Cited by 75Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyBRCA gene mutations in cancerGene expression and cancer classification

Machine learning identifies interacting genetic variants contributing to breast cancer risk: A case study in Finnish cases and controls

Open access
Behravan, Hamid, Hartikainen, Jaana M., Tengström, Maria, Pylkäs, Katri, Winqvist, Robert, Kosma, Veli–Matti, Mannermaa, Arto·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

We propose an effective machine learning approach to identify group of interacting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which contribute most to the breast cancer (BC) risk by assuming dependencies among BCAC iCOGS SNPs. We adopt a gradient tree boosting method followed by an adaptive iterative SNP search to capture complex non-linear SNP-SNP interactions and consequently, obtain group of interacting SNPs with high BC risk-predictive potential. We also propose a support vector machine formed by the identified SNPs to classify BC cases and controls. Our approach achieves mean average precision (mAP) of 72.66, 67.24 and 69.25 in discriminating BC cases and controls in KBCP, OBCS and merged KBCP-OBCS sample sets, respectively. These results are better than the mAP of 70.08, 63.61 and 66.41 obtained by using a polygenic risk score model derived from 51 known BC-associated SNPs, respectively, in KBCP, OBCS and merged KBCP-OBCS sample sets. BC subtype analysis further reveals that the 200 identified KBCP SNPs from the proposed method performs favorably in classifying estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and negative (ER−) BC cases both in KBCP and OBCS data. Further, a biological analysis of the identified SNPs reveals genes related to important BC-related mechanisms, estrogen metabolism and apoptosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-31573-5

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Siddhartha PK Genome-wide meta-analyses of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer association studies identify multiple new susceptibility loci shared by at least two cancer types Cancer Discovery 2016 6 1052 1067 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1227 27432226 PMC5010513 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behravan, H., Hartikainen, J. M., Tengström, M., Pylkäs, K., Winqvist, R., Kosma, V., & Mannermaa, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Behravan, Hamid
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-09-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
13149-13149
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889381121
Cited by
75
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
  • McGill University
  • Génome Québec
  • Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
breast cancer risk, single nucleotide polymorphisms, gene-gene interaction, epistasis, gradient boosting decision tree, support vector machine, polygenic risk score, estrogen receptor status, breast cancer subtypes, estrogen metabolism, apoptosis, Finnish population
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Finland, Humans, Prognosis, Risk, Genome, Human, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Protein Interaction Mapping, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genome-Wide Association Study, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review