Cited by 954Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure

Jones, Kendall R., Venter, Oscar, Fuller, Richard A., Allan, James R., Maxwell, Sean L., Negret, Pablo Jose, Watson, James E. M.·2018·Science

Abstract

Protected yet pressured: Protected areas are increasingly recognized as an essential way to safeguard biodiversity. Although the percentage of land included in the global protected area network has increased from 9 to 15%, Jones et al. found that a third of this area is influenced by intensive human activity. Thus, even landscapes that are protected are experiencing some human pressure, with only the most remote northern regions remaining almost untouched. Science , this issue p. 788

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aap9565

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current approaches for estimating human pressures on protected areas rely mainly on land-use changes such as those used in compiling the human footprint index.

    “A fundamental problem is that current approaches for estimating human pressures on protected areas rely mainly on land‐use changes such as those used in compiling the human footprint index (Jones et al., 2018).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Jones et al., 2018

  • One third of protected areas are under intense human pressure globally.

    “One third of PAs are under intense human pressure globally ( 7 ), especially from anthropogenic activities along their borders and despite heavy protection ( 8 -11 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, K. R., Venter, O., Fuller, R. A., Allan, J. R., Maxwell, S. L., Negret, P. J., & Watson, J. E. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Northern British Columbia (CA)
  • School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Kendall R.
Venue
Science
Published
2018-05-18
Volume
360
Issue
6390
Pages
788-791
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2803929532
Cited by
954
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 1
FWCI
50.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
protected areas, anthropogenic pressure, biodiversity loss, conservation effectiveness, Convention on Biological Diversity, protected area designation, biodiversity targets
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Human Activities, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review