Cited by 16Infrared Thermography in MedicineThermal Regulation in MedicineSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Proper use of noncontact infrared thermometry for temperature screening during COVID-19

Open access
Hussain, Amber S., Hussain, Heather S., Betcher, Nathan, Behm, Robert, Cagir, Burt·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Among the myriad of challenges healthcare institutions face in dealing with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), screening for the detection of febrile persons entering facilities remains problematic, particularly when paired with CDC and WHO spatial distancing guidance. Aggressive source control measures during the outbreak of COVID-19 has led to re-purposed use of noncontact infrared thermometry (NCIT) for temperature screening. This study was commissioned to establish the efficacy of this technology for temperature screening by healthcare facilities. We conducted a prospective, observational, single-center study in a level II trauma center at the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak to assess (i) method agreement between NCIT and temporal artery reference temperature, (ii) diagnostic accuracy of NCIT in detecting referent temperature [Formula: see text] and ensuing test sensitivity and specificity and (iii) technical limitations of this technology. Of 51 healthy, non-febrile, healthcare workers surveyed, the mean temporal artery temperature was [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] confidence interval (CI) = [Formula: see text]). Mean NCIT temperatures measured from [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] distances were [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text], respectively. From statistical analysis, the only method in sufficient agreement with the reference standard was NCIT at [Formula: see text]. This demonstrated that the device offset (mean temperature difference) between these methods was [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) with 95% of measurement differences within [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). By setting the NCIT screening threshold to [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text], we achieve diagnostic accuracy with [Formula: see text] test sensitivity and specificity for temperature detection [Formula: see text] by reference standard. In comparison, reducing this screening criterion to the lower limit of the device-specific offset, such as [Formula: see text], produces a highly sensitive screening test at [Formula: see text], which may be favorable in high-risk pandemic disease. For future consideration, an infrared device with a higher distance-to-spot size ratio approaching 50:1 would theoretically produce similar results at [Formula: see text], in accordance with CDC and WHO spatial distancing guidelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-90100-1

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indirect core body temperature evaluation can achieve a high accuracy of ±0.03 °C.

    “From these data, the internal core body temperature is evaluated with a high accuracy of ±0.03 °C [129,140,146,147,148,149].”

    From The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables (2022) · cites this paper as [129]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]World Health Organization (WHO). Infection prevention and control of epidemic- and pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care. WHO Guidelines, 1–156, available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112656/1/9789241507134_eng.pdf?ua=1 (2014). 24983124
  2. [19]Kaplan, H. Practical Applications of Infrared Thermal Sensing and Imaging Equipment, Third Edition. SPIE Publications, available from http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=bbdd9c98ec3667d1768ec321addb312f.
  3. [24]World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level, available from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/251730/9789241549929-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (2016). 27977095

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussain, A. S., Hussain, H. S., Betcher, N., Behm, R., & Cagir, B.
Affiliations
Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hussain, Amber S.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-06-04
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
11832-11832
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163985688
Cited by
16
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
temperature screening, COVID-19 pandemic, measurement agreement, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, screening thresholds, healthcare worker screening, trauma centers
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Aged, Body Temperature, Female, Fever, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Thermometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review