Cited by 1,447Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Rights and ReformsEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond

A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation

Open access
Garnett, Stephen T., Burgess, Neil D., Fa, Julia E., Fernández-Llamazares, Álvaro, Molnár, Zsolt, Robinson, Cathy J., Watson, James E. M., Zander, Kerstin K. +12 more·2018·Nature Sustainability

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The decline in nature is lower in areas managed by Indigenous Peoples than in other lands.

    “Although the decline in nature is lower in areas managed by Indigenous Peoples than in other lands ( 60 )”

    From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Fig. 2 discussion reports that 67% of Indigenous Peoples’ lands were classified as natural, compared with 44% of other lands, and describes lower-intensity land use. These are spatial comparisons, not measurements of decline over time, so they do not establish that nature is declining more slowly on Indigenous-managed lands. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Worldwide, the area traditionally owned, managed, used, or occupied by Indigenous Peoples represents ~8 million km2 in 87 countries, overlaps with at least 35 to 40% of the area that is formally protected, and a similar proportion of all remaining terrestrial areas with very low human intervention.

    “Worldwide, the area traditionally owned, managed, used, or occupied by Indigenous Peoples (red circle), representing ~8 million km 2 in 87 countries, overlaps with at least 35 to 40% of the area that is formally protected (yellow circle), and a similar proportion of all remaining terrestrial areas with very low human intervention (blue circle) [<4 Human Footprint Index ( 18 )] [based on ( 60 )]”

    From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Extent and conservation importance section identifies Indigenous Peoples’ lands in 87 countries or entities. The passage near Fig. 1 says they manage or have rights to at least 37.9 million km², of which about 7.8 million km² lies within protected areas—not that their total area is ~8 million km². That passage supports the roughly 40% protected-area overlap, while the passage near Fig. 2 reports 37% of remaining natural lands. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Globally, Indigenous peoples and local communities have a key role in maintaining ecosystems resilient to global change.

    “Globally, Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) have a key role in maintaining ecosystems resilient to global change113.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

    In “Consequences of Indigenous influence on land management” (page unavailable), the paper says Indigenous Peoples and local communities contribute to biodiversity conservation, and that Indigenous Peoples sustain ecosystem diversity worldwide. It describes Indigenous management institutions as resilient, but does not establish that the ecosystems they maintain are resilient to global change. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • IPLCs defend their territories against illegal deforestation and land use disturbances, and they also promote forest restoration by expanding diverse agroforestry systems.

    “IPLCs defend their territories against illegal deforestation and land use disturbances49,113, and they also promote forest restoration by expanding diverse agroforestry systems121,122.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

    The 'Consequences of Indigenous influence on land management' section says Indigenous Peoples protect biodiversity on their lands, and the 'Fig. 2 around here' section reports that most Indigenous lands have low-intensity land uses. Neither passage establishes that IPLCs defend their territories specifically against illegal deforestation or land-use disturbances. The agroforestry clause is attached to other citations, so it is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nature is overall better preserved within lands managed by Indigenous Peoples.

    “the fact that nature is overall better preserved within them ( 60 )”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (2016), Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge; 2016).
  2. Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Tenth Meeting X/2. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011 -2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-10/cop-10-dec-02-en.pdf (2010)
  3. Jonas H. et al. Will OECMs increase recognition and support for ICCAs? PARKS 23, 2 (2017).
  4. United Nations Department of Economic Affairs. State of the World's Indigenous Peoples, Vol. 9 (United Nations Publications, New York; 2009). References in Methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garnett, S. T., Burgess, N. D., Fa, J. E., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Molnár, Z., Robinson, C. J., Watson, J. E. M., Zander, K. K., Austin, B., Brondizio, E. S., Collier, N. F., Duncan, T., Ellis, E., Geyle, H., Jackson, M. V., Jonas, H., Malmer, P., McGowan, B., Sivongxay, A., & Leiper, I.
Affiliations
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
  • UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research (HU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
Corresponding author
Garnett, Stephen T.
Venue
Nature Sustainability
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
1
Issue
7
Pages
369-374
ISSN
2398-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2840063536
Cited by
1,447
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 170 · 2025: 206 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 241 · 2022: 196 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 149 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 17
FWCI
66.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Sustainability (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Keywords
indigenous territories, indigenous peoples, land tenure rights, traditional land management, protected areas, primary forest, conservation, climate agreements, benefit sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review