Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A physicochemical-sensing electronic skin for stress response monitoring

Open access
Xu, Changhao, Song, Yu, Sempionatto, Juliane R., Solomon, Samuel A., Yu, You, Nyein, Hnin Y. Y., Tay, Roland Yingjie, Li, Jiahong, Heng, Wenzheng, Min, Jihong, Lao, Alison, Hsiai, Tzung K., Sumner, Jennifer A., Gao, Wei·2024·Nature Electronics

Abstract

Approaches to quantify stress responses typically rely on subjective surveys and questionnaires. Wearable sensors can potentially be used to continuously monitor stress-relevant biomarkers. However, the biological stress response is spread across the nervous, endocrine and immune systems, and the capabilities of current sensors are not sufficient for condition-specific stress response evaluation. Here we report an electronic skin for stress response assessment that non-invasively monitors three vital signs (pulse waveform, galvanic skin response and skin temperature) and six molecular biomarkers in human sweat (glucose, lactate, uric acid, sodium ions, potassium ions and ammonium). We develop a general approach to prepare electrochemical sensors that relies on analogous composite materials for stabilizing and conserving sensor interfaces. The resulting sensors offer long-term sweat biomarker analysis of more than 100 h with high stability. We show that the electronic skin can provide continuous multimodal physicochemical monitoring over a 24-hour period and during different daily activities. With the help of a machine learning pipeline, we also show that the platform can differentiate three stressors with an accuracy of 98.0% and quantify psychological stress responses with a confidence level of 98.7%. An electronic skin that is capable of long-term monitoring of vital signs and molecular biomarkers in sweat can—with the help of machine learning—be used to classify stress responses with high accuracy and predict state anxiety levels with high reliability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41928-023-01116-6

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Xu, C., Song, Y., Sempionatto, J. R., Solomon, S. A., Yu, Y., Nyein, H. Y. Y., Tay, R. Y., Li, J., Heng, W., Min, J., Lao, A., Hsiai, T. K., Sumner, J. A., & Gao, W.
Venue
Nature Electronics
Published
2024-01-19
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
168-179
ISSN
2520-1131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391027752
Cited by
399
References
53
FWCI
41.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A physicochemical-sensing electronic skin for stress response monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41928-023-01116-6
The paper
Xu, C., Song, Y., Sempionatto, J. R., Solomon, S. A., Yu, Y., Nyein, H. Y. Y., Tay, R. Y., Li, J., Heng, W., Min, J., Lao, A., Hsiai, T. K., Sumner, J. A., & Gao, W. (2024). A physicochemical-sensing electronic skin for stress response monitoring. Nature Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-023-01116-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.