Cited by 293SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingAnimal Virus Infections Studies

Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody by wild-type plaque reduction neutralization, microneutralization and pseudotyped virus neutralization assays

Open access
Bewley, Kevin R., Coombes, Naomi S., Gagnon, Luc, McInroy, Lorna, Baker, Natalie, Shaik, Imam, St-Jean, Julien R., St-Amant, Natalie +14 more·2021·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Virus neutralization assays measure neutralizing antibodies in serum and plasma, and the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is considered the gold standard for measuring levels of these antibodies for many viral diseases. We have developed procedures for the standard PRNT, microneutralization assay (MNA) and pseudotyped virus neutralization assay (PNA) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The MNA offers advantages over the PRNT by reducing assay time, allowing increased throughput and reducing operator workload while remaining dependent upon the use of wild-type virus. This ensures that all severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigens are present, but Biosafety Level 3 facilities are required. In addition to the advantages of MNA, PNA can be performed with lower biocontainment (Biosafety Level 2 facilities) and allows for further increases in throughput. For each new vaccine, it is critical to ensure good correlation of the neutralizing activity measured using PNA against the PRNT or MNA. These assays have been used in the development and licensure of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca; Oxford University) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen) coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines and are critical for demonstrating bioequivalence of future vaccines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-021-00536-y

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Live virus neutralization assays are considered the gold standard for assessing immune responses.

    “Live virus neutralization assays are considered to be the gold standard for assessing immune responses25.”

    From An Omicron-specific, self-amplifying mRNA booster vaccine for COVID-19: a phase 2/3 randomized trial (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Development of the protocol section calls the live-virus plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) the gold standard for assessing humoral correlates of protection for many viral diseases. The citing sentence broadens this to live-virus neutralization assays generally and to immune responses beyond the humoral response. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bewley, K. R., Coombes, N. S., Gagnon, L., McInroy, L., Baker, N., Shaik, I., St-Jean, J. R., St-Amant, N., Buttigieg, K. R., Humphries, H. E., Godwin, K. J., Brunt, E., Allen, L., Leung, S., Brown, P. J., Penn, E. J., Thomas, K., Kulnis, G., Hallis, B., Carroll, M., Funnell, S., & Charlton, S.
Affiliations
Public Health England (GB)
Corresponding author
Bewley, Kevin R.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2021-04-23
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
3114-3140
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W3155000349
Cited by
293
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 25 · 2013: 1
FWCI
18.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The PNA elements of this work were supported by the Global Health Vaccine Accelerator Platforms (GH-VAP) and the Coronavirus Immunotherapy Consortium (CoVIC) funded by BMGF
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, neutralizing antibodies, plaque reduction neutralization test, microneutralization, antibody quantification, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, Ad26.COV2-S
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Ad26COVS1, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Antibodies, Viral, Humans, Neutralization Tests, Time Factors, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review