Cited by 551COVID-19 and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and AccessMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Prevalence and predictors of general psychiatric disorders and loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom

Open access
Li, Lambert Zixin, Wang, Senhu·2020·Psychiatry Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Despite ample research on the prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders during COVID-19, we know little about the broader psychological impact of the pandemic on a wider population. The study investigates the prevalence and predictors of general psychiatric disorders measured by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and frequency of loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom, a country heavily hit by the pandemic. We analyzed 15,530 respondents of the first large-scale, nationally representative survey of COVID-19 in a developed country, the first wave of Understanding Society COVID-19 Study. Results show that 29.2% of the respondents score 4 or more, the caseness threshold, on the general psychiatric disorder measure, and 35.86% of the respondents sometimes or often feel lonely. Regression analyses show that those who have or had COVID-19-related symptoms are more likely to develop general psychiatric disorders and are lonelier. Women and young people have higher risks of general psychiatric disorders and loneliness, while having a job and living with a partner are protective factors. This study showcases the psychological impact, including general psychiatric disorders and loneliness, of broader members of the society during COVID-19 and the underlying social inequalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113267

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L. Z., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Wang, Senhu
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
291
Pages
113267
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039041384
Cited by
551
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 177 · 2020: 26
FWCI
44.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (19ZDA149)
  • Nanjing University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, loneliness, GHQ-12, prevalence, predictive factors, social inequality, gender differences, youth, employment, living with a partner, psychological impact of pandemic, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, United Kingdom, Health Surveys, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review