Cited by 2,954Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Aging, Cellular Senescence, and Cancer

Open access
Campisi, Judith·2013·Annual Review of Physiology

Abstract

For most species, aging promotes a host of degenerative pathologies that are characterized by debilitating losses of tissue or cellular function. However, especially among vertebrates, aging also promotes hyperplastic pathologies, the most deadly of which is cancer. In contrast to the loss of function that characterizes degenerating cells and tissues, malignant (cancerous) cells must acquire new (albeit aberrant) functions that allow them to develop into a lethal tumor. This review discusses the idea that, despite seemingly opposite characteristics, the degenerative and hyperplastic pathologies of aging are at least partly linked by a common biological phenomenon: a cellular stress response known as cellular senescence. The senescence response is widely recognized as a potent tumor suppressive mechanism. However, recent evidence strengthens the idea that it also drives both degenerative and hyperplastic pathologies, most likely by promoting chronic inflammation. Thus, the senescence response may be the result of antagonistically pleiotropic gene action.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

127 of 201 cited sources checked · 52 supported · 4 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The disruptive effects of senescent fibroblasts in those cultures were due primarily to their secretion of MMPs, which are prominent SASP components.

    “the effects of the senescent fibroblasts were due primarily to their secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are prominent SASP components (32, 94).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] source

      In “SASPs Induce Epithelial–Mesenchyme Transitions and Invasiveness” (page unavailable), the paper reports that senescent fibroblast secretions promoted invasion, but identifies IL-6 and IL-8—not MMPs—as the SASP factors contributing substantially to that effect. Our copy does not identify MMPs as prominent SASP components or as the primary cause of these effects. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [94] source

      The Results section, “Members of MMP and Other Gene Clusters Comprise the Conserved SASP” (page not provided), identifies secreted MMPs as SASP components. The paper does not show that MMPs were primarily responsible for the disruptive effects in the cited cultures; its Discussion instead attributes much of the growth-stimulatory activity to CXCL-1. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The SASP includes proteins that can help senescent cells evade immune recognition and clearance.

    “Finally, the SASP also includes proteins that can help senescent cells evade immune recognition and clearance (92, 93).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [92] source

      In “The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype Affects Leukocyte Infiltration and Tumor Immunology” (page unavailable), the paper says molecules overexpressed by senescent fibroblasts can lead to an inadequate immune response near those cells. It does not say that these proteins help senescent cells themselves evade immune recognition or clearance; the discussion concerns immune responses in the tumor environment. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [93] source

      The “Multiple roles of the SASP” section says the SASP might signal the immune system to clear senescent cells. It also describes SASP-associated cytokines and enzymes promoting clearance in mouse models. The cited paper thus makes the contrary point, rather than identifying proteins that help senescent cells evade recognition or clearance. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The proliferative arrest of mouse cells cultured in ambient oxygen (~20%) has only some features of the senescence response induced under more physiological oxygen concentrations.

    “This finding may be complicated by the fact that the proliferative arrest of mouse cells cultured in ambient oxygen concentrations (approximately 20%), which is substantially higher than the oxygen concentrations to which cells are exposed in vivo, has only some features of the senescence response that is induced under more physiological oxygen concentrations (38, 94).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [38] source

      The paper reports that mouse embryonic fibroblasts arrested and showed a senescent morphology in 20% oxygen. But in its discussion of growth at physiological 3% oxygen (Fig. 2a; page unavailable), it says the cells grew with little evidence of replicative senescence, rather than undergoing the contrasting senescence response described in the claim. It notes an exception for DNA-repair-deficient Balb/c cells, whose eventual senescence at 3% oxygen had a phenotype similar to that of cells grown at 20%. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [94] source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The permanence of senescence arrest supports that senescence evolved partly to suppress cancer.

    “The permanence of the senescence growth arrest enforces the idea that the senescence response evolved at least in part to suppress the development of cancer (9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Premisecitation

    Molecular manipulations such as sequential inactivation of tumor suppressor genes can make senescent cells proliferate.

    “However, molecular biological manipulations, for example, the sequential inactivation of certain tumor suppressor genes, can cause senescent cells to proliferate (10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dysfunctional telomeres trigger a DNA damage response but block attempted DNA repair.

    “Dysfunctional telomeres elicit a DNA damage response (DDR) but suppress attempted DNA repair (22–25).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [22] source
    • cites [23] source
    • cites [24] source
    • cites [25] source

      The paper reports that dysfunctional taz1Δ telomeres undergo a DNA damage response, supporting the first half of the claim. But it says DNA repair proteins accumulate at those chromosome ends and concludes, “Thus, DNA repair is ongoing at taz1Δ chromosome ends” (Abstract; page not supplied). It describes suppression of checkpoint signaling and cell-cycle arrest, not suppression of repair at these dysfunctional telomeres. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dysfunctional telomeres appear irreparable, so cells with them have persistent DDR signaling and p53 activation that enforce senescence arrest.

    “Dysfunctional telomeres appear to be irreparable; consequently, cells with such telomeres experience persistent DDR signaling and p53 activation (24, 26), which enforce the senescence growth arrest (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] source
    • cites [26] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The idea that senescence is tumor suppressive was speculative 50 years ago but became more firmly grounded.

    “Hence, the idea that the senescence response is tumor suppressive, although still speculative 50 years ago, was more firmly grounded (9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Repair followed by division at telomeres causes genomic instability through chromosome fusion and breakage cycles, a major cancer risk factor.

    “In the case of telomeres, repair followed by cell division will cause rampant genomic instability through cycles of chromosome fusion and breakage (20, 21)—major risk factors for developing cancer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] source
    • cites [21] source

      Section 2 (p. 7) describes DNA repair systems fusing dysfunctional or uncapped telomeres, followed by mitotic breakage and cycles of fusion that cause genomic instability. Section 7 (pp. 15–16) links this instability to cancer, but specifies that it arises when cells with dysfunctional telomeres divide despite tumor-suppressor checkpoints. The claim omits the dysfunctional-telomere condition and makes repair at telomeres sound generally harmful. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the INK-ATTAC model, drug-treated BubR1H/H;INK-ATTAC mice did not live longer but were remarkably protected from several other age-related pathologies, including cataracts, sarcopenia, and loss of subcutaneous fat.

    “Although drug-treated BubR1H/H;INK-ATTAC mice did not live longer, they were remarkably protected from several other age-related pathologies, including cataracts, sarcopenia, and loss of subcutaneous fat (128).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Cells that express p16INK4a are senescent.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The rapid robust DDR immediately after DNA damage does not induce a SASP; the SASP develops slowly over several days in culture and only after the initial DDR subsides.

    “That is, the rapid robust DDR that occurs immediately after DNA damage does not induce a SASP; rather, the SASP develops slowly—over several days in culture—and only after the initial DDR subsides (32, 42).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] source

      The irradiation experiment (Figure 1D; page unavailable) reports that a robust SASP appeared 4–7 days after DNA damage, not immediately, and that both radiation doses initiated a DDR while only the senescence-inducing dose produced a SASP. The DDR discussion likewise calls the SASP a slow response rather than a simple or classic DDR. Neither passage establishes that the initial DDR had subsided before the SASP developed. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [42] source

      In the indexed passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable), the paper reports that IL-6 and IL-8 secretion rises over 2–5 days after high-dose irradiation, rather than immediately, and links the response to persistent DNA-damage signalling. It does not establish that the SASP begins only after the initial DDR subsides; it says DDR signalling persists and helps initiate the delayed cytokine response. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The SASP cytokines responsible for these immune responses are incompletely understood but are very likely numerous.

    “The SASP cytokines that are responsible for these immune responses are incompletely understood but are very likely numerous (132, 135).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [132] source

      The passage labeled Abstract (page not provided) reports that four inflammatory cytokines were upregulated after p53 reactivation in murine liver tumours, alongside infiltration by several innate immune cell types. This supports the suggestion that multiple cytokines may be involved, but the paper does not identify which cytokines are responsible for the immune responses or explicitly assess how completely they are understood. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [135] source

      The Abstract says IL-6, IL-8, and other secreted factors attract immune cells, and the ‘NF-kB controls the SASP’ section identifies multiple immune-response genes. This supports the involvement of several SASP factors, but the paper does not establish that numerous cytokines are responsible for the immune responses or explicitly say that their identities are incompletely understood. Its statement that little is known concerns regulation of the SASP, not which cytokines mediate immunity. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There are age-related changes in the innate immune system, although they tend to be less striking than changes in adaptive immunity; the aged innate immune system is more likely to show loss of proper regulation than loss of function.

    “There are also age-related changes in the innate immune system, although they tend to be less striking than the changes in adaptive immunity; moreover, the aged innate immune system is more likely to show a loss of proper regulation than a loss of function (142, 143).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [142] source

      The Abstract states that age-related innate immunosenescence appears to reflect dysregulation rather than exclusively impaired function, and the Introduction describes both diminished responses and hyper-reactivity. Neither passage establishes the claim that age-related innate changes are less striking than changes in adaptive immunity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [143] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Secreted WNT16B is an important enforcer of the senescence growth arrest of human fibroblasts in culture and of mouse cells that senesce in vivo due to activated RAS.

    “Likewise, secreted WNT16B is an important enforcer of the senescence growth arrest of human fibroblasts in culture, as well as that of mouse cells that senesce in vivo owing to expression of an activated RAS oncogene (138).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [138] source

      The Results section, “WNT16B is necessary for the onset of replicative senescence” (page unavailable), reports that WNT16B knockdown let cultured human fibroblasts bypass senescence and continue proliferating. The Results section, “WNT16 is activated in OIS in vitro and in vivo” (page unavailable), finds WNT16B overexpressed in activated-K-Ras mouse lung lesions, but identifies it there as a marker; it does not show that WNT16B enforces growth arrest in those mouse cells. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This signaling cascade induced both a senescence growth arrest and expression of several genes encoding SASP proteins.

    “This signaling cascade induced both a senescence growth arrest and the expression of several genes that encode SASP proteins.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Aging also causes hyperplastic diseases, especially in vertebrates, and cancer is the most lethal of these.

    “However, especially among vertebrates, aging also promotes hyperplastic pathologies, the most deadly of which is cancer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Cellular senescence probably does not explain all aging phenotypes.

    “Cellular senescence is unlikely to explain all aging phenotypes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In multicellular organisms, aging involves progressive decline in function of multiple cells and tissues.

    “Among multicellular organisms, aging is marked by a progressive decline in the function of multiple cells and tissues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The senescence response is widely accepted as a strong tumor suppressor mechanism.

    “The senescence response is widely recognized as a potent tumor suppressive mechanism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Senescence is an essentially irreversible arrest of cell proliferation triggered by potentially oncogenic stress.

    “Cellular senescence refers to the essentially irreversible arrest of cell proliferation (growth) that occurs when cells experience potentially oncogenic stress (8) (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    External hazards limit lifespan and reduce older individuals in natural populations.

    “Extrinsic hazards—accidents, predation, infection, starvation, and so forth—limit the life span of most species, thereby depleting natural populations of older individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Rose MR, 1991 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    These changes include secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and proteases, called SASP.

    “These changes include the secretion of numerous proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and proteases, a feature termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (Figures 2 and 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    DDR signaling also establishes and maintains SASP.

    “As discussed below, DDR signaling also establishes and maintains the SASP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Telomerase-positive human cells include most cancer cells, embryonic stem cells, some adult stem cells, and a few somatic cells such as activated T cells.

    “Telomerase-positive human cells include most cancer cells, embryonic stem cells, certain adult stem cells, and a few somatic cells (for example, activated T cells).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    DNA polymerases are unidirectional and need a labile primer, so linear DNA ends cannot be fully replicated.

    “Because polymerases that copy DNA templates are unidirectional and require a labile primer, the ends of linear DNA molecules cannot be completely replicated (13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The SASP is a plastic phenotype: its protein components vary among cell types and to some extent with the senescence-inducing stimulus.

    “Finally, the SASP is a plastic phenotype. That is, proteins that are included in the SASP vary among cell types and, to some extent, with the stimulus that induced the senescence response.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These cells have a finite replicative lifespan and undergo replicative or cellular senescence.

    “These cells were said to have a finite replicative life span, and, later, to undergo replicative or cellular senescence (sometimes termed replicative or cellular aging).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Later decades strengthened links between senescence and both aging and cancer.

    “The ensuing decades have seen the links between cellular senescence and both aging and cancer strengthen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The link between the Hayflick limit and cancer was more obvious.

    “The link to cancer was more obvious.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Senescence and SASP likely evolved both to suppress cancer and to promote tissue repair or regeneration after injury.

    “Rather, cellular senescence and the SASP likely evolved both to suppress the development of cancer and to promote tissue repair or regeneration in the face of injury.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Later decades produced a more complex view of senescence causes and consequences.

    “They have also seen an increasingly more complex view of both the causes and consequences of cellular senescence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    ATM, NBS1, and CHK2 act upstream of p53, and p53 does not positively regulate the SASP.

    “These proteins act upstream of p53, which does not positively regulate the SASP (discussed below) (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Senescent cells accumulate with age, creating a tissue microenvironment permissive for the development or at least the progression of cancer.

    “The picture that emerges, then, is that senescent cells accumulate with age, creating a tissue microenvironment that is permissive for the development, or at least the progression, of cancer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Cells enter a senescent state to prevent proliferation of damaged cells, which is a major risk factor for cancer.

    “After all, cells enter a senescent state to prevent the proliferation of damaged cells, which is a major risk factor for the development of cancer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SASP components MMP3 and VEGF are particularly important in stimulating tumor growth; MMP3 promotes tumor cell invasion and VEGF promotes tumor-driven angiogenesis.

    “Of particular importance in this regard are the SASP components MMP3 (stromelysin) (130), which also promotes tumor cell invasion, and VEGF (97), which promotes tumor-driven angiogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [130] source
    • cites [97] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Senescent cells can suppress cancer nonautonomously by stimulating the immune system to target oncogene-expressing premalignant or malignant cells, in addition to suppressing tumorigenesis by cell-autonomous growth arrest.

    “Thus, in addition to suppressing tumorigenesis by implementing a cell-autonomous growth arrest, senescent cells can suppress cancer nonautonomously by stimulating the immune system to target oncogene-expressing premalignant or malignant cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    EMT enables transformed epithelial cells to invade and migrate through tissues and is critical in the development of metastatic cancer.

    “This morphological transition enables transformed epithelial cells to invade and migrate through tissues and is critical in the development of metastatic cancer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The effects of senescent cells within the tumor microenvironment are complex and highly dependent on physiological context.

    “The effects of senescent cells within the tumor microenvironment are complex and highly dependent on physiological context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The beneficial effect of senescent cells on tissue repair poses a paradox because wound healing and tissue repair decline with age.

    “The beneficial effect of senescent cells on tissue repair poses a paradox because wound healing and tissue repair decline with age.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Wound healing and tissue repair decline with age.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In both acute liver injury and cutaneous wounds, senescent cells are not chronically present, unlike during aging and at sites of age-related pathologies.

    “In both cases, senescent cells are not chronically present, which is the case during aging and at the sites of age-related pathologies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
35 of 35
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Cells that express p16INK4a are senescent.

    “there is strong evidence that p16INK4a-expressing cells are senescent, but this assumption has not yet been rigorously tested.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Wound healing and tissue repair decline with age.

    “wound healing and tissue repair decline with age.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During early cancer progression, mutated cells display a genuine senescent phenotype due to oncogene-induced senescence.

    “During the early phases of cancer progression, mutated cells display a genuine senescent phenotype, as a consequence of oncogene-induced senescence150.”

    From Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (2024) · cites this paper as [150]

    The “Mitogens and Proliferation-Associated Signals” section says oncogenic H-RAS and other oncogenic signals can induce genuine cellular senescence. Its example concerns normal cells, however; the passages do not establish that mutated cells display this phenotype specifically during the early phases of cancer progression. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Senescent cells exhibit an altered secretome known as SASP, which significantly disrupts the skin microenvironment.

    “These senescent cells exhibit an altered secretome known as SASP, which significantly disrupts the skin microenvironment.158”

    From Inflammation and aging: signaling pathways and intervention therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [158]

    The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype section identifies the SASP as a feature of many senescent cells. In “Senescent Cells and Degenerative Phenotypes” (page unavailable), the paper says senescent cells are thought to contribute to skin thinning and collagen loss, perhaps through secreted proteases. That qualified account does not establish that the SASP significantly disrupts the skin microenvironment as a general fact. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Oxidative stress and macromolecular damage in aged cells induce cellular senescence, which can cause or exacerbate aging and several age-related pathologies.

    “Oxidative stress and macromolecular damage in aged cells induce a complex stress response termed cellular senescence, which has been shown to cause or exacerbate aging and several age-related pathologies”

    From Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies senescent cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells in the aged mouse brain (2020) · cites this paper as Campisi 2013

    The Genomic Damage section says oxidative stress can produce DNA lesions that may drive senescence. The Dark Side section reports evidence that senescent cells contribute to age-related pathology, including experimental protection from several pathologies in a premature-aging mouse model. The claim is broader than the review's evidence: it refers to macromolecular damage generally rather than the genomic damage described, and says senescence has been shown to cause aging itself, whereas the cited mouse experiment did not extend lifespan. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cellular senescence is an essential tumor suppression mechanism in vivo.

    “Therefore, cellular senescence is believed to be an essential tumor suppression mechanism in vivo.”
  • Senescent cells accumulate in many vertebrate tissues with age and contribute to age-related pathologies, presumably through their secretion of factors constituting the senescence-associated secretory phenotype.

    “Senescent cells (SnCs) accumulate in many vertebrate tissues with age and contribute to age-related pathologies1–3, presumably through their secretion of factors contributing to the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)4–6.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The SASP is said to maintain and not maintain the same growth arrest

    Minor

    The summary says SASP components help maintain the senescence growth arrest, then says that in these cases they help establish it rather than maintain it once established. The distinction between the two roles is left inconsistent.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bandyopadhyay D, 2002, Cancer Res., 62, 6231
  2. Campisi J, 2011, Semin. Cancer Biol., 21, 354

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campisi, J.
Affiliations
Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
Corresponding author
Campisi, Judith
Venue
Annual Review of Physiology
Published
2013-02-10
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
685-705
ISSN
  • 0066-4278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1585
OpenAlex
W2150748567
Cited by
2,954
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 220 · 2025: 270 · 2024: 267 · 2023: 269 · 2022: 279 · 2021: 278 · 2020: 268 · 2019: 261 · 2018: 205 · 2017: 185 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 46
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R37AG009909, P01AG041122, P01AG017242)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
cellular senescence, aging, cancer, tumor suppression, chronic inflammation, antagonistic pleiotropy, cellular stress response, malignant transformation
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Damage, Humans, Neoplasms, Stress, Physiological, Cellular Senescence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review