Bayes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems33, 5081–5092 (2020).
  2. [31]Loshchilov, I. & Hutter, F. Decoupled weight decay regularization. OpenReview.net https://openreview.net/forum?id=Bkg6RiCqY7 (2019).
  3. [32]Yaroslav, G. et al. Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks Vol. 7 (2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashuach, T., Gabitto, M. I., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Gabitto, Mariano I.
  • Yosef, Nir
Venue
Nature Methods
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-08-20
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
1222-1231
ISSN
1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382632237
Cited by
385
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 153 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 1
FWCI
32.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AI090023)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI090023, AI090023, U19AI167903)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
deep generative models, multiomic data integration, single-cell transcriptomics, chromatin accessibility, probabilistic models, missing data
MeSH terms
Models, Statistical, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review