Cited by 37Bioenergy crop production and managementEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilitySoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Perennial-GHG: A new generic allometric model to estimate biomass accumulation and greenhouse gas emissions in perennial food and bioenergy crops

Open access
Ledo, A., Heathcote, R., Hastings, A., Smith, P., Hillier, J.·2018·Environmental Modelling & Software

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.005

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perennials have potential additional plant inputs from management interventions such as pruning and on-site retention of litter.

    “Perennials not only produce more plant residue than annual crops (Ferchaud et al., 2016) but also have the potential additional plant inputs from management interventions such us pruning and on-site retention of litter (Ledo et al., 2018).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ledo et al., 2018

  • Perennials are disturbed usually only at the beginning of the life cycle and not during.

    “Perennials, in contrast, are disturbed usually only at the beginning of the life cycle and not during (Ledo et al., 2018), thus potentially avoiding SOC lost by mechanical soil treatments.”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ledo et al., 2018

  • Burning trees at the end of the crop cycle results in net GHG emissions.

    “Plant residue management is also important, that is, burning tress at the end of the crop cycle results in net GHG emissions (Ledo et al., 2018).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ledo et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ledo, A., Heathcote, R., Hastings, A., Smith, P., & Hillier, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Cool Farm Alliance (GB)
Corresponding author
Ledo, A.
Venue
Environmental Modelling & Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
102
Pages
292-305
ISSN
1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791020936
Cited by
37
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Modelling & Software (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
NERC (NE/N017854/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
perennial crops, greenhouse gas emissions, biomass accumulation, allometric equations, carbon balance, energy crops, food crops, apple, coffee, sugarcane, Miscanthus, carbon dioxide removal, soil carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review