Cited by 18Sleep and related disordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

A randomized controlled trial of a digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia for older adults

Open access
Ritterband, Lee M., Shaffer, Kelly M., Thorndike, Frances P., Chow, Philip I., Gonder-Frederick, Linda, Ingersoll, Karen S., Cohn, Wendy F., Frederick, Christina +7 more·2025·npj Digital Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Older adults with insomnia face considerable challenges accessing treatment given limited availability to first-line therapy (Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, CBT-I). This study evaluated the efficacy of Sleep Healthy Using the Internet for Older Adults Suffering with Insomnia and Sleeplessness (SHUTi OASIS), a tailored CBT-I internet intervention for older adults with insomnia, in a 3-arm randomized controlled trial (SHUTi OASIS alone, SHUTi OASIS + stepped support, online patient education [PE]). 311 participants (ages 55-95) were randomized to receive SHUTi OASIS (alone n = 105; with stepped support n = 102), with both conditions reporting significant improvements across post, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups in insomnia severity compared to those receiving PE (n = 104). Clinically meaningful indices of insomnia response and remission were also higher among those receiving SHUTi OASIS. Those who received SHUTi OASIS also significantly outperformed those receiving PE on secondary outcomes, including sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, number of awakenings, sleep quality, and fatigue, across most timepoints. Results indicate that digital CBT-I provides important benefits for older adults, offering strong potential to expand access to insomnia treatment for this underserved population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-025-01847-0

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Education on the biological mechanisms underlying sleep onset anxiety empowers individuals to identify symptoms, apply coping strategies, and reduce maladaptive responses to pre-sleep worry.

    “Education on the biological mechanisms underlying sleep onset anxiety, including both cognitive and physiological aspects, empowers individuals to identify symptoms, apply coping strategies, and reduce maladaptive responses to pre-sleep worry [70].”

    From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Methods (Interventions; page not provided) describe general insomnia education and a CBT-I program, but do not say the education covers the biological mechanisms of sleep-onset anxiety. Searches for pre-sleep worry, physiological arousal, symptom identification, and coping strategies found no passage linking such education to the claimed benefits. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [57]Kadel, R. & Kip, K. SAS macro to compute effect size (Cohen’s d) and its confidence interval from raw survey data. In vol. 337 (Raleigh/Durham, 2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritterband, L. M., Shaffer, K. M., Thorndike, F. P., Chow, P. I., Gonder-Frederick, L., Ingersoll, K. S., Cohn, W. F., Frederick, C., MacDonnell, K., Glazer, J. V., Mattos, M. K., Hilgart, M. M., Quigg, M. S., Bashir, M., & Morin, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Ritterband, Lee M.
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-07-19
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
458-458
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412521323
Cited by
18
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 3
FWCI
18.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Aging (R01AG047885)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
insomnia, older adults, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, digital interventions, online therapy, online patient education, sleep quality, treatment access, fatigue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review