The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution
Open accessAbstract
Microplastic pollution caused by washing processes of synthetic textiles has recently been assessed as the main source of primary microplastics in the oceans. Therefore, understanding the effective contribution of the washing process of synthetic clothes to this environmental problem, is of great importance. In this study, wash trials at real scale were performed on commercial clothes by using a household washing machine in order to gain reliable data about the release of microplastics, and to identify possible influences of textile characteristics on the release. The wastewater was collected and filtered through subsequent filters with decreasing porosity, and the amount and dimensions of microfibres were determined. Microfibre release was analysed in relation to the nature and characteristics of the washed clothes. Results showed that microfibres released during washing range from 124 to 308 mg for kg of washed fabric depending from the type of washed garment that corresponds to a number of microfibres ranging from 640,000 to 1,500,000. Some textile characteristics, such as the type of fibres constituting the yarns and their twist, influenced the release of microfibres during washing. A great amount of microfibres of cellulosic nature was also released during washing of clothes made with a blend of polyester/cellulose. Finally the most abundant fraction of microfibres shed was retained by filters with pore size of 60 µm, presenting an average length of 360–660 μm and an average diameter of 12–16 μm, indicating dimensions that could pass through wastewater treatment plants and pose a threat for marine organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2031505 · Cited by 5,440
Synthetic fibers as an indicator of land application of sludge
Zubris, K. A. V., & Richards, B. K. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.04.013 · Cited by 723
Cited by
Microfibers in oceanic surface waters: a global characterization
Suaria, G., Achtypi, A., Perold, V., Lee, J. R., Pierucci, A., Bornman, T. G., Aliani, S., & Ryan, P. G. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay8493 · Cited by 528
De Falco, F., Cocca, M., Avella, M., & Thompson, R. C. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b06892 · Cited by 452
Self-citationAthey, S. N., & Erdle, L. M. (2022) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5173 · Cited by 289
Occurrence of Microplastics in Tap and Bottled Water: Current Knowledge
Gambino, I., Bagordo, F., Grassi, T., Panico, A., & De Donno, A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19095283 · Cited by 213
Greenwashing and Bluewashing in Black Friday-Related Sustainable Fashion Marketing on Instagram
Sailer, A., Wilfing, H., & Straus, E. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031494 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- De Falco, F., Di Pace, E., Cocca, M., & Avella, M.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2019-04-29
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6633-6633
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2943642024
- Cited by
- 825
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-019-43023-x
- The paper
- De Falco, F., Di Pace, E., Cocca, M., & Avella, M. (2019). The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43023-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.