Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regional hyperconnectivity in the medial temporal lobes as a maladaptive mechanism for colorectal cancer-related cognitive decline

Nguyen, John Quan, Riddle, Tara, Nguyen, Nathan, Chao, Sharon, Dutta, Debapriya, Hill, Ashley, Yu, Robert, Rowland, Kendrith, Shi, Zhaoyue·2025·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-15547-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-15547-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Morgan, E. et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut 72 (2), 338–344 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Vardy, J. et al. Cognitive function and fatigue after diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 25 (12), 2404–2412 (2014). · DOI
  3. Vardy, J. L. et al. Cognitive function in patients with colorectal cancer who do and do not receive chemotherapy: a prospective, longitudinal, controlled study. J. Clin. Oncol. 33 (34), 4085 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cruzado, J. A. et al. Longitudinal study of cognitive dysfunctions induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients. Support. Care Cancer. 22 (7), 1815–1823 (2014).
  5. Visovatti, M. A., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Chang, A. E., Northouse, L. & Cimprich, B. Assessment of cognitive impairment and complaints in individuals with colorectal cancer. Oncol. Nurs. Forum Vol. 43 (2), 169 (2016). · DOI
  6. Wieldraaijer, T. et al. Follow-up of colon cancer patients; causes of distress and need for supportive care: results from the ICARE cohort study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO). 43 (1), 118–125 (2017). · DOI
  7. Han, C. J., Yang, G. S. & Syrjala, K. Symptom experiences in colorectal cancer survivors after cancer treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs. 43 (3), E132–E158 (2020). · DOI
  8. Zang, Y., Jiang, T., Lu, Y., He, Y. & Tian, L. Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 22 (1), 394–400 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Jiang, L. & Zuo, X. N. Regional homogeneity: a multimodal, multiscale neuroimaging marker of the human connectome. Neuroscientist 22 (5), 486–505 (2016). · DOI
  10. Yao, Z., Wang, L., Lu, Q., Liu, H. & Teng, G. Regional homogeneity in depression and its relationship with separate depressive symptom clusters: a resting-state fMRI study. J. Affect. Disord. 115 (3), 430–438 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Henneghan, A. M. et al. Measuring self-reported cancer-related cognitive impairment: recommendations from the cancer neuroscience initiative working group. JNCI: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 113 (12), 1625–1633 (2021). · DOI
  12. Benedict, R. H., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L. & Brandt, J. Hopkins verbal learning Test–Revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. Clin. Neuropsychol. 12 (1), 43–55 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ruff, R. M., Light, R. H., Parker, S. B. & Levin, H. S. Benton controlled oral word association test: reliability and updated norms. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 11 (4), 329–338 (1996). · DOI
  14. Tombaugh, T. N. Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 19 (2), 203–214 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wagner, L. I., Sweet, J., Butt, Z., Lai, J. S. & Cella, D. Measuring patient self-reported cognitive function: development of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function instrument. J. Support Oncol. 7 (6), W32–W39 (2009).
  16. Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., FitzGerald, P. & Parkes, K. R. The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 21 (1), 1–16 (1982). · DOI
  17. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. & Carbin, M. G. Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 8 (1), 77–100 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marques, J. P. et al. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage 49 (2), 1271–1281 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  19. O’Brien, K. R. et al. Robust T1-weighted structural brain imaging and morphometry at 7T using MP2RAGE. PloS One, 9(6), e99676. (2014). · DOI
  20. Yan, C. G., Wang, X. D., Zuo, X. N. & Zang, Y. F. DPABI: data processing & analysis for (resting-state) brain imaging. Neuroinformatics 14, 339–351 (2016). · DOI
  21. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17 (2), 825–841 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rolls, E. T., Huang, C. C., Lin, C. P., Feng, J. & Joliot, M. Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. Neuroimage 206, 116189 (2020). · DOI
  23. Forman, S. D. et al. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn. Reson. Med. 33 (5), 636–647 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Shallice, T. et al. Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature 368 (6472), 633–635 (1994). · DOI
  25. Jonides, J. et al. The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory. J. Neurosci. 18 (13), 5026–5034 (1998). · DOI
  26. Narayanan, N. S. et al. The role of the prefrontal cortex in the maintenance of verbal working memory: an event-related FMRI analysis. Neuropsychology 19 (2), 223 (2005). · DOI
  27. Emch, M., Von Bastian, C. C. & Koch, K. Neural correlates of verbal working memory: an fMRI meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 180 (2019). · DOI
  28. Xia, M., Wang, J. & He, Y. BrainNet viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PloS One 8(7), e68910 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Shapiro, A. M., Benedict, R. H., Schretlen, D. & Brandt, J. Construct and concurrent validity of the Hopkins verbal learning Test–revised. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13 (3), 348–358 (1999). · DOI
  30. Wefel, J. S., Vardy, J., Ahles, T. & Schagen, S. B. International cognition and cancer task force recommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 12 (7), 703–708 (2011). · DOI
  31. Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A. & O’Keefe, J. The human hippocampus and Spatial and episodic memory. Neuron 35 (4), 625–641 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sweatt, J. D. Hippocampal function in cognition. Psychopharmacology 174, 99–110 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Aminoff, E. M., Kveraga, K. & Bar, M. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 (8), 379–390 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Frackowiak, R. S. Functional mapping of verbal memory and Language. Trends Neurosci. 17 (3), 109–115 (1994). · DOI
  35. Lin, Y. H. et al. Anatomy and white matter connections of the inferior Temporal gyrus. World Neurosurg. 143, e656–e666 (2020). · DOI
  36. Ranasinghe, K. G. et al. Neuronal synchrony abnormalities associated with subclinical epileptiform activity in early-onset alzheimer’s disease. Brain 145 (2), 744–753 (2022). · DOI
  37. Targa Dias Anastacio, H., Matosin, N. & Ooi, L. Neuronal hyperexcitability in alzheimer’s disease: what are the drivers behind this aberrant phenotype? Translational Psychiatry. 12 (1), 257 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Stam, C. J. Hub overload and failure as a final common pathway in neurological brain network disorders. Netw. Neurosci. 8 (1), 1–23 (2024). · DOI
  39. Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. The economy of brain network organization. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13 (5), 336–349 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Burton, M. W. The role of inferior frontal cortex in phonological processing. Cogn. Sci. 25 (5), 695–709 (2001). · DOI
  41. Hirshorn, E. A. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in Covert word retrieval: neural correlates of switching during verbal fluency. Neuropsychologia 44 (12), 2547–2557 (2006). · DOI
  42. Hanakawa, T., Dimyan, M. A. & Hallett, M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex. 18 (12), 2775–2788 (2008). · DOI
  43. Tao, L. et al. Impairment of the executive function in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy treatment: a functional MRI study. Eur. J. Cancer Care 26(6), e12553. (2017). · DOI
  44. Rolls, E. T., Cheng, W. & Feng, J. The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression. Brain Commun. 2 (2), fcaa196 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Duarte, A., Henson, R. N., Knight, R. T., Emery, T. & Graham, K. S. Orbito-frontal cortex is necessary for Temporal context memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22 (8), 1819–1831 (2010). · DOI
  46. Mızrak, E., Bouffard, N. R., Libby, L. A., Boorman, E. D. & Ranganath, C. The hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex jointly represent task structure during memory-guided decision making. Cell Rep. 37(9). (2021). · DOI
  47. O’brien, J. L. et al. Longitudinal fMRI in elderly reveals loss of hippocampal activation with clinical decline. Neurology 74 (24), 1969–1976 (2010). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, J. Q., Riddle, T., Nguyen, N., Chao, S., Dutta, D., Hill, A., Yu, R., Rowland, K., & Shi, Z.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2025-08-15
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
DOI
10.1038/s41598-025-15547-y
Cited by
3
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.