Cited by 58Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsChemokine receptors and signalingAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Ischemia-induced Neuronal Cell Death Is Mediated by Chemokine Receptor CX3CR1

Open access
Wang, Jinkun, Gan, Yan, Han, Pengcheng, Yin, Junxiang, Liu, Qingwei, Ghanian, Soha, Gao, Feng, Gong, Guanghui +1 more·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The chemokine fractalkine (CX3CL1) and its receptor CX3CR1 play a fundamental role in the pathophysiology of stroke. Previous studies have focused on a paracrine interaction between neurons that produce fractalkine and microglia that express CX3CR1 receptors in the central nervous system. Recent findings have demonstrated the functional expression of CX3CR1 receptors by hippocampal neurons, suggesting their involvement in neuroprotective and neurodegenerative actions. To elucidate the roles of neuronal CX3CR1 in neurodegeneration induced by ischemic stroke, a mouse model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) was employed. In the pMCAO mice, increased CX3CR1 levels, apoptosis-associated morphological changes, and Caspase 3-positive neuronal cells were observed in the striatum and in the hippocampus 24 hours after occlusion. Upregulation of CX3CR1 in ischemic neurons is associated with neuronal apoptotic cell death. In contrast, ischemia-induced apoptotic neuronal cell death was decreased in CX3CR1 deficient mice. Cultured primary hippocampal neurons obtained from CX3CR1 deficient mice were more resistant to glutamate-induced excitotoxicity by blocking calcium influx than those from wild-type mice. For the first time, we reported that neuronal CXCR1 mediates neuronal apoptotic cell death in ischemia. Our results suggest that modulating CXCR1 activity offers a novel therapeutic strategy for stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-18774-0

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wang et al. reported that transient expression of Cx3cr1 in neurons is neuronal protective in an ischemic model.

    “Wang et al., reported that transient expression of Cx3cr1 in neurons is neuronal protective in an ischemic model (Wang et al., 2018).”

    From Targeting Microglia Using Cx3cr1-Cre Lines: Revisiting the Specificity (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2018

    The Discussion states the opposite: elevated neuronal CX3CR1 is associated with apoptotic death, while CX3CR1 deficiency protects against ischemic brain damage. The study used a permanent, not transient, ischemia model. The supplied passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Wang et al., the IHC data showed that the majority of Cx3cr1-positive cells were neurons and very few, if any, were microglia.

    “However, oddly, the IHC data showed that the majority of Cx3cr1-positive cells were neurons and very few, if any, were microglia.”

    From Targeting Microglia Using Cx3cr1-Cre Lines: Revisiting the Specificity (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2018

    In Results, Figure 2, the double staining is described as showing CX3CR1 mainly in ischemic neurons, supporting the majority-neuronal part of the claim. The same Results section reports CX3CR1 upregulation in microglia at a relatively lower level at 24 hours, but does not establish that very few, if any, CX3CR1-positive cells were microglia. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Gan, Y., Han, P., Yin, J., Liu, Q., Ghanian, S., Gao, F., Gong, G., & Tang, Z.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (CN)
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Zhiwei
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-01-11
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
556-556
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782347637
Cited by
58
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2017FE467, 81360204, 81760220)
  • Kunming Medical University (2017FE467-)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
CX3CR1, fractalkine, ischemic stroke, neuronal apoptosis, hippocampal neurons, middle cerebral artery occlusion, excitotoxicity, glutamate, caspase-3, neuroprotection, stroke treatment
MeSH terms
CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1, Animals, Calcium, Cells, Cultured, Corpus Striatum, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Up-Regulation, Apoptosis, Glutamic Acid, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review