Cited by 85Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

Alignment of spatial genomics data using deep Gaussian processes

Open access
Jones, Andrew, Townes, F. William, Li, Didong, Engelhardt, Barbara E.·2023·Nature Methods

Abstract

Spatially resolved genomic technologies have allowed us to study the physical organization of cells and tissues, and promise an understanding of local interactions between cells. However, it remains difficult to precisely align spatial observations across slices, samples, scales, individuals and technologies. Here, we propose a probabilistic model that aligns spatially-resolved samples onto a known or unknown common coordinate system (CCS) with respect to phenotypic readouts (for example, gene expression). Our method, Gaussian Process Spatial Alignment (GPSA), consists of a two-layer Gaussian process: the first layer maps observed samples’ spatial locations onto a CCS, and the second layer maps from the CCS to the observed readouts. Our approach enables complex downstream spatially aware analyses that are impossible or inaccurate with unaligned data, including an analysis of variance, creation of a dense three-dimensional (3D) atlas from sparse two-dimensional (2D) slices or association tests across data modalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-023-01972-2

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loki Align's superiority over PASTE and GPSA likely stems from PASTE's design for linear transformations, which maintains topological integrity but struggles with spatial warping, while GPSA aims to map readouts to a common coordinate system, risking topological fidelity.

    “This superiority likely stems from PASTE’s design for linear transformations, which maintains topological integrity but struggles with spatial warping32, while GPSA aims to map readouts to a common coordinate system, risking topological fidelity33.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [24]Lorbert A Ramadge PJ Kernel hyperalignment Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2012 25 1790 1798
  2. [28]Preibisch, S., Karaiskos, N. & Rajewsky, N. Image-based representation of massive spatial transcriptomics datasets. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2021.12.07.471629 (2021).
  3. [47]Cressie, N. & Wikle, C. K. Statistics for Spatio–Temporal Data (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
  4. [50]Damianou, A. & Lawrence, N. D. Deep Gaussian processes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 207–215 (PMLR, 2013).
  5. [51]Salimbeni, H. & Deisenroth, M. Doubly stochastic variational inference for deep Gaussian processes. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.30 (2017).
  6. [52]Hensman, J., Fusi, N. & Lawrence, N. D. Gaussian processes for big data. In Proceedings of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI; 2013).
  7. [53]Titsias, M. Variational learning of inducing variables in sparse Gaussian processes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 567–574 (PMLR, 2009).
  8. [54]Snelson E Ghahramani Z Sparse Gaussian processes using pseudo-inputs Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2006 18 1257
  9. [55]Boyle P Frean M Dependent Gaussian processes Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2005 17 217 224

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, A., Townes, F. W., Li, D., & Engelhardt, B. E.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Engelhardt, Barbara E.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2023-08-17
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1379-1387
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W4385955242
Cited by
85
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (AWD1005627)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (U2CCA233195)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL133218)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
spatial genomics, spatial alignment, deep Gaussian processes, probabilistic models
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Statistical, Normal Distribution, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review