Cited by 577Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

ZIFA: Dimensionality reduction for zero-inflated single-cell gene expression analysis

Open access
Pierson, Emma, Yau, Christopher·2015·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-seq data allows insight into normal cellular function and various disease states through molecular characterization of gene expression on the single cell level. Dimensionality reduction of such high-dimensional data sets is essential for visualization and analysis, but single-cell RNA-seq data are challenging for classical dimensionality-reduction methods because of the prevalence of dropout events, which lead to zero-inflated data. Here, we develop a dimensionality-reduction method, (Z)ero (I)nflated (F)actor (A)nalysis (ZIFA), which explicitly models the dropout characteristics, and show that it improves modeling accuracy on simulated and biological data sets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-015-0805-z

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both scGPT and Geneformer produce cell embeddings intended to project potentially noisy gene expression measurements to a more biologically relevant latent space, and then these cell embeddings are fine-tuned for cell type classification.

    “Both scGPT and Geneformer produce cell embeddings intended to project potentially noisy gene expression measurements to a more biologically relevant latent space [18–21], and then these cell embeddings are fine-tuned for cell type classification.”

    From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction describes projecting high-dimensional single-cell gene-expression measurements into a low-dimensional latent space to reveal patterns, and discusses noise from dropout events. It does not discuss scGPT or Geneformer, so it cannot establish that those models produce embeddings for this purpose. The fine-tuning clause follows the citation and is not assessed as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Shapiro E Biezuner T Linnarsson S Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science Nat Rev Genet 2013 14 9 618 30 10.1038/nrg3542 23897237 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Blainey PC Quake SR Dissecting genomic diversity, one cell at a time Nat Methods 2014 11 1 19 21 10.1038/nmeth.2783 24524132 PMC3947563 · DOI
  3. [7]Kharchenko PV Silberstein L Scadden DT Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis Nat Methods 2014 11 7 740 2 10.1038/nmeth.2967 24836921 PMC4112276 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [9]Tipping ME Bishop CM Probabilistic principal component analysis J R Stat Soc: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 1999 61 3 611 22 10.1111/1467-9868.00196 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [12]Tenenbaum JB De Silva V Langford JC A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction Science 2000 290 5500 2319 23 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 11125149 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [13]Kruskal JB Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis Psychometrika 1964 29 1 1 27 10.1007/BF02289565 · DOI
  7. [14]Shalek AK Satija R Shuga J Trombetta JJ Gennert D Lu D Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation Nature 2014 510 7505 363 369 24919153 PMC4193940
  8. [16]Usoskin D Furlan A Islam S Abdo H Lönnerberg P Lou D Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing Nat Neurosci 2015 18 1 145 53 10.1038/nn.3881 25420068 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierson, E., & Yau, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Yau, Christopher
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2015-11-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
241-241
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2152692691
Cited by
577
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 23 · 2014: 2
FWCI
20.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L001411/1)
  • Wellcome Trust (090532/Z/09/Z)
  • Li Ka Shing Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
dimensionality reduction, zero-inflated data, dropout events, single-cell RNA sequencing, gene expression, factor analysis, high-dimensional data visualization
MeSH terms
Software, Models, Statistical, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Principal Component Analysis, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review