Cited by 556Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Research review: attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders

Bar‐Haim, Yair·2010·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Attention bias modification (ABM) is a newly emerging therapy for anxiety disorders that is rooted in current cognitive models of anxiety and in established experimental data on threat‐related attentional biases in anxiety. This review describes the evidence indicating that ABM has the potential to become an enhancing tool for current psychological and pharmacological treatments for anxiety or even a novel standalone treatment. The review also outlines the gaps in need of bridging before ABM techniques could be routinely applied and incorporated into standard treatment protocols.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02251.x

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of available data suggests that tonic immobility, peritraumatic dissociation, and dissociative PTSD may be mediated by a shared neural network involving amygdala deactivation, absence of sympathetically mediated arousal symptoms, parasympathetic activation, and analgesia.

    “A review of available data suggests that tonic immobility, peritraumatic dissociation, and dissociative PTSD may be mediated by a shared neural network involving amygdala deactivation, absence of sympathetically mediated arousal symptoms (decreased skin conductance and an absence of heart rate increases), parasympathetic activation (a decrease in heart rate in some studies, presumably reflecting a”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [126]

  • Conventional ABM threat-avoidance training lacks most features of cognitive skill training because it relies primarily on repeated practice to reduce AB to threat.

    “Conventional ABM threat-avoidance training lacks most of these features because it relies primarily on repeated practice to reduce AB to threat, which is consistent with a widely held view of ABM training as an implicit training method of directly modifying automatic AB [16,33,66].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bar‐Haim, Y.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Bar‐Haim, Yair
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-09
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
859-870
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1918330770
Cited by
556
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 44
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
attentional bias modification, anxiety disorders, cognitive models of anxiety, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, treatment integration, child and adolescent anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Attention, Child, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Semantics, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review