Cited by 19Diabetes Management and ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Multi-step ahead predictive model for blood glucose concentrations of type-1 diabetic patients

Open access
Zaidi, Syed Mohammed Arshad, Chandola, Varun, Ibrahim, Muhanned, Romanski, Bianca, Mastrandrea, Lucy D., Singh, Tarunraj·2021·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of blood glucose (BG) levels is a key aspect of diabetes management. Patients with Type-1 diabetes (T1D) require an effective tool to monitor these levels in order to make appropriate decisions regarding insulin administration and food intake to keep BG levels in target range. Effectively and accurately predicting future BG levels at multi-time steps ahead benefits a patient with diabetes by helping them decrease the risks of extremes in BG including hypo- and hyperglycemia. In this study, we present a novel multi-component deep learning model that predicts the BG levels in a multi-step look ahead fashion. The model is evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively on actual blood glucose data for 97 patients. For the prediction horizon (PH) of 30 mins, the average values for root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and normalized mean squared error (NRMSE) are $$23.22 \pm 6.39$$ 23.22 ± 6.39 mg/dL, 16.77 ± 4.87 mg/dL, $$12.84 \pm 3.68$$ 12.84 ± 3.68 and $$0.08 \pm 0.01$$ 0.08 ± 0.01 respectively. When Clarke and Parkes error grid analyses were performed comparing predicted BG with actual BG, the results showed average percentage of points in Zone A of $$80.17 \pm 9.20$$ 80.17 ± 9.20 and $$84.81 \pm 6.11,$$ 84.81 ± 6.11 , respectively. We offer this tool as a mechanism to enhance the predictive capabilities of algorithms for patients with T1D.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-03341-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zaidi, S. M. A., Chandola, V., Ibrahim, M., Romanski, B., Mastrandrea, L. D., & Singh, T.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Corresponding author
Zaidi, Syed Mohammed Arshad
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-12-21
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
24332-24332
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225966252
Cited by
19
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International (1-SRA-2019-823-S-B)
  • Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC 1910539)
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI 1537210)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, blood glucose prediction, multi-step forecasting, continuous glucose monitoring, deep learning, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, Clarke error grid, insulin management
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review