Cited by 34Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

A human isogenic iPSC-derived cell line panel identifies major regulators of aberrant astrocyte proliferation in Down syndrome

Open access
Kawatani, Keiji, Nambara, Toshihiko, Nawa, Nobutoshi, Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka, Kusakabe, Haruna, Hirata, Katsuya, Tanave, Akira, Sumiyama, Kenta +5 more·2021·Communications Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Astrocytes exert adverse effects on the brains of individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Although a neurogenic-to-gliogenic shift in the fate-specification step has been reported, the mechanisms and key regulators underlying the accelerated proliferation of astrocyte precursor cells (APCs) in DS remain elusive. Here, we established a human isogenic cell line panel based on DS-specific induced pluripotent stem cells, the XIST -mediated transcriptional silencing system in trisomic chromosome 21, and genome/chromosome-editing technologies to eliminate phenotypic fluctuations caused by genetic variation. The transcriptional responses of genes observed upon XIST induction and/or downregulation are not uniform, and only a small subset of genes show a characteristic expression pattern, which is consistent with the proliferative phenotypes of DS APCs. Comparative analysis and experimental verification using gene modification reveal dose-dependent proliferation-promoting activity of DYRK1A and PIGP on DS APCs. Our collection of human isogenic cell lines provides a comprehensive set of cellular models for further DS investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-021-02242-7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased astrogliogenesis can be partially reversed by silencing HSA21 by the non-coding RNA XIST in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived astrocyte progenitor cells.

    “This increased astrogliogenesis can be partially reversed by the silencing of HSA21 by the non-coding RNA XIST in iPSC-derived astrocyte progenitor cells104,105.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. [2]Noormohammadi A Mechanisms of protein homeostasis (proteostasis) maintain stem cell identity in mammalian pluripotent stem cells Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018 75 275 290 10.1007/s00018-017-2602-1 28748323 PMC11105389 · DOI
  2. [3]Megarbane A The 50th anniversary of the discovery of trisomy 21: the past, present, and future of research and treatment of Down syndrome Genet. Med. 2009 11 611 616 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b2e34c 19636252 · DOI
  3. [4]Dierssen M Herault Y Estivill X Aneuploidy: from a physiological mechanism of variance to Down syndrome Physiol. Rev. 2009 89 887 920 10.1152/physrev.00032.2007 19584316 · DOI
  4. [5]Vacca RA Down syndrome: neurobiological alterations and therapeutic targets Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019 98 234 255 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.001 30615933 · DOI
  5. [6]Azevedo FA Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain J. Comp. Neurol. 2009 513 532 541 10.1002/cne.21974 19226510 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Griffin WS Life-long overexpression of S100beta in Down’s syndrome: implications for Alzheimer pathogenesis Neurobiol. Aging 1998 19 401 405 10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00074-8 9880042 PMC3833593 · DOI
  7. [8]Mito T Becker LE Developmental changes of S-100 protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein in the brain in Down syndrome Exp. Neurol. 1993 120 170 176 10.1006/exnr.1993.1052 8491278 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Zdaniuk G Wierzba-Bobrowicz T Szpak GM Stepien T Astroglia disturbances during development of the central nervous system in fetuses with Down’s syndrome Folia Neuropathol. 2011 49 109 114 21845539
  9. [10]Molofsky AV Deneen B Astrocyte development: a guide for the perplexed Glia 2015 63 1320 1329 10.1002/glia.22836 25963996 · DOI
  10. [12]Guidi S Neurogenesis impairment and increased cell death reduce total neuron number in the hippocampal region of fetuses with Down syndrome Brain Pathol. 2008 18 180 197 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00113.x 18093248 PMC8095525 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [13]Lu J S100B and APP promote a gliocentric shift and impaired neurogenesis in Down syndrome neural progenitors PLoS ONE 2011 6 e22126 10.1371/journal.pone.0022126 21779383 PMC3133657 · DOI
  12. [14]Kurabayashi N Nguyen MD Sanada K DYRK1A overexpression enhances STAT activity and astrogliogenesis in a Down syndrome mouse model EMBO Rep. 2015 16 1548 1562 10.15252/embr.201540374 26373433 PMC4641506 · DOI
  13. [15]Hirata K 4-Phenylbutyrate ameliorates apoptotic neural cell death in Down syndrome by reducing protein aggregates Sci. Rep. 2020 10 14047 10.1038/s41598-020-70362-x 32820178 PMC7441064 · DOI
  14. [17]Araujo BHS Down syndrome iPSC-derived astrocytes impair neuronal synaptogenesis and the mTOR pathway in vitro Mol. Neurobiol. 2018 55 5962 5975 10.1007/s12035-017-0818-6 29128905 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [18]Bambrick LL Yarowsky PJ Krueger BK Altered astrocyte calcium homeostasis and proliferation in theTs65Dn mouse, a model of Down syndrome J. Neurosci. Res 2003 73 89 94 10.1002/jnr.10630 12815712 · DOI
  16. [19]Nelson PG Cerebral cortical astroglia from the trisomy 16 mouse, a model for down syndrome, produce neuronal cholinergic deficits in cell culture Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1997 94 12644 12648 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12644 9356503 PMC25068 · DOI
  17. [20]Jiang J Translating dosage compensation to trisomy 21 Nature 2013 500 296 300 10.1038/nature12394 23863942 PMC3848249 · DOI
  18. [21]Chiang JC Jiang J Newburger PE Lawrence JB Trisomy silencing by XIST normalizes Down syndrome cell pathogenesis demonstrated for hematopoietic defects in vitro Nat. Commun. 2018 9 5180 10.1038/s41467-018-07630-y 30518921 PMC6281598 · DOI
  19. [22]Czerminski JT Lawrence JB Silencing Trisomy 21 with XIST in neural stem cells promotes neuronal differentiation Dev. Cell 2020 52 294 308 e293 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.12.015 31978324 PMC7055611 · DOI
  20. [23]Banno K Systematic cellular disease models reveal synergistic interaction of Trisomy 21 and GATA1 mutations in hematopoietic abnormalities Cell Rep. 2016 15 1228 1241 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.031 27134169 · DOI
  21. [24]Omori S A pair of maternal chromosomes derived from meiotic nondisjunction in Trisomy 21 affects nuclear architecture and transcriptional regulation Sci. Rep. 2017 7 764 10.1038/s41598-017-00714-7 28396582 PMC5429678 · DOI
  22. [25]Yusa K Zhou L Li MA Bradley A Craig NL A hyperactive piggyBac transposase for mammalian applications Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2011 108 1531 1536 10.1073/pnas.1008322108 21205896 PMC3029773 · DOI
  23. [26]Haidet-Phillips AM Gene profiling of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived astrocyte progenitors following spinal cord engraftment Stem Cells Transl. Med 2014 3 575 585 10.5966/sctm.2013-0153 24604284 PMC4006486 · DOI
  24. [27]Wutz A Jaenisch R A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation Mol. Cell 2000 5 695 705 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80248-8 10882105 · DOI
  25. [28]Chow JC Inducible XIST-dependent X-chromosome inactivation in human somatic cells is reversible Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2007 104 10104 10109 10.1073/pnas.0610946104 17537922 PMC1891207 · DOI
  26. [29]Csankovszki G Nagy A Jaenisch R Synergism of Xist RNA, DNA methylation, and histone hypoacetylation in maintaining X chromosome inactivation J. Cell Biol. 2001 153 773 784 10.1083/jcb.153.4.773 11352938 PMC2192370 · DOI
  27. [30]Park J Dyrk1A phosphorylates p53 and inhibits proliferation of embryonic neuronal cells J. Biol. Chem. 2010 285 31895 31906 10.1074/jbc.M110.147520 20696760 PMC2951261 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [31]Chen JY Lin JR Tsai FC Meyer T Dosage of Dyrk1a shifts cells within a p21-cyclin D1 signaling map to control the decision to enter the cell cycle Mol. Cell 2013 52 87 100 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.009 24119401 PMC4039290 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [32]Kii I Selective inhibition of the kinase DYRK1A by targeting its folding process Nat. Commun. 2016 7 11391 10.1038/ncomms11391 27102360 PMC4844702 · DOI
  30. [33]Yabut O Domogauer J D’Arcangelo G Dyrk1A overexpression inhibits proliferation and induces premature neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells J. Neurosci. 2010 30 4004 4014 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4711-09.2010 20237271 PMC3842457 · DOI
  31. [34]Kurabayashi N Nguyen MD Sanada K Triple play of DYRK1A kinase in cortical progenitor cells of Trisomy 21 Neurosci. Res 2019 138 19 25 10.1016/j.neures.2018.09.007 30227164 · DOI
  32. [35]Cresto N Pillet LE Billuart P Rouach N Do astrocytes play a role in intellectual disabilities? Trends Neurosci. 2019 42 518 527 10.1016/j.tins.2019.05.011 31300246 · DOI
  33. [36]Jorgensen OS Brooksbank BW Balazs R Neuronal plasticity and astrocytic reaction in Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease J. Neurol. Sci. 1990 98 63 79 10.1016/0022-510X(90)90182-M 1977892 · DOI
  34. [38]Kim K Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells Nat. Biotechnol. 2011 29 1117 1119 10.1038/nbt.2052 22119740 PMC3357310 · DOI
  35. [39]Murray A Brief report: isogenic induced pluripotent stem cell lines from an adult with mosaic down syndrome model accelerated neuronal ageing and neurodegeneration Stem Cells 2015 33 2077 2084 10.1002/stem.1968 25694335 PMC4737213 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [40]Weick JP Deficits in human trisomy 21 iPSCs and neurons Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2013 110 9962 9967 10.1073/pnas.1216575110 23716668 PMC3683748 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [41]Nawa N Elimination of protein aggregates prevents premature senescence in human trisomy 21 fibroblasts PLoS ONE 2019 14 e0219592 10.1371/journal.pone.0219592 31356639 PMC6663065 · DOI
  38. [42]Lombardo A Site-specific integration and tailoring of cassette design for sustainable gene transfer Nat. Methods 2011 8 861 869 10.1038/nmeth.1674 21857672 · DOI
  39. [43]Klatt D Differential transgene silencing of myeloid-specific promoters in the AAVS1 safe harbor locus of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived myeloid cells Hum. Gene Ther. 2020 31 199 210 10.1089/hum.2019.194 31773990 PMC7047106 · DOI
  40. [44]Ordovas L Efficient recombinase-mediated cassette exchange in hPSCs to study the hepatocyte lineage reveals AAVS1 locus-mediated transgene inhibition Stem Cell Rep. 2015 5 918 931 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.09.004 PMC4649136 26455413 · DOI
  41. [45]Brown CJ Willard HF The human X-inactivation centre is not required for maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation Nature 1994 368 154 156 10.1038/368154a0 8139659 · DOI
  42. [46]Berletch JB Escape from X inactivation varies in mouse tissues PLoS Genet. 2015 11 e1005079 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005079 25785854 PMC4364777 · DOI
  43. [47]Patrat, C., Ouimette, J. F. & Rougeulle, C. X chromosome inactivation in human development. Development147, dev183095 (2020). 31900287
  44. [48]Loda A Genetic and epigenetic features direct differential efficiency of Xist-mediated silencing at X-chromosomal and autosomal locations Nat. Commun. 2017 8 690 10.1038/s41467-017-00528-1 28947736 PMC5612955 · DOI
  45. [49]Cotton AM Spread of X-chromosome inactivation into autosomal sequences: role for DNA elements, chromatin features and chromosomal domains Hum. Mol. Genet 2014 23 1211 1223 10.1093/hmg/ddt513 24158853 PMC4051349 · DOI
  46. [50]Cremer T Cremer C Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001 2 292 301 10.1038/35066075 11283701 · DOI
  47. [51]Boyle S The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells Hum. Mol. Genet 2001 10 211 219 10.1093/hmg/10.3.211 11159939 · DOI
  48. [52]Fritz AJ Sehgal N Pliss A Xu J Berezney R Chromosome territories and the global regulation of the genome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2019 58 407 426 10.1002/gcc.22732 30664301 PMC7032563 · DOI
  49. [53]Heard E Human XIST yeast artificial chromosome transgenes show partial X inactivation center function in mouse embryonic stem cells Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1999 96 6841 6846 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6841 10359800 PMC22003 · DOI
  50. [54]Chow JC Hall LL Lawrence JB Brown CJ Ectopic XIST transcripts in human somatic cells show variable expression and localization Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002 99 92 98 10.1159/000071579 12900550 · DOI
  51. [55]Heard E Mongelard F Arnaud D Avner P Xist yeast artificial chromosome transgenes function as X-inactivation centers only in multicopy arrays and not as single copies Mol. Cell Biol. 1999 19 3156 3166 10.1128/MCB.19.4.3156 10082582 PMC84109 · DOI
  52. [57]Hammerle B Transient expression of Mnb/Dyrk1a couples cell cycle exit and differentiation of neuronal precursors by inducing p27KIP1 expression and suppressing NOTCH signaling Development 2011 138 2543 2554 10.1242/dev.066167 21610031 PMC3100710 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [59]Canzonetta C DYRK1A-dosage imbalance perturbs NRSF/REST levels, deregulating pluripotency and embryonic stem cell fate in Down syndrome Am. J. Hum. Genet 2008 83 388 400 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.012 18771760 PMC2556438 · DOI
  54. [60]Duchon A Herault Y DYRK1A, a dosage-sensitive gene involved in neurodevelopmental disorders, is a target for drug development in Down syndrome Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2016 10 104 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00104 27375444 PMC4891327 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [62]Mazur-Kolecka B Effect of DYRK1A activity inhibition on development of neuronal progenitors isolated from Ts65Dn mice J. Neurosci. Res. 2012 90 999 1010 10.1002/jnr.23007 22252917 · DOI
  56. [63]Cattaneo E Conti L De-Fraja C Signalling through the JAK-STAT pathway in the developing brain Trends Neurosci. 1999 22 365 369 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01378-2 10407422 · DOI
  57. [64]Herrmann JE STAT3 is a critical regulator of astrogliosis and scar formation after spinal cord injury J. Neurosci. 2008 28 7231 7243 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1709-08.2008 18614693 PMC2583788 · DOI · Paper page
  58. [66]Tsuda M JAK-STAT3 pathway regulates spinal astrocyte proliferation and neuropathic pain maintenance in rats Brain 2011 134 1127 1139 10.1093/brain/awr025 21371995 PMC4571138 · DOI
  59. [67]Kinoshita T Fujita M Maeda Y Biosynthesis, remodelling and functions of mammalian GPI-anchored proteins: recent progress J. Biochem. 2008 144 287 294 10.1093/jb/mvn090 18635593 · DOI
  60. [68]Vetro A Early infantile epileptic-dyskinetic encephalopathy due to biallelic PIGP mutations Neurol. Genet. 2020 6 e387 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000387 32042915 PMC6984131 · DOI
  61. [69]Shao M Down syndrome critical region protein 5 regulates membrane localization of Wnt receptors, Dishevelled stability and convergent extension in vertebrate embryos Development 2009 136 2121 2131 10.1242/dev.032649 19465602 · DOI
  62. [70]Sorci G S100B protein in tissue development, repair and regeneration World J. Biol. Chem. 2013 4 1 12 10.4331/wjbc.v4.i1.1 23580916 PMC3622753 · DOI
  63. [71]Clarke LE Barres BA Emerging roles of astrocytes in neural circuit development Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013 14 311 321 10.1038/nrn3484 23595014 PMC4431630 · DOI · Paper page
  64. [72]Mizuno GO Aberrant calcium signaling in astrocytes inhibits neuronal excitability in a human down syndrome stem cell model Cell Rep. 2018 24 355 365 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.033 29996097 PMC6631348 · DOI · Paper page
  65. [73]Nishimura K Development of defective and persistent Sendai virus vector: a unique gene delivery/expression system ideal for cell reprogramming J. Biol. Chem. 2011 286 4760 4771 10.1074/jbc.M110.183780 21138846 PMC3039346 · DOI
  66. [74]DeKelver RC Functional genomics, proteomics, and regulatory DNA analysis in isogenic settings using zinc finger nuclease-driven transgenesis into a safe harbor locus in the human genome Genome Res. 2010 20 1133 1142 10.1101/gr.106773.110 20508142 PMC2909576 · DOI
  67. [76]Bolger AM Lohse M Usadel B Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data Bioinformatics 2014 30 2114 2120 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 24695404 PMC4103590 · DOI · Paper page
  68. [77]Langmead B Salzberg SL Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 Nat. Methods 2012 9 357 359 10.1038/nmeth.1923 22388286 PMC3322381 · DOI · Paper page
  69. [78]Robinson MD Oshlack A A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data Genome Biol. 2010 11 R25 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 20196867 PMC2864565 · DOI · Paper page
  70. [79]Lienhard M Grimm C Morkel M Herwig R Chavez L MEDIPS: genome-wide differential coverage analysis of sequencing data derived from DNA enrichment experiments Bioinformatics 2014 30 284 286 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt650 24227674 PMC3892689 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawatani, K., Nambara, T., Nawa, N., Yoshimatsu, H., Kusakabe, H., Hirata, K., Tanave, A., Sumiyama, K., Banno, K., Taniguchi, H., Arahori, H., Ozono, K., & Kitabatake, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (JP)
  • Nara Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kitabatake, Yasuji
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2021-06-14
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
730-730
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3169004320
Cited by
34
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP19bm0804009)
  • MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP16K10090, JP19H03619, JP17K16257)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
Down syndrome, astrocyte proliferation, induced pluripotent stem cells, isogenic cell lines, DYRK1A
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Astrocytes, Cell Line, Down Syndrome, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Blotting, Western, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Gene Dosage, Gene Silencing, Cell Proliferation, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review