Cited by 443Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus

Trappenberg, Thomas P., Dorris, Michael C., Munoz, Douglas P., Klein, Raymond M.·2001·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Significant advances in cognitive neuroscience can be achieved by combining techniques used to measure behavior and brain activity with neural modeling. Here we apply this approach to the initiation of rapid eye movements (saccades), which are used to redirect the visual axis to targets of interest. It is well known that the superior colliculus (SC) in the midbrain plays a major role in generating saccadic eye movements, and physiological studies have provided important knowledge of the activity pattern of neurons in this structure. Based on the observation that the SC receives localized sensory (exogenous) and voluntary (endogenous) inputs, our model assumes that this information is integrated by dynamic competition across local collicular interactions. The model accounts well for the effects upon saccadic reaction time (SRT) due to removal of fixation, the presence of distractors, execution of pro-versus antisaccades, and variation in target probability, and suggests a possible mechanism for the generation of express saccades. In each of these cases, the activity patterns of “neurons” within the model closely resemble actual cell behavior in the intermediate layer of the SC. The interaction structure we employ is instrumental for producing a physiologically faithful model and results in new insights and hypotheses regarding the neural mechanisms underlying saccade initiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892901564306

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exogenous and endogenous attention mechanisms are combined in LIP, SC, and FEF to generate a saliency map.

    “It has been proposed that exogenous and endogenous attention mechanisms are combined in area LIP [34], the SC [35], and the FEF (e.g. [31]) to generate a saliency map [34].”

    From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trappenberg, T. P., Dorris, M. C., Munoz, D. P., & Klein, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2001-02
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
256-271
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2162957977
Cited by
443
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 30
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DalSpace (Dalhousie University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
saccade initiation, superior colliculus, exogenous signals, endogenous signals, saccade latency, distractors, target probability, express saccades, neural modeling, eye movements
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Saccades, Superior Colliculi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review