Cited by 40Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

A randomized, controlled pilot trial of the Emotional Faces Memory Task: a digital therapeutic for depression

Open access
Iacoviello, Brian M., Murrough, James W., Hoch, Megan M., Huryk, Kathryn M., Collins, Katherine A., Cutter, Gary R., Iosifescu, Dan V., Charney, Dennis S.·2018·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

There is an urgent need for more effective treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD). Digital therapeutics, such as computerized cognitive–emotional training interventions, represent a promising new strategy for treating MDD. Here we report a replication of efficacy of a digital cognitive–emotional training intervention designed to enhance cognitive control for emotional information-processing. In a randomized, double-blind, controlled study design, 51 participants with MDD in a current major depressive episode were randomly assigned to participate in a digital cognitive–emotional training regimen (Emotional Faces Memory Task (EFMT); n = 28) involving 18 sessions over 6 weeks, or an active control condition (CT; n = 23) involving computerized working memory training. MDD symptoms were assessed weekly using a clinician-rated measure (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; Ham-D); and neurocognition (working memory), at baseline and study outcome. Mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of all participants randomized revealed a significantly greater reduction in MDD symptom severity (Ham-D) from baseline to outcome in the EFMT group (8.65 points) compared to the CT group (4.77 points) (F(6,205) = 3.23, p = .005, d = 0.46). Ten of 28 EFMT participants achieved clinical response (≥50% reduction in symptoms) compared to 4 of 23 in CT. Both groups exhibited similar, small improvements in working memory. This replicated the preliminary efficacy of a digital cognitive–emotional training approach for the treatment of MDD. EFMT may be a feasible and effective intervention strategy for MDD, but future studies to elucidate its mechanism of action are warranted. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT: 01934491).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-018-0025-5

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association practice guidelines recommend that HCPs consider appropriate treatments (including both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy options) for preventing relapse in patients with depression who have achieved remission.

    “Both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association practice guidelines recommend that HCPs consider appropriate treatments (including both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy options) for preventing relapse in patients with depression who have achieved remission.45,46”

    From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iacoviello, B. M., Murrough, J. W., Hoch, M. M., Huryk, K. M., Collins, K. A., Cutter, G. R., Iosifescu, D. V., & Charney, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Click Therapeutics, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Iacoviello, Brian M.
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2018-06-06
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807399715
Cited by
40
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23mh099223-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5K23MH099223, K23 MH099223)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, digital therapeutics, cognitive control, emotional processing, working memory training, depression severity, replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review