Cited by 28Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Face perception influences the programming of eye movements.

Open access

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that face stimuli elicit extremely fast and involuntary saccadic responses toward them, relative to other categories of visual stimuli. In the present study, we further investigated to what extent face stimuli influence the programming and execution of saccades examining their amplitude. We performed two experiments using a saccadic choice task: two images (one with a face, one with a vehicle) were simultaneously displayed in the left and right visual fields of participants who had to initiate a saccade toward the image (Experiment 1) or toward a cross in the image (Experiment 2) containing a target stimulus (a face or a vehicle). Results revealed shorter saccades toward vehicle than face targets, even if participants were explicitly asked to perform their saccades toward a specific location (Experiment 2). Furthermore, error saccades had smaller amplitude than correct saccades. Further analyses showed that error saccades were interrupted in mid-flight to initiate a concurrently-programmed corrective saccade. Overall, these data suggest that the content of visual stimuli can influence the programming of saccade amplitude, and that efficient online correction of saccades can be performed during the saccadic choice task.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-36510-0

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A competition between conscious and unconscious mechanisms is the predicted result, with evidence from different timescales of gaze shifts during visual search of faces.

    “A competition between mechanisms is the predicted result, evidence for which comes from the different timescales of gaze shifts during visual search of faces (Kauffman et al., 2019; Taylor et al., 2024)”

    From The function(s) of consciousness revisited: insights from a modular/constitutive model using vision as a test case (2026) · cites this paper as Kauffman et al., 2019

    The General Discussion (no page supplied) describes competing saccade programs in a face-versus-vehicle choice task. It also reports that corrective gaze shifts occurred after a much shorter delay than initial saccades, supporting the timescale point. The paper does not characterize the competing programs as conscious versus unconscious mechanisms, and its experiment was a two-image choice task rather than visual search of faces. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kauffmann, L., Peyrin, C., Chauvin, A., Entzmann, L., Breuil, C., & Guyader, N.
Affiliations
  • Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Kauffmann, Louise
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-01-24
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
560-560
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913960384
Cited by
28
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-IDEX-02, ANR-11-LABX-0025-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
face perception, saccades, saccade amplitude, saccade programming, corrective saccades, visual attention, face advantage
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Data Accuracy, Adult, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Saccades, Visual Fields, Motor Vehicles, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review