CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 187Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchCOVID-19 and Mental HealthMigration, Health and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress during the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war, a comparison between populations in Poland, Ukraine, and Taiwan

Open access
Chudzicka-Czupała, Agata, Hapon, Nadiya, Chiang, Soon-Kiat, Żywiołek-Szeja, Marta, Karamushka, Liudmyla, Lee, Charlotte T., Grabowski, Damian, Paliga, Mateusz, Rosenblat, Joshua D., Ho, Roger, McIntyre, Roger S., Chen, Yi-Lung·2023·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-28729-3PMC PMC9982762

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Ukraine has been embroiled in an increasing war since February 2022. In addition to Ukrainians, the Russo-Ukraine war has affected Poles due to the refugee crisis and the Taiwanese, who are facing a potential crisis with China. We examined the mental health status and associated factors in Ukraine, Poland, and Taiwan. The data will be used for future reference as the war is still ongoing. From March 8 to April 26, 2022, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques in Ukraine, Poland, and Taiwan. Depression, anxiety, and stress were measured using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress (DASS)-21 item scale; post-traumatic stress symptoms by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and coping strategies by the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE). We used multivariate linear regression to identify factors significantly associated with DASS-21 and IES-R scores. There were 1626 participants (Poland: 1053; Ukraine: 385; Taiwan: 188) in this study. Ukrainian participants reported significantly higher DASS-21 ( p < 0.001) and IES-R ( p < 0.01) scores than Poles and Taiwanese. Although Taiwanese participants were not directly involved in the war, their mean IES-R scores (40.37 ± 16.86) were only slightly lower than Ukrainian participants (41.36 ± 14.94). Taiwanese reported significantly higher avoidance scores (1.60 ± 0.47) than the Polish (0.87 ± 0.53) and Ukrainian (0.91 ± 0.5) participants ( p < 0.001). More than half of the Taiwanese (54.3%) and Polish (80.3%) participants were distressed by the war scenes in the media. More than half (52.5%) of the Ukrainian participants would not seek psychological help despite a significantly higher prevalence of psychological distress. Multivariate linear regression analyses found that female gender, Ukrainian and Polish citizenship, household size, self-rating health status, past psychiatric history, and avoidance coping were significantly associated with higher DASS-21 and IES-R scores after adjustment of other variables ( p < 0.05). We have identified mental health sequelae in Ukrainian, Poles, and Taiwanese with the ongoing Russo-Ukraine war. Risk factors associated with developing depression, anxiety, stress, and post-traumatic stress symptoms include female gender, self-rating health status, past psychiatric history, and avoidance coping. Early resolution of the conflict, online mental health interventions, delivery of psychotropic medications, and distraction techniques may help to improve the mental health of people who stay inside and outside Ukraine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-28729-3

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Chronology of events before and during Russia-Ukraine war in 2021 and 2022. UN GA United Nations General Assembly, UN HRC United Nations Human Rights Council.
Figure 1 Chronology of events before and during Russia-Ukraine war in 2021 and 2022. UN GA United Nations General Assembly, UN HRC United Nations Human Rights Council.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Summary of Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and mean IES-R scores between the three countries.
Figure 2 Summary of Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and mean IES-R scores between the three countries.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Aldwin, C. M. Culture, coping and resilience to stress. in Gross National Happiness and Development - Proceedings of the First International Conference on Operationalization of Gross National Happiness. 563–573 (Centre for Bhutan Studies, Thimphu, 2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Hapon, N., Chiang, S.-K., Żywiołek-Szeja, M., Karamushka, L., Lee, C. T., Grabowski, D., Paliga, M., Rosenblat, J. D., Ho, R., McIntyre, R. S., & Chen, Y.-L.
Affiliations
  • Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
  • Lviv University (UA)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
  • University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Asia University (TW)
Corresponding author
Ho, Roger
ORCID
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-03-03
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
3602-3602
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41598-023-28729-3
PMC
PMC9982762
OpenAlex
W4323042680
Cited by
187
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 34
FWCI
53.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National University of Singapore, Department of Psychological Medicine (R-177-000-100-001/R-177-000-003-001/ R177000702733)
  • National University of Singapore, iHeathtech (R-722-000-004-731)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, psychological distress, war trauma, coping strategies, avoidance coping, help-seeking barriers, refugees, cross-national comparison, Ukraine, Poland, Taiwan, DASS-21, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Brief COPE, gender differences, citizenship, household size, self-rated health
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Poland, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Taiwan, Ukraine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review