CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chiral spintronics

Yang, See-Hun, Naaman, Ron, Paltiel, Yossi, Parkin, Stuart S. P.·2021·Nature Reviews Physics
DOI 10.1038/s42254-021-00302-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42254-021-00302-9

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 154

  1. Linder, J. Improved domain-wall dynamics and magnonic torques using topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 90, 041412 (2014). · DOI
  2. Yang, S.-H. Spintronics on chiral objects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 120502 (2020). · DOI
  3. Banerjee-Ghosh, K. et al. Separation of enantiomers by their enantiospecific interaction with achiral magnetic substrates. Science 360, 1331–1334 (2018). An application of the CISS-induced exchange forces and the relevance of these forces to homochirality in life. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Göhler, B. et al. Spin selectivity in electron transmission through self-assembled monolayers of double-stranded DNA. Science 331, 894–897 (2011). A demonstration of high spin selectivity of photoexcited electrons passing through chiral monolayers. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Yang, X., van der Wal, C. H. & van Wees, B. J. Spin-dependent electron transmission model for chiral molecules in mesoscopic devices. Phys. Rev. B 99, 024418 (2019). · DOI
  6. Naaman, R. & Waldeck, D. H. Comment on “Spin-dependent electron transmission model for chiral molecules in mesoscopic devices”. Phys. Rev. B 101, 026403 (2020). · DOI
  7. Yang, X., van der Wal, C. H. & van Wees, B. J. Reply to “Comment on ‘Spin-dependent electron transmission model for chiral molecules in mesoscopic devices’”. Phys. Rev. B 101, 026404 (2020). · DOI
  8. Yang, X., van der Wal, C. H. & van Wees, B. J. Detecting chirality in two-terminal electronic nanodevices. Nano Lett. 20, 6148–6154 (2020). · DOI
  9. Nürenberg, D. & Zacharias, H. Evaluation of spin-flip scattering in chirality-induced spin selectivity using the Riccati equation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 3761–3770 (2019). · DOI
  10. Dzyaloshinsky, I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241–255 (1958). · DOI
  11. Moriya, T. Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 120, 91–98 (1960). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Manchon, A., Koo, H. C., Nitta, J., Frolov, S. M. & Duine, R. A. New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling. Nat. Mater. 14, 871–882 (2015). · DOI
  13. Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1260 (2015). · DOI
  14. Luo, Z. et al. Chirally coupled nanomagnets. Science 363, 1435–1439 (2019). · DOI
  15. Dao, T. P. et al. Chiral domain wall injector driven by spin–orbit torques. Nano Lett. 19, 5930–5937 (2019). · DOI
  16. Luo, Z. et al. Current-driven magnetic domain-wall logic. Nature 579, 214–218 (2020). · DOI
  17. Yang, S.-H. An all-electrical magnetic logic gate that harnesses chirality between domains. Nature 579, 201–202 (2020). · DOI
  18. Yang, S.-H., Ryu, K.-S. & Parkin, S. Domain-wall velocities of up to 750 m s−1 driven by exchange-coupling torque in synthetic antiferromagnets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 221–226 (2015). This paper shows very efficient composite domain wall motion from antiferromagnets. · DOI
  19. Yang, S.-H., Garg, C. & Parkin, S. S. P. Chiral exchange drag and chirality oscillations in synthetic antiferromagnets. Nat. Phys. 15, 543–548 (2019). Observation of chiral exchange drag and chirality oscillations from synthetic antiferromagnets. · DOI
  20. Liu, C.-X., Zhang, S.-C. & Qi, X.-L. The quantum anomalous Hall effect: theory and experiment. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 301–321 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Xie, Z. et al. Spin specific electron conduction through DNA oligomers. Nano Lett. 11, 4652–4655 (2011). · DOI
  22. Kettner, M. et al. Spin filtering in electron transport through chiral oligopeptides. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 14542–14547 (2015). · DOI
  23. Naaman, R. & Waldeck, D. H. Spintronics and chirality: spin selectivity in electron transport through chiral molecules. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 66, 263–281 (2015). · DOI
  24. Suda, M. et al. Light-driven molecular switch for reconfigurable spin filters. Nat. Commun. 10, 2455 (2019). · DOI
  25. Yeganeh, S., Ratner, M. A., Medina, E. & Mujica, V. Chiral electron transport: scattering through helical potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 014707 (2009). · DOI
  26. Medina, E., López, F., Ratner, M. A. & Mujica, V. Chiral molecular films as electron polarizers and polarization modulators. EPL 99, 17006 (2012). · DOI
  27. Liu, Y., Xiao, J., Koo, J. & Yan, B. Chirality-driven topological electronic structure of DNA-like materials. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00924-5 (2021). · DOI
  28. Gutierrez, R. et al. Modeling spin transport in helical fields: derivation of an effective low-dimensional Hamiltonian. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 22276–22284 (2013). · DOI
  29. Michaeli, K., Beratan, D. N., Waldeck, D. H. & Naaman, R. Voltage-induced long-range coherent electron transfer through organic molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5931–5936 (2019). · DOI
  30. Guo, A.-M. & Sun, Q. Spin-selective transport of electrons in DNA double helix. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 218102 (2012). · DOI
  31. Dalum, S. & Hedegård, P. Theory of chiral induced spin selectivity. Nano Lett. 19, 5253–5259 (2019). · DOI
  32. Michaeli, K., Varade, V., Naaman, R. & Waldeck, D. H. A new approach towards spintronics–spintronics with no magnets. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 103002 (2017). · DOI
  33. Dor, O. B., Yochelis, S., Mathew, S. P., Naaman, R. & Paltiel, Y. A chiral-based magnetic memory device without a permanent magnet. Nat. Commun. 4, 2256 (2013). · DOI
  34. Aragonès, A. C. et al. Measuring the spin-polarization power of a single chiral molecule. Small 13, 1602519 (2017). · DOI
  35. Alam, K. M. & Pramanik, S. Spin filtering with poly-T wrapped single wall carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale 9, 5155–5163 (2017). · DOI
  36. Lu, H. et al. Spin-dependent charge transport through 2D chiral hybrid lead-iodide perovskites. Sci. Adv. 5, eaay0571 (2019). Close to 90% spin selectivity achieved in chiral perovskites crystals. · DOI
  37. Bloom, B. P., Graff, B. M., Ghosh, S., Beratan, D. N. & Waldeck, D. H. Chirality control of electron transfer in quantum dot assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9038–9043 (2017). · DOI
  38. Mathew, S. P., Mondal, P. C., Moshe, H., Mastai, Y. & Naaman, R. Non-magnetic organic/inorganic spin injector at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 242408 (2014). · DOI
  39. Abendroth, J. M. et al. Analyzing spin selectivity in DNA-mediated charge transfer via fluorescence microscopy. ACS Nano 11, 7516–7526 (2017). · DOI
  40. Ben Dor, O., Morali, N., Yochelis, S., Baczewski, L. T. & Paltiel, Y. Local light-induced magnetization using nanodots and chiral molecules. Nano Lett. 14, 6042–6049 (2014). · DOI
  41. Fontanesi, C., Capua, E., Paltiel, Y., Waldeck, D. H. & Naaman, R. Spin-dependent processes measured without a permanent magnet. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707390 (2018). · DOI
  42. Smolinsky, E. Z. B. et al. Electric field-controlled magnetization in GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures–chiral organic molecules hybrids. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 1139–1145 (2019). · DOI
  43. Kumar, A., Capua, E., Fontanesi, C., Carmieli, R. & Naaman, R. Injection of spin-polarized electrons into a AlGaN/GaN device from an electrochemical cell: evidence for an extremely long spin lifetime. ACS Nano 12, 3892–3897 (2018). · DOI
  44. Eckshtain-Levi, M. et al. Cold denaturation induces inversion of dipole and spin transfer in chiral peptide monolayers. Nat. Commun. 7, 10744 (2016). · DOI
  45. Santos, J. I. et al. Chirality-induced electron spin polarization and enantiospecific response in solid-state cross-polarization nuclear magnetic resonance. ACS Nano 12, 11426–11433 (2018). · DOI
  46. Huang, Z. et al. Magneto-optical detection of photoinduced magnetism via chirality-induced spin selectivity in 2D chiral hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites. ACS Nano 14, 10370–10375 (2020). · DOI
  47. Inui, A. et al. Chirality-induced spin-polarized state of a chiral crystal CrNb3S6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166602 (2020). · DOI
  48. Koplovitz, G. et al. Magnetic nanoplatelet-based spin memory device operating at ambient temperatures. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606748 (2017). · DOI
  49. Al‐Bustami, H. et al. Single nanoparticle magnetic spin memristor. Small 14, 1801249 (2018). · DOI
  50. Koplovitz, G. et al. Nano ferromagnetism: single domain 10 nm ferromagnetism imprinted on superparamagnetic nanoparticles using chiral molecules (Small 1/2019). Small 15, 1970004 (2019). · DOI
  51. Alpern, H. et al. Unconventional superconductivity induced in Nb films by adsorbed chiral molecules. New J. Phys. 18, 113048 (2016). · DOI
  52. Sukenik, N. et al. Proximity effect through chiral molecules in Nb–graphene-based devices. Adv. Mater. Technol. 3, 1700300 (2018). · DOI
  53. Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17031 (2017). · DOI
  54. Nayak, A. K. et al. Magnetic antiskyrmions above room temperature in tetragonal Heusler materials. Nature 548, 561–566 (2017). · DOI
  55. Yu, X. Z. et al. Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet. Nature 564, 95–98 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Shen, L. et al. Current-induced dynamics and chaos of antiferromagnetic bimerons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 037202 (2020). · DOI
  57. Liu, Y., Hou, W., Han, X. & Zang, J. Three-dimensional dynamics of a magnetic hopfion driven by spin transfer torque. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 127204 (2020). · DOI
  58. Ryu, K.-S., Thomas, L., Yang, S.-H. & Parkin, S. Chiral spin torque at magnetic domain walls. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 527–533 (2013). · DOI
  59. Emori, S., Bauer, U., Ahn, S.-M., Martinez, E. & Beach, G. S. D. Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nat. Mater. 12, 611–616 (2013). These two papers present observations of chiral SOT from chiral domain walls. · DOI
  60. Malozemoff, A. P. & Slonczewski, J. C. Magnetic Domain Walls in Bubble Materials (Elsevier, 1979).
  61. Ezawa, Z. F. Quantum Hall Effects (World Scientific, 2013). · DOI
  62. Thiaville, A., Rohart, S., Jué, É., Cros, V. & Fert, A. Dynamics of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls in ultrathin magnetic films. EPL 100, 57002 (2012). · DOI
  63. Garg, C. et al. Efficient chiral-domain-wall motion driven by spin-orbit torque in metastable platinum films. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 034052 (2020). · DOI
  64. Filippou, P. C. et al. Chiral domain wall motion in unit-cell thick perpendicularly magnetized Heusler films prepared by chemical templating. Nat. Commun. 9, 4653 (2018). · DOI
  65. Ryu, K.-S., Yang, S.-H., Thomas, L. & Parkin, S. S. P. Chiral spin torque arising from proximity-induced magnetization. Nat. Commun. 5, 3910 (2014). · DOI
  66. Yoshimura, Y. et al. Soliton-like magnetic domain wall motion induced by the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Nat. Phys. 12, 157–161 (2016). · DOI
  67. Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011). Experimental observation of SOT. · DOI
  68. Garello, K. et al. Symmetry and magnitude of spin–orbit torques in ferromagnetic heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 587–593 (2013). · DOI
  69. Hoffmann, A. Spin Hall effects in metals. IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 5172–5193 (2013). · DOI
  70. Garg, C. et al. Highly asymmetric chiral domain-wall velocities in Y-shaped junctions. Nano Lett. 18, 1826–1830 (2018). · DOI
  71. Garg, C., Yang, S.-H., Phung, T., Pushp, A. & Parkin, S. S. P. Dramatic influence of curvature of nanowire on chiral domain wall velocity. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602804 (2017). · DOI
  72. Parkin, S. & Yang, S.-H. Memory on the racetrack. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 195–198 (2015). · DOI
  73. Parkin, S. S. P., More, N. & Roche, K. P. Oscillations in exchange coupling and magnetoresistance in metallic superlattice structures: Co/Ru, Co/Cr, and Fe/Cr. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2304–2307 (1990). · DOI
  74. Yang, S.-H. & Parkin, S. Novel domain wall dynamics in synthetic antiferromagnets. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 303001 (2017). · DOI
  75. Cohen, A. et al. Current driven chiral domain wall motions in synthetic antiferromagnets with Co/Rh/Co. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 053902 (2020). · DOI
  76. Bläsing, R. et al. Exchange coupling torque in ferrimagnetic Co/Gd bilayer maximized near angular momentum compensation temperature. Nat. Commun. 9, 4984 (2018). · DOI
  77. Avci, C. O. et al. Interface-driven chiral magnetism and current-driven domain walls in insulating magnetic garnets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 561–566 (2019). · DOI
  78. Shiino, T. et al. Antiferromagnetic domain wall motion driven by spin-orbit torques. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 087203 (2016). · DOI
  79. Narozhny, B. N. & Levchenko, A. Coulomb drag. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025003 (2016). · DOI
  80. Nielsen, H. B. & Ninomiya, M. The Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in a crystal. Phys. Lett. B 130, 389–396 (1983). · DOI · Paper page
  81. Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911 (2013). · DOI
  82. Hoffmann, M. et al. Antiskyrmions stabilized at interfaces by anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions. Nat. Commun. 8, 308 (2017). · DOI
  83. Lemesh, I. et al. Current-induced skyrmion generation through morphological thermal transitions in chiral ferromagnetic heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 30, 1805461 (2018). · DOI
  84. Duong, N. K. et al. Stabilizing zero-field skyrmions in Ir/Fe/Co/Pt thin film multilayers by magnetic history control. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 072401 (2019). · DOI
  85. Yu, G. et al. Room-temperature skyrmions in an antiferromagnet-based heterostructure. Nano Lett. 18, 980–986 (2018). · DOI
  86. Moreau-Luchaire, C. et al. Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabilization of small individual skyrmions at room temperature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 444–448 (2016). · DOI
  87. Legrand, W. et al. Room-temperature stabilization of antiferromagnetic skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 19, 34–42 (2020). · DOI
  88. Heinze, S. et al. Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 7, 713–718 (2011). · DOI
  89. Jiang, W. et al. Direct observation of the skyrmion Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 13, 162–169 (2017). Direct observation of the skyrmion Hall effect. · DOI
  90. Hirata, Y. et al. Vanishing skyrmion Hall effect at the angular momentum compensation temperature of a ferrimagnet. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 232–236 (2019). · DOI
  91. Zhang, X., Zhou, Y. & Ezawa, M. Magnetic bilayer-skyrmions without skyrmion Hall effect. Nat. Commun. 7, 10293 (2016). · DOI
  92. Bruno, P., Dugaev, V. K. & Taillefumier, M. Topological Hall effect and Berry phase in magnetic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 096806 (2004). · DOI
  93. Kurumaji, T. et al. Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet. Science 365, 914–918 (2019). · DOI
  94. Skjærvø, S. H., Marrows, C. H., Stamps, R. L. & Heyderman, L. J. Advances in artificial spin ice. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 13–28 (2020). · DOI
  95. Branford, W. R., Ladak, S., Read, D. E., Zeissler, K. & Cohen, L. F. Emerging chirality in artificial spin ice. Science 335, 1597–1600 (2012). · DOI
  96. Nisoli, C., Moessner, R. & Schiffer, P. Colloquium: Artificial spin ice: Designing and imaging magnetic frustration. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1473–1490 (2013). · DOI
  97. Farhan, A. et al. Emergent magnetic monopole dynamics in macroscopically degenerate artificial spin ice. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav6380 (2019). · DOI
  98. Nayak, A. K. et al. Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501870 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  99. Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539–1592 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  100. Miyasato, T. et al. Crossover behavior of the anomalous Hall effect and anomalous Nernst effect in itinerant ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 086602 (2007). · DOI
  101. Zhang, W. et al. Giant facet-dependent spin-orbit torque and spin Hall conductivity in the triangular antiferromagnet IrMn3. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600759 (2016). · DOI
  102. Tsai, H. et al. Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state. Nature 580, 608–613 (2020). · DOI
  103. Kimata, M. et al. Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin Hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet. Nature 565, 627–630 (2019). · DOI
  104. Savary, L. & Balents, L. Quantum spin liquids: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016). · DOI
  105. Takagi, H., Takayama, T., Jackeli, G., Khaliullin, G. & Nagler, S. E. Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 264–280 (2019). · DOI
  106. Kitaev, A. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann. Phys. 321, 2–111 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  107. Liu, Z.-X. & Normand, B. Dirac and chiral quantum spin liquids on the honeycomb lattice in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 187201 (2018). · DOI
  108. Modic, K. A., Ramshaw, B. J., Shekhter, A. & Varma, C. M. Chiral spin order in some purported Kitaev spin-liquid compounds. Phys. Rev. B 98, 205110 (2018). · DOI
  109. Modic, K. A. et al. Robust spin correlations at high magnetic fields in the harmonic honeycomb iridates. Nat. Commun. 8, 180 (2017). · DOI
  110. Kasahara, Y. et al. Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid. Nature 559, 227–231 (2018). · DOI
  111. Cao, H. B. et al. Low-temperature crystal and magnetic structure of α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 93, 134423 (2016). · DOI
  112. Hirobe, D. et al. One-dimensional spinon spin currents. Nat. Phys. 13, 30–34 (2017). · DOI
  113. Klitzing, K. V., Dorda, G. & Pepper, M. New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494–497 (1980). · DOI · Paper page
  114. Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  115. Bernevig, B. A., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells. Science 314, 1757–1761 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  116. Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  117. Mellnik, A. R. et al. Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insulator. Nature 511, 449–451 (2014). Observation of chiral SOT from TI. · DOI
  118. Rojas-Sánchez, J.-C. et al. Spin to charge conversion at room temperature by spin pumping into a new type of topological insulator: α-Sn films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 096602 (2016). · DOI
  119. Dc, M. et al. Room-temperature high spin–orbit torque due to quantum confinement in sputtered BixSe1−x films. Nat. Mater. 17, 800–807 (2018). · DOI
  120. Han, J. et al. Room-temperature spin-orbit torque switching induced by a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077702 (2017). · DOI
  121. Khang, N. H. D., Ueda, Y. & Hai, P. N. A conductive topological insulator with large spin Hall effect for ultralow power spin–orbit torque switching. Nat. Mater. 17, 808–813 (2018). · DOI
  122. Chi, Z. et al. The spin Hall effect of Bi-Sb alloys driven by thermally excited Dirac-like electrons. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2324 (2020). · DOI
  123. Yasuda, K. et al. Current-nonlinear Hall effect and spin-orbit torque magnetization switching in a magnetic topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 137204 (2017). · DOI
  124. Zhu, L., Ralph, Daniel, C. & Buhrman, R. A. Highly efficient spin-current generation by the spin Hall effect in Au1−xPtx. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 031001 (2018). · DOI
  125. Tokura, Y., Yasuda, K. & Tsukazaki, A. Magnetic topological insulators. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126–143 (2019). · DOI
  126. Chang, C.-Z. et al. Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator. Science 340, 167–170 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  127. Chang, C.-Z. et al. High-precision realization of robust quantum anomalous Hall state in a hard ferromagnetic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 14, 473–477 (2015). · DOI
  128. Mogi, M. et al. Magnetic modulation doping in topological insulators toward higher-temperature quantum anomalous Hall effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 182401 (2015). · DOI
  129. Deng, Y. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4. Science 367, 895–900 (2020). · DOI
  130. Liu, C. et al. Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 19, 522–527 (2020). · DOI
  131. Nenno, D. M., Garcia, C. A. C., Gooth, J., Felser, C. & Narang, P. Axion physics in condensed-matter systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 682–696 (2020). · DOI
  132. Liu, M. et al. Large discrete jumps observed in the transition between Chern states in a ferromagnetic topological insulator. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600167 (2016). · DOI
  133. Lv, Y. et al. Unidirectional spin-Hall and Rashba–Edelstein magnetoresistance in topological insulator-ferromagnet layer heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 9, 111 (2018). · DOI
  134. Gupta, S., Kanai, S., Matsukura, F. & Ohno, H. Magnetic and transport properties of Sb2Te3 doped with high concentration of Cr. Appl. Phys. Express 10, 103001 (2017). · DOI
  135. Ou, Y. et al. Enhancing the quantum anomalous Hall effect by magnetic codoping in a topological insulator. Adv. Mater. 30, 1703062 (2018). · DOI
  136. Liang, S. et al. Experimental tests of the Chiral anomaly magnetoresistance in the Dirac-Weyl semimetals Na3Bi and GdPtBi. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031002 (2018).
  137. Shi, S. et al. All-electric magnetization switching and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in WTe2/ferromagnet heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 945–949 (2019). · DOI
  138. Johansson, A., Henk, J. & Mertig, I. Edelstein effect in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 97, 085417 (2018). · DOI
  139. Li, P. et al. Spin-momentum locking and spin-orbit torques in magnetic nano-heterojunctions composed of Weyl semimetal WTe2. Nat. Commun. 9, 3990 (2018). · DOI
  140. Sato, M. & Ando, Y. Topological superconductors: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017). · DOI
  141. Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M. & Das Sarma, S. Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  142. Mackenzie, A. P. & Maeno, Y. The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657–712 (2003). · DOI
  143. Sasaki, S. et al. Topological superconductivity in CuxBi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 217001 (2011). · DOI
  144. Novak, M., Sasaki, S., Kriener, M., Segawa, K. & Ando, Y. Unusual nature of fully gapped superconductivity in In-doped SnTe. Phys. Rev. B 88, 140502 (2013). · DOI
  145. Pustogow, A. et al. Constraints on the superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4 from oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 574, 72–75 (2019). · DOI
  146. Meinert, M. Unconventional superconductivity in YPtBi and related topological semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 137001 (2016). · DOI
  147. Amet, F. et al. Supercurrent in the quantum Hall regime. Science 352, 966–969 (2016). · DOI
  148. Yang, S., Garg, C., Phung, T., Rettner, C. & Hughes, B. Spin-orbit torque driven one-bit magnetic racetrack devices — memory and neuromorphic applications. Int. Symp. VLSI Technol. Syst. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSI-TSA.2019.8804677 (2019). · DOI
  149. Kampfrath, T. et al. Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves. Nat. Photonics 5, 31–34 (2011). · DOI
  150. Mashkovich, E. A. et al. Terahertz optomagnetism: nonlinear THz excitation of GHz spin waves in antiferromagnetic FeBO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 157202 (2019). · DOI
  151. Cai, K. et al. Ultrafast and energy-efficient spin–orbit torque switching in compensated ferrimagnets. Nat. Electron. 3, 37–42 (2020). · DOI
  152. Ryu, K-.S, Thomas, L., Yang, S-.H, Parkin, S.S.P. Current induced tilting of domain walls in high velocity motion along perpendicularly magnetized micron-sized Co/Ni/Co racetracks. Appl. Phys. Express 5, 093006 (2012). · DOI
  153. Phung, T. et al. Highly efficient in-line magnetic domain wall injector. Nano Lett. 15, 835–841 (2015). · DOI
  154. Xiao, D., Chang, M.-C. & Niu, Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 (2010). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yang, S.-H., Naaman, R., Paltiel, Y., & Parkin, S. S. P.
Venue
Nature Reviews Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-04-08
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
328-343
ISSN
2522-5820
DOI
10.1038/s42254-021-00302-9
Cited by
553
References
10
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review