Cited by 168Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Cobolt: integrative analysis of multimodal single-cell sequencing data

Open access
Gong, Boying, Zhou, Yun, Purdom, Elizabeth·2021·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A growing number of single-cell sequencing platforms enable joint profiling of multiple omics from the same cells. We present , a novel method that not only allows for analyzing the data from joint-modality platforms, but provides a coherent framework for the integration of multiple datasets measured on different modalities. We demonstrate its performance on multi-modality data of gene expression and chromatin accessibility and illustrate the integration abilities of by jointly analyzing this multi-modality data with single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-021-02556-z

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • StabMap, Cobolt, MultiVI and Bridge Integration in Seurat v5 integrate unmatched datasets using separately collected multi-omics datasets.

    “These methods include StabMap170, Cobolt171, MultiVI172 and ‘Bridge Integration’ in Seurat v5 (ref. 173).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gong, B., Zhou, Y., & Purdom, E.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Purdom, Elizabeth
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2021-12-28
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
351-351
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W4200581587
Cited by
168
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (U19MH114830)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
single-cell multi-omics, single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell ATAC-seq, chromatin accessibility, gene expression, data integration framework
MeSH terms
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing, RNA-Seq, Chromatin, Humans, Sequence Analysis, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review