Cited by 28Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Geostatistics and Mapping

A global, empirical, harmonised dataset of soil organic carbon changes under perennial crops

Open access
Ledo, Alicia, Hillier, Jonathan, Smith, Pete, Aguilera, Eduardo, Blagodatskiy, Sergey, Brearley, Francis Q., Datta, Ashim, Diaz-Pines, Eugenio +17 more·2019·Scientific Data

Abstract

A global, unified dataset on Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) changes under perennial crops has not existed till now. We present a global, harmonised database on SOC change resulting from perennial crop cultivation. It contains information about 1605 paired-comparison empirical values (some of which are aggregated data) from 180 different peer-reviewed studies, 709 sites, on 58 different perennial crop types, from 32 countries in temperate, tropical and boreal areas; including species used for food, bioenergy and bio-products. The database also contains information on climate, soil characteristics, management and topography. This is the first such global compilation and will act as a baseline for SOC changes in perennial crops. It will be key to supporting global modelling of land use and carbon cycle feedbacks, and supporting agricultural policy development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41597-019-0062-1

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in bulk density (BD) after and before perennials could not be analyzed because those data were missing from the original dataset.

    “In particular, we were not able to analyze changes in BD after and before perennials since those data were missing from the original dataset (see Ledo et al., 2019 for further details).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ledo et al., 2019

    Methods > Unifying units says missing bulk-density values were left as NA and only 51% of studies reported BD, supporting a data-availability limitation. Methods > Empirical data gathering describes paired current and previous soil-characteristic values. The paper does not say that before-and-after BD changes could not be analyzed; the citing authors’ inability to perform that analysis is their own conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To date there has been a lack of evidence about the capacity of perennial crops to store SOC.

    “Nonetheless, to date there has been a lack of evidence about the capacity of perennial crops to store SOC (Ledo et al., 2019).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ledo et al., 2019

  • Many of the crops in the dataset were not duplicated.

    “Second, and more importantly, many of the crops in the dataset were not duplicated (Ledo et al., 2019; Table S1), specifying crop type as random effect would be an obvious confounding factor.”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ledo et al., 2019

    The Background & Summary reports 58 crops and 1,605 entries, while Data Records points to a crop list in Online-only Table 1. The passages in our copy do not give the number of entries per crop or say how many crop types occur only once; searches for crop duplication and entries per crop did not establish the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ledo, A., Hillier, J., Smith, P., Aguilera, E., Blagodatskiy, S., Brearley, F. Q., Datta, A., Diaz-Pines, E., Don, A., Dondini, M., Dunn, J., Feliciano, D. M., Liebig, M. A., Lang, R., Llorente, M., Zinn, Y. L., McNamara, N., Ogle, S., Qin, Z., Rovira, P., Rowe, R., Vicente-Vicente, J. L., Whitaker, J., Yue, Q., & Zerihun, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (IN)
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
  • Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (ES)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ledo, Alicia
Venue
Scientific Data
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
57-57
ISSN
2052-4463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946000168
Cited by
28
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
Type
data paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P027784/1)
  • Österreichische Gesellschaft für Dermatologie und Venerologie (NE/N017854/1)
  • CNPq
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Keywords
soil organic carbon, perennial crops, soil carbon change, energy crops, bioproducts, land use change, carbon cycle feedbacks, soil management, topography, climate, soil properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review