Cited by 75COVID-19 diagnosis using AIPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Advancing COVID-19 diagnosis with privacy-preserving collaboration in artificial intelligence

Open access
Bai, Xiang, Wang, Hanchen, Ma, Liya, Xu, Yongchao, Gan, Jiefeng, Fan, Ziwei, Yang, Fan, Ma, Ke +38 more·2021·Nature Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Artificial intelligence provides a promising solution for streamlining COVID-19 diagnoses; however, concerns surrounding security and trustworthiness impede the collection of large-scale representative medical data, posing a considerable challenge for training a well-generalized model in clinical practices. To address this, we launch the Unified CT-COVID AI Diagnostic Initiative (UCADI), where the artificial intelligence (AI) model can be distributedly trained and independently executed at each host institution under a federated learning framework without data sharing. Here we show that our federated learning framework model considerably outperformed all of the local models (with a test sensitivity/specificity of 0.973/0.951 in China and 0.730/0.942 in the United Kingdom), achieving comparable performance with a panel of professional radiologists. We further evaluated the model on the hold-out (collected from another two hospitals without the federated learning framework) and heterogeneous (acquired with contrast materials) data, provided visual explanations for decisions made by the model, and analysed the trade-offs between the model performance and the communication costs in the federated training process. Our study is based on 9,573 chest computed tomography scans from 3,336 patients collected from 23 hospitals located in China and the United Kingdom. Collectively, our work advanced the prospects of utilizing federated learning for privacy-preserving AI in digital health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-021-00421-z

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep convolutional neural networks have been shown to give excellent performance in imaging.

    “where deep convolutional neural networks have been shown to given excellent performance.26”
  • CycleGANs, trained on unpaired contrast and non-contrast CT scans, have been used to generate synthetic non-contrast or contrast CT scans, showing improvements in COVID-19 diagnosis.

    “In medicine, a model architecture called 'CycleGANs' , trained on unpaired contrast and non-contrast CT scans, has been used to generate synthetic non-contrast or contrast CT scans 121 , with this approach showing improvements, for instance, in COVID-19 diagnosis 122”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [122]

  • Coupling federated learning with homomorphic encryption to train a model to predict a COVID-19 diagnosis from chest CT scans resulted in the aggregate model outperforming all of the locally trained models.

    “A recent study demonstrated the potential of coupling federated learning with homomorphic encryption to train a model to predict a COVID-19 diagnosis from chest CT scans, with the aggregate model outperforming all of the locally trained models 122”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, X., Wang, H., Ma, L., Xu, Y., Gan, J., Fan, Z., Yang, F., Ma, K., Yang, J., Bai, S., Shu, C., Zou, X., Huang, R., Zhang, C., Liu, X., Tu, D., Xu, C., Zhang, W., Wang, X., Chen, A., Zeng, Y., Yang, D., Wang, M.-W., Holalkere, N., Halin, N. J., Kamel, I. R., Wu, J., Peng, X., Wang, X., Shao, J., Mongkolwat, P., Zhang, J., Liu, W., Roberts, M., Teng, Z., Beer, L., Sanchez, L. E., Sala, E., Rubin, D. L., Weller, A., Lasenby, J., Zheng, C., Wang, J., Li, Z., Schönlieb, C., & Xia, T.
Affiliations
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Wuhan Union Hospital (CN)
  • Wuhan Children's Hospital (CN)
  • Wuhan Blood Center (CN)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Central Hospital of Wuhan (CN)
  • Mahidol University (TH)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Bai, Xiang
  • Wang, Xi
  • Zheng, Chuansheng
  • Wang, Jianming
  • Li, Zhen
  • Schönlieb, Carola
  • Xia, Tian
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2021-12-15
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
1081-1089
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3213704721
Cited by
75
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 7
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Alan Turing Institute (777826)
  • Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Royal Society
  • European Commission (777826, HORIZON2020)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771801, 61703171)
  • Cambridge Trust
  • National Research Council of Thailand (25/2561)
  • Thammasat University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T017961/1, EP/V025279/1, EP/N014588/1, EP/T003553/1, EP/S026045/1)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA242879)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 diagnosis, federated learning, privacy-preserving machine learning, chest CT, distributed training, medical data security, model interpretability, cross-institutional collaboration, radiologist comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review