Berry phase effects on electronic properties
Open accessAbstract
Ever since its discovery the notion of Berry phase has permeated through all branches of physics. Over the past three decades it was gradually realized that the Berry phase of the electronic wave function can have a profound effect on material properties and is responsible for a spectrum of phenomena, such as polarization, orbital magnetism, various (quantum, anomalous, or spin) Hall effects, and quantum charge pumping. This progress is summarized in a pedagogical manner in this review. A brief summary of necessary background is given and a detailed discussion of the Berry phase effect in a variety of solid-state applications. A common thread of the review is the semiclassical formulation of electron dynamics, which is a versatile tool in the study of electron dynamics in the presence of electromagnetic fields and more general perturbations. Finally, a requantization method is demonstrated that converts a semiclassical theory to an effective quantum theory. It is clear that the Berry phase should be added as an essential ingredient to our understanding of basic material properties.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes how the Berry phase and Berry curvature of Bloch electrons modify electronic properties, from electric polarization and orbital magnetization to quantum, anomalous, and valley Hall effects. It develops a semiclassical wave-packet formalism and shows how it can be re-quantized into effective quantum theories.
Key findings
- The Berry curvature adds an anomalous velocity transverse to an electric field, giving Hall currents; the quantum Hall conductivity is a Chern number quantized in units of \(e^2/h\).
- Electric polarization in crystals is expressed as a Berry phase/Zak phase, with polarization defined only up to a quantum; in inversion-symmetric one-dimensional systems Zak’s phase is 0 or \(\pi\).
- Orbital magnetization contains a Berry-curvature contribution beyond the sum of quasiparticle orbital moments; in the broken-inversion graphene model the orbital moment can be “30 times larger than the spin moment.”
- Degenerate bands require a non-Abelian Berry curvature, which underlies spin Hall effects, the Dirac electron’s \(g=2\), and Rashba-like spin-orbit terms in semiconductor electrons.
Methods
- Pedagogical review, not a primary experimental study; it builds the semiclassical theory of Bloch electron wave packets, including Berry connection, Berry curvature, orbital magnetic moment, and modified phase-space density of states.
- Applies the formalism to examples including the Rice-Mele model, graphene with broken inversion symmetry, fcc Fe, Fe thin films, magnetic Bloch bands/Hofstadter spectrum, the Dirac electron, and the Kane model.
- Uses re-quantization methods—Bohr-Sommerfeld/EBK and canonical quantization/generalized Peierls substitution—to connect semiclassical dynamics to effective quantum Hamiltonians.
Limitations
- The paper states it does not attempt to cover all Berry phase effects and refers readers to other books/reviews for omitted topics.
- The paper states that direct measurement of the Berry curvature is still lacking, with only indirect evidence through quantities such as quantum Hall conductance, anomalous Hall effect, or graphene Hall plateaus.
- The paper notes method limitations: the one-band approximation, validity to first order in external fields, Bohr-Sommerfeld ambiguities such as the Maslov index, and failure for nonclosed or chaotic orbits; it also notes many-body extensions are still at an early stage.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 176 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning§ 3. Example: The two-level system · p. 6
The Berry connection is not gauge-independent.
“This is not surprising because the Berry curvature is a gauge-independent quantity and the Berry connection is not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ III. ELECTRON DYNAMICS IN THE PRESENCE OF ELECTRIC FIELDS · p. 13
In the presence of an electric field, an electron can acquire an anomalous velocity proportional to the Berry curvature of the band.
“In the presence of an electric field, an electron can acquire an anomalous velocity proportional to the Berry curvature of the band (Chang and Niu, 1995, 1996; Sundaram and Niu, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 1995, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sundaram and Niu, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ A. Adiabatic current · p. 8
The adiabatic current induced by a time-dependent perturbation in a band is equal to the q-integral of the Berry curvature Ω_nqt.
“We have thus derived the remarkable result that the adiabatic current induced by a time-dependent perturbation in a band is equal to the q -integral of the Berry curvature Ω n qt (Thouless, 1983).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thouless, 1983
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 7
The path C must be closed to make γ_n a gauge-invariant quantity with physical significance.
“We emphasize that the path C must be closed to make γ n a gauge-invariant quantity with physical significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Quantized adiabatic particle transport · p. 9
The quantization of the Chern number is always true as long as the Hamiltonian is periodic in both parameters.
“Note that in our proof, we made no reference to the original physical system; the quantization of the Chern number is always true as long as the Hamiltonian is periodic in both parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 7
The Berry curvature of energy bands is an intrinsic property of the band structure because it only depends on the wave function.
“The Berry curvature Ω n ( q ) is an intrinsic property of the band structure because it only depends on the wave function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3. Example: The two-level system · p. 6
The Berry curvature is gauge-independent.
“This is not surprising because the Berry curvature is a gauge-independent quantity and the Berry connection is not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 7
The Berry curvature itself is a local gauge-invariant quantity.
“In fact, once we have introduced the concept of the Berry curvature, a closed loop is not necessary because the Berry curvature itself is a local gauge-invariant quantity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 11
The polarization difference between two states is given by the integrated bulk current as the system adiabatically evolves from the initial state at t=0 to the final state at t=T.
“The above equation can be interpreted in the following way: The polarization difference between two states is given by the integrated bulk current as the system adiabatically evolves from the initial state at t = 0 to the final state at t = T .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 1. The Rice-Mele model · p. 13
In the Rice-Mele model with ∆=0, the polarization difference between P(δ) and P(-δ) is ea/2.
“Therefore the polarization difference between P ( δ ) and P ( -δ ) is ea/ 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 1. Conditions for nonzero particle transport for cyclic motion · p. 10
The criterion for c_n to be nonzero is that a degeneracy point must occur somewhere inside the torus as one varies q, R1 and R2.
“Thus, the criterion for c n to be nonzero is that a degeneracy point must occur somewhere inside the torus as one varies q , R 1 and R 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12
In a one-dimensional system with inversion symmetry, the polarization density P is either 0 or ea/2 modulo ea.
“Therefore P is either 0 or ea/ 2 (modulo ea ). Any other value of P will break the inversion symmetry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Quantized adiabatic particle transport · p. 9
The Berry phase over a torus is quantized in the unit of 2π.
“Here we prove that it is also true in the case of a torus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12
The polarization obtained from the two-point formula is determined up to an uncertainty quantum.
“However, a price must be paid to use the two-point formula, namely, the polarization in Eq. (2.28) is determined up to an uncertainty quantum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12
In a one-dimensional system with inversion symmetry, Zak's phase can only take the value 0 or π modulo 2π.
“Consequently, Zak's phase can only take the value 0 or π (modulo 2 π ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 1. Conditions for nonzero particle transport for cyclic motion · p. 10
If R(t) is a smooth function of t, then R must have at least two components for its trajectory to trace out a circle on the torus.
“If R ( t ) is a smooth function of t , as it is usually the case for physical quantities, then R must have at least two components, say R 1 and R 2 . Otherwise the trajectory of R ( t ) cannot trace out a circle on the torus [see Fig. 1(a)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Quantized adiabatic particle transport · p. 9
The transported particle number over a time cycle is quantized and is an integer called the first Chern number.
“Therefore the transported particle number c , given in Eq. (2.11), must be quantized. This integer is called the first Chern number, which characterizes the topological structure of the mapping from the parameter space ( q, t ) to the Bloch states | u ( q, t ) 〉 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
The calculated electron density using Eq. (6.18) and the numerical result from direct diagonalization of the tight-binding Hamiltonian are virtually indistinguishable.
“Figure 11 shows the calculated electron density using Eq. (6.18) together with numerical result obtained by direct diagonalization of the tight-binding Hamiltonian. These two results are virtually indistinguishable in the plot”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
Since the split magnetic subband is narrower and flatter than the original Bloch band, the electron group velocity is small.
“Furthermore, since the split magnetic subband is narrower and flatter than the original Bloch band, the electron group velocity is small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
The states on the opposite sides of the k1 boundaries have the same phase.
“That is, the states on the opposite sides of the k 1 boundaries have the same phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
The size of a real-space hyperorbit may be very large if phase coherence can be maintained during the circulation, since it is proportional to the inverse of the residual magnetic field δB.
“The size of a real-space hyperorbit may be very large (if phase coherence can be maintained during the circulation) since it is proportional to the inverse of the residual magnetic field δB .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
The area of the largest hyperorbit should be equal to or slightly smaller than the area of the MBZ (2π/a)^2/q, assuming δB << B0 so that the number of hyperorbits is large.
“The area of the largest hyperorbit should be equal to or slightly smaller (assuming δB ≪ B 0 so that the number of hyperorbits is large) than the area of the MBZ (2 π/a ) 2 /q (see Fig. 13(b)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
In the case of the MBB, the magnetic field B0 changes the band structure itself.
“In the case of the MBB, the magnetic field B 0 changes the band structure itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
The r-orbit is simply the k-orbit rotated by π/2 and linearly scaled by the factor hbar/eδB.
“Similar to the Bloch band case, it is not difficult to see from Eq. (8.23) that the r -orbit is simply the k -orbit rotated by π/ 2 and (linearly) scaled by the factor ¯ h/eδB .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
The degeneracy of the original Landau level is Φ/φ0 = Np/q, where Φ=Nφ is the total magnetic flux through the two-dimensional sample.
“The degeneracy of the original LL is Φ /φ 0 = Np/q , where Φ = Nφ is the total magnetic flux through the two dimensional sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
If the magnetic flux φ enclosed by a plaquette is (p/q)φ0, where p and q are co-prime integers, then T^q_{a1} commutes with T_{a2}.
“If the magnetic flux φ enclosed by a plaquette is ( p/q ) φ 0 , where p and q are co-prime integers, then T q a 1 would commute with T a 2 (see Fig. 12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
The magnetic translation operator T_a defined in the text commutes with the Hamiltonian H.
“The operator T a being defined this way has the desired property that [ H,T a ]=0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
T_a1 commutes with T_a2 only if the magnetic flux φ is an integer multiple of the flux quantum φ0 = e/h.
“T a 1 commutes with T a 2 only if the flux φ is an integer multiple of the flux quantum φ 0 = e/h .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
The k-orbit moves along a path with constant E(k)=E0(k)-M(k)·δB, which is the magnetic Bloch band energy shifted by the magnetization energy.
“This determines the k -orbit moving along a path with constant E ( k ) = E 0 ( k ) -M ( k ) · δ B , which is the magnetic Bloch band energy shifted by the magnetization energy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
Since the magnetic unit cell is q times larger than the usual unit cell, the magnetic Brillouin zone (MBZ) has to be q times smaller.
“Since the magnetic unit cell is q times larger than the usual unit cell, the magnetic Brillouin zone (MBZ) has to be q times smaller.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
Therefore, the MBZ has a q-fold degeneracy along the b2 direction.
“Therefore, the MBZ has a q -fold degeneracy along the b 2 direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
The number of hyperorbits should be |1/(qδφ)+σ_H|, where δφ≡δB a^2/φ0 is the residual flux per plaquette.
“Therefore, it is not difficult to see that the number of hyperorbits should be | 1 / ( qδφ ) + σ H | , where δφ ≡ δBa 2 /φ 0 is the residual flux per plaquette.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
Magnetic translations along different directions usually do not commute.
“Unlike usual translation operators, magnetic translations along different directions usually do not commute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
After splitting, each magnetic Bloch band again has only N/q states, the number of states in a MBZ.
“Therefore, after splitting, each MBB again has only N/q states, the number of states in a MBZ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
When δB is not zero, there exists a similar circulating motion in the MBB, called a hyperorbit.
“As a result, when δ B is not zero, there exists similar circulating motion in the MBB. This type of orbit will be called 'hyperorbit'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
In the example, the MBZ is folded back q times along the b1 direction.
“Then, in this example, the MBZ is folded back q times along the b 1 direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
For such an orbit, the Berry phase correction Γ/2π in Eq. (7.3) is very close to the integer Hall conductivity σ_H of the MBB.
“For such an orbit, the Berry phase correction Γ / 2 π in Eq. (7.3) is very close to the integer Hall conductivity σ H of the MBB.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
As a result of imposing the parallel-transport condition, the phases of any two states in the MBZ have a definite relation.
“As a result, the phases of any two states in the MBZ have a definite relation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
After quantization, there can only be a finite number of hyperorbits in the MBZ.
“After the quantization, there can only be a finite number of hyperorbits in the MBZ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39
Except for the extension to multiple components, the form of the magnetic moment remains the same as its Abelian counterpart.
“Except for the extension to multiple components, the form of the magnetic moment remains the same as its Abelian counterpart (see Eq. (4.6)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
Because of the spin-orbit coupling between the electron and the spinless impurity, the scattering amplitude is not symmetric with respect to the transverse direction.
“Because of the spin-orbit coupling between the electron and the (spinless) impurity, the scattering amplitude is not symmetric with respect to the transverse direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
The Berry curvature emerges when one restricts the whole Hilbert space to a particular (HH or LH) subspace.
“The Berry curvature emerges when one restricts the whole Hilbert space to a particular (HH or LH) subspace.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 40
Compared to the Abelian case in Eq. (5.8), the kdot equation also has the electric force and the Lorentz force.
“Compared to the Abelian case in Eq. (5.8), the ˙ k c -equation also has the electric force and the Lorentz force.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 40
The anomalous velocity in Eq. (9.7) remains essentially the same, with the Abelian Berry curvature replaced by the non-Abelian one.
“Also, the anomalous velocity in Eq. (9.7) remains essentially the same. One only needs to replace the Abelian Berry curvature with the non-Abelian one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
These are magnetic energy subbands at a finer energy scale compared to the original MBB.
“These are the magnetic energy subbands at a finer energy scale compared to the original MBB.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
The Hall conductivity is σ_close_r = eρ/δB.
“Therefore, the Hall conductivity is σ close r = eρ/δB .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
For a closed orbit, the motion is a cyclotron motion superimposed with a drift along the E × δB direction.
“For a closed orbit, this is just a cyclotron motion superimposed with a drift along the E × δ B direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
After time average, the cyclotron motion does not contribute to a net transport.
“After time average, the former does not contribute to a net transport.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 40
Same as the Abelian case, the wavepacket energy has three terms: the Bloch energy, the electrostatic energy, and the magnetization energy.
“Same as the Abelian case, it has three terms : the Bloch energy, the electrostatic energy, and the magnetization energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
The sum of these integers equals the original Hall conductivity: σ_H = ∑_r σ_r.
“The sum of these integers should be equal to the original Hall conductivity: σ H = ∑ r σ r .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
For lattices with square or triangular symmetry, there is one, and only one, nesting (open) hyperorbit in the MBZ.
“For lattices with square or triangular symmetry, there is one, and only one, nesting (open) hyperorbit in the MBZ (for example, see the diamond-shaped energy contour in Fig. 13(b)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
The dipole-energy term eE·R originates from the shift between the charge center r_c and the center of the canonical variable r.
“The dipole-energy term e E · R is originated from the shift between the charge center r c and the center of the canonical variable r .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
The form of the Hamiltonian, especially the spin-orbit term and Yafet term, is clearly gauge dependent because of the gauge-dependent Berry connection.
“First, the form of the Hamiltonian, especially the spin-orbit term and Yafet term, is clearly gauge dependent because of the gaugedependent Berry connection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
The semiclassical theory based on the variables F and M is gauge independent.
“Third, the semiclassical theory based on the variables F and M , on the other hand, are gauge independent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
Compared to the semiclassical Hamiltonian in Eq. (9.9), the quantum Hamiltonian has two additional terms from the Taylor expansion.
“Compared to the semiclassical Hamiltonian in Eq. (9.9), the quantum Hamiltonian has two additional terms from the Taylor expansion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ E. Semiconductor electron · p. 42
To the lowest order of k, the rotating wavepacket in the conduction band has a magnetic moment.
“To the lowest order of k , it has the magnetic moment,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
If the first Chern number (or its non-Abelian generalization) is not zero, one cannot choose a global gauge in which R is smooth everywhere in the Brillouin zone.
“However, if the first Chern number (or its non-Abelian generalization) is not zero, one cannot choose a global gauge in which R is smooth everywhere in the Brillouin zone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6
If all energy levels are included, the total Berry curvature vanishes for each value of R.
“In fact, if all energy levels are included, it follows from Eq. (1.13) that the total Berry curvature vanishes for each value of R ,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 2
In the absence of degeneracy, an eigenstate evolving adiabatically around a closed loop returns to itself with a phase difference equal to the time integral of the energy plus an extra Berry phase.
“In the absence of degeneracy, the eigenstate will surely come back to itself when finishing the loop, but there will be a phase difference equal to the time integral of the energy (divided by ¯ h ) plus an extra which is later commonly called the Berry phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A. Topical overview · p. 2
The Berry phase is physical.
“This property makes the Berry phase physical, and the early experimental studies were focused on measuring it directly through interference phenomena.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ A. Topical overview · p. 3
It is necessary and sufficient to include the Berry phases and gradient energy corrections in addition to the energy dispersions in order to account for all phenomena up to first order in the fields.
“It is necessary and sufficient to include the Berry phases and gradient energy corrections in addition to the energy dispersions in order to account all phenomena up to first order in the fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Cyclic adiabatic evolution · p. 4
According to the quantum adiabatic theorem, a system initially in an eigenstate will stay as an instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian throughout the process.
“According to the quantum adiabatic theorem (Kato, 1950; Messiah, 1962), a system initially in one of its eigenstates | n ( R (0)) 〉 will stay as an instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian H ( R ( t )) throughout the process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kato, 1950
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Messiah, 1962
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ A. Topical overview · p. 3
Based on the Berry phase formula, polarization-related properties can now be routinely calculated using first-principles methods with a typical precision of density functional theory.
“Based on the Berry phase formula, one can now routinely calculate polarization related properties using first principles methods, with a typical precision of the density functional theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 3
By including a side-jump term into the usual Boltzmann equation, the semiclassical theory can reproduce all the intricacies of linear response theory in weakly disordered systems.
“Moreover, by including a side-jump term (which is itself a kind of Berry phase effect) into the usual Boltzmann equation and associated transport during collisions as well as anomalous transport between collisions, the semiclassical theory can also reproduce all the intricacies of linear response theory in weakly disordered systems (Sinitsyn, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sinitsyn, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6
The Berry curvature can be regarded as the result of the residual interaction of projected-out energy levels.
“In view of Eq. (1.13), the Berry curvature can be regarded as the result of the 'residual' interaction of those projected-out energy levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ A. Topical overview · p. 3
Spin-orbit coupling and various Yafet terms are explained by the generalized Peierls substitution.
“Spin-orbit coupling and various mysterious Yafet terms are all found a simple explanation from this generalized Peierls substitution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Berry Phase Effects on Electronic Properties · p. 1
The Berry phase of the electronic wave function is responsible for a spectrum of phenomena, including ferroelectricity, orbital magnetism, various (quantum/anomalous/spin) Hall effects, and quantum charge pumping.
“is responsible for a spectrum of phenomena, such as ferroelectricity, orbital magnetism, various (quantum/anomalous/spin) Hall effects, and quantum charge pumping”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Berry Phase Effects on Electronic Properties · p. 1
The Berry phase of the electronic wave function can have a profound effect on material properties.
“the Berry phase of the electronic wave function can have a profound effect on material properties”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 2
The Berry phase can be written as an integral of the Berry curvature over a surface suspending the loop.
“Indeed, Berry himself showed that one can write the Berry phase as an integral of a field, which we now call as the Berry curvature, over a surface suspending the loop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ A. Topical overview · p. 2
The Berry phase is gauge invariant up to an unessential integer multiple of 2π when the eigen-wavefunction is kept single valued over the loop.
“The Berry phase is unchanged (up to unessential integer multiple of 2 π ) by such a phase factor, provided the eigen-wavefunction is kept to be single valued over the loop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 3
A generalized Peierls substitution relating physical variables to canonical variables turns the semiclassical dynamics into a full quantum theory valid to first order in the fields.
“Finally, one can execute a generalized Peierls substitution relating the physical variables to the canonical variables, turning the semiclassical dynamics into a full quantum theory valid to first order in the fields (Chang and Niu, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 15
The quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions is robust against many-body interactions and disorder.
“Niu et al. (1985) further showed that the quantized Hall conductivity in two-dimensions is robust against many-body interactions and disorder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Niu et al. (1985)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ III. ELECTRON DYNAMICS IN THE PRESENCE OF ELECTRIC FIELDS · p. 13
The usual description of Bloch electron dynamics under an electric field, in which the electron velocity is simply given by the band energy derivative, is incomplete.
“Through recent progress on the semiclassical dynamics of Bloch electrons, it has been made increasingly clear that this description is incomplete.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 3. Adiabatic Pumping · p. 11
The concepts of gauge field and geometric phase can still be applied to open mesoscopic systems described by the scattering matrix.
“Although the physical description of these open systems are dramatically different from the closed ones, the concepts of gauge field and geometric phase can still be applied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Quantized adiabatic particle transport · p. 9
If the potential shifts one spatial period in the time cycle, the particle transport equals the number of filled Bloch bands (double if spin degeneracy is counted).
“If the potential shifts one spatial period in the time cycle, the particle transport should be equal to the number of filled Bloch bands (double if the spin degeneracy is counted).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 15
The Hall conductivity σ_xy is the Chern number in units of e^2/h.
“Here σ xy is just the Chern number in the units of e 2 /h , i.e.,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Berry curvature: Symmetry considerations · p. 14
In systems with either broken time-reversal or inversion symmetries, a proper description requires the full velocity formula including the Berry curvature.
“However, in systems with either broken time-reversal or inversion symmetries, their proper description requires the use of the full velocity formula (3.6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Many-body interactions and disorder · p. 10
If the Fermi energy lies in a gap, the current j(κ) is insensitive to the boundary condition specified by κ.
“The key step is achieved by realizing that if the Fermi energy lies in a gap, then the current j ( κ ) should be insensitive to the boundary condition specified by κ (Niu and Thouless, 1984; Thouless, 1981).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Niu and Thouless, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thouless, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6
The Berry curvature is a more fundamental quantity than the Berry phase.
“In this sense, the Berry curvature is a more fundamental quantity than the Berry phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 15
The Hall conductivity is quantized for a two-dimensional band insulator of non-interacting electrons.
“Therefore the Hall conductivity is quantized for a twodimensional band insulator of non-interacting electrons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Anomalous velocity · p. 14
The electron velocity in a Bloch state under an electric field has, in addition to the usual band dispersion contribution, an anomalous velocity term.
“We can see that, in addition to the usual band dispersion contribution, an extra term previously known as an anomalous velocity also contributes to v n ( k ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 7
The Berry curvature is nonzero in a wide range of materials, in particular crystals with broken time-reversal or inversion symmetry.
“It is nonzero in a wide range of materials, in particular, crystals with broken time-reversal or inversion symmetry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ III. ELECTRON DYNAMICS IN THE PRESENCE OF ELECTRIC FIELDS · p. 13
This anomalous velocity is responsible for a number of transport phenomena, in particular various Hall effects.
“This anomalous velocity is responsible for a number of transport phenomena, in particular various Hall effects, which we study in this section.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12
The polarization may be regarded as a multi-valued quantity with each value differing by the quantum.
“Because of this uncertainty quantum, the polarization may be regarded as a multi-valued quantity with each value differed by the quantum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 15
The Hall conductivity is quantized even in the presence of many-body interaction and disorder.
“Therefore the Hall conductivity is quantized even in the presence of many-body interaction and disorder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 8
In the presence of inversion symmetry, Zak's phase γ_n is either 0 or π.
“By analyzing the symmetry properties of Wannier functions (Kohn, 1959) of a one-dimensional crystal, Zak (1989a) showed that γ n is either 0 or π in the presence of inversion symmetry; a simple argument is given in Sec. II.C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kohn, 1959
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zak (1989a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 14
In a strong magnetic field, the Hall conductivity of a two-dimensional electron gas is exactly quantized in units of e^2/h.
“They found that in a strong magnetic field the Hall conductivity of a two-dimensional electron gas is exactly quantized in the units of e 2 /h .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klitzing et al. (1980)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 8
If the crystal lacks inversion symmetry, Zak's phase γ_n can assume any value.
“If the crystal lacks inversion symmetry, γ n can assume any value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zak (1989a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 15
For a two-dimensional band insulator, the Hall conductivity is given by the integral of the Berry curvature over the entire Brillouin zone.
“It follows from Eq. (3.6) that the Hall conductivity of the system is given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Berry curvature: Symmetry considerations · p. 14
In graphene with broken inversion symmetry, the Berry curvature at valleys K1 and K2 has opposite signs due to time-reversal symmetry.
“The Berry curvature at valley K 1 and K 2 have opposite signs due to time-reversal symmetry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xiao et al. , 2007b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 11
Electric polarization can be regarded as 'unquantized' adiabatic particle transport.
“This description implies a time-dependent Hamiltonian H ( t ), and the electric polarization can be regarded as 'unquantized' adiabatic particle transport.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 7
Information of the Berry curvature is essential in a proper description of the dynamics of Bloch electrons.
“It is now well recognized that information of the Berry curvature is essential in a proper description of the dynamics of Bloch electrons, which has various effects on transport and thermodynamic properties of crystals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 15
The existence of a bulk energy gap guarantees that the Hall conductivity remains unchanged after thermodynamic averaging.
“The existence of a bulk energy gap guarantees that the Hall conductivity remains unchanged after thermodynamic averaging, which is given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Berry curvature: Symmetry considerations · p. 14
For crystals with simultaneous time-reversal and spatial inversion symmetry, the Berry curvature vanishes identically throughout the Brillouin zone.
“Therefore, for crystals with simultaneous time-reversal and spatial inversion symmetry the Berry curvature vanish identically throughout the Brillouin zone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6
In practice, effective Hamiltonians obtained by projecting a full Hamiltonian are accompanied by some residual Berry curvature.
“However, in practice one usually deals with effective Hamiltonians which are obtained through some projection process of the full Hamiltonian. Therefore there will always be some 'residual' Berry curvature accompanying the effective Hamiltonian.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3. Example: The two-level system · p. 6
The generic two-level Hamiltonian describes a number of physical systems in condensed matter physics for which the Berry phase effect has been discussed.
“Despite its simple form, the above Hamiltonian describes a number of physical systems in condensed matter physics for which the Berry phase effect has been discussed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Culcer et al. , 2003; Liu et al. , 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rice and Mele, 1982; Su et al. , 1979
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Onoda et al. , 2004b; Vanderbilt and King-Smith, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ B. Berry curvature: Symmetry considerations · p. 14
As the gap approaches zero, the Berry phase acquired by an electron during one circle around the valley becomes exactly ±π.
“We note that as the gap approaches zero, the Berry phase acquired by an electron during one circle around the valley becomes exactly ± π .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Conditions for nonzero particle transport for cyclic motion · p. 10
The number of transported electrons can be related to the number of monopoles, which are degeneracy points in the parameter space.
“Therefore the number of transported electrons can be related to the number of monopoles, which are degeneracy points in the parameter space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 11
It is always the change of the polarization that has been measured.
“The above interpretation is also consistent with experiments, as it is always the change of the polarization that has been measured (Resta and Vanderbilt, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Resta and Vanderbilt, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Example: The two-level system · p. 7
The degeneracy points of a two-level system act as sources and drains of the Berry curvature flux.
“Therefore the degeneracy points act as sources and drains of the Berry curvature flux.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Many-body interactions and disorder · p. 10
In the general case with many-body interactions and disorder, the quantization of particle transport is still valid as long as the system remains an insulator during the whole process.
“Niu and Thouless (1984) studied this problem and showed that in the general case the quantization of particle transport is still valid as long as the system remains an insulator during the whole process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Niu and Thouless (1984)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
Unless the system has both time-reversal and inversion symmetry, the orbital moment m(q) is generally nonzero.
“Therefore unless the system has both time-reversal and inversion symmetry, m ( q ) is in general nonzero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
The size of the wave packet has a nonzero lower bound because it is constructed using an incomplete basis of Bloch functions.
“In fact, since it is constructed using an incomplete basis of the Bloch functions, the size of the wave packet has a nonzero lower bound (Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marzari and Vanderbilt, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
Under symmetry operations, the orbital moment transforms exactly like the Berry curvature.
“Under symmetry operations, the orbital moment transforms exactly like the Berry curvature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
Upon application of a magnetic field, the orbital moment couples to the field through a Zeeman-like term -m(q)·B.
“For example, upon the application of a magnetic field, the orbital moment will couple to the field through a Zeeman-like term -m ( q ) · B .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16
The integration of the Berry curvature of a full band is ±π for the upper and lower bands.
“One can verify that the integration of the Berry curvature of a full band, 2 π ∫ ∞ 0 qdq Ω ± , is ± π for the upper and lower bands, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Anomalous Hall conductivity as a Fermi surface property · p. 17
The Hall conductivity can be written as the Berry phase of quasiparticles on the Fermi surface, up to a multiple of 2π.
“This issue was first raised by Haldane (2004), and he showed that the Hall conductivity can be written, in the units of e 2 / 2 πh , as the Berry phase of quasiparticles on the Fermi surface, up to a multiple of 2 π .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haldane (2004)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
The Berry phase around the Dirac points becomes exactly ±π.
“Meanwhile, The Berry phase around the Dirac points becomes exactly ± π (also see Sec. VII.C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17
In metallic systems, electron scattering can be important in transport phenomena.
“The above discussion does not take into account the fact that, unlike insulators, in metallic systems electron scattering can be important in transport phenomena.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
The Berry curvatures in the two valleys have opposite sign, as required by time-reversal symmetry.
“Note that the Berry curvatures in two valleys have opposite sign, as required by time-reversal symmetry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Anomalous Hall conductivity as a Fermi surface property · p. 17
The Berry phase on the Fermi surface should be added as a topological ingredient to the Landau Fermi liquid theory.
“This observation suggests that the Berry phase on the Fermi surface should be added as a topological ingredient to the Landau Fermi liquid theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
For the graphene model with broken inversion symmetry, the orbital moment of the conduction band is given by Eq. (4.7).
“For the graphene model with broken-inversion symmetry, discussed in Sec. III.E, the orbital moment of the conduction band is given by (Xiao et al. , 2007b)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xiao et al. , 2007b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17
Two contributions to the anomalous Hall effect arise due to scattering: skew scattering and side jump.
“Two contributions to the anomalous Hall effect arises due to scattering: (i) the skew scattering that refers to the asymmetric scattering amplitude with respect to the scattering angle between the incoming and outgoing electron waves (Smit, 1958), and (ii) the side jump which is a sudden shift of the electron coordinates during scattering (Berger, 1970).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Smit, 1958
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Berger, 1970
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16
The Hall conductivity is resonantly enhanced only when -∆ < ε_F < ∆.
“It is only when -∆ < ε F < ∆, the Hall conductivity is resonantly enhanced (Onoda et al. , 2006b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Onoda et al. , 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17
In both semiclassical and full quantum mechanical approaches, the Berry-phase supported intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect has been firmly established.
“In both approaches, the Berryphase supported intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect has been firmly established.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sinitsyn, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Onoda et al. , 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sinitsyn et al. , 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20
The magnetic dipole e r × p is not defined in a periodic system.
“The main difficulty of calculating the orbital magnetization is exactly the same one we faced when calculating the electric polarization: the magnetic dipole e r × p is not defined in a periodic system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16
The intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect can be regarded as an unquantized version of the quantum Hall effect.
“The intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect can be regarded as an 'unquantized' version of the quantum Hall effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20
There was no proper way to calculate orbital magnetization until recently when the Berry phase theory of orbital magnetization was developed.
“In fact, there was no proper way to calculate this quantity until recently when the Berry phase theory of orbital magnetization is developed (Shi et al. , 2007; Thonhauser et al. , 2005; Xiao et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Shi et al. , 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thonhauser et al. , 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xiao et al. , 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16
The scattering-independent intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect comes from the Berry-phase supported anomalous velocity.
“It was later realized that the scattering-independent intrinsic contribution comes from the Berry-phase supported anomalous velocity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
Broken inversion symmetry allows a valley Hall effect.
“It is this broken inversion symmetry that allows a valley Hall effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
The orbital moment behaves exactly like the electron spin.
“This orbital moment behaves exactly like the electron spin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
Zhou et al. reported observation of a band gap opening in epitaxial graphene, attributed to inversion symmetry breaking by the substrate potential.
“Zhou et al. (2007) have recently reported the observation of a band gap opening in epitaxial graphene, attributed to the inversion symmetry breaking by the substrate potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
Intrinsic graphene has two degenerate and inequivalent Dirac points at the corners of the Brillouin zone, where conduction and valence bands touch, forming a valley structure.
“The band structure of intrinsic graphene has two degenerate and inequivalent Dirac points at the corners of the Brillouin zone, where the conduction and valance bands touch each other, forming a valley structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
A wave packet may possess a self-rotation around its center of mass, which gives rise to an orbital magnetic moment.
“Therefore, a wave packet may possess a self-rotation around its center of mass, which will in turn give rise to an orbital magnetic moment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
The orbital moment is an intrinsic property of the band; its expression does not depend on the actual shape and size of the wave packet, only on the Bloch functions.
“We emphasize that the orbital moment is an intrinsic property of the band. Its final expression, Eq. (4.6), does not depend on the actual shape and size of the wave packet, and only depends on the Bloch functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
The valley Hall conductivity can be nonzero when inversion symmetry is broken, even if time reversal symmetry remains.
“Therefore, the valley Hall conductivity can be nonzero when the inversion symmetry is broken, even if time reversal symmetry remains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17
The Hall conductivity is the sum of intrinsic, skew scattering, and side jump contributions.
“The Hall conductivity is the sum of different contributions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16
Three mechanisms have been identified for the anomalous Hall effect: the intrinsic contribution and the extrinsic contributions from skew and side-jump scattering.
“In the past, three mechanisms have been identified: the intrinsic contribution (Karplus and Luttinger, 1954; Luttinger, 1958), and the extrinsic contributions from the skew (Smit, 1958) and side-jump scattering (Berger, 1970).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Karplus and Luttinger, 1954
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Luttinger, 1958
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smit, 1958
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17
In dirty samples and at high temperatures, σ_sk becomes small compared to both σ_in and σ_sj.
“On the other hand, in dirty samples and at high temperatures, σ sk H becomes small compared to both σ in H and σ sj H .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Anomalous Hall conductivity as a Fermi surface property · p. 18
Shindou and Balents derived an effective Boltzmann equation for quasiparticles on the Fermi surface using the Keldysh formalism, where the Berry phase of the Fermi surface is defined in terms of quasiparticle Green functions.
“On the theory side, Shindou and Balents (2006, 2008) derived an effective Boltzmann equation for quasiparticles on the Fermi surface using the Keldysh formalism, where the Berry phase of the Fermi surface is defined in terms of the quasiparticle Green functions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shindou and Balents (2006, 2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 2. Anomalous Hall conductivity as a Fermi surface property · p. 17
The intrinsic Hall conductivity is also a Fermi surface property.
“Therefore the intrinsic Hall conductivity is also a Fermi surface property.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20
For a wave packet, the magnetic dipole is not a problem because it is localized in space.
“For a wave packet this is not a problem because it is localized in space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
The wave packet has a finite spread in real space.
“The wave packet, unlike a classical point particle, has a finite spread in real space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 19
If one constructs a wave packet using only the positive energy states of the Dirac Hamiltonian, its orbital moment in the non-relativistic limit is exactly the Bohr magneton.
“If one construct a wave packet using only the positive energy states (the electron branch) of the Dirac Hamiltonian, its orbital moment in the non-relativistic limit is exactly the Bohr magneton (Sec. IX).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
Valley transport in systems with broken inversion symmetry is a very general phenomenon.
“As we can see, the valley transport in systems with broken inversion symmetry is a very general phenomenon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 20
Orbital moments in different valleys have opposite signs, as required by time-reversal symmetry.
“So orbital moments in different valleys have opposite signs, as required by time-reversal symmetry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16
When the Fermi energy is in the gap region, the intrinsic Hall conductivity reaches its maximum value of about -e^2/2h.
“As we can see, when the Fermi energy ε F is in the gap region, the Hall conductivity reaches its maximum value (about -e 2 / 2 h ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18
As ∆ goes to zero, the Berry curvature vanishes everywhere except at the Dirac points where it diverges.
“We remark that as ∆ goes to zero, the Berry curvature vanishes everywhere except at the Dirac points where it diverges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 23
In the case of only an electric field, Eq. (5.8a) reduces to the anomalous velocity formula (3.6) derived before.
“As we can see, in the case of only an electric field, Eq. (5.8a) reduces to the anomalous velocity formula (3.6) we derived before.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 23
The latter provides another route for the Berry phase to enter transport problems in inhomogeneous situations, which can be caused by a non-uniform distribution function, or a spatially-dependent perturbation, or both.
“The latter provides another route for the Berry phase to enter the transport problems in inhomogeneous situations, which can be caused by a non-uniform distribution function, or a spatially-dependent perturbation, or both.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Fermi volume · p. 24
The Fermi volume can be changed linearly by a magnetic field when the Berry curvature is nonzero.
“We show that the Fermi volume can be changed linearly by a magnetic field when the Berry curvature is nonzero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 23
The constant density of states guaranteed by Liouville's theorem is no longer the case for Berry-phase modified dynamics.
“From a classical point of view, the constant density of states is guaranteed by the Liouvilles theorem, which states that the volume element is a conserved quantity during the time evolution of the system. 7 However, as we shall show below, this is no longer the case for the Berry-phase modified dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2. Streda Formula · p. 24
The thermodynamic argument justifying the Streda relation is valid only for insulators because in metals the adiabaticity would break down.
“Note that this argument is valid only for insulators because in metals the adiabaticity would break down.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22
The intrinsic contribution has been verified in CuCr2Se4-xBrx (Lee et al., 2004a,b), La1-xSrxCoO3 (Miyasato et al., 2007), Nd2Mo2O7 and Sm2Mo2O7 (Hanasaki et al., 2008), and Ga1-xMnx (Pu et al., 2008).
“The intrinsic contribution has been verified in CuCr 2 Se 4 -x Br x (Lee et al. , 2004a,b), La 1 -x Sr x CoO 3 (Miyasato et al. , 2007), Nd 2 Mo 2 O 7 and Sm 2 Mo 2 O 7 (Hanasaki et al. , 2008), Ga 1 -x Mn x (Pu et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2004a,b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Miyasato et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hanasaki et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Equations of motion · p. 23
The wave packet dynamics can be obtained from the time-dependent variational principles (Kramer and Saraceno, 1981).
“The wave packet dynamics can be obtained from the time-dependent variational principles (Kramer and Saraceno, 1981).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kramer and Saraceno, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20
A scalar potential V(r) will induce a transverse velocity of the form Eq. (4.10).
“Therefore, in general a scalar potential V ( r ) will induce a transverse velocity of the following form”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 24
Because the Berry curvature is generally k-dependent and the magnetic field is r-dependent, the phase-space volume ΔV changes during time evolution of the state variables (r,k).
“The fact that the Berry curvature is generally k -dependent and the magnetic fields is r -dependent implies that the phase-space volume ∆ V changes during time evolution of the state variables ( r , k ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 23
The Lagrangian is given by Eq. (5.6), where ε_M(k) = ε_0(k) - B·m(k), with ε_0(k) being the unperturbed band energy.
“Using Eq. (4.5), we find the Langragian is given by, up to some unimportant total time-derivative terms (dropping the subscript c on r c and k c ),”
- Also stated in: § A. Equations of motion · p. 23 · plain
“where ε M ( k ) = ε 0 ( k ) -B · m ( k ) with ε 0 ( k ) being the unperturbed band energy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A. Equations of motion · p. 23 · plain
- Interpretationreasoning§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22
Measurement of anomalous thermoelectric transport, such as the anomalous Nernst effect, can give further insight into the intrinsic mechanism of the anomalous Hall effect.
“Hence, the measurement of this type of transport, such as the anomalous Nernst effect, can give further insight of the intrinsic mechanism of the anomalous Hall effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Fermi volume · p. 24
For band insulators with a nonzero integral of the Berry curvature (Chern number), discontinuous behavior of physical properties in a magnetic field is expected.
“Discontinuous behavior of physical properties in a magnetic field is therefore expected for band insulators with a nonzero integral of the Berry curvatures (Chern numbers).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Streda Formula · p. 24
Streda (1982) derived a formula relating the Hall conductivity to the field derivative of the electron density at a fixed chemical potential.
“In the context of the quantum Hall effect, Streda (1982) derived a formula relating the Hall conductivity to the field derivative of the electron density at a fixed chemical potential”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Streda (1982)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20
The velocity formula should stay the same whether the electric field enters through a time-dependent vector potential or through the gradient of the electrostatic potential, because it should be gauge invariant.
“In both cases, the velocity formula should stay the same because it should be gauge invariant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21
L11xy is proportional to the well-known anomalous Hall conductivity.
“This is proportional to the well-known anomalous Hall conductivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: We assume ∇µ = 0 and ∇T = 0.
- Interpretationreasoning§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22
The correct description of anomalous thermoelectric transport in ferromagnets requires knowledge of both the magnetic moment and orbital magnetization.
“It turns out the correct description of anomalous thermoelectric transport in ferromagnets requires the knowledge of both the magnetic moment and orbital magnetization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Dipole moment · p. 22
The time derivative of the spin dipole contributes to the total spin current (Culcer et al., 2004).
“The time derivative of the spin dipole contributes to the total spin current (Culcer et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Culcer et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Cyclotron period · p. 26
The paper recovered the usual expression for the cyclotron period, with the 2D electron density defined with the modified density of states.
“We thus recovered the usual expression for the cyclotron period, with the 2D electron density, Eq. (5.29), defined with the modified density of states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29
The dislocation situation is similar to the Aharonov-Bohm effect, with the dislocation playing the role of the solenoid and the Berry curvature Ω_rr the role of the magnetic field.
“What we have here is a situation similar to the Aharonov-Bohm effect (Aharonov and Bohm, 1959), with the dislocation playing the role of the solenoid, and the Berry curvature Ω rr the role of the magnetic field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aharonov and Bohm, 1959
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
The agreement between calculated and numerical electron density confirms the Berry-phase modification to the density of states.
“which confirms the Berry-phase modification to the density of states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
The electron density of states is modified by the Berry curvature.
“The electron density of states is also modified by the Berry curvature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
If the Berry curvature vanishes, the density of states is constant.
“The density of states is a constant in this case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
In the time-dependent case, the density of states D(r,q) has the same form as in the time-independent case.
“One can show that in the time-dependent case D ( r , q ) has the same form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28
The Berry curvature between r and q can be realized in deformed crystals as a quantity proportional to the strain and the electronic mass renormalization in the crystal (Sundaram and Niu, 1999).
“Finally, the Berry curvature between r and q can be realized in deformed crystals as a quantity proportional to the strain and the electronic mass renormalization in the crystal (Sundaram and Niu, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sundaram and Niu, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29
Bird and Preston (1988) showed that this Berry phase can affect the electron diffraction pattern of a deformed crystal.
“Bird and Preston (1988) showed that this Berry phase can affect the electron diffraction pattern of a deformed crystal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bird and Preston (1988)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29
The formalism is applicable to dislocation strain fields, which are well defined except in a region of a few atomic spacings around the dislocation line.
“The above formalism is also applicable to dislocation strain fields, which are well defined except in a region of a few atomic spacings around the lin of dislocation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
To first order in the spatial gradient, the density of states is given by Eq. (6.16).
“In many situations we are aiming at a first-order calculation in the spatial gradient. In this case, the density of states given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30
Due to the loss of tracking of λ, there is an uncertain quantum which is the second Chern number.
“Again, due to the loss of tracking of λ , there is an uncertain quantum which is the second Chern number.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30
The adiabatic current induced by inhomogeneity is explicitly proportional to the spatial gradient.
“We can see that this current is explicitly proportional to the spatial gradient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28
The physics of quantum adiabatic transport and the quantum and anomalous Hall effect can be described from a unified point of view.
“The physics of quantum adiabatic transport and the quantum and anomalous Hall effect can be described from a unified point of view.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 26
In the low field limit (ω_c τ ≪ 1), the Berry phase induces a linear magnetoresistance.
“Next we consider the magnetotransport at the low field limit, i.e., ω c τ ≪ 1. In particular, we show that the Berry phase induce a linear magnetoresistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28
The Berry curvature Ω_rt plays a role like the electric force.
“The Berry curvature Ω r t plays a role like the electric force.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Magnetic field induced polarization · p. 31
The magnetic-field-induced polarization implies an electromagnetic coupling of the form Eq. (6.35).
“such a magnetic-field-induced polarization implies that there is an electromagnetic coupling of the form”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27
If Ω(k) is smooth and W_kk' is localized, the relaxation time can be approximated by Eq. (5.40).
“If we assume Ω ( k ) is smooth and W kk ′ is localized, the relaxation time can be approximated by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Ω(k) is smooth and W_kk' is localized.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Magnetic field induced polarization · p. 31
When θ = π, the corresponding insulator is known as a 3D Z2 topological insulator.
“When θ = π , the corresponding insulator is known as a 3D Z 2 topological insualtor (Qi et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Qi et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30
For a two-dimensional minimal model with h(r) having two components and H[λh(r)], the polarization can be written as Eq. (6.32).
“Consider a twodimensional minimal model with h ( r ) having two components. If we write H [ h ( r ); λ ] as H [ λ h ( r )], i.e., λ acts like a switch, the polarization can be written as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
A domain wall in the dimerization profile is known to carry fractional charge.
“Such a domain wall is known to carry fractional charge (Rice and Mele, 1982; Su et al. , 1979).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rice and Mele, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Su et al., 1979
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29
In the free electron limit (V→0), the deformation-induced gradient correction quantity vanishes.
“Note that in the free electron limit ( V → 0) this quantity vanishes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
Non-canonical variables are a common feature of Berry-phase participated dynamics.
“The non-canonical variables is a common feature of Berry-phase participated dynamics (Littlejohn and Flynn, 1991).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Littlejohn and Flynn, 1991
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30
Xiao et al. (2007a) showed that the first-order contribution to polarization can be classified into a perturbative contribution due to wavefunction correction and a topological contribution from electron dynamics.
“Xiao et al. (2007a) showed that the first order contribution to the polarization can be classified into two categories: the perturbative contribution due to the correction to the wave function, and the topological contribution which is from the dynamics of the electrons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xiao et al. (2007a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28
If the perturbation is an electromagnetic field, the density of states equation (6.15) reduces to equation (5.13) under the substitution k = q + eA(r).
“If the perturbation is electromagnetic field, by the variable substitution k = q + e A ( r ), Eq. (6.15) reduces to Eq. (5.13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30
If the order parameter has period l_y in the y-direction, the polarization quantum in the x-direction is given by Eq. (6.31).
“If we assume the order parameter has period l y in the y -direction, the polarization quantum in the x -direction is given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The order parameter has period l_y in the y-direction.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Magnetic field induced polarization · p. 31
Essin et al. (2008) considered the polarization induced by a magnetic field, which can be regarded as arising from a spatial inhomogeneity in the vector potential A(r).
“Using the above formalism, Essin et al. (2008) considered the polarization induced by a magnetic field, which can be regarded as arising from a spatial inhomogeneity in the vector potential A ( r ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Essin et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32
Under a weak uniform electric field E, according to the semiclassical equations of motion, the quasi-momentum of an electron wavepacket is given by Eq. (7.4).
“Under a weak uniform electric field E , according to the semiclassical equations of motion, the quasi-momentum of an electron wavepacket is simply (see Eq. (5.8))”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33
Before applying a magnetic field, the energy dispersion near the Dirac point in graphene is linear, E(k) = hbar v_F k.
“Before applying a magnetic field, the energy dispersion near the Dirac point is linear, E ( k ) = ¯ hv F k .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34
The center-of-mass variables r_c and k_c in the semiclassical dynamics in Eq. (5.8) are not canonical variables since their Poisson brackets are not of the canonical form.
“For example, the center-ofmass variables r c and k c in the semiclassical dynamics in Eq. (5.8) are not canonical variables since their Poisson brackets are not of the canonical form (Duval et al. , 2006a; Xiao et al. , 2005),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Duval et al., 2006a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xiao et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32
For a simple one-dimensional lattice with inversion symmetry, the Berry phase Γ_Cm can only have two values, 0 or π.
“For a simple one-dimensional lattice with inversion symmetry, the Berry phase Γ C m can only have two values, 0 or π (Zak, 1989b), as discussed earlier in Sec. II.C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zak, 1989b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32
Due to the Berry phase, the average positions are displaced from the positive ions located at am.
“Due to the Berry phase, they are displaced from the positive ions located at am .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32
The average positions 〈r_c〉_m are the average positions of the Wannier function.
“Such average positions 〈 r c 〉 m are the average positions of the Wannier function (Vanderbilt and King-Smith, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vanderbilt and King-Smith, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31
For a moving domain wall in a thin magnetic wire, the Berry curvature Ω_rt will induce an electromotive force, resulting in a voltage difference between the two ends.
“On the other hand, for a moving domain wall in a thin magnetic wire, the Berry curvature Ω rt will induce an electromotive force, which results in a voltage difference between the two ends.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32
The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization method may give inconsistent quantization rules because choices of conjugate variables are not unique.
“However, since the choices of conjugate variables are not unique, the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization method may give inconsistent quantization rules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32
The problem can be fixed by using integrals over closed loops in phase space with integer m_i and Maslov indices ν_i (EBK quantization).
“This problem can be fixed if, instead of Eq. (7.1), one uses the following integrals,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tabor, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33
If the energy dispersion near a degenerate point is linear, then the cyclotron orbit will acquire a Berry phase Γ_C = π, independent of the shape of the orbit.
“It is known that, if the energy dispersion near a degenerate point is linear, then the cyclotron orbit will acquire a Berry phase Γ C = π , independent of the shape of the orbit (Blount, 1962b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blount, 1962b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31
According to Eqs. (6.9), this Berry curvature field acts on the electrons as an effective magnetic field.
“According to Eqs. (6.9), this field acts on the electrons as an effective magnetic field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33
The experimental observation of a quantum Hall plateau at zero energy is a direct consequence of the Berry phase.
“The experimental observation of a quantum Hall plateau at zero energy is thus a direct consequence of the Berry phase (Novoselov et al. , 2005, 2006; Zhang et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Novoselov et al., 2005, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32
Bloch oscillation is not commonly observed in laboratory because in a usual solid the electron scattering time is shorter than the period T_B by several orders of magnitude, destroying phase coherence within a tiny fraction of a period.
“Second, the fascinating phenomenon of Bloch oscillation is not commonly observed in laboratory for the following reason: In an usual solid, the electron scattering time is shorter than the period T B by several orders of magnitude. Therefore, the phase coherence of the electron is destroyed within a tiny fraction of a period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31
This Berry curvature induced emf has been experimentally measured recently.
“This Berry curvature induced emf has has been experimentally measured recently (Yang et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33
The orbit in k-space can be obtained by re-scaling the r-space orbit in Eq. (7.9) with a linear factor of λ_B^2, followed by a rotation of ninety degrees, where λ_B = sqrt(hbar/eB).
“The orbit in k -space can be obtained by re-scaling the r -space orbit in Eq. (7.9) with a linear factor of λ 2 B , followed by a rotation of ninety degrees, where λ B ≡ √ ¯ h/eB is the magnetic length (Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33
With the semiclassical equation, the Bohr-Sommerfeld condition in Eq. (7.3) can be written as Eq. (7.9) with ν=2.
“the Bohr-Sommerfeld condition in Eq. (7.3) can be written as (notice that ¯ h q c = ¯ h k c -e A , and ν = 2),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32
In the wavepacket formulation of Bloch electrons, both r_c and q_c are treated as generalized coordinates, and their conjugate momenta are hbar q_c and hbar A respectively.
“In the wavepacket formulation of Bloch electrons, both r c and q c are treated as generalized coordinates. With the Lagrangian in Eq. (5.7), one can find their conjugate momenta ∂L/∂ ˙ r c and ∂L/∂ ˙ q c , which are equal to ¯ h q c and ¯ h 〈 u | i∂u/∂ q c 〉 = ¯ h A respectively (Sundaram and Niu, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sundaram and Niu, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31
For a ferromagnetic thin film described by Hamiltonian Eq. (6.36), the simple momentum-dependence dictates that all k-dependent Berry curvatures vanish.
“The simple momentum-dependence of the Hamiltonian dictates that all k -dependent Berry curvatures vanish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33
An orbit C in k-space lies on the intersection of a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field and the constant-energy surface.
“From Eq. (5.25b), it is not difficult to see that an orbit C in k -space lies on the intersection of a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field and the constant-energy surface (Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ VII. QUANTIZATION OF ELECTRON DYNAMICS · p. 31
Knowledge of the Bloch energy, the Berry curvature, and the magnetic moment in the semiclassical theory constitutes sufficient information for building the re-quantized theory.
“It will become clear that, the knowledge of the Bloch energy, the Berry curvature, and the magnetic moment in the semiclassical theory constitute sufficient information for building the re-quantized theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32
The value of the Maslov index is not always evident in the Bohr-Sommerfeld method.
“First, the value of the Maslov index is not always evident.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31
The Berry curvature Ω_rr will drive a Hall current, just like the ordinary Hall effect.
“The Berry curvature Ω rr will drive a Hall current, just like the ordinary Hall effect (Bruno et al. , 2004; Ye et al. , 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bruno et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ye et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33
When a uniform B field is applied to a solid, the electron executes a cyclotron motion in both r-space and k-space.
“When an uniform B fi eld is applied to a solid, the electron would execute a cyclotron motion in both the r -space and the k -space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31
In magnetic materials with domain walls or spin textures, Berry curvatures originate only from the nontrivial real space configuration of the system.
“In this subsection we discuss the Berry curvatures which originate only from the nontrivial real space configuration of the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31
Ω_rt acts on the electrons as an effective electric field.
“Similarly, Ω r t acts on the electrons as an effective electric field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
The hyperorbit motion can be quantized using the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule.
“Similar to the cyclotron orbit, the hyperorbit motion can also be quantized using the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule (see Eq. (7.3)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
This rule can be derived with the help of the magnetic translation symmetry.
“This rule can be derived with the help of the magnetic translation symmetry (Dana et al. , 1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dana et al., 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
The states on opposite sides of the MBZ boundaries represent the same physical state.
“The states on opposite sides of the MBZ boundaries represent the same physical state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
Therefore, states on opposite sides of the MBZ boundaries can only differ by a phase factor.
“Therefore, they can only differ by a phase factor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
Therefore, there is no cyclotron motion of k even though there is a magnetic field B0.
“Therefore, there is no cyclotron motion of k (even though there is a magnetic field B 0 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
The semiclassical equations of motion valid under the one-band approximation have exactly the same form as Eq. (5.8), with hbar k, E0(k), and B reinterpreted as the magnetic momentum, magnetic band energy, and extra magnetic field δB respectively.
“The semiclassical equations of motion that is valid under the one-band approximation have exactly the same form as Eq. (5.8). One simply needs to reinterpret ¯ h k , E 0 ( k ), and B in Eq. (5.8) as the magnetic momentum, the magnetic band energy, and the extra magnetic field δ B respectively (Chang and Niu, 1995, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 1995, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
According to Laughlin's gauge-invariance argument, each isolated magnetic Bloch band carries a quantized Hall conductivity.
“According to Laughlin's gauge-invariance argument (Laughlin, 1981), each of the isolated magnetic Bloch band carries a quantized Hall conductivity (see Sec. II.B and Sec. III.C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laughlin, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
The extra vector potential ∇f can be removed by a gauge transformation Eq. (8.4).
“The extra vector potential ∇ f can be removed by a gauge transformation,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
The same cannot be true for the k2 boundaries, otherwise the topology will be too trivial to accommodate the quantum Hall conductivity.
“The same cannot also be true for the k 2 boundaries, otherwise the topology will be too trivial to accommodate the quantum Hall conductivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
The phase has to be non-integrable in order to account for the Hall conductivity.
“For one thing, the phase has to be non-integrable in order to account for the Hall conductivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34
The Bloch energy, Berry curvature, and orbital moment of the semiclassical theory contain sufficient information for building a quantum theory that accounts for all physical effects to first order in external fields.
“Second, the Bloch energy, Berry curvature, and orbital moment of the semiclassical theory contains sufficient information for building a quantum theory that accounts for all physical effects to first order in external fields.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 37
This equation determines the Hall conductivity (mod q) of a magnetic Bloch band.
“This equation determines the Hall conductivity (mod q ) of a MBB (Dana et al. , 1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dana et al., 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
The quantized Hall conductivity is closely related to the nontrivial topological property of the magnetic Bloch state.
“This is closely related to the nontrivial topological property of the magnetic Bloch state (Kohmoto, 1985; Morandi, 1988).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kohmoto, 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Morandi, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
The distribution of Hall conductivities among the split subbands follows a simple rule first discovered by Thouless et al. (1982).
“Furthermore, the distribution of Hall conductivities among the split subbands follows a very simple rule first discovered by Thouless et al. (1982) et al .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thouless et al. (1982)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
When the lattice potential is much stronger than the magnetic field, if each plaquette encloses a magnetic flux (p/q)φ0, then each Bloch band splits to q subbands.
“It was found that, if each plaquette encloses a magnetic flux ( p/q ) φ 0 , then each Bloch band would split to q subbands (Hatsugai and Kohmoto, 1990; Kohmoto, 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hatsugai and Kohmoto, 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kohmoto, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34
When both B and Ω are nonzero, applying both Peierls substitutions simultaneously is not enough to produce the correct commutation relations, mainly because of the non-trivial factor κ.
“When both B and Ω are nonzero, applying both of the Peierls substitutions simultaneously is not enough to produce the correct commutation relations, mainly because of the non-trivial factor κ there.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
Because of the vector potential, the Hamiltonian H no longer has the lattice translation symmetry.
“Because of the vector potential, the Hamiltonian H above no longer has the lattice translation symmetry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
Since the lattice symmetry of the charge density is not broken by a uniform magnetic field, one should be able to define translation operators that differ from the usual ones only by phase factors.
“However, since the lattice symmetry of the charge density is not broken by an uniform magnetic field, one should be able to define translation operators that differ from the usual ones only by phase factors (Lifshitz and Landau, 1980).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lifshitz and Landau, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 37
In order for the integral (1/2π)∮∂MBZ dk·A(k) to be the Hall conductivity σ_H (in units of h/e^2), the integer in Eq. (8.16) has to be equal to σ_H.
“In order for the integral (1 / 2 π ) ∮ ∂ MBZ d k · A ( k ) (which is nonzero only along the upper horizontal boundary) to be the Hall conductivity σ H (in units of h/e 2 ), the integer in Eq. (8.16) obviously has to be equal to σ H .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
The operator T_a defined as the magnetic translated state has the property [H,T_a]=0.
“The operator T a being defined this way has the desired property that [ H,T a ]=0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35
The non-commutativity of magnetic translations is a result of the Aharonov-Bohm phase.
“That is, the non-commutativity is a result of the Aharonov-Bohm phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36
If the magnetic field is much stronger than the lattice potential, and each plaquette has a magnetic flux φ=(p/q)φ0, then after turning on the lattice potential each Landau level splits to p subbands.
“In this case, if each plaquette has a magnetic flux φ = ( p/q ) φ 0 , then after turning on the lattice potential, each LL will split to p subbands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39
The term in the spin dynamics proportional to the Berry connection is in fact the spin-orbit coupling.
“Later we will see that it is in fact the spin-orbit coupling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ IX. NON-ABELIAN FORMULATION · p. 39
The semiclassical electron dynamics with an Abelian Berry curvature can be extended to cases where the energy bands are degenerate or nearly degenerate (e.g., due to spin).
“Such a formalism can be extended to the cases where the energy bands are degenerate or nearly degenerate (eg., due to spin) (Culcer et al. , 2005; Shindou and Imura, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Culcer et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shindou and Imura, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
In addition to the Berry curvature, impurity scattering is another source of the extrinsic SHE.
“In addition to the Berry curvature, impurity scattering is another source of the (extrinsic) SHE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
For the non-Abelian case, the Berry curvature F is often proportional to the spin S.
“For the non-Abelian case, the Berry curvature F is often proportional to the spin S (see Secs. VIII.C and IX.E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
Both the distribution of the σ_r's and the pattern of splitting can be determined entirely within the semiclassical formulation.
“Therefore, both the distribution of the σ r 's and the pattern of splitting can be determined entirely within the semiclassical formulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39
Because of the spinor degree of freedom, the Berry curvature and magnetic moment become vector-valued matrices instead of usual vectors.
“However, because of the spinor degree of freedom, the latter two become vector-valued matrices, instead of the usual vectors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
This is the source of the intrinsic spin Hall effect (SHE) in semiconductors predicted by Murakami et al. (2003).
“This is the source of the intrinsic spin Hall effect (SHE) in semiconductors predicted by Murakami et al. (2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakami et al. (2003)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
Intrinsic SHE has also been theoretically predicted in metals.
“Indeed, intrinsic SHE has also been theoretically predicted in metals (Guo et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guo et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
Because the MBZ is q-fold degenerate, the number of energy levels produced by these hyperorbits is given by Eq. (8.26).
“Because the MBZ is q -fold degenerate (see Sec. VIII.A), the number of energy levels produced by these hyperorbits are (Chang and Niu, 1995)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
Since the total number of hyperorbits in the parent band can be determined by the quantization rule, one can pin down the value of σ_open_r with the help of the sum rule σ_parent_H = ∑_r σ_r.
“However, since the total number of hyperorbits in the parent band can be determined by the quantization rule, we can easily pin down the value of σ open r with the help of the sum rule: σ parent H = ∑ r σ r .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
The trajectories of spin-up and spin-down electrons are parted toward opposite directions transverse to the electric field.
“That is, the trajectories of spin-up and spin-down electrons are parted toward opposite directions transverse to the electric field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
This is the same skew scattering (or Mott scattering) in AHE.
“This is the same skew scattering (or Mott scattering) in AHE (see Sec. III.D.1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ IX. NON-ABELIAN FORMULATION · p. 39
Because degenerate Bloch states have multiple components, the Berry curvature becomes a matrix with non-Abelian gauge structure.
“Because the degenerate Bloch states have multiple components, the Berry curvature becomes a matrix with non-Abelian gauge structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39
If the wavepacket is narrowly distributed around q_c, it is possible to write the magnetic moment as the spinor average of M.
“If the wavepacket is narrowly distributed around q c , then it is possible to write it as the spinor average of the following quantity (Culcer et al. , 2005),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Culcer et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
If tunnelling between degenerate hyperorbits is taken into account, each energy level will be broadened into an energy band.
“If one further takes the tunnelling between degenerate hyperorbits into account (Wilkinson, 1984a), then each energy level will be broadened into an energy band.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilkinson, 1984a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
As a result, the frequency of the hyperorbit motion can be very low.
“As a result, the frequency of the hyperorbit motion can be very low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37
It is possible to detect the hyperorbit using resonant absorption of ultrasonic wave or conductance oscillation in an electron focusing device.
“Nevertheless, it is possible to detect the hyperorbit using, for example, resonant absorption of ultrasonic wave or the conductance oscillation in an electron focusing device.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
There can be a net transverse current if the populations of spin-up and spin-down electrons are different, such as in a ferromagnet.
“There can be a net transverse current if the populations of spin-up and spin-down electrons are different, such as the case in a ferromagnet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
According to Laughlin's argument, each isolated subband should have its own integer Hall conductivity.
“According to Laughlin's argument, each of the isolated subband should have its own integer Hall conductivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laughlin, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
The spin Hall current can still be nonzero.
“However, the spin Hall current can still be nonzero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39
R and F have the same structure as the gauge potential and gauge field in the non-Abelian SU(2) gauge theory.
“Here, R and F also have the same structure as the gauge potential and gauge field in the non-Abelian SU (2) gauge theory (Wilczek and Zee, 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilczek and Zee, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
This leads to the anomalous Hall effect.
“This then leads to the anomalous Hall effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
Such a projection of the Hilbert space almost always generates a Berry curvature.
“As we shall see in Sec. IX.E, such a projection of the Hilbert space almost always generates a Berry curvature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
Therefore, the SHE should be common in semiconductors or other materials.
“Therefore, the SHE should be common in semiconductors or other materials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
Because of its open trajectory, the above analysis fails for the nesting orbit since the first term in Eq. (8.27) also contributes to the Hall conductivity.
“Because of its open trajectory, the above analysis fails for the nesting orbit since the first term in Eq. (8.27) also contributes to the Hall conductivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38
As a result of band splitting, the integer Hall conductivity σ_H of the parent band is split to a distribution of integers σ_r (there are q of them).
“That is, as a result of band splitting, the integer Hall conductivity σ H of the parent band is split to a distribution of integers σ r (there are q of them).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
If F is proportional to S, then in the presence of an electric field, the anomalous velocity is proportional to E × S.
“If this is true, then in the presence of an electric field, the anomalous velocity is proportional to E × S .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40
If the populations of different spins are equal, the net electric Hall current is zero.
“If the populations of different spins are equal, then the net electric Hall current is zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
The projection from the full space with eight bands to the HH-LH complex of four bands generates a Berry curvature F_p = -(2 V^2 / 3 E_g^2) J, where J is the spin-3/2 matrix.
“The projection from the full space with eight bands to the HH-LH complex of four bands generates a Berry curvature F p = -(2 V 2 / 3 E 2 g ) J (Chang and Niu, 2008), where J is the spin-3/2 matrix.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ D. Dirac electron · p. 41
Because of the huge gap between branches, interbranch tunnelling happens (and the semiclassical theory fails) only if the field is so strong that electron-positron pair-production can no longer be ignored.
“Furthermore, because of the huge gap between branches, interbranch tunnelling happens (and the semiclassical theory fails) only if the field is so strong that electron-positron pair-production can no longer be ignored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Dirac electron · p. 41
In this case, even the lattice potential in a solid can be considered as a semiclassical perturbation.
“In this case, even the lattice potential in a solid can be considered as a semiclassical perturbation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40
The canonical variables r and p accurate to linear order of the fields are related to the center-of-mass variables as given by Eq. (9.11).
“The canonical variables r and p accurate to linear order of the fields are related to the center-of-mass variables as follows (Chang and Niu, 2008),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ E. Semiconductor electron · p. 42
The dipole term e E · R yields a spin-orbit coupling whose coefficient α and form are the same as the Rashba coupling.
“The coefficient α and the form of the spin-orbit coupling are the same as the Rashba coupling (Bychkov and Rashba, 1984; Rashba, 1960).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bychkov and Rashba, 1984; Rashba, 1960
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
For both the Dirac electron and the semiconductor electron, the dipole term is closely related to the spin-orbit coupling.
“Although the exact form of the Berry connection R depends on the physical model, we will show that for both the Dirac electron (IX.D) and the semiconductor electron (IX.E), the dipole term is closely related to the spin-orbit coupling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ E. Semiconductor electron · p. 42
The wavepacket in the conduction band spontaneously rotates with respect to its own center of mass.
“The wavepacket in the conduction band also spontaneously rotates with respect to its own center of mass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43
The effective Hamiltonian alone is not enough for correct prediction if the physical variables have not been identified properly.
“The effective Hamiltonian itself is not enough for correct prediction, if the physical variables have not been identified properly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
If one chooses the eight bands as the full space, the Berry curvatures of the heavy hole and the light hole get new contributions from P F_p P.
“Instead of the HH-LH complex, if one chooses the eight bands in Fig. 15 as the full space, then the Berry curvatures of the heavy hole and the light hole will get new contributions from P F p P .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
Starting from theory II instead of theory I as the parent theory would introduce errors P F_p P and P M_p P.
“This means that starting from theory II, instead of theory I, as the parent theory, one would have the errors P F p P and P M p P .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
Therefore, the effective quantum theory can be smooth globally.
“Therefore, the effective quantum theory can be smooth globally.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43
The Pauli Hamiltonian can be obtained from blockdiagonalizing the Dirac Hamiltonian using a unitary transformation.
“The Pauli Hamiltonian can also be obtained from blockdiagonalizing the Dirac Hamiltonian using an unitary transformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foldy and Wouthuysen, 1950
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43
The discrepancy between the two transverse velocities can be traced to the difference between the two position variables r_c and r.
“The source of this discrepancy can be traced back to the difference between the two position variables: r c and r (see Eq. (9.11)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ D. Dirac electron · p. 41
The two branches are separated by a huge energy gap mc^2.
“This two branches are separated by a huge energy gap mc 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
The Berry curvature and magnetic moment for theory III when starting from the parent space (F′ and M′) differ from F and M because they are obtained from summations with more outside states from the full space.
“They are different from F and M since the former are obtained from the summations with more outside states from the full space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
If one starts from the parent space, the Berry curvature and the magnetic moment for theory II are zero.
“On the other hand, if one starts from the parent space, then the Berry curvature and the magnetic moment for theory II is zero (instead of F p and M p ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43
The equation for ̇r_c should be regarded as the correct one because it is based on the Dirac theory.
“One should regard the equation for ˙ r c as the correct one since it is based on the Dirac theory (also see Bliokh (2005)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bliokh (2005)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 43
The Berry curvature and magnetic moment matrices for theory II and theory III have different ranks because the parent space and the wavepacket space have different dimensions.
“These two sets of matrices have different ranks since the parent space and the wavepacket space have different dimensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44
The side jump of the electromagnetic wave and the electron can be unified using similar dynamical equations.
“In fact, the side jump of the electromagnetic wave and the electron can be unified using similar dynamical equations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43
Since the basis of states has been rotated in the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation, the explicit representations of all observables should be changed.
“Since the basis of states has been rotated, the explicit representations of all of the observables should be changed as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
After further projections, additional anomalous velocities (eV^2/E_g^2) E × σ and (eV^2/3E_g^2) E × σ are obtained for HH and LH respectively.
“Therefore, after further projections, we would get additional anomalous velocities ( eV 2 /E 2 g ) E × σ and ( eV 2 / 3 E 2 g ) E × σ for HH and LH respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ E. Semiconductor electron · p. 43
In the wavepacket formulation, the correction δg to the g-factor originates from the electron's rotating motion.
“In the wavepacket formulation, we see that δg is indeed originated from the electron's rotating motion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
The heavy hole (or the light hole) acquires a non-zero Berry curvature as a result of the projection from the parent space to the HH band (or the LH band).
“The heavy hole (or the light hole) acquires a non-zero Berry curvature as a result of the projection from this parent space to the HH band (or the LH band).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakami et al. (2003, 2004)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ D. Dirac electron · p. 41
The energy spectrum of H0 has a positive-energy branch and a negative-energy branch, each with two-fold degeneracy due to spin.
“The energy spectrum of H 0 has positive-energy branch and negativeenergy branch, each with two-fold degeneracy due to the spin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43
The r_c in Eq. (9.11) can be obtained by a Foldy-Wouthuysen rotation followed by a projection to the positive-energy subspace.
“For example, the r c in Eq. (9.11) can be obtained by a FW rotation, followed by a projection to the positive-energy subspace (Foldy and Wouthuysen, 1950).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foldy and Wouthuysen, 1950
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
In such a non-trivial topological situation, one has to work with patches of the Brillouin zone for a single canonical quantum theory.
“In such a non-trivial topological situation, one has to work with patches of the Brillouin zone for a single canonical quantum theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41
Such gauge dependence has prevented one from assigning a clear physical significance to the Yafet term.
“Such gauge dependence has prevented one from assigning a clear physical significance to the Yafet term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Dirac electron · p. 41
Therefore, the adiabatic condition on the external electromagnetic field can be easily satisfied: the spatial variation of the potential only needs to be much smoother than λ_c.
“Therefore, the adiabatic condition on the external electromagnetic field can be easily satisfied: the spatial variation of the potential only needs to be much smoother than λ c .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44
The Berry curvature is responsible for a transverse shift (side jump) of the light beam reflecting off an interface.
“The Berry curvature is responsible for a transverse shift (side jump) of the light beam reflecting off an interface (Onoda et al. , 2004a, 2006a; Sawada and Nagaosa, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Onoda et al., 2004a, 2006a; Sawada and Nagaosa, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
In Murakami et al.'s original proposal of the spin Hall effect of holes, the parent space is the HH-LH complex.
“For example, in Murakami et al. (2003, 2004)'s original proposal of the spin Hall effect of holes, the parent space is the HH-LH complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakami et al. (2003, 2004)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 43
The Berry curvature and the magnetic moment for theory I (the full space) are zero because there is no state outside the full space.
“From Eqs. (9.30) and (9.31), one sees that the Berry curvature and the magnetic moment for theory I are zero since there is no state outside the full space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Dirac electron · p. 41
Since the wavepacket is living on a branch with twofold degeneracy, the Berry connection and curvature are 2×2 matrices.
“Since the wavepacket is living on a branch with twofold degeneracy, the Berry connection and curvature are 2 × 2 matrices (Chang and Niu, 2008),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44
The equation of motion approach focused in this review has very general validity.
“This shows that the equation of motion approach being focused in this review has very general validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44
This Berry curvature gives rise to a spin-dependent transverse velocity e E × F′ that is crucial to the spin Hall effect.
“It gives rise to a spin-dependent transverse velocity e E × F ′ that is crucial to the spin Hall effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 146
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 98
- The quote only partly states this claim. 23
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 1. The Rice-Mele model · p. 12At half-filling, the Rice-Mele model is a metal for ∆=δ=0 and an insulator otherwise.
“At half-filling, the system is a metal for ∆ = δ = 0, and an insulator otherwise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone given§ 3. Adiabatic Pumping · p. 11The integrand in Eq. (2.22) can be thought as the Berry curvature Ω_X1X2 = -2 I〈∂_X1 u | ∂_X2 u〉 if the inner product of the state vector is identified with the matrix product.
“The integrand in Eq. (2.22) can be thought as the Berry curvature Ω X 1 X 2 = -2 ℑ〈 ∂ X 1 u | ∂ X 2 u 〉 if we identify the inner product of the state vector with the matrix product.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12The Wannier center position is defined only up to a lattice vector.
“The quantum uncertainty found in Eq. (2.29) is reflected by the fact that the Wannier center position is defined only up to a lattice vector.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ 1. The Rice-Mele model · p. 13In the Rice-Mele model, if the system adiabatically evolves along a loop enclosing the degeneracy point (0,0) in (∆,δ) space, the polarization changes by ea, corresponding to a quantized charge e pumped out after one cycle; if the loop does not contain the degeneracy point, the pumped charge is zero.
“On the other hand, if the loop does not contain the degeneracy point, then the pumped charge is zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3. Example: The two-level system · p. 7The Berry curvature integrated over a closed manifold is quantized in units of 2π and equals the net number of monopoles inside.
“In general, the Berry curvature integrated over a closed manifold is quantized in the units of 2 π and equals to the net number of monopoles inside.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37The magnetic quasi-momentum hbar k is a good quantum number with hbar kdot = 0.
“On the other hand, the magnetic quasi-momentum ¯ h k is a good quantum number with ¯ h ˙ k = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36Since the area of the MBZ is smaller by a factor of q, each magnetic Bloch band has N/q states, sharing the number of states of the original Bloch band equally.
“Since the area of the MBZ (and the number of states within) is smaller by a factor of q , each MBB has N/q states, sharing the number of states of the original Bloch band equally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingreasoning§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36The same does not apply to a MBZ.
“However, the same does not apply to a MBZ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36Between the two limits, when the magnetic field is neither very strong nor very weak, the band splitting does not follow a simple pattern.
“Between the two limits, when the magnetic field is neither very strong nor very weak, the band splitting does not follow a simple pattern.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35The translated states are not equivalent but have the same energy as ψ_nk because [H,T_a1]=0.
“These states are not equivalent, but have the same energy as ψ n k since [ H,T a 1 ] = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36When the field is tuned from weak to strong, the subbands split, merge, and interact in a complicated manner, such that in the end there are only p subbands in the strong-field limit.
“When the field is tuned from weak to strong, the subbands will split, merge, and interact with each other in a complicated manner, such that in the end there are only p subbands in the strong-field limit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38D_open_r can be calculated from Eq. (8.26) once σ_open_r is known.
“Furthermore, D open r can be calculated from Eq. (8.26) once σ open r is known.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39Equation (9.8) governs the dynamics of the spinor, from which one can derive the equation for the spin vector Jdot.
“Equation (9.8) governs the dynamics of the spinor, from which we can derive the equation for the spin vector ˙ J , where J = 〈 J 〉 , and J is the spin matrix,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39The spin dynamics in Eq. (9.10) is influenced by the Zeeman energy in H.
“The spin dynamics in Eq. (9.10) is influenced by the Zeeman energy in H , as it should be.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38The Hall current density for a filled magnetic band in a clean sample is given by Eq. (8.28).
“Therefore the Hall current density for a filled magnetic band in a clean sample is,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38If the areal electron density of a sample is ρ0, then after applying a flux φ=p/q per plaquette, the MBZ shrinks by q times and ρ=ρ0/q.
“If the areal electron density of a sample is ρ 0 , then after applying a flux φ = p/q per plaquette, the MBZ shrinks by q times and ρ = ρ 0 /q .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38The number of subbands split from a parent band that originated from a closed hyperorbit is given by Eq. (8.33).
“This is the number of subbands split from a parent band that is originated from a closed hyperorbit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38The Hall conductivity for a closed hyperorbit produced by δB_{r-1} ≡ δφ_{r-1}/a^2 is given by Eq. (8.32).
“As a result, the Hall conductivity for a closed hyperorbit produced by δB r -1 ≡ δφ r -1 /a 2 is (recall that ρ r = ρ 0 /q r ),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38The Hall conductivity and the number of splitting subbands are indeed integers.
“One can see that the Hall conductivity and the number of splitting subbands are indeed integers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 40The rdot equation is slightly more complicated: the derivative in the group velocity ∂E/∂k_c is replaced by the covariant derivative and the variables are now matrices in general.
“The ˙ r c -equation is slightly more complicated: The derivative in the group velocity ∂E/∂ k c is replaced by the covariant derivative and the variables are now matrices in general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 40The spinor-averaged Hamiltonian matrix is the wavepacket energy, E = <H>.
“The spinor-averaged Hamiltonian matrix is nothing but the wavepacket energy, E = 〈H〉 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40The Bohr-Sommerfeld procedure applies to the Abelian case and is limited to closed orbits in phase space.
“Such a procedure applies to the Abelian case and is limited to closed orbits in phase space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40The last terms in both equations can be neglected in some occasions; for example, they will not change the force and the velocity in Eqs. (9.6) and (9.7).
“The last terms in both equations can be neglected in some occasions. For example, they will not change the force and the velocity in Eqs. (9.6) and (9.7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43When an electric field is applied to a Dirac electron, the transverse velocity calculated from the Heisenberg equation of motion for the Pauli Hamiltonian is larger by a factor of two than that calculated from Eq. (9.7).
“That is, the transverse velocity is larger by a factor of two.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effective Pauli Hamiltonian is accurate for most low-energy applications in solid state.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40When expressed in the new variables, the semiclassical Hamiltonian in Eq. (9.9) can be written as Eq. (9.12).
“When expressed in the new variables, the semiclassical Hamiltonian in Eq. (9.9) can be written as,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40In the wavepacket theory, the variables r_c and k_c have very clear physical meaning, but they are not canonical variables.
“In the wavepacket theory, the variables r c and k c have very clear physical meaning, but they are not canonical variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ D. Dirac electron · p. 41The size of the wavepacket can be as small as the Compton wavelength λ_c = hbar/mc (but not smaller), which is two orders of magnitude smaller than the Bohr radius.
“The size of the wavepacket can be as small as the Compton wavelength λ c = ¯ h/mc (but not smaller), which is two orders of magnitude smaller than the Bohr radius.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 2The usual derivation of the anomalous velocity is based on linear response: the velocity operator has off-diagonal elements and the electric field mixes bands, so the expectation value of velocity acquires an additional term proportional to the field beyond the usual group velocity.
“The usual derivation of the anomalous velocity is based on a linear response analysis: the velocity operator has off-diagonal elements and electric field mixes the bands, so that the expectation value of the velocity acquires an additional term proportional to the field other than the usual group velocity in the original band (Adams and Blount, 1959; Blount, 1962b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Adams and Blount, 1959
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Blount, 1962b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 5The Berry curvature can be viewed as the magnetic field in the parameter space.
“The vector form gives us an intuitive picture of the Berry curvature: it can be viewed as the magnetic field in the parameter space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 2The anomalous velocity was first recognized in the mid and late 1990s as an effect of the Berry curvature intrinsic to each band, whose existence has nothing to do with the external field.
“The anomalous velocity were first recognized in mid and late 90s as an effect of the Berry curvature intrinsic to each of the bands, whose existence has really nothing to do with the external field (Chang and Niu, 1995, 1996; Sundaram and Niu, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 1995, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sundaram and Niu, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 3Electric polarization can be expressed in terms of the Berry phase across the entire Brillouin zone, linking it with adiabatic charge transport.
“A breakthrough on electric polarization were made in early 90s by linking it with the phenomenon of adiabatic charge transport and expressing it in terms of the Berry phase 1 across the entire Brillouin zone (King-Smith and Vanderbilt, 1993; Resta, 1992; Vanderbilt and King-Smith, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites King-Smith and Vanderbilt, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Resta, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vanderbilt and King-Smith, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6The Berry curvature summation formula can be evaluated under any gauge choice and is particularly useful for numerical calculations where a smooth phase choice is not guaranteed.
“The summation formula has the advantage that no differentiation on the wave function is involved, therefore it can be evaluated under any gauge choice. This property is particularly useful for numerical calculations, in which the condition of a smooth phase choice of the eigenstates is not guaranteed in standard diagonalization algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6The Berry curvature becomes singular if two energy levels are brought together at a certain value of R; this degeneracy point corresponds to a monopole in parameter space.
“Equation (1.13) also shows that Ω n µν ( R ) becomes singular if two energy levels ε n ( R ) and ε n ′ ( R ) are brought together at certain value of R . This degeneracy point corresponds to a monopole in the parameter space; an explicit example is given below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Topical overview · p. 3The Berry phase concept is essential for a coherent understanding of all the basic phenomena in solid state physics.
“the concept is essential for a coherent understanding of all the basic phenomena”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6The Berry curvature summation formula has been used to evaluate the Berry curvature in crystals with eigenfunctions supplied from first-principles calculations.
“It has been used to evaluate the Berry curvature in crystals with the eigenfunctions supplied from first-principles calculations (Fang et al. , 2003; Yao et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fang et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yao et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A. Topical overview · p. 3For integrable dynamics such as Bloch oscillations and cyclotron orbits, the Bohr-Sommerfeld or EKB quantization rule can be used, with the Berry phase entering as a shift to the classical action and affecting quantized level energies, e.g., Wannier-Stark ladders and Landau levels.
“For integrable dynamics, such as Bloch oscillations and cyclotron orbits, one can use the Bohr-Sommerfeld or EKB quantization rule. The Berry phase enters naturally as a shift to the classical action, affecting the energies of the quantized levels, e.g., the Wannier-Stark ladders and the Landau levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 1. Cyclic adiabatic evolution · p. 5The Berry phase depends only on the geometric aspect of the closed path and is independent of how R(t) varies in time.
“From the above definition, we can see that the Berry phase only depends on the geometric aspect of the closed path, and is independent of how R ( t ) varies in time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6The Berry curvature is a local quantity that provides a local description of the geometric properties of the parameter space.
“Compared to the Berry phase which is always associated with a closed path, the Berry curvature is truly a local quantity. It provides a local description of the geometric properties of the parameter space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 6If the energy levels are degenerate, the dynamics must be projected to a subspace spanned by those degenerate eigenstates, and non-Abelian Berry curvature naturally arises.
“However, if the energy levels are degenerate, then the dynamics must be projected to a subspace spanned by those degenerate eigenstates. Wilczek and Zee (1984) showed that in this situation non-Abelian Berry curvature naturally arises.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilczek and Zee (1984)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 2. Berry curvature · p. 5The Berry curvature is gauge invariant and observable.
“It can be verified from Eq. (1.11) that, unlike the Berry vector potential, the Berry curvature is gauge invariant and thus observable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ A. Topical overview · p. 2The vast majority of applications of the Berry phase concept are found in solid state physics.
“Not surprisingly, the vast majority of applications of the Berry phase concept are found here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A. Topical overview · p. 2The Berry phase is like the Aharonov-Bohm phase of a charged particle traversing a loop including a magnetic flux, while the Berry curvature is like the magnetic field.
“In primitive terms, the Berry phase is like the Aharonov-Bohm phase of a charge particle traversing a loop including a magnetic flux, while the Berry curvature is like the magnetic field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 2The Berry phase has close analogies to gauge field theories and differential geometry.
“Third, the Berry phase has close analogies to gauge field theories and differential geometry (Simon, 1983).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Simon, 1983
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 2The Berry phase is geometrical: it can be written as a line integral over the loop in parameter space and does not depend on the exact rate of change along the loop.
“Second, the Berry phase is geometrical. It can be written as a line-integral over the loop in the parameter space, and does not depend on the exact rate of change along the loop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ A. Topical overview · p. 3The traditional view cannot explain some basic effects to zeroth order of the fields: electric polarization and magnetization can exist in the absence of electric and magnetic fields in ferroelectric and ferromagnetic materials.
“Interestingly enough, the traditional view cannot even explain some basic effects to zeroth order of the fields. The two basic electromagnetic properties of solids as a medium are the electric polarization and magnetization, which can exist in the absence of electric and magnetic fields in ferroelectric and ferromagnetic materials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Topical overview · p. 2The anomalous velocity's existence was predicted in the early 1950s and its experimental relevance was established only recently.
“The anomalous velocity is a prime example, whose existence were predicted in the early 50s (Karplus and Luttinger, 1954) and whose experimental relevance were established only recently (Lee et al. , 2004a,b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Karplus and Luttinger, 1954
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lee et al., 2004a,b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A. Topical overview · p. 3The classic definitions of electric polarization and magnetization based on bound charges and currents are inadequate for the electronic contribution, and polarization and orbital magnetization cannot be determined from charge and current densities in the bulk of a crystal.
“Their classic definition were based on the picture of bound charges and currents, but these are clearly inadequate for the electronic contribution and it was known that the polarization and orbital magnetization cannot be determined from the charge and current densities in the bulk of a crystal at all.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12The polarization defined above is a bulk quantity because it is given by the Berry phase of the ground state wave function.
“Before concluding, we point out that the polarization defined above is clearly a bulk quantity as it is given by the Berry phase of the ground state wave function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Berry curvature: Symmetry considerations · p. 14In fcc Fe, the Berry curvature is negligible in most areas of momentum space and displays sharp peaks where Fermi lines have avoided crossings due to spin-orbit coupling.
“As we can see, the Berry curvature is negligible in most areas in the momentum space and displays very sharp and pronounced peaks in regions where the Fermi lines (intersection of the Fermi surface with (010) plane) have avoided crossings due to spin-orbit coupling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yao et al. , 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. The Rice-Mele model · p. 12If ∆=0, the Rice-Mele model reduces to the Su-Shrieffer-Heeger model.
“If ∆ = 0 it reduces to the celebrated Su-Shrieffer-Heeger model (Su et al. , 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Su et al. , 1979
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. The quantum Hall effect · p. 15A magnetic field is not necessary for the quantum Hall effect; the condition is a nonzero Chern number of the band.
“However, from the above derivation it is clear that a magnetic field is not necessary for the quantum Hall effect to occur as the condition is a nonzero Chern number of the band.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. The ground state is non-degenerate. · p. 10The Chern number can only change discontinuously and does not change at all if the perturbation is small.
“However, the fact that the Chern number must be an integer means that it can only be changed in a discontinous way and does not change at all if the perturbation is small. This is a general outcome of the topological invariance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ B. Quantized adiabatic particle transport · p. 9If the periodic potential slides its position without changing its shape, the electrons simply follow the potential.
“If the periodic potential slides its position without changing its shape, we expect that the electrons simply follow the potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Berry phase in Bloch bands · p. 8Zak's phase is entirely due to the torus topology of the Brillouin zone and is the only way to realize a closed path in a one-dimensional parameter space.
“We note that this phase is entirely due to the torus topology of the Brillouin zone, and it is the only way to realize a closed path in a one-dimensional parameter space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12The polarization per unit cell can be defined as the dipole moment of the Wannier charge density.
“King-Smith and Vanderbilt (1993) further showed that, based on Eq. (2.28), the polarization per unit cell can be defined as the dipole moment of the Wannier charge density,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites King-Smith and Vanderbilt (1993)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 11Only the change in polarization has physical meaning and it can be quantified by using the Berry phase of the electronic wave function.
“These problems are eventually solved by the modern theory of polarization (King-Smith and Vanderbilt, 1993; Resta, 1994), where it is shown that only the change in polarization has physical meaning and it can be quantified by using the Berry phase of the electronic wave function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites King-Smith and Vanderbilt, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Resta, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Electric Polarization of Crystalline Solids · p. 12Both adiabatic transport and electric polarization can be regarded as manifestations of Zak's phase.
“In view of Eq. (2.28), both the adiabatic transport and the electric polarization can be regarded as the manifestation of Zak's phase, given in Eq. (1.29).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Anomalous velocity · p. 14The anomalous velocity is always transverse to the electric field and gives rise to a Hall current.
“This velocity is always transverse to the electric field, which will give rise to a Hall current.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17The converged value is very close to the bulk σ_ah of Fe, confirming the dominance of the intrinsic contribution in Fe.
“It turns out that this converged value is very close to the bulk σ ah of Fe, which confirms the dominance of the intrinsic contribution in Fe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18Intervalley scattering is strongly suppressed due to large separation in momentum space, making the valley index a good quantum number.
“Because of their large separation in momentum space, the intervalley scattering is strongly suppressed (Gorbachev et al. , 2007; Morozov et al. , 2006; Morpurgo and Guinea, 2006), which makes the valley index a good quantum number.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gorbachev et al. , 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Morozov et al. , 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Morpurgo and Guinea, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17The intrinsic contribution σ_in is independent of relaxation time τ, the skew scattering contribution σ_sk is proportional to τ, and the side jump contribution σ_sj is independent of τ.
“where σ in H is the intrinsic contribution given by Eq. (3.14), σ sk H is the skew scattering contribution, which is proportional to the relaxation time τ , and σ sj H is the side jump contribution, which is independent of τ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18The valley Hall effect relies on inversion symmetry breaking and survives in time-reversal invariant systems.
“In this subsection we discuss another type of Hall effect which relies on inversion symmetry breaking, and survives in time-reversal invariant systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20The orbital magnetization is not simply the thermodynamic average of the orbital moment; there is another contribution due to the center-of-mass motion of the wave packet.
“As it turns out, this is only part of the contribution. There is another contribution due to the center-of-mass motion of the wave packet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18Upon application of an electric field, electrons in different valleys flow to opposite transverse edges, giving rise to a net valley Hall current in the bulk.
“Once the structure of the Berry curvature is revealed, the valley Hall effect becomes transparent: upon the application of an electric field, electrons in different valleys will flow to opposite transverse edges, giving rise to a net valley Hall current in the bulk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16Unlike the quantum Hall effect, the anomalous Hall effect does not require a nonzero Chern number; a band with zero Chern number can have nonzero local Berry curvature and give a nonzero anomalous Hall conductivity.
“However, unlike the quantum Hall effect, the anomalous Hall effect does not require a nonzero Chern number of the band; for a band with zero Chern number, the local Berry curvature can be nonzero and give rise to a nonzero anomalous Hall conductivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Anomalous Hall conductivity as a Fermi surface property · p. 17The Hall conductivity Eq. (3.14) is given as an integration over all occupied states below the Fermi energy.
“An interesting aspect of the intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect is that the Hall conductivity, Eq. (3.14), is given as an integration over all occupied states below the Fermi energy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18A necessary condition for the charge Hall effect to manifest is broken time-reversal symmetry of the system.
“Anecessary condition for the charge Hall effect to manifest is the broken time-reversal symmetry of the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18Under time reversal, both the valley current and electric field are invariant.
“Under time reversal, both the valley current and electric field are invariant ( τ z changes sign because the two valleys switch when the crystal momentum changes sign).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Construction of the wave packet and its orbital moment · p. 20In realistic situations, the orbital moment can be 30 times larger than the spin moment, and can be used as an effective way to detect and generate valley polarization.
“In realistic situations, the moment can be 30 times larger than the spin moment, and can be used as an effective way to detect and generate the valley polarization (Xiao et al. , 2007b; Yao et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Xiao et al. , 2007b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yao et al. , 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. The anomalous Hall Effect · p. 16For a generic Hamiltonian with spin-orbit split bands, the Berry curvatures of the two energy bands have opposite sign and are highly concentrated around the gap.
“The Berry curvatures of the two energy bands have opposite sign, and is highly concentrated around the gap”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17In Fe thin films, measured σ_ah vs σ_xx^2 converge to a single point as σ_xx approaches zero, where impurity-scattering induced contribution is washed out by phonon scattering and only the intrinsic contribution survives.
“We can see that although σ ah in different thin films and at different temperatures shows a large variation at finite σ xx , they converge to a single point as σ xx approaches zero, where the impurity-scattering induced contribution should be washed out by the phonon scattering and only the intrinsic contribution survives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tian et al.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ E. The valley Hall effect · p. 18Under spatial inversion, the valley current is invariant but the electric field changes sign.
“Under spatial inversion, the valley current is still invariant but the electric field changes sign.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20In the bulk where V(r) vanishes, the electron energy is just the bulk band-energy; near the boundary, it is tilted up due to the increase of V(r).
“In the bulk where V ( r ) vanishes, the electron energy is just the bulk band-energy; near the boundary, it will be tilted up due to the increase of V ( r ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The confining potential V(r) varies slowly at atomic length scale such that the wave packet description of the electron is still valid on the boundary.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17Excellent agreement with experiments has been demonstrated in ferromagnetic transition metals and semiconductors, leaving little room for the side jump contribution.
“Excellent agreement with experiments has been demonstrated in ferromagnetic transition metals and semiconductors (Fang et al. , 2003; Jungwirth et al. , 2002; Xiao et al. , 2006b; Yao et al. , 2004, 2007), which leaves little room for the side jump contribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fang et al. , 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jungwirth et al. , 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xiao et al. , 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Anomalous Hall conductivity as a Fermi surface property · p. 18The integral over the Fermi sea can be converted to a more efficient integral on the Fermi surface.
“From a computational point of view, the advantage lies in that the integral over the Fermi sea is converted to a more efficient integral on the Fermi surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic contributions · p. 17If the sample is clean and the temperature is low, the relaxation time τ can be extremely large, and skew scattering is expected to dominate.
“If the sample is clean and the temperature is low, the relaxation time τ can be extremely large, and the skew scattering is expected to dominate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21If O = v, one finds the expression for the local current.
“If ˆ O = ˆ v , one finds the expression for the local current:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21The final expression for orbital magnetization, Eq. (4.14), is given in terms of bulk Bloch functions and does not depend on the boundary condition; the boundary is merely a tool to expose the free current contribution because in a uniform system the magnetization current always vanishes in the bulk.
“This is a wrong assertion as the final expression, Eq. (4.14), is given in terms of the bulk Bloch functions and does not depend on the boundary condition. Here, the boundary is merely a tool to expose the 'free current' contribution because in a uniform system, the magnetization current always vanishes in the bulk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22The local current is given by Eq. (4.19), where replacing the distribution function g(r,q) with the local Fermi-Dirac function f(r,q) is sufficient for a first-order calculation.
“Firstly, as we showed in Eq. (4.19), the local current is given by”
- Also stated in: § D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22 · plain
“where in the second term we have replaced the distribution function g ( r , q ) with the local Fermi-Dirac function f ( r , q ), which is sufficient for a first-order calculation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 24Although the phase-space volume is no longer conserved, it is a local function of the state variables and has nothing to do with the history of time evolution; a modified density of states can be introduced such that the number of states in the volume element remains constant in time.
“Although the phase space volume is no longer conserved, it is a local function of the state variables and has nothing to do with the history of time evolution. We can thus introduce a modified density of states”
- Also stated in: § B. Modified density of states · p. 24 · plain
“such that the number of states in the volume element, D n ( r , k )∆ V , remains constant in time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § B. Modified density of states · p. 24 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ C. Dipole moment · p. 21The finite size of the wave packet not only allows an orbital magnetic moment but also leads to the concept of the dipole moment associated with an operator.
“The finite size of the wave packet not only allows an orbital magnetic moment, but also leads to the concept of the dipole moment associated with an operator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22Equation (4.23) is the most general expression for the transport current; the contribution from the orbital magnetic moment m(q) cancels out, agreeing with the picture that the orbital moment is due to self-rotation, is localized, and cannot contribute to transport.
“Equation (4.23) is the most general expression for the transport current. We notice that the contribution from the orbital magnetic moment m ( q ) cancels out. This agrees with the intuitive picture we developed in Sec. IV.B, i.e., the orbital moment is due to the selfrotation of the wave packet, therefore it is localized and cannot contribute to transport”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Streda Formula · p. 24Using Eq. (5.16) for an insulator, one obtains in 2D the same result as Thouless et al. (1982) obtained using the Kubo formula; the fact that the quantum Hall conductivity can be derived using the modified density of states further confirms the necessity to introduce this concept.
“Using Eq. (5.16) for an insulator, we obtain, in 2D”
- Also stated in: § 2. Streda Formula · p. 24 · plain
“This is what Thouless et al. (1982) obtained using the Kubo formula. The fact that the quantum Hall conductivity can be derived using the modified density of states further confirms the necessity to introduce this concept.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thouless et al. (1982)
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 2. Streda Formula · p. 24 · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ A. Equations of motion · p. 23If the length scale of perturbations is much larger than the spatial spread of the wave packet, the approximate Hamiltonian that the wave packet feels may be obtained by linearizing the perturbations about the wave packet center r_c.
“If the length scale of the perturbations is much larger than the spatial spread of the wave packet, the approximate Hamiltonian that the wave packet 'feels' may be obtained by linearizing the perturbations about the wave packet center r c as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25Similar formulas for insulators with zero Chern number have been obtained by Ceresoli et al. (2006) and Thonhauser et al. (2005) using the Wannier function approach, and have been numerically confirmed for a tight-binding model.
“Similar formula for insulators with zero Chern number has been obtained by Ceresoli et al. (2006); Thonhauser et al. (2005) using the Wannier function approach, and has been numerically confirmed for a tightbinding model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ceresoli et al. (2006)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thonhauser et al. (2005)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Dipole moment · p. 22If O is the spin operator s, Eq. (4.18) gives the spin dipole; in general the spin center and mass center do not coincide, usually due to spin-orbit interaction.
“If ˆ O is the spin operator ˆ s , then Eq. (4.18) gives the spin dipole”
- Also stated in: § C. Dipole moment · p. 22 · plain
“It shows that in general the spin center and the mass center do not coincide, which is usually due to the spin-orbit interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
- Also stated in: § C. Dipole moment · p. 22 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Dipole moment · p. 21The dipole moment appears naturally when considering the thermodynamic average of a physical quantity, and in the wave packet approach it is given by Eq. (4.15).
“The dipole moment appears naturally when we consider the thermodynamic average of a physical quantity, with its operator denoted by ˆ O . In the wave packet approach, it is given by”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Modified density of states · p. 24Although the density of states is no longer constant, the dynamics itself is still Hamiltonian; the modification comes from the fact that r and k are no longer canonical variables, and the density of states can be regarded as the phase-space measure (Bliokh, 2006b; Duval et al., 2006b,a; Xiao et al., 2006a).
“We emphasize that although the density of states is no longer a constant, the dynamics itself is still Hamiltonian. The modification comes from the fact that the dynamical variables, r and k , are no longer canonical variables, and the density of states can be regarded as the phase space measure (Bliokh, 2006b; Duval et al. , 2006b,a; Xiao et al. , 2006a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bliokh, 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Duval et al., 2006b,a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xiao et al., 2006a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22Anomalous thermoelectric transport in ferromagnets refers to the appearance of a Hall current driven by statistical forces, such as gradients of temperature and chemical potential (Chien and Westgate, 1980).
“As an application of the above concepts, we consider the problem of anomalous thermoelectric transport in ferromagnets, which refers to the appearance of a Hall current driven by statistical forces, such as the gradient of temperature and chemical potential (Chien and Westgate, 1980).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chien and Westgate, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 23Compared to the conventional equations of motion for Bloch electrons (Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976), there are two differences: (1) the electron energy is modified by the orbital magnetic moment; (2) the electron velocity gains an extra velocity term proportional to the Berry curvature.
“Compared to the conventional equations of motion for Bloch electrons (Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976), there are two differences: (1) The electron energy is modified by the orbital magnetic moment; (2) the electron velocity gains an extra velocity term proportional to the Berry curvature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22For the intrinsic contribution to anomalous thermoelectric transport, both the Einstein relation and Mott relation still hold (Onoda et al., 2008; Xiao et al., 2006b).
“It is straightforward to verify that for the intrinsic contribution to the anomalous thermoelectric transport, both the Einstein relation and Mott relation still hold (Onoda et al. , 2008; Xiao et al. , 2006b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Onoda et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xiao et al., 2006b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25For band insulators, there will be a discontinuity of the orbital magnetization if the integral of the Berry curvature over the Brillouin zone, or the anomalous Hall conductivity, is non-zero and quantized; the size of the discontinuity is given by the quantized anomalous Hall conductivity times E_g/e, where E_g is the energy gap.
“Following the discussions on band insulators in our first example in Sec. V.B.1, there will be a discontinuity of the orbital magnetization if the integral of the Berry curvature over the Brillouin zone, or the anomalous Hall conductivity, is non-zero and quantized.”
- Also stated in: § C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25 · plain
“The size of the discontinuity is given by the quantized anomalous Hall conductivity times E g /e , where E g is the energy gap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25 · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20This transverse velocity leads to a boundary current given by Eq. (4.11).
“This transverse velocity will lead to a boundary current (of the dimension 'current density × width' in 2D) given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22Equation (4.23) is not limited to transport driven by statistical forces; at the microscopic level a mechanical force generally has two effects: it can drive electron motion directly and appear in the expression for rdot, and it can make the electron energy and Berry curvature spatially dependent, hence manifest in the second term of Eq. (4.23).
“Equation (4.23) is not limited to transport driven by statistical forces. As we shall show later, at the microscopic level the mechanical force generally has two effects:”
- Also stated in: § D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 23 · plain
“it can drive the electron motion directly, and appears in the expression for ˙ r ; it can also make the electron energy and the Berry curvature spatially dependent, hence also manifest in the second term in Eq. (4.23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 23 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone given§ D. Magnetotransport · p. 25The equations of motion (5.8) and the density of states (5.13) give a complete description of the electron dynamics in the presence of electromagnetic fields.
“The equations of motion (5.8) and the density of states (5.13) gives us a complete description of the electron dynamics in the presence of electromagnetic fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 23The effect of a uniform A(r_c) is to add a phase to the eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian; therefore the wave packet can be written as Eq. (5.4).
“The effect of a uniform A ( r c ) is to add a phase to the eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. Therefore the wave packet can be written as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Modified density of states · p. 23The Berry curvature not only modifies the electron dynamics but also has a profound effect on the electron density of states in phase space (Xiao et al., 2005).
“The Berry curvature not only modifies the electron dynamics, but also has a profound effect on the electron density of states in the phase space (Xiao et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xiao et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20Integrating Eq. (4.11) by parts yields an expression for magnetization in terms of the zero-temperature Hall conductivity σxy(ε).
“Integrating Eq. (4.11) by part, we obtain”
- Also stated in: § B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21 · plain
“where σ xy ( ε ) is the zero-temperature Hall conductivity for a system with Fermi energy ε :”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: For a current I flowing in a closed circuit enclosing a sufficiently small area A, the circuit carries a magnetic moment I·A, so the magnetization (magnetic moment per unit area) has magnitude I.
- Also stated in: § B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21 · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22Similar to the anomalous Hall effect, anomalous thermoelectric transport has intrinsic and extrinsic contributions; the paper focuses on the former.
“Similar to the anomalous Hall effect, there are also intrinsic and extrinsic contributions, and we will focus on the former.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22In the presence of an electric field, the electron acquires an anomalous velocity proportional to the Berry curvature, which gives rise to a Hall current.
“Recall that in the presence of an electric field, the electron acquires an anomalous velocity proportional to the Berry curvature, which gives rise to a Hall current.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21The boundary current corresponds to the global movement of the wave packet center and is called the 'free current' contribution, whereas the orbital moment is due to 'localized' current.
“Since the boundary current corresponds to the global movement of the wave packet center, we call this contribution the 'free current' contribution, whereas the orbital moment are due to 'localized' current.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21The orbital magnetization has two contributions: one from the self-rotation of the wave packet and one from the center-of-mass motion.
“The orbital magnetization has two different contributions: one is from the self-rotation of the wave packet, and the other is due to the center-of-mass motion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Dipole moment · p. 22The self-rotation of the wave packet can be thought of as a localized circuit; therefore, if the distribution is not uniform, those localized circuits contribute to the local current jL.
“The self-rotation can be thought as localized circuit. Therefore if the distribution is not uniform, those localized circuit will contribute to the local current j L”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21If O = e, then Pe = 0, consistent with the charge center coinciding with the mass center of the electron; as a result, one cannot derive a current flowing in the x-direction.
“If ˆ O = e , then P e = 0. This is consistent with the fact that the charge center coincides with the mass center of the electron. As a result, one cannot derive a current flowing in the x -direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25The magnetization is the field derivative at fixed temperature and chemical potential, M = -(∂F/∂B)_{μ,T}, with the result Eq. (5.20); integration by parts of the second term gives the exact formula obtained in Eq. (4.14).
“The magnetization is then the field derivative at fixed temperature and chemical potential, M = -( ∂F/∂ B ) µ,T , with the result”
- Also stated in: § C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25 · plain
“Integration by parts of the second term will give us the exact formula obtained in Eq. (4.14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 24The correct semiclassical limit of the sum in Eq. (5.9) is Eq. (5.12), where the expectation value in a wave packet could include the dipole contribution due to the finite size of the wave packet; in a uniform system it is simply given by Eq. (5.13).
“Therefore, the correct semiclassical limit of the sum in Eq. (5.9) is”
- Also stated in: § B. Modified density of states · p. 24 · hedged
“where 〈· · ·〉 W is the expectation value in a wave packet, which could includes the dipole contribution due to the finite size of the wave packet (See Sec. 4.18). In a uniform system it is simply given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § B. Modified density of states · p. 24 · hedged
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21The dipole moment of an observable is a general consequence of the wave packet approach and must be included in the semiclassical theory; its contribution appears only when the system is inhomogeneous.
“The dipole moment of an observable is a general consequence of the wave packet approach and must be included in the semiclassical theory. Its contribution appears only when the system is inhomogeneous.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21The first term in the orbital magnetization is what one would obtain if the wave packet is treated as a point particle; the second term is due to the finite size of the wave packet.
“The first term is what one would obtain if the wave packet is treated as a point particle. The second term is due to the finite size of the wave packet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 21In more rigorous approaches (Shi et al., 2007; Xiao et al., 2005) the boundary is not needed and the derivation is based on a pure bulk picture.
“Finally, in more rigorous approaches (Shi et al. , 2007; Xiao et al. , 2005) the boundary is not needed and the derivation is based on a pure bulk picture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shi et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xiao et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25Shi et al. (2007) provided a full quantum mechanical derivation of the formula and showed that it is valid in the presence of electron-electron interaction, provided the one-electron energies and wave functions are calculated self-consistently within the framework of the exact current and spin-density functional theory (Vignale and Rasolt, 1988).
“Recently, Shi et al. (2007) provided a full quantum mechanical derivation of the formula, and showed that it is valid in the presence of electronelectron interaction, provided the one-electron energies and wave functions are calculated self-consistently within the framework of the exact current and spin-density functional theory (Vignale and Rasolt, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shi et al. (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vignale and Rasolt, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Anomalous thermoelectric transport · p. 22In ferromagnetic systems, it is important to discount the contribution from the magnetization current; the magnetization current cannot be measured by conventional transport experiments (Cooper et al., 1997).
“Secondly, in ferromagnetic systems, it is important to discount the contribution from the magnetization current. It was argued that the magnetization current cannot be measured by conventional transport experiments (Cooper et al. , 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cooper et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25The equilibrium magnetization density can be obtained from the grand canonical potential, which within first order in the magnetic field may be written as Eq. (5.19), where the electron energy ε_M = ε(k) - m(k)·B includes a correction due to the orbital magnetic moment m(k).
“The equilibrium magnetization density can be obtained from the grand canonical potential, which, within first order in the magnetic field, may be written as”
- Also stated in: § C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25 · plain
“where the electron energy ε M = ε ( k ) -m ( k ) · B includes a correction due to the orbital magnetic moment m ( k ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 23For the wave packet energy, <W|ΔH|W> = -m(k)·B, because the wave packet carries an orbital magnetic moment m(k) that couples to the magnetic field.
“For the wave packet energy, we have 〈 W | ∆ H | W 〉 = -m ( k ) · B . This is expected as we already showed that the wave packet carries an orbital magnetic moment m ( k ) that will couple to the magnetic field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Orbital magnetization: Revisit · p. 25The paper has derived a general expression for the equilibrium orbital magnetization density, valid at zero magnetic field but at arbitrary temperatures; from this derivation the orbital magnetization is indeed a bulk property, and the center-of-mass contribution comes from the Berry-phase correction to the electron density of states.
“We have thus derived a general expression for the equilibrium orbital magnetization density, valid at zero magnetic field but at arbitrary temperatures. From this derivation we can clearly see that the orbital magnetization is indeed a bulk property. The center-of-mass contribution identified before comes from the Berry-phase correction to the electron density of states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Orbital magnetization · p. 20A wave packet in the boundary region feels a force ∇V(r) due to the confining potential, and according to Eq. (4.10) the electron acquires a transverse velocity whose direction is parallel with the boundary.
“Now consider a wave packet in the boundary region. It will feel a force ∇ V ( r ) due to the presence of the confining potential. Consequently, according to Eq. (4.10) the electron acquires a transverse velocity, whose direction is parallel with the boundary (Fig. 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The confining potential V(r) varies slowly at atomic length scale such that the wave packet description of the electron is still valid on the boundary.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Magnetic field induced polarization · p. 31For A = By zhat with B = h/(e a_z l_y) xhat, the magnetic flux over the supercell a_z × l_y in the x-direction is exactly h/e, so the system is periodic in the y-direction with period l_y.
“Consider A = By ˆ z with B = h/ea z l y ˆ x . Note that magnetic flux over the supercell a z × l y in the x -direction is exactly h/e , therefore the system is periodic in the y -direction with period l y .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30Starting from Eq. (6.9) and the modified density of states (6.16), the adiabatic current induced by inhomogeneity is given by Eq. (6.29).
“Starting from Eq. (6.9) and making use of the modified density of states (6.16), one finds the adiabatic current induced by inhomogeneity is give by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28If the Berry curvature vanishes, Eq. (6.13) becomes the canonical equations of motion for Hamiltonian dynamics, and r and q are canonical variables.
“Note that if the Berry curvature vanishes, Eq. (6.13) becomes the canonical equations of motion for Hamiltonian dynamics, and r and q are called canonical variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30In many physical situations the system is in an inhomogeneous state and the electric polarization strongly depends on the inhomogeneity.
“However, in many physical situations the system is in an inhomogeneous state and the electric polarization strongly depends on the inhomogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Cyclotron period · p. 25In a uniform magnetic field, the semiclassical equations of motion reduce to Eq. (5.25), and motion in k-space is confined in the xy-plane and completely determined once the energy ε and the z component of the wave vector k_z are given.
“In this case, the equations of motion reduce to”
- Also stated in: § 1. Cyclotron period · p. 25 · plain
“From the second equation of (5.25) we can see that motion in k -space is confined in the xy -plane and is completely determined once the energy ε and the z component of the wave vector k z is given.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1. Cyclotron period · p. 25 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30Xiao et al. (2007a) showed how the two-point formula can be implemented in numerical calculations using a discretized version.
“Xiao et al. (2007a) also showed how the two-point formula can be implemented in numerical calculations using a discretized version (Kotiuga, 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Xiao et al. (2007a)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kotiuga, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28The antisymmetric tensor Ω_rr is realized in terms of the magnetic field in the Lorentz force and is also seen in the singular form (δ-function like distribution) of dislocations in a deformed crystal (Bird and Preston, 1988).
“The antisymmetric tensor Ω ↔ rr is realized in terms of the magnetic field in the Lorenz force and is also seen in the singular form ( δ -function like distribution) of dislocations in a deformed crystal (Bird and Preston, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bird and Preston, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29For deformed crystals, the gradient correction to the electron energy is given by Eq. (6.8) and was found by Sundaram and Niu (1999).
“One is the gradient correction to the electron energy, given in Eq. (6.8). It is found that (Sundaram and Niu, 1999)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sundaram and Niu, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29Direct calculation of the change of electron density using the modified density of states (6.16) gives Eq. (6.24).
“On the other hand, we can also directly calculate the change of the electron density using the modified density of states (6.16), which gives”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30Qi et al. (2008) obtained a similar result.
“Similar result has been obtained by Qi et al. (2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Qi et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ VI. ELECTRON DYNAMICS IN THE PRESENCE OF GENERAL PERTURBATIONS · p. 27In the general theory of electron dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals, the Berry curvature enters into the equations of motion and modifies the density of states; one needs to introduce the Berry curvature defined in the extended parameter space (r,q,t).
“In this section we present the general theory of electron dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals (Panati et al. , 2003; Shindou and Imura, 2005; Sundaram and Niu, 1999). As expected, the Berry curvature enters into the equations of motion and modifies the density of states. The difference is that one needs to introduce the Berry curvature defined in the extended parameter space ( r , q , t ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Panati et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shindou and Imura, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sundaram and Niu, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30Kunz (1986) showed that charge transport in incommensurate potentials is quantized and given in the form of Chern numbers, consistent with the derived result.
“Kunz (1986) has discussed the charge pumping in incommensurate potentials and he showed that in general the charge transport is quantized and is given in the form of Chern numbers, which is consistent with what we have derived.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kunz (1986)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27More generally, the relaxation time can always be expanded to first order of (e/ħ)B·Ω, Eq. (5.41), where τ1 should be regarded as a fitting parameter within this theory.
“More generally, we can always expand the relaxation time to first order of ( e/ ¯ h ) B · Ω ,”
- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
“where τ 1 should be regarded as a fitting parameter within this theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 26In the low field limit, the diagonal element of the conductivity is given by Eq. (5.37), which is the zeroth order expansion based on ω_c τ, and there are four places in this expression depending on B: explicit B-dependence in D(k), modification of v_x by the orbital magnetic moment, modification to the Fermi energy, and possible B-dependence of the relaxation time τ.
“By solving the Boltzmann equation, one finds that the diagonal element of the conductivity is given by”
- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 26 · plain
“This is just the zeroth order expansion based on ω c τ . There are four places in this expression depending on B . (1) There is an explicit B -dependence in ¯ D ( k ). (2) The electron velocity v x is modified by the orbital magnetic moment:”
- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
“(3) There is also a modification to the Fermi energy, given by Eq. (5.17). (4) The relaxation time τ can also depend on B .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 26 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28The term Ω_qt was identified as the adiabatic velocity vector in Sec. II.
“The term Ω q t was identified as the adiabatic velocity vector in Sec. II.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. The high field limit · p. 26For a hole-like band, the Hall current is obtained by subtracting the contribution of holes from that of the filled band, and there is an additional term in the current expression proportional to the Chern number of the band.
“Let us now consider the hole-like band. The Hall current is obtained by substracting the contribution of holes from that of the filled band, which is given by -e E × ∫ [ d k ] Ω . Therefore”
- Also stated in: § 2. The high field limit · p. 26 · plain
“So for the hole-like band, there is an additional term in the current expression proportional to the Chern number (the second integral) of the band.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 2. The high field limit · p. 26 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28In the presence of electromagnetic perturbations, the local basis can be written as |u(r_c,q)> = |u(k)>, where k = q + eA(r); using the chain rule, Δε in Eq. (6.8) becomes -m(k)·B, and the equations of motion (6.9) reduce to Eq. (5.8).
“Hence the local basis can be written as | u ( r c , q ) 〉 = | u ( k ) 〉 , where k = q + e A ( r ). One can verify that by using the chain rule ∂ q α = ∂ k α and ∂ r α = ( ∂ r α A β ) ∂ k β , ∆ ε given in Eq. (6.8) becomes -m ( k ) · B , and the equations of motion (6.9) reduces to Eq. (5.8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Cyclotron period · p. 26There is a velocity term proportional to B in Eq. (5.25) that seems to suggest a current along the field direction; after averaging over the distribution function, this current is actually zero.
“In addition, we note that there is a velocity term proportional to B in Eq. (5.25), which seems to suggest there will be a current along the field direction. We show that after averaging over the distribution function, this current is actually zero.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is no magnetic monopole in k-space.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29A wave packet of incident wave vector q taken around the line of dislocation acquires a Berry phase given by Eq. (6.25), where b is the Burgers vector.
“On account of this multiple-valuedness, a wave packet of incident wave vector q taken around the line of dislocation acquires a Berry phase”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27In the presence of the Berry curvature, the collision term in the Boltzmann equation is given by Eq. (5.38), where W_kk' is the transition probability from k' to k state.
“In the presence of the Berry curvature, the collision term in the Boltzmann equation is given by”
- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
“where W kk ′ is the transition probability from k ′ to k state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30The second Chern form demands that the system must be two-dimensional or higher; otherwise it vanishes.
“The second Chern form demands that the system must be two-dimensional or higher, otherwise the second Chern form vanishes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. The high field limit · p. 26In the high field limit (ω_c τ ≫ 1), the total current in crossed electric and magnetic fields is the Hall current as if calculated from the free electron model, and it has no dependence on the relaxation time τ; this result ensures that even in the presence of anomalous Hall effect, the high field Hall current gives the real electron density.
“Therefore in the high field limit we reach the remarkable conclusion: the total current in crossed electric and magnetic fields is the Hall current as if calculated from free electron model”
- Also stated in: § 2. The high field limit · p. 26 · plain
“and it has no dependence on the relaxation time τ . This result ensures that even in the presence of anomalous Hall effect, the high field Hall current gives the 'real' electron density.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In the high field limit, all orbits are closed.
- Also stated in: § 2. The high field limit · p. 26 · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29For a one-dimensional insulator under uniform strain with new lattice constant a+δa and one electron per unit cell, the electron density goes from 1/a to Eq. (6.23).
“We first consider a one-dimensional insulator with lattice constant a and is under a uniform strain with a new lattice constant a + δa , i.e., ∂ x u = δa/a . Assuming one electron per unit cell, the electron density goes from 1 /a to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Polarization induced by inhomogeneity · p. 30The coefficient χ is given by Eq. (6.33), where the Berry curvature is defined on the parameter space (q,h).
“The coefficient χ is given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29An insulator under a uniform strain remains an insulator.
“From a physical point of view, it says an insulator under a uniform strain remains an insulator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28The form of the equations of motion is quite symmetrical with respect to r and q, and there are Berry curvatures between every pair of phase-space variables plus time.
“The form of the equations of motion is quite symmetrical with respect to r and q , and there are Berry curvatures between every pair of phase space variables plus time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28The presence of the Berry curvature renders the variables non-canonical and modifies the density of states.
“The presence of the Berry curvature renders the variables non-canonical and, as a consequence, modifies the density of states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Equations of motion · p. 28If the perturbation is uniform in space and only varies in time, all spatial derivatives vanish, and the equations reduce to Eq. (6.10); the first equation is the velocity formula (2.5) obtained in Sec. II, and the term Ω_qq was identified as the Hall conductivity tensor.
“In fact, if the perturbation is uniform in space (has the same period as the unperturbed crystal) and only varies in time, all the spatial derivatives vanish; we obtain”
- Also stated in: § A. Equations of motion · p. 28 · plain
“The first equation is the velocity formula (2.5) obtained in Sec. II. The term Ω ↔ qq was identified as the Hall conductivity tensor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § A. Equations of motion · p. 28 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27Expanding expression (5.37) to first order of B and taking the spherical band approximation yields Eq. (5.42), where M is the effective mass tensor; the zero-field conductivity takes the usual form Eq. (5.43), and the ratio -σ(1)xx/σ(0)xx gives the linear magnetoresistance.
“Expand expression (5.37) to first order of B , and take the spherical band approximation, we obtain”
- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
“where M is the effect mass tensor. The zero-field conductivity takes the usual form”
- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
“The ratio -σ (1) xx /σ (0) xx will then give us the linear magnetoresistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3. The Low Field Limit · p. 27 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Magnetic field induced polarization · p. 31This coupling is labeled 'axion electrodynamics' and was discussed by Wilczek (1987).
“This coupling, labeled 'axion electrodynamics', was discussed by Wilczek (1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilczek (1987)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29For deformed crystals, in addition to A_q, there are two other vector potentials, leading to Berry curvatures given by Eq. (6.22).
“For deformed crystals, in addition to A q , there are two other vector potentials”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Deformed Crystal · p. 29A wave packet should not feel the effect of a deformation of the lattice in the absence of electron-phonon coupling.
“Which is expected since a wave packet should not feel the effect of a deformation of the lattice in the absence of electron-phonon coupling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Modified density of states · p. 28In the Rice-Mele model with spatially varying dimerization at half filling, the system is an insulator and its electron density is given by Eq. (6.18).
“At half filling, the system is an insulator and its electron density is given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Magnetic field induced polarization · p. 31The induced polarization by the magnetic field is given by Eq. (6.34).
“The induced polarization is given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32The method of canonical quantization in Sec. VII.D does not have these problems.
“On the other hand, the method of canonical quantization in Sec. VII.D does not have these problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33In reality, the orbit in one band would couple with orbits in other bands; as a result, the Landau levels are broadened into mini-bands.
“In reality, the orbit in one band would couple with the orbits in other bands. As a result, the Landau levels are broadened into mini-bands (Wilkinson, 1984a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilkinson, 1984a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32This inconsistency is known to happen in the case of an isotropic three-dimensional harmonic oscillator.
“This is known to happen in the case of an isotropic three-dimensional harmonic oscillator (Tabor, 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tabor, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31The time-dependence of the spin texture gives rise to the Berry curvature Ω_rt given by Eq. (6.38).
“In addition, the time-dependence of the spin texture also gives rises to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32With a superlattice that has a much larger lattice constant, the period T_B can be reduced by two orders of magnitude, which could make Bloch oscillation and Wannier-Stark ladders detectable.
“Nonetheless, with the help of a superlattice that has a much larger lattice constant, the period T B can be reduced by two orders of magnitude, which could make the Bloch oscillation and the accompanying Wannier-Stark ladders detectable (Mendes and Bastard, 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mendes and Bastard, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32Because of the charge separation, the one-dimensional crystal has a polarization ΔP = eΓ_c/2π compared to the state without charge separation, which is the electric dipole per unit cell, consistent with Eq. (2.28).
“Because of the charge separation mentioned above, the one-dimensional crystal has a polarization ∆ P = e Γ c / 2 π (compared to the state without charge separation), which is the electric dipole per unit cell. This is consistent with the result in Eq. (2.28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32The Bohr-Sommerfeld method fails if the trajectory in phase space is not closed, or if the dynamic system is chaotic so that no invariant torus exists.
“Second, this method fails if the trajectory in phase space is not closed, or if the dynamic system is chaotic so that no invariant torus exists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32Since the Berry phase is path dependent, one may need to solve the equation self-consistently to obtain the quantized orbits.
“Since the Berry phase is path dependent, one may need to solve the equation self-consistently to obtain the quantized orbits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32It takes time T_B = h/(eEa) for the electron to traverse the first Brillouin zone, so the angular frequency of the periodic motion is ω_B = eEa/hbar; this is Bloch oscillation.
“It takes the time T B = h/ ( eEa ) for the electron to traverse the first Brillouin zone. Therefore, the angular frequency of the periodic motion is ω B = eEa/ ¯ h . This is the so-called Bloch oscillation (Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashcroft and Mermin, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32Starting from Eq. (7.5), the average position of the electron is given by Eq. (7.6).
“Starting from Eq. (7.5), it is not difficult to find the average position of the electron,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31The spatial variation of local spin textures gives rise to the Berry curvature field Eq. (6.37), where θ and φ are spherical angles specifying the direction of n.
“Then the spatial variation of local spin textures gives rise to the Berry curvature field”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The electron spin will follow the local spin direction during its motion (adiabatic approximation).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34Even though one can always have canonical pairs in a Hamiltonian system, as guaranteed by the Darboux theorem, in practice finding them may not be a trivial task.
“Even though one can always have canonical pairs in a Hamiltonian system, as guaranteed by the Darboux theorem (Arnold, 1989), in practice, however, finding them may not be a trivial task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arnold, 1989 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33Without quantization, the size of an orbit is determined by the initial energy of the electron and can be varied continuously.
“Without quantization, the size of an orbit is determined by the initial energy of the electron and can be varied continuously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32After time average, the quantized energies of the electron wavepacket are given by Eq. (7.7), which are the energy levels of the Wannier-Stark ladders.
“After time average, the quantized energies of the electron wavepacket are,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33As a result, the 1/2 on the right hand side of Eq. (7.10) is cancelled by the Berry phase term; according to Eq. (7.10), the area of a cyclotron orbit is πk^2 = 2π|m|eB/hbar, and the Landau level energy is E_m = v_F sqrt(2eB hbar m).
“As a result, the 1 / 2 on the right hand side of Eq. (7.10) is cancelled by the Berry phase term. According to Eq. (7.10), the area of a cyclotron orbit is thus πk 2 = 2 π | m | eB ¯ h , m ∈ Z . From which one can easily obtain the Landau level energy E m = v F √ 2 eB ¯ hm .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ E. Spin Texture · p. 31Unlike the anomalous Hall effect, this mechanism for a nonvanishing Hall effect does not require spin-orbit coupling, but does need a topologically nontrivial spin texture, for example, a skyrmion.
“Unlike the anomalous Hall effect discussed in Sec. III.D, this mechanism for a nonvanishing Hall effect does not require the spin-orbit coupling, but does need a topologically nontrivial spin texture, for example, a skyrmion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization · p. 32The quantization condition for an orbit with constant energy becomes Eq. (7.3).
“The quantization condition for an orbit with constant energy thus becomes,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ VII. QUANTIZATION OF ELECTRON DYNAMICS · p. 31Berry curvature often appears as a result of restricting or projecting the extent of a theory to its subspace.
“Berry curvature often appears as a result of restricting (or projecting) the extent of a theory to its subspace.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ VII. QUANTIZATION OF ELECTRON DYNAMICS · p. 31The re-quantized theory is valid in the same subspace of the semiclassical theory.
“The re-quantized theory is valid in the same subspace of the semiclassical theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33Applying the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule as Onsager did, only certain orbits satisfying the quantization rule are allowed; each orbit corresponds to an energy level (Landau level), and this method remains valid in the presence of the Berry phase.
“One then applies the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule, as Onsager did, to quantize the size of the orbit (Onsager, 1952). That is, only certain orbits satisfying the quantization rule are allowed. Each orbit corresponds to an energy level of the electron (i.e., the Landau level). Such a method remains valid in the presence of the Berry phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Onsager, 1952 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33For an electron with a quadratic energy dispersion before applying the magnetic field, the quantized levels are equally spaced; with the Berry phase correction, which is usually different for different orbits, the energy levels are no longer uniformly distributed.
“For an electron with a quadratic energy dispersion (before applying the magnetic field), these levels are equally spaced. However, with the Berry phase correction, which are usually different for different orbits, the energy levels are no longer uniformly distributed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32Beyond the one-band approximation, there exist Zener tunnellings between Bloch bands; therefore the quantized levels are not stationary states and should be understood as resonances with finite life-times.
“First, beyond the one-band approximation, there exist Zener tunnellings between Bloch bands. Therefore, the quantized levels are not stationary states of the system. They should be understood as resonances with finite life-times (Gl¨ uck et al. , 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glück et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32Bloch oscillation and Wannier-Stark ladders can also be realized in an optical lattice, in which the atom can be coherent over a long period of time.
“Alternatively, the Bloch oscillation and WannierStark ladders can also be realized in an optical lattice (Ben Dahan et al. , 1996; Wilkinson and Kay, 1996), in which the atom can be coherent over a long period of time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ben Dahan et al., 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wilkinson and Kay, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33In addition to point degeneracy, other types of degeneracy in momentum space can also be a source of the Berry phase; the effect of Berry phase generated by a line of band contact on magneto-oscillations is studied in Mikitik and Sharlai.
“In addition to point degeneracy, other types of degeneracy in momentum space can also be a source of the Berry phase. For example, the effect of the Berry phase generated by a line of band contact on magneto-oscillations is studied in Mikitik and Sharlai (1999, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikitik and Sharlai (1999, 2004)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ VII. QUANTIZATION OF ELECTRON DYNAMICS · p. 31The Berry curvature plays a crucial role in the semiclassical dynamics of electrons, which is valid under the one-band approximation.
“In particular, the Berry curvature plays a crucial role in the semiclassical dynamics of electrons, which is valid under the oneband approximation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Wannier-Stark ladder · p. 32The energy of the oscillatory electron is quantized in multiples of hbarω_B, and unlike a harmonic oscillator, the Bloch oscillator has no zero-point energy (Maslov index zero); these equally spaced levels are Wannier-Stark ladders.
“Similar to a simple harmonic oscillator, the energy of the oscillatory electron is quantized in multiples of ¯ hω B . However, unlike the former, the Bloch oscillator has no zero-point energy (that is, the Maslov index is zero). These equally spaced energy levels are called the Wannier-Stark ladders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation · p. 33The integral on the left-hand side of Eq. (7.9) is the magnetic flux enclosed by the real-space orbit; therefore the enclosed flux has to jump in steps of the flux quantum plus a Berry phase correction.
“The integral on the left-hand side is simply the magnetic flux enclosed by the real-space orbit (allowing a drift along the B -direction). Therefore, the enclosed flux has to jump in steps of the flux quantum (plus a Berry phase correction).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34In that case, one can apply a Peierls-like substitution to the coordinate variables and write r_c = x + A(q), satisfying commutation relations from Eq. (7.13).
“One can apply a Peierls-like substitution to the coordinate variables and write r c = x + A ( q ). It is not difficult to see that the commutation relations arising from Eq. (7.13) can indeed be satisfied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. MAGNETIC BLOCH BAND · p. 34The magnetic Bloch band usually carries non-zero quantum Hall conductance and has a nontrivial topology.
“The MBB usually carries non-zero quantum Hall conductance and has a nontrivial topology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34In the case of a system with Berry curvature but not in a magnetic field, κ=1, the roles of r_c and k_c in the commutators are reversed, momentum variables commute but coordinates do not.
“In the second case, consider a system with Berry curvature but not in a magnetic field ( Ω = 0 , B = 0). In this case, again we have κ = 1. Now the roles of r c and k c in the commutators are reversed. The momentum variables commute with each other, but not the coordinates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34If a physical observable is a product of several canonical variables, the order of the product may become a problem after quantization since the variables may not commute; to preserve hermitian property, the operator product needs to be symmetrized.
“First, if a physical observable is a product of several canonical variables, the order of the product may become a problem after the quantization since the variables may not commute with each other. To preserve the hermitian property of the physical observable, the operator product needs to be symmetrized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. MAGNETIC BLOCH BAND · p. 34The semiclassical dynamics is valid when the external field is weak enough to be treated as a perturbation to the Bloch states; this premise is no longer valid if the external field is strong enough to significantly alter the Bloch bands.
“The semiclassical dynamics in previous sections is valid when the external field is weak, such that the latter can be treated as a perturbation to the Bloch states. Such a premise is no longer valid if the external field is so strong that the structure of the Bloch bands is significantly altered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. MAGNETIC BLOCH BAND · p. 34The translational symmetry and topological property of the subband are very different from those of the usual Bloch band; the former is called the magnetic Bloch band.
“The translational symmetry and the topological property of the subband are very different from those of the usual Bloch band. To distinguish between the two, the former is called the magnetic Bloch band (MBB).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35For a uniform magnetic field, the vector potential must be a linear function of r; therefore ΔA is independent of r and f = ΔA·r.
“For an uniform magnetic field, the vector potential must be a linear function of r . Therefore, ∆ A is independent of r and f = ∆ A · r .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ B. Basics of magnetic Bloch band · p. 36In general, the phases of Bloch states at different k's are unrelated and can be defined independently.
“In general, the phases of Bloch states at different k 's are unrelated and can be defined independently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ VIII. MAGNETIC BLOCH BAND · p. 34The formulation provides a clear picture of the hierarchical subbands split by the strong magnetic field (the Hofstadter spectrum).
“Such an elegant formulation provides a clear picture of the hierarchical subbands split by the strong magnetic field (the Hofstadter spectrum) (Hofstadter, 1976).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hofstadter, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ C. Semiclassical picture: hyperorbits · p. 37When a weak magnetic field is applied to a Bloch band, the electron experiences a Lorentz force and executes a cyclotron motion on the surface of the Fermi sea.
“When a weak magnetic field is applied to a Bloch band, the electron experiences a Lorentz force and executes a cyclotron motion on the surface of the Fermi sea.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ A. Magnetic translational symmetry · p. 35In the presence of a strong magnetic field, one needs to treat the magnetic field and the lattice potential on equal footing and solve the Schrödinger equation Eq. (8.1).
“In the presence of a strong magnetic field, one needs to treat the magnetic field and the lattice potential on equal footing and solve the following Schrodinger equation,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. MAGNETIC BLOCH BAND · p. 34In quantum Hall systems, the magnetic field is of the order of Tesla and a Bloch band breaks into many subbands.
“This happens, for example, in quantum Hall systems where the magnetic field is of the order of Tesla and a Bloch band would break into many subbands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34After canonical quantization, x becomes i∂/∂q in the quasi-momentum representation; in Blount (1962b), the position operator r in the one-band approximation acquires a correction, which is the Berry connection A; therefore r_c can be identified with the projected position operator P r P.
“After the canonical quantization, x becomes i∂/∂ q in the quasi-momentum representation. In Blount (1962b), the position operator r in the one-band approximation acquires a correction, which is our Berry connection A . Therefore, r c can be identified with the projected position operator P r P , where P projects to the energy band of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blount (1962b)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34In general, exact canonical variables cannot be found easily; since the semiclassical theory is valid to linear order of field, only canonical variables correct to the same order are needed, and the result is Eq. (7.15).
“In general, exact canonical variables cannot be found easily. However, since the semiclassical theory itself is valid to linear order of field, we only need to find the canonical variables correct to the same order in practice. The result is (Chang and Niu, 2008),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang and Niu, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. MAGNETIC BLOCH BAND · p. 34The Berry curvature of the Bloch electron is first revealed in the magnetic Bloch band.
“In fact, the Berry curvature of the Bloch electron is first revealed in the MBB.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Canonical quantization (Abelian case) · p. 34With these equations, one can verify Eqs. (7.13), (7.14), and (7.15) to linear orders of B and Ω.
“With these equations, one can verify Eqs. (7.13),(7.14), and (7.15) to linear orders of B and Ω .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ IX. NON-ABELIAN FORMULATION · p. 39In order to have a complete effective theory, one also needs to identify the correct physical variables relevant to experiments.
“In order to have a complete effective theory, one also needs to identify the correct physical variables relevant to experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38Since then, such a recipe has been used widely in the analysis of the Hofstadter spectrum.
“Since then, such a recipe has been used widely in the analysis of the Hofstadter spectrum (Hofstadter, 1976).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hofstadter, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38What is special about these truncations is that p_r/q_r is the closest approximation to p/q among all fractions with q ≤ q_r.
“What is special about these truncations is that p r /q r is the closet approximation to p/q among all fractions with q ≤ q r (Khinchin, 1964).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Khinchin, 1964
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40The SHE was first observed in semiconductors and later in metals.
“They are first observed in semiconductors (Kato et al. , 2004; Sih et al. , 2005; Wunderlich et al. , 2005), and later in metals (Kimura et al. , 2007; Seki et al. , 2008; Valenzuela and Tinkham, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kato et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sih et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wunderlich et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38The computation in principle can be carried out to all orders of r.
“The computation in principle can be carried out to all orders of r .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39In such a formulation, there are three essential quantities: the Bloch energy E0(q), the Berry curvature, and the magnetic moment of the wavepacket.
“Similar to the non-degenerate case, there are three essential quantities in such a formulation. In addition to the Bloch energy E 0 ( q ), there are the Berry curvature and the magnetic moment of the wavepacket (see Sec. IV).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40The anomalous velocity in Eq. (9.7) proportional to the Berry curvature F is the transverse current in the quantum Hall effect and the anomalous Hall effect.
“We have seen earlier that it is the transverse current in the quantum Hall effect and the anomalous Hall effect (Sec. III).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ D. Hall conductivity of hyperorbit · p. 38The proper way to separate the uniform magnetic field B into a quantizing part B0 and a perturbation δB was first proposed by Azbel (1964).
“The proper way to separate them was first proposed by Azbel (1964).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Azbel (1964)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40The anomalous Hall effect requires spinful electrons with spin-orbit coupling, and therefore the carrier dynamics is suitably described by Eqs. (9.6), (9.7) and (9.10).
“The latter requires spinful electrons with spin-orbit coupling and therefore the carrier dynamics is suitably described by Eqs. (9.6), (9.7) and (9.10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39In an energy band with D-fold degeneracy, the wavepacket is a superposition of the Bloch states ψ_nq.
“The wavepacket in an energy band with D -fold degeneracy is a superposition of the Bloch states ψ n q (Cf. Sec. IV),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40In the original proposal, a four-band Luttinger model is used to describe the heavy-hole (HH) bands and light-hole (LH) bands.
“In the original proposal, a four-band Luttinger model is used to describe the heavyhole (HH) bands and light-hole (LH) bands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakami et al. (2003)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40To date, most of the experimental evidences for the SHE belong to the extrinsic case.
“To date, most of the experimental evidences for the SHE belong to the extrinsic case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39Redefining the spinor basis amounts to a gauge transformation.
“Redefining the spinor basis { ψ n q } amounts to a gauge transformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40The extrinsic SHE was first predicted by Dyakonov and Perel and later revived by Hirsch.
“This is first predicted by Dyakonov and Perel (1971a,b) (also see (Chazalviel, 1975)) and the same idea is later revived by Hirsch (1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dyakonov and Perel (1971a,b)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hirsch (1999)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ IX. NON-ABELIAN FORMULATION · p. 39The effective Hamiltonian is only part of an effective theory, and the variables in the effective Hamiltonian are often gauge-dependent and therefore cannot be physical variables.
“Finally, we point out that the effective Hamiltonian is only part of an effective theory, and that the variables in the effective Hamiltonian are often gauge-dependent and therefore cannot be physical varaibles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ A. Non-Abelian electron wavepacket · p. 39The Berry connection and Berry curvature in the Abelian case have the same mathematical structures as the vector potential and the magnetic field in electromagnetism.
“Recall that the Berry connection and Berry curvature in the Abelian case have the same mathematical structures as the vector potential and the magnetic field in electromagnetism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44Whenever the scope of the parent theory needs to be extended, one only needs additional input from F_p and M_p and the accuracy can be improved easily.
“On the other hand, however, whenever the scope of the parent theory needs to be extended, e.g, from II to I, instead of starting all of the calculations anew, one only needs additional input from F p and M p and the accuracy can be improved easily.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ F. Incompleteness of effective Hamiltonian · p. 43The canonical variables in the effective Hamiltonian may not be physical observables; for the position variable, they may differ by a Berry connection.
“Nevertheless, we would like to emphasize that, the canonical variables in the effective Hamiltonian may not be physical observables. They may differ, for example, by a Berry connection in the case of the position variable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ G. Hierarchy structure of effective theories · p. 44This Berry curvature corresponds to the F′ above.
“This Berry curvature corresponds to the F ′ above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44There exist sporadic and indirect evidences of the effect of the Berry phase or the Berry curvature through measurements such as quantum Hall conductance, anomalous Hall effect, or Hall plateau in graphene.
“There does exist sporadic and indirect evidences of the effect of the Berry phase or the Berry curvature through the measurement of, for example, the quantum Hall conductance, the anomalous Hall effect, or the Hall plateau in graphene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40With both the semiclassical theory and the method of re-quantization, one can start from a quantum theory of general validity and descend to an effective quantum theory with a smaller range of validity.
“With both the semiclassical theory and the method of re-quantization at hand, one can start from a quantum theory of general validity (such as the Dirac theory of electrons) and descend to an effective quantum theory with a smaller range of validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40The spin Hall conductivity in metals can be detected at room temperature and can be several orders of magnitude larger than that in semiconductors.
“The spin Hall conductivity in metals can be detected at room temperature and can be several orders of magnitude larger than that in semiconductors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44Similar approach has been extended to quasiparticle dynamics in Bose-Einstein condensate.
“Indeed, similar approach has also been extended to the quasiparticle dynamics in Bose-Einstein condensate (Zhang et al. , 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44In many circumstances, the Berry curvature should be as important as the Bloch energy.
“In this review, one can see clearly that in many circumstances, the Berry curvature should be as important as the Bloch energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40Such a procedure can be applied iteratively to generate a hierarchy of effective quantum theories.
“Such a procedure can be applied iteratively to generate a hierarchy of effective quantum theories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41It is doubtful that the electric dipole, or the spin-orbit energy can be measured independently.
“For that matter, it is also doubtful that the electric dipole, or the spin-orbit energy can be measured independently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41The correction to the Zeeman energy is sometimes called the Yafet term, which vanishes near a band edge.
“The correction to the Zeeman energy is sometimes called the Yafet term, which vanishes near a band edge (Yafet, 1963).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yafet, 1963
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40This is a generalization of the Peierls substitution to the non-Abelian case.
“This is a generalization of the Peierls substitution to the non-Abelian case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44The Berry curvature plays a crucial role in the electronic structure and electron dynamics of crystals.
“Even though the Berry curvature plays a crucial role in the electronic structure and electron dynamics of crystals, direct measurement of such a quantity is still lacking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ E. Semiconductor electron · p. 42Unlike the usual Rashba coupling, which requires structural inversion asymmetry to generate an internal field, this dipole term exists in a bulk semiconductor with inversion symmetry but requires an external field E.
“However, unlike the usual Rashba coupling that requires structural inversion asymmetry to generate an internal field, this term exists in a bulk semiconductor with inversion symmetry but requires an external field E .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ E. Semiconductor electron · p. 42In the presence of an electric field, the Berry curvature generates a transverse velocity such that spin-up and spin-down electrons move in opposite directions, resulting in a spin-Hall effect.
“As a result, spin-up and spin-down electrons move toward opposite directions, which results in a spin-Hall effect (see Sec. IX.B for related discussion).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ X. OUTLOOK · p. 44Direct measurement of the Berry curvature is still lacking.
“Even though the Berry curvature plays a crucial role in the electronic structure and electron dynamics of crystals, direct measurement of such a quantity is still lacking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 41In a neighborhood of a k-point, one can always choose to work within a particular gauge.
“Second, in a neighborhood of a k -point, one can always choose to work within a particular gauge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ B. Spin Hall effect · p. 40Such a large effect could be due to the resonant Kondo scattering from the Fe impurities.
“Such a large effect could be due to the resonant Kondo scattering from the Fe impurities (Guo et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guo et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization helps predicting quantized energy levels.
“In Sec. VII, we have introduced the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization, which helps predicting quantized energy levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ C. Quantization of electron dynamics · p. 40Even though a Hamiltonian system always admits canonical variables, it is not always easy to find them.
“As we have mentioned in Sec. VII.D, even though a Hamiltonian system always admits canonical variables, it is not always easy to find them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Electrons are in Bloch waves traveling more or less independently in periodic potentials of the lattice, except that the Pauli exclusion principle has to be satisfied and electron-electron interactions are taken care of in some self-consistent manner.
“A basic paradigm of theoretical framework is based on the assumption that electrons are in Bloch waves traveling more or less independently in periodic potentials of the lattice, except that the Pauli exclusion principle has to be satisfied and electron-electron interactions are taken care of in some self-consistent manner.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The perturbation is periodic in time.
“We assume the perturbation is periodic in time, i.e., the Hamiltonian satisfies”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The basis function along the contour of the rectangle is single-valued.
“The basis function along the contour of the rectangle is assumed to be single-valued.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The adiabatic transformation is parameterized by a scalar λ(t) with λ(0)=0 and λ(T)=1.
“For general purpose, we shall assume the adiabatic transformation is parameterized by a scalar λ ( t ) with λ (0) = 0 and λ ( T ) = 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Periodic boundary condition is assumed for the Rice-Mele model.
“Assuming periodic boundary condition, the Bloch representation of the above Hamiltonian is given by H ( q ) = h ( q ) · σ , where”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The perturbations are sufficiently weak that transitions between different bands can be neglected, so electron dynamics is confined within a single band.
“We assume the perturbations are sufficiently weak such that transitions between different bands can be neglected. i.e., the electron dynamics is confined within a single band.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For simplicity, there is only one partially filled band.
“For simplicity, let us consider a two-dimensional system. We assume there is only one partially filled band.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Fermi surface is a closed loop in the Brillouin zone.
“If we assume the Fermi surface is a closed loop in the Brillouin zone, then”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The confining potential V(r) varies slowly at atomic length scale such that the wave packet description of the electron is still valid on the boundary.
“We further assume that the potential V ( r ) varies slowly at atomic length scale such that the wave packet description of the electron is still valid on the boundary.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For a current I flowing in a closed circuit enclosing a sufficiently small area A, the circuit carries a magnetic moment I·A, so the magnetization (magnetic moment per unit area) has magnitude I.
“Recall that for a current I fl owing in a closed circuit enclosing a sufficiently small area A , the circuit carries a magnetic moment given by I · A . Therefore the magnetization (magnetic moment per unit area) has the magnitude of the current I .”
The paper relies on this without support.
The wave packet is well localized around r_c so that the δ-function can be expanded to first order of r - r_c.
“Since the w packet is well localized around r c we can expand the δ -function to first order of ˆ r -r c”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The width L of the sampling function is sufficiently small to be treated as a δ-function at the macroscopic level and sufficiently big to contain a large number of wave packets of width l inside its range.
“The width L of the sampling function is sufficiently s so that it can be treated as a δ -function at the macroscopic level and is sufficiently big so that it contain large number of wave packets of width l inside its range.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
We assume ∇µ = 0 and ∇T = 0.
“We assume ∇ µ = 0 and ∇ T = 0.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the high field limit, all orbits are closed.
“We can then assume all orbits are closed.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the relaxation-time approximation, a characteristic relaxation time exists so that Eq. (5.39) holds.
“In the relaxation-time approximation we make the assumption that a characteristic relaxation time exists so that”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Ω(k) is smooth and W_kk' is localized.
“If we assume Ω ( k ) is smooth and W kk ′ is localized, the relaxation time can be approximated by”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no magnetic monopole in k-space.
“if there is no magnetic monopole in k -space, the second term also vanishes.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The system can be described, at least at the mean-field level, by a perfect crystal under the influence of an external field h(r).
“We assume that, at least at the mean-field level, the system can be described by a perfect crystal under the influence of an external field h ( r ).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The order parameter is periodic in space (but generally incommensurate with the crystal lattice).
“As usually in the case of multiferroics, we can assume the order parameter is periodic in space (but in general incommensurate with the crystal lattice).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The order parameter has period l_y in the y-direction.
“If we assume the order parameter has period l y in the y -direction,”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The electron spin will follow the local spin direction during its motion (adiabatic approximation).
“Because of the strong s -d coupling, we adopt the adiabatic approximation which states that the electron spin will follow the local spin direction during its motion.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The magnetic field is uniform along the z-axis and the electron is confined to the x-y plane.
“For convenience of discussion, we assume the magnetic field is uniform along the z -axis and the electron is confined to the x -y plane.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the zero Berry curvature under magnetic field case, hbar k_c = p + e A(x) and x and p are canonical conjugate variables.
“Obviously, if one assumes ¯ h k c = p + e A ( x ) and requires x and p to be canonical conjugate variables,”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effective Pauli Hamiltonian is accurate for most low-energy applications in solid state.
“It is considered accurate for most of the low-energy applications in solid state.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Earlier studies on graphene established quantized energies of LLs for spinless 2D Dirac fermions are ε_n = v_F sgn(n) sqrt(2e|B n|) (n=0, ±1, ±2...).
“Earlier studies on graphene (205,206) established that the quantized energies of LLs for spinless 2D Dirac fermions are ε n = v F sgn(n) 2e |B n| (n = 0, ±1, ±2. . .), 5.”
From Transport of Topological Semimetals (2019) · cites this paper as [206]
In “C. de Haas-van Alphen oscillation” (p. 33), the review derives graphene Landau-level energies near the Dirac point with square-root dependence on the level index and magnetic field. Its printed expression includes ℏ, which the cited formula omits, and the passage does not explicitly give the claimed sgn(n) form for negative-energy levels. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe zero energy of the zeroth Landau level can be understood through the Berry phase arising from cyclotron motion of carriers in momentum space.
“Such a zero energy can be understood in terms of the Berry phase arising from the cyclotron motion of carriers in momentum space (206).”
From Transport of Topological Semimetals (2019) · cites this paper as [206]
The magnetic moment occurs from the self-rotating electric wavepacket, which is virtually impossible to be directly observed with electrons.
“The magnetic moment occurs from the self-rotating electric wavepacket [7678], which is virtually impossible to be directly observed with electrons.”
From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
The geometry of the eigenmodes gives rise to Berry curvature in opposite directions at the K- and K'-points.
“Thus, the geometry of the eigenmodes gives rise to the Berry curvature which is in opposite directions at the K - and K ′ -points [21,86, 78] (see fig. 3.1 b)).”
From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
The spiralling intensity is a valley contrasting quantity, analogous to the orbital momentum of electrons in condensed matter systems, manifested when inversion symmetry is broken.
“the spiralling intensity is a valley contrasting quantity, analogous to the orbital momentum of electrons in condensed matter systems [76-78], manifested when the inversion symmetry is broken.”
From Anyons, Zitterbewegung and dynamical phase transitions in topologically nontrivial systems (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
The centre-of-energy velocity of the wave packet contains an anomalous contribution proportional to the Berry curvature of the band, and this contribution is responsible for various Hall effects.
“Based on the semi-classic equations of motion for wave packet propagation in the presence of Berry curvature1,19,20,33,34, the centre-of-energy velocity of the wave packet contains an ‘anomalous’ contribution proportional to the Berry curvature of the band, and this contribution is responsible for various Hall effects1,19,33.”
From Photonic Hall effect and helical Zitterbewegung in a synthetic Weyl system (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
The intrinsic SOI of light originate from fundamental properties of the Maxwell equations and are analogous to the spin-orbit interactions of relativistic quantum particles and electrons in solids.
“The intrinsic SOI of light originate from fundamental properties of the Maxwell equations 7,8 and are analogous to the spin-orbit interactions of relativistic quantum particles 2,9,10 and electrons in solids 11,12 .”
From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
The spin-dependent spectra of photonic quasi-particles in periodic crystal-like structures with broken spatial inversion symmetry is entirely analogous to the spin-dependent splitting of electron energy levels in solids with SOI.
“The latter case is entirely analogous to the spin-dependent splitting of electron energy levels in solids with SOI 11,12 .”
From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
The experimental reconstruction captures the main features of Berry curvature, including overall symmetry and sign, quantitative magnitude over much of the band, and the complementarity Ω1 = -Ω2.
“as can be seen, the main features of the Berry curvature are well captured, such as the overall symmetry and sign, the quantitative magnitude over much of the band and the predicted complementarity of the two bands 1,26 (that is, Ω ϕ,Q 1 = -Ω ϕ,Q 2 ).”
From Experimental measurement of the Berry curvature from anomalous transport (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
A semi-classical wavepacket moves as a coherent object with an additional anomalous Hall velocity due to Berry curvature at its centre-of-mass when an external force is applied or control parameter pumped.
“In the simplest case, a semi-classical wavepacket moves as a coherent object governed by classical equations of motion with an additional 'anomalous' Hall velocity due to the geometrical Berry curvature at its centre-ofmass, as an external force is applied or as the control parameter is pumped 1,4 .”
From Experimental measurement of the Berry curvature from anomalous transport (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Polar and azimuthal angles are interchanged
MinorThe parameterization labels θ as the azimuthal angle and φ as the polar angle, but the later identification of the south pole at θ = π treats θ as the polar angle.
“Parameterize h by its azimuthal angle θ and polar angle φ , h = h (sin θ cos φ, sin θ sin φ, cos θ ).”
“However, the phase of | u -〉 is not defined at the south pole ( θ = π ).”
Flux quantum is defined two different ways
MinorThe text defines the magnetic flux quantum as e/h in one section and h/e in another. These are reciprocal quantities, not the same flux quantum.
“T a 1 commutes with T a 2 only if the flux φ is an integer multiple of the flux quantum φ 0 = e/h .”
“where φ 0 ≡ h/e is the flux quantum.”
Cites
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611 · see citing works
Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L., & Kim, P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04235 · Cited by 13,435 · see citing works
Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes
Berry, M. V. (1984) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1984.0023 · Cited by 9,252 · see citing works
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics
Arnold, V. I. (1989) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1 · Cited by 9,116 · see citing works
Klitzing, K. V., Dorda, G., & Pepper, M. (1980) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.45.494 · Cited by 7,119 · see citing works
Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory
Aharonov, Y., & Bohm, D. (1959) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.115.485 · Cited by 6,996 · see citing works
Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Periodic Potential
Thouless, D. J., Kohmoto, M., Nightingale, M. P., & den Nijs, M. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.405 · Cited by 6,973 · see citing works
Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation
Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M., & Das Sarma, S. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083 · Cited by 6,861 · see citing works
Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R., & Heeger, A. J. (1979) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.42.1698 · Cited by 6,783 · see citing works
Haldane, F. D. M. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2015 · Cited by 6,301 · see citing works
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics
Арнольд, В. И. (1978) · Graduate texts in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1693-1 · Cited by 5,169 · see citing works
Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H., & Ong, N. P. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1539 · Cited by 4,798 · see citing works
Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization
Kimura, T., Goto, T. K., Shintani, H., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02018 · Cited by 4,738 · see citing works
Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands
Marzari, N., & Vanderbilt, D. H. (1997) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.56.12847 · Cited by 4,715 · see citing works
Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity
Cheong, S., & MOSTOVOY, M. V. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1804 · Cited by 4,603 · see citing works
Theory of polarization of crystalline solids
King-Smith, R. D., & Vanderbilt, D. (1993) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.1651 · Cited by 4,472 · see citing works
Band structure of indium antimonide
Kane, E. O. (1957) · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-3697(57)90013-6 · Cited by 3,701 · see citing works
Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,
Dirac, P. A. M. (1931) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0130 · Cited by 3,701 · see citing works
Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields
Hofstadter, D. R. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.14.2239 · Cited by 3,495 · see citing works
Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators
Qi, X.-L., Hughes, T. L., & Zhang, S.-C. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.195424 · Cited by 3,329 · see citing works
Controlling the Electronic Structure of Bilayer Graphene
Ohta, T., Bostwick, A., Seyller, T. K., Horn, K., & Rotenberg, E. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130681 · Cited by 3,300 · see citing works
Hirsch, J. E. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1834 · Cited by 3,163 · see citing works
Observation of the Spin Hall Effect in Semiconductors
Kato, Y. K., Myers, R. C., Gossard, A. C., & Awschalom, D. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1105514 · Cited by 2,636 · see citing works
Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach
Resta, R. (1994) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.66.899 · Cited by 2,567 · see citing works
Halperin, B. I. (1982) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.25.2185 · Cited by 2,547 · see citing works
Spin—Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems
Winkler, R. (2003) · Springer Tracts in Modern Physics · doi:10.1007/b13586 · Cited by 2,489 · see citing works
Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions
Laughlin, R. B. (1981) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5632 · Cited by 2,478 · see citing works
Substrate-induced bandgap opening in epitaxial graphene
Zhou, S., Gweon, G.-H., Fedorov, A. V., First, P. N., de Heer, W. A., Lee, D. H., Guinea, F., Neto, A. H. C., & Lanzara, A. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2003 · Cited by 2,379 · see citing works
Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topological Transport
Xiao, D., Yao, W., & Niu, Q. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.236809 · Cited by 2,296 · see citing works
Self-citationElectric polarization reversal and memory in a multiferroic material induced by magnetic fields
Hur, N., Park, S., Sharma, P., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02572 · Cited by 2,263 · see citing works
On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non-Relativistic Limit
Foldy, L. L., & Wouthuysen, S. A. (1950) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.78.29 · Cited by 2,183 · see citing works
Landau-Level Degeneracy and Quantum Hall Effect in a Graphite Bilayer
McCann, E., & Fal’ko, V. I. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.086805 · Cited by 2,060 · see citing works
Unconventional quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase of 2π in bilayer graphene
Novoselov, K. S., McCann, E., Morozov, S. V., Fal’ko, V. I., Katsnelson, M. I., Zeitler, U., Jiang, D., Schedin, F., & Geim, A. K. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys245 · Cited by 1,967 · see citing works
Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids
Zak, J. (1989) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.2747 · Cited by 1,950 · see citing works
Dissipationless Quantum Spin Current at Room Temperature
Murakami, S., Nagaosa, N., & Zhang, S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087128 · Cited by 1,947 · see citing works
Holonomy, the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem, and Berry's Phase
Simon, B. (1983) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.51.2167 · Cited by 1,884 · see citing works
Condensed-Matter Simulation of a Three-Dimensional Anomaly
Semenoff, G. W. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.2449 · Cited by 1,832 · see citing works
Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems
Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2111 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Quantization of particle transport
Thouless, D. J. (1983) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.27.6083 · Cited by 1,767 · see citing works
Karplus, R., & Luttinger, J. M. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.95.1154 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
Valley filter and valley valve in graphene
Rycerz, A., Tworzydło, J., & Beenakker, C. W. J. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys547 · Cited by 1,681 · see citing works
Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors
Dyakonov, M. I., & Perel, V. I. (1971) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(71)90196-4 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
Direct electronic measurement of the spin Hall effect
Valenzuela, S. O., & Tinkham, M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04937 · Cited by 1,508 · see citing works
Observation of coupled magnetic and electric domains
Fiebig, M., Lottermoser, T., Fröhlich, D., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01077 · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Wunderlich, J., Kaestner, B., Sinova, J., & Jungwirth, T. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.047204 · Cited by 1,494 · see citing works
Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen
Peierls, R. F. (1933) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1007/bf01342591 · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
Side-Jump Mechanism for the Hall Effect of Ferromagnets
Berger, L. (1970) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.2.4559 · Cited by 1,359 · see citing works
Electric polarization as a bulk quantity and its relation to surface charge
Vanderbilt, D., & King-Smith, R. D. (1993) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.4442 · Cited by 1,307 · see citing works
Precession of the Polarization of Particles Moving in a Homogeneous Electromagnetic Field
Bargmann, V., Michel, L., & Telegdi, V. L. (1959) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.2.435 · Cited by 1,201 · see citing works
Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields
Wu, T. T., & Yang, C. N. (1975) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.12.3845 · Cited by 1,196 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(1.20) is the field generated by a monopole at the origin h = 0 (Dirac, 1931; Sakurai, 1993; Wu and Yang, 1975), where the two energy levels become degenerate.”
BackgroundInfluentialValley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking
Yao, W., Xiao, D., & Niu, Q. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.235406 · Cited by 1,158 · see citing works
Self-citationOnoda, M., Murakami, S., & Nagaosa, N. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.083901 · Cited by 1,148 · see citing works
Analytic Properties of Bloch Waves and Wannier Functions
Kohn, W. (1959) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.115.809 · Cited by 1,145 · see citing works
Quantized Hall conductance as a topological invariant
Niu, Q., Thouless, D. J., & Wu, Y.-S. (1985) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.31.3372 · Cited by 1,136 · see citing works
Self-citationTopological invariant and the quantization of the Hall conductance
Kohmoto, M. (1985) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(85)90148-4 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
On the Adiabatic Theorem of Quantum Mechanics
Kato, T. (1950) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.5.435 · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
Room-Temperature Reversible Spin Hall Effect
Kimura, T., Otani, Y., Sato, T., Takahashi, S., & Maekawa, S. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.156601 · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
The Anomalous Hall Effect and Magnetic Monopoles in Momentum Space
Fang, Z., Nagaosa, N., Takahashi, K. S., Asamitsu, A., Mathieu, R., Ogasawara, T., Yamada, H., Kawasaki, M., Tokura, Y., & Terakura, K. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089408 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry-phase effects
Sundaram, G. M., & Niu, Q. (1999) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.14915 · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
Self-citationFirst Principles Calculation of Anomalous Hall Conductivity in Ferromagnetic bcc Fe
Yao, Y., Kleinman, L., MacDonald, A. H., Sinova, J., Jungwirth, T., Wang, D.-S., Wang, E., & Niu, Q. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.037204 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Self-citationTheory of the Insulating State
Kohn, W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.133.a171 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
The spontaneous hall effect in ferromagnetics II
Smit, J. (1958) · Physica · doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(58)93541-9 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Bloch Oscillations of Atoms in an Optical Potential
Ben Dahan, M., Peik, E., Reichel, J., Castin, Y., & Salomon, C. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4508 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
Magnetoelectric Polarizability and Axion Electrodynamics in Crystalline Insulators
Essin, A. M., Moore, J. E., & Vanderbilt, D. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.146805 · Cited by 947 · see citing works
Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnetic Semiconductors
Jungwirth, T., Niu, Q., & MacDonald, A. H. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.207208 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
Self-citationWen, X. G., & Niu, Q. (1990) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.9377 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
Self-citationStrong Suppression of Weak Localization in Graphene
Morozov, S. V., Novoselov, K. S., Katsnelson, M. I., Schedin, F., Ponomarenko, L. A., Jiang, D., & Geim, A. K. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.016801 · Cited by 903 · see citing works
Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors
Qi, X.-L., Wu, Y.-S., & Zhang, S.-C. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.085308 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Two applications of axion electrodynamics
Wilczek, F. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.1799 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Scattering approach to parametric pumping
Brouwer, P. W. (1998) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.r10135 · Cited by 844 · see citing works
Quantum Theory of Electrical Transport Phenomena
Kohn, W., & Luttinger, J. M. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.590 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Elementary Excitations of a Linearly Conjugated Diatomic Polymer
Rice, M. J., & Melé, E. J. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1455 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Berry Curvature on the Fermi Surface: Anomalous Hall Effect as a Topological Fermi-Liquid Property
Haldane, F. D. M. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.206602 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Bliokh, K. Y., & Bliokh, Y. P. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.073903 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Piezoelectricity and flexoelectricity in crystalline dielectrics
Tagantsev, A. K. (1986) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.34.5883 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in Hg 1 − y Mn y Te Quantum Wells
Liu, C., Qi, X.-L., Dai, X., Fang, Z., & Zhang, S. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.146802 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Quantum-Mechanical Position Operator in Extended Systems
Resta, R. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1800 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Dynamics of Band Electrons in Electric and Magnetic Fields
Wannier, G. H. (1962) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.34.645 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Interpretation of the de Haas-van Alphen effect
Onsager, L. (1952) · The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440908521019 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Zak, J. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.a1602 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Theory of quantised Hall conductivity in two dimensions
Streda, P. (1982) · Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/15/22/005 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Chang, M., & Niu, Q. (1996) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.53.7010 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Adiabatic Quantum Electron Pump
Switkes, M., Marcus, C. M., Campman, K. L., & Gossard, A. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5409.1905 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Geometrodynamics of spinning light
Bliokh, K. Y., Niv, A., Kleiner, V., & Hasman, E. (2008) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2008.229 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Berry-Phase Effect in Anomalous Thermoelectric Transport
Xiao, D., Yao, Y., Fang, Z., et al. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.026603 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Self-citationBerry Phase Correction to Electron Density of States in Solids
Xiao, D., Shi, J., & Niu, Q. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.137204 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Self-citationHomotopy and Quantization in Condensed Matter Physics
Avron, J. E., Seiler, R., & Simon, B. (1983) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.51.51 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Miyasato, T., Abe, N., Fujii, T., Asamitsu, A., Onoda, S., Onose, Y., Nagaosa, N., & Tokura, Y. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.086602 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Topological Hall Effect and Berry Phase in Magnetic Nanostructures
Bruno, P., Dugaev, V. K., & Taillefumier, M. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.096806 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Ye, J., Kim, Y. B., Millis, A. J., Shraiman, B. I., Majumdar, P., & Tešanović, Z. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3737 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Ab initiotheory of gate induced gaps in graphene bilayers
Min, H., Sahu, B. R., Banerjee, S. K., & MacDonald, A. H. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.155115 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Proper Scaling of the Anomalous Hall Effect
Tian, Y., Ye, L., & Jin, X. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.087206 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Theory of the electric polarization in crystals
Resta, R. (1992) · Ferroelectrics · doi:10.1080/00150199208016065 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Imbert, C. (1972) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.5.787 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
First-Principles Approach to Insulators in Finite Electric Fields
Souza, I., Íñiguez, J., & Vanderbilt, D. H. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.117602 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnets
Onoda, S., Sugimoto, N., & Nagaosa, N. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.126602 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field
Blount, E. I. (1962) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.126.1636 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Electron Localization in the Insulating State
Resta, R., & Sorella, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.370 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Quantised adiabatic charge transport in the presence of substrate disorder and many-body interaction
Niu, Q., & Thouless, D. J. (1984) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/17/12/016 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Self-citationManifestation of Berry's Phase in Metal Physics
Mikitik, G. P., & Sharlai, Y. V. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2147 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect in Platinum: First-Principles Calculations
Guo, G., Murakami, S., Chen, T.-W., et al. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.096401 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Vignale, G., & Rasolt, M. (1988) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.10685 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Sih, V., Myers, R. C., Kato, Y. K., et al. (2005) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys009 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Onoda, S., Sugimoto, N., & Nagaosa, N. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.165103 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Geometry of the Time-Dependent Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics
Krämer, P., & Saraceno, M. (1981) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-10579-4 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Orbital Magnetization in Periodic Insulators
Thonhauser, T., Ceresoli, D., Vanderbilt, D., et al. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.137205 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Theory of the Hall Effect in Ferromagnetic Substances
Luttinger, J. M. (1958) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.112.739 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
The Effect of a Magnetic Field on Electrons in a Periodic Potential
Luttinger, J. M. (1951) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.84.814 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Morpurgo, A. F., & Guinea, F. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.196804 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Girvin, S. M., & Prange, R. E. (1987) · Graduate texts in contemporary physics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0499-9 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Giant spin Hall effect in perpendicularly spin-polarized FePt/Au devices
Seki, T., Hasegawa, Y., Mitani, S., Takahashi, S., Imamura, H., Maekawa, S., Nitta, J., & Takanashi, K. (2008) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2098 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Topological Quantum Numbers in Nonrelativistic Physics
Thouless, D. J. (1998) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789812386298 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Topological Nature of Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnets
Onoda, M., & Nagaosa, N. (2002) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.71.19 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Adiabatic Perturbation Theory in Quantum Dynamics
Teufel, S. (2003) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/b13355 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Nenciu, G. (1991) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.63.91 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Semiclassical theories of the anomalous Hall effect
Sinitsyn, N. A. (2007) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/02/023201 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Martin, R. M. (1972) · Physical review. B, Solid state · doi:10.1103/physrevb.5.1607 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Coherent electron focusing with quantum point contacts in a two-dimensional electron gas
van Houten, H., Beenakker, C. W. J., Williamson, J. G., et al. (1989) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.39.8556 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Valley Susceptibility of an Interacting Two-Dimensional Electron System
Gunawan, O., Shkolnikov, Y. P., Vakili, K., Gokmen, T., Poortere, E. P. D., & SHAYEGAN, M. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.186404 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
SU ( 2 ) non-Abelian holonomy and dissipationless spin current in semiconductors
Murakami, S., Nagosa, N., & Zhang, S. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.235206 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach
Souza, I., Wilkens, T., & Martin, R. M. (2000) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.1666 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, Chern insulators, and metals
Ceresoli, D., Thonhauser, T., Vanderbilt, D. H., & Resta, R. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.024408 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Electrons in Perturbed Periodic Lattices
Slater, J. C. (1949) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.76.1592 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
A simple theory of the anomalous hall effect in semiconductors
Nozières, P., & Lewiner, C. (1973) · Journal de physique · doi:10.1051/jphys:019730034010090100 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Manifestations of Berry's phase in molecules and condensed matter
Resta, R. (2000) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/12/9/201 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Berry-phase treatment of the homogeneous electric field perturbation in insulators
Nunes, R. W., & Gonze, X. (2001) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.155107 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Sinitsyn, N. A., MacDonald, A. H., Jungwirth, T., Dugaev, V. K., & Sinova, J. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.045315 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Berry Phase, Hyperorbits, and the Hofstadter Spectrum
Chang, M.-C., & Niu, Q. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1348 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Self-citationElectric polarization in crystals and its response to thermal and elastic perturbations
Tagantsev, A. K. (1991) · Phase Transitions · doi:10.1080/01411599108213201 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Experimental Realization of a Quantum Spin Pump
Watson, S. K., Potok, R. M., Marcus, C. M., et al. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.258301 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Quantum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and Its Generalization to Interacting Systems
Shi, J., Vignale, G., Xiao, D., et al. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.197202 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationMott Relation for Anomalous Hall and Nernst Effects in Ga1−xMnxAs Ferromagnetic Semiconductors
Pu, Y., Chiba, D., Matsukura, F., et al. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.117208 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Macroscopic polarization as a geometric quantum phase: Many-body formulation
Ortiz, G., & Martin, R. M. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.14202 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Linear Magnetization Dependence of the Intrinsic Anomalous Hall Effect
Zeng, C., Yao, Y., Niu, Q., et al. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.037204 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantization of the Hall Conductance for General, Multiparticle Schrödinger Hamiltonians
Avron, J. E., & Seiler, R. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.259 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Cooper, N. R., Halperin, B. I., & Rouzine, I. M. (1997) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.2344 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Semiclassical quantum mechanics
Hagedorn, G. A. (1980) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01230088 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Single-electron transport in a one-dimensional channel by high-frequency surface acoustic waves
Talyanskii, V. I., Shilton, J. M., Pepper, M., et al. (1997) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.56.15180 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Magnetic Translation Group. II. Irreducible Representations
Zak, J. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.a1607 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Weak Localization in Bilayer Graphene
Gorbachev, R., Tikhonenko, F. V., Mayorov, A. S., Horsell, D. W., & Savchenko, A. K. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.176805 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Mesoscopic Mechanism of Adiabatic Charge Transport
Zhou, F., Spivak, B. Z., & Altshuler, B. L. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.608 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Lee, W.-L., Watauchi, S., Miller, V. L., Cava, R. J., & Ong, N. P. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094383 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Geometrical Optics of Beams with Vortices: Berry Phase and Orbital Angular Momentum Hall Effect
Bliokh, K. Y. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.043901 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Comment on calculations of electric polarization in crystals
Martin, R. M. (1974) · Physical review. B, Solid state · doi:10.1103/physrevb.9.1998 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Semiclassical Spin Transport in Spin-Orbit-Coupled Bands
Culcer, D., Sinova, J., Sinitsyn, N. A., et al. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.046602 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Energy spectrum and the quantum Hall effect on the square lattice with next-nearest-neighbor hopping
Hatsugai, Y., & Kohmoto, M. (1990) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.42.8282 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Geometric phases in the asymptotic theory of coupled wave equations
Littlejohn, R. G., & Flynn, W. G. (1991) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.44.5239 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Wannier-Stark Ladders and Bloch Oscillations in Superlattices
Mendez, E. E., & Bastard, G. (1993) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881353 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Detection of Valley Polarization in Graphene by a Superconducting Contact
Akhmerov, A. R., & Beenakker, C. W. J. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.157003 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Berry curvature, orbital moment, and effective quantum theory of electrons in electromagnetic fields
Chang, M., & Niu, Q. (2008) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/19/193202 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationAdiabatic Quantum Pump of Spin-Polarized Current
Mucciolo, E. R., Chamon, C., & Marcus, C. M. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.146802 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Universal Electromotive Force Induced by Domain Wall Motion
Yang, S. A., Beach, G. S. D., Knutson, C., et al. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.067201 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Zero modes and the quantized Hall conductance of the two-dimensional lattice in a magnetic field
Kohmoto, M. (1989) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.39.11943 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Anomalous Hall Heat Current and Nernst Effect in the CuCr2Se4−xBrx Ferromagnet
Lee, W., Watauchi, S., Miller, V. L., et al. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.226601 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Towards a quantum pump of electric charges
Niu, Q. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.1812 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationFermi-surface calculation of the anomalous Hall conductivity
Wang, X., Vanderbilt, D. H., Yates, J. R., & Souza, I. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.195109 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Critical properties of electron eigenstates in incommensurate systems
Wilkinson, M. (1984) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1984.0016 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Energy bands in the presence of an external force field—II
Adams, E. N., & Blount, E. I. (1959) · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-3697(59)90004-6 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Effective Action for Adiabatic Process: Dynamical Meaning of Berry and Simon's Phase
Kuratsuji, H., & Iida, S. (1985) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.74.439 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Dichroic f -sum rule and the orbital magnetization of crystals
Souza, I., & Vanderbilt, D. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.054438 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Anomalous Hall effect in paramagnetic two-dimensional systems
Culcer, D., MacDonald, A. H., & Niu, Q. (2003) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.045327 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationApplication of the Side-Jump Model to the Hall Effect and Nernst Effect in Ferromagnets
Berger, L. (1972) · Physical review. B, Solid state · doi:10.1103/physrevb.5.1862 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Quantised Hall conductance in a perfect crystal
Dana, I., Avron, J. E., & Žák, J. (1985) · Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/18/22/004 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Scaling of the Anomalous Hall Effect in Sr1−xCaxRuO3
Mathieu, R., Asamitsu, A., Yamada, H., et al. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.016602 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Effective Dynamics for Bloch Electrons: Peierls Substitution and Beyond
Panati, G., Spohn, H., & Teufel, S. (2003) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0950-1 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
BERRY PHASE CORRECTION TO ELECTRON DENSITY IN SOLIDS AND "EXOTIC" DYNAMICS
DUVAL, C., HORVÁTH, Z., HORVÁTHY, P. A., MARTINA, L., & STICHEL, P. C. (2006) · Modern Physics Letters B · doi:10.1142/s0217984906010573 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Sawada, K., & Nagaosa, N. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.237402 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Spin-Wave Dynamics in Real Crystals
Niu, Q., & Kleinman, L. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2205 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationAvron, J. E., Elgart, A., Graf, G. M., et al. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.236601 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Quantum Pump for Spin and Charge Transport in a Luttinger Liquid
Sharma, P., & Chamon, C. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.096401 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Adiabatic Dynamics of Local Spin Moments in Itinerant Magnets
Niu, Q., Wang, X., Kleinman, L., et al. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.207 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationCoherent wave-packet evolution in coupled bands
Culcer, D., Yao, Y., & Niu, Q. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.085110 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationReal-Space Approach to Calculation of Electric Polarization and Dielectric Constants
Nunes, R. W., & Vanderbilt, D. H. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.712 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Inoue, J.-I., Kato, T., Ishikawa, Y., et al. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.046604 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Group-Theoretical Consideration of Landau Level Broadening in Crystals
Zak, J. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.136.a776 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
The microscopic magnetization: concept andapplication
Hirst, L. L. (1997) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.69.607 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Motion of an Electron in a Perturbed Periodic Potential
Adams, E. N. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.41 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Spin-dependent Hall effect in semiconductors
Chazalviel, J. N. (1975) · Physical review. B, Solid state · doi:10.1103/physrevb.11.3918 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Linear-Network Model for Magnetic Breakdown in Two Dimensions
Chambers, W. G. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a135 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Disorder effects in the anomalous Hall effect induced by Berry curvature
Sinitsyn, N. A., Niu, Q., Sinova, J., & Nomura, K. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.045346 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationUmucalılar, R. O., Zhai, H., & Oktel, M. Ö. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.070402 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Localisation and the two-dimensional Hall effect
Thouless, D. J. (1981) · Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/14/23/022 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Anomalous Hall effect in a two-dimensional electron gas with spin-orbit interaction
Dugaev, V. K., Bruno, P., Taillefumier, M., Canals, B., & Lacroix, C. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.224423 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Geometrical aspects in optical wave-packet dynamics
Onoda, M., Murakami, S., & Nagaosa, N. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.066610 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
The lifetime of Wannier ladder states
Avron, J. E. (1982) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90213-5 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Thomas precession, spin-orbit interaction, and Berry’s phase
Mathur, H. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.3325 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Enhanced Spin Hall Effect by Resonant Skew Scattering in the Orbital-Dependent Kondo Effect
Guo, G., Maekawa, S., & Nagaosa, N. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.036401 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Topological spin transport of a relativistic electron
Bliokh, K. Y. (2005) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/epl/i2005-10205-1 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Einstein’s Unknown Insight and the Problem of Quantizing Chaos
Stone, A. D. (2005) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2062917 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Noncommutative geometry and non-Abelian Berry phase in the wave-packet dynamics of Bloch electrons
Shindou, R., & Imura, K.-I. (2005) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.05.019 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Phase Loss in WKB Waves Due to Reflection by a Potential
Friedrich, H., & Trost, J. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4869 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
An example of phase holonomy in WKB theory
Wilkinson, M. (1984) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/17/18/016 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Transport and Dissipation in Quantum Pumps
Avron, J. E., Elgart, A., Graf, G. M., & Sadun, L. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1023/b:joss.0000037245.45780.e1 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Polarization and Adiabatic Pumping in Inhomogeneous Crystals
Xiao, D., Shi, J., Clougherty, D. P., & Niu, Q. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.087602 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationAnomalous Nernst Effects in Pyrochlore Molybdates with Spin Chirality
Hanasaki, N., Sano, K., Onose, Y., OHTSUKA, T., Iguchi, S., Kézsmárki, I., Miyasaka, S., Onoda, S., Nagaosa, N., & Tokura, Y. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.106601 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Gosselin, P., Bérard, A., & Mohrbach, H. (2007) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2007-00212-6 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Chun, S., Kim, Y. S., Choi, H. K., Jeong, I. T., Lee, W. O., Suh, K. S., Oh, Y. S., Kim, K. H., Khim, Z. G., Woo, J. C., et al. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.026601 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Observation of Berry's Geometrical Phase in Electron Diffraction from a Screw Dislocation
Bird, D. M., & Preston, A. R. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2863 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
First-Principles Calculation of Diamagnetic Band Structure
Schellnhuber, H. J., & Obermair, G. M. (1980) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.45.276 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Gauge Fields, Geometric Phases, and Quantum Adiabatic Pumps
Zhou, H.-Q., Cho, S. Y., & McKenzie, R. H. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.186803 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Ashcroft, N. W., 1976, Solid State Physics
- Azbel, M. Y., 1964, Sov. Phys. JETP, 19, 634
- Blount, E. I., 1962, Solid State Physics
- Bohm, A., 2003, The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems: Foundations, Mathematical Concepts, and Applications in Molecular and Condensed Matter Physics, 10.1007/978-3-662-10333-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Bychkov, Y., 1984, JETP Lett., 39, 78
- 1980, The Hall Effect and Its Application
- Dyakonov, M. I., 1971, JETP Lett., 13, 467
- Federov, F. I., 1955, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 105, 465
- Jackson, J. D., 1998, Classical Electrodynamics
- Khinchin, A. Y., 1964, Continued Fractions
- Lifshitz, E. M., 1980, Statistical Physics: Part 2 (Course of Theoretical Physics)
- Marder, M. P., 2000, Condensed-Matter Physics
- Messiah, A., 1962, Quantum Mechanics
- Morandi, G., 1988, Quantum Hall Effect: Topological Problems in Condensed-Matter Physics
- Rashba, E. I., 1960, Sov. Phys. Solid State, 2, 1224
- Resta, R., 2007, Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective
- Sakurai, 1993, Modern Quantum Mechanics
- Shapere, A., 1989, Geometric Phases in Physics
- Strange, P., 1998, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: With Applications in Condensed Matter and Atomic Physics, 10.1017/CBO9780511622755 · DOI
- Tabor, M., 1989, Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics: An Introduction
- Yafet, Y., 1963, Solid State Physics: Advances in Research and Applications
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J., & Vishwanath, A. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015001 · Cited by 4,528 · see citing works
“The semiclassical equations of motion for an electron now take the following symmetric form (Xiao et al., 2010a) ṙ = v − ṗ× B (5) ṗ = eE + eṙ×B (6) where v is an appropriately defined renormalized band velocity and E, B are externally applied electric and magnetic fields.”
BackgroundPhotonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides
Mak, K. F., & Shan, J. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.282 · Cited by 3,819 · see citing works
Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Amo, A., Goldman, N., Hafezi, M., Lu, L., Rechtsman, M. C., Schuster, D., Simon, J., Zilberberg, O., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015006 · Cited by 3,722 · see citing works
Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D., & Soljačić, M. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.248 · Cited by 3,655 · see citing works
Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications
Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I., & Vanderbilt, D. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1419 · Cited by 3,283 · see citing works
Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides
Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D., & Heinz, T. F. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2942 · Cited by 2,855 · see citing works
Self-citationSpin–orbit interactions of light
Bliokh, K. Y., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Nori, F., & Zayats, A. V. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.201 · Cited by 2,276 · see citing works
Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature
Nakatsuji, S., Kiyohara, N., & Higo, T. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15723 · Cited by 1,721 · see citing works
<i>Colloquium</i> : Topological band theory
Bansil, A., Lin, H., & Das, T. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.021004 · Cited by 1,587 · see citing works
Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of Weyl metals
Son, D. T., & Spivak, B. Z. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.104412 · Cited by 1,378 · see citing works
Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferromagnetic kagome-lattice semimetal
Liu, E., Sun, Y., Kumar, N., Muechler, L., Sun, A., Jiao, L., Yang, S.-Y., Liu, D., Liang, A., Xu, Q., et al. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0234-5 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms
Goldman, N., Juzeliūnas, G., Öhberg, P., & Spielman, I. B. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/12/126401 · Cited by 1,212 · see citing works
Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal Invariant Materials
Sodemann, I., & Fu, L. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.216806 · Cited by 1,145 · see citing works
Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene
McIver, J. W., Schulte, B., Stein, F.-U., Matsuyama, T., Jotzu, G., Meier, G., & Cavalleri, A. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0698-y · Cited by 888 · see citing works
Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet
Ikhlas, M., Tomita, T., Koretsune, T., Suzuki, M.-T., Nishio-Hamane, D., Arita, R., Otani, Y., & Nakatsuji, S. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4181 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Tokura, Y., & Kanazawa, N. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00297 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Giant anomalous Nernst effect and quantum-critical scaling in a ferromagnetic semimetal
Sakai, A., Mizuta, Y. P., Nugroho, A. A., Sihombing, R., Koretsune, T., Suzuki, M.-T., Takemori, N., Ishii, R., Nishio-Hamane, D., Arita, R., et al. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0225-6 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Quantum anomalous Hall effect and related topological electronic states
Weng, H., Yu, R., Hu, X., Dai, X., & Fang, Z. (2015) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2015.1068524 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Experimental reconstruction of the Berry curvature in a Floquet Bloch band
Fläschner, N., Rem, B. S., Tarnowski, M., Vogel, D., Lühmann, D.-S., Sengstock, K., & Weitenberg, C. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4568 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals
Wu, L., Patankar, S., Morimoto, T., Nair, N. L., Thewalt, E., Little, A., Analytis, J. G., Moore, J. E., & Orenstein, J. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3969 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Exploring 4D quantum Hall physics with a 2D topological charge pump
Lohse, M., Schweizer, C., Price, H. M., Zilberberg, O., & Bloch, I. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25000 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Chiral Phonons at High-Symmetry Points in Monolayer Hexagonal Lattices
Zhang, L., & Niu, Q. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.115502 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, H.-J., Kim, K.-S., Wang, J.-F., Sasaki, M., Satoh, N., Ohnishi, A., Kitaura, M., Yang, M., & Li, L. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.246603 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Anomalous Hall Effect in Weyl Metals
Burkov, A. A. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.187202 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Yang, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, W.-J., Parkin, S. S. P., & Yan, B. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa5487 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Chiral Anomaly as the Origin of the Planar Hall Effect in Weyl Semimetals
Nandy, S., Sharma, G., Taraphder, A., & Tewari, S. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.176804 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Semimetals for high-performance photodetection
Liu, J., Xia, F., Xiao, D., García de Abajo, F. J., & Sun, D. (2020) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0715-7 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Self-citationStructured Weyl Points in Spin-Orbit Coupled Fermionic Superfluids
Xu, Y., Zhang, F., & Zhang, C. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.265304 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Transport of Topological Semimetals
Hu, J., Xu, S.-Y., Ni, N., & Mao, Z. (2019) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010023 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Predicted Unusual Magnetoresponse in Type-II Weyl Semimetals
Yu, Z.-M., Yao, Y., & Yang, S. A. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.077202 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses
Ahn, J., Guo, G.-Y., Nagaosa, N., & Vishwanath, A. (2022) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01465-z · Cited by 252 · see citing works
“As we show in Supplementary Note 3, w 1 = w n 1 − w 1 , (63) where w 1 and w m 1 are the first Stiefel-Whitney numbers of bands n and m, or equivalently, the Berry phases of bands n and m divided by π [3, 4].”
BackgroundExperimental measurement of the Berry curvature from anomalous transport
Wimmer, M., Price, H. M., Carusotto, I., & Peschel, U. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4050 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Topological Mirror Superconductivity
Zhang, F., Kane, C. L., & Mele, E. J. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.056403 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Berry phase of nonideal Dirac fermions in topological insulators
Taskin, A. A., & Ando, Y. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.035301 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Dirac cones in two-dimensional artificial crystals for classical waves
Lu, J., Qiu, C., Xu, S., Ye, Y., Ke, M., & Liu, Z. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.134302 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines
Li, T., Duca, L., Reitter, M., Grusdt, F., Demler, E., Endres, M., Schleier-Smith, M., Bloch, I., & Schneider, U. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad5812 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Recent Progress in the Study of Topological Semimetals
Bernevig, A., Weng, H., Fang, Z., & Dai, X. (2018) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.87.041001 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Kowalewski, M., Bennett, K., Dorfman, K. E., & Mukamel, S. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.193003 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Chiral magnetic effect and natural optical activity in metals with or without Weyl points
Ma, J., & Pesin, D. A. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.235205 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Topology and Symmetry of Quantum Materials via Nonlinear Optical Responses
Orenstein, J., Moore, J. E., Morimoto, T., Torchinsky, D. H., Harter, J. W., & Hsieh, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013712 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
π Berry phase and Zeeman splitting of Weyl semimetal TaP
Hu, J., Liu, J. Y., Graf, D., Radmanesh, S. M. A., Adams, D. J., Chuang, A., Wang, Y., Chiorescu, I., Wei, J., Spinu, L., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep18674 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Scattering-free edge states between heterogeneous photonic topological insulators
Ma, T., & Shvets, G. (2017) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.165102 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Resonance-enhanced optical nonlinearity in the Weyl semimetal TaAs
Patankar, S., Wu, L., Lu, B., Rai, M., Tran, J. D., Morimoto, T., Parker, D. E., Grushin, A. G., Nair, N. L., Analytis, J. G., et al. (2018) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.165113 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Anomalous and Quantum Hall Effects in Lossy Photonic Lattices
Ozawa, T., & Carusotto, I. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.133902 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Thermoelectric quantum oscillations in ZrSiS
Matusiak, M., Cooper, J. R., & Kaczorowski, D. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15219 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Measurement of Chern numbers through center-of-mass responses
Price, H. M., Zilberberg, O., Ozawa, T., Carusotto, I., & Goldman, N. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.245113 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Non-Abelian gauge field optics
Chen, Y., Zhang, R.-Y., Xiong, Z., Hang, Z. H., Li, J., Shen, J. Q., & Chan, C. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10974-8 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Phonon Magnetic Moment from Electronic Topological Magnetization
Ren, Y., Xiao, C., Saparov, D., & Niu, Q. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.186403 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationIshizuka, H., Hayata, T., Ueda, M., & Nagaosa, N. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.216601 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Magnetic torque anomaly in the quantum limit of Weyl semimetals
Moll, P. J. W., Potter, A. C., Nair, N. L., Ramshaw, B. J., Modic, K. A., Riggs, S., Zeng, B., Ghimire, N. J., Bauer, E. D., Kealhofer, R., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12492 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Monitoring nonadiabatic avoided crossing dynamics in molecules by ultrafast X-ray diffraction
Kowalewski, M., Bennett, K., & Mukamel, S. (2017) · Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1063/1.4984241 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Jho, Y.-S., & Kim, K.-S. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.205133 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Photonic Hall effect and helical Zitterbewegung in a synthetic Weyl system
Ye, W., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Horsley, S. A. R., Wen, S., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Light: Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-019-0160-z · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Berry curvature as a lower bound for multiparameter estimation
Guo, W., Zhong, W., Jing, X.-X., Fu, L.-B., & Wang, X. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.042115 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Spin-orbit interactions of light in isotropic media
Bliokh, K. Y., Aiello, A., & Alonso, M. A. (2012) · The Angular Momentum of Light · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511795213.009 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Wavepacket Self‐Rotation and Helical Zitterbewegung in Symmetry‐Broken Honeycomb Lattices
Liu, X., Lunić, F., Song, D., Dai, Z., Xia, S., Tang, L., Xu, J., Chen, Z., & Buljan, H. (2021) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.202000563 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ghodrati, M. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.046004 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Spin-orbit interactions of light
Bliokh, K. Y., Rodriguez-Fortuno, F. J., Nori, F., & Zayats, A. V. (2015) · arXiv
Weyl and Dirac Semimetals in Three Dimensional Solids
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J., & Vishwanath, A. (2017) · arXiv
“The semiclassical equations of motion for an electron now take the following symmetric form (Xiao et al., 2010a) ṙ = v − ṗ× B (5) ṗ = eE + eṙ×B (6) where v is an appropriately defined renormalized band velocity and E, B are externally applied electric and magnetic fields.”
Background
- Authors
- Xiao, D., Chang, M.-C., & Niu, Q.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-07-06
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1959-2007
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2132568564
- Cited by
- 5,277
- References
- 236
- Citations by year
- 2026: 496 · 2025: 584 · 2024: 552 · 2023: 484 · 2022: 464 · 2021: 518 · 2020: 420 · 2019: 348 · 2018: 328 · 2017: 270 · 2016: 216 · 2015: 192 · 2014: 140 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 87
- FWCI
- 45.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Welch Foundation
- National Science Council
- Basic Energy Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Keywords
- Berry phase, Berry curvature, electron wave functions, anomalous Hall effect, quantum Hall effect, spin Hall effect, orbital magnetism, polarization, requantization, solid state physics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review