Reshaping biomolecular structure prediction through strategic conformational exploration with HelixFold-S1
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Generating large ensembles of candidate conformations is standard for improving biomolecular structure prediction. Yet aimless sampling is inefficient and costly, producing many redundant conformations with limited diversity, so additional computation often yields little improvement. Here, we present HelixFold-S1, a guided planning approach that strategically targets the most informative regions of conformational space to produce accurate conformations. For each biomolecule, predicted inter-chain contact probabilities serve as a blueprint of the conformational space, guiding computational effort toward higher-probability, low-redundancy contacts that constrain structure generation. Across diverse biomolecular benchmarks, HelixFold-S1 achieves markedly higher structural accuracy than traditional unguided methods while reducing sampling requirements by an order of magnitude. Predicted contact probabilities also provide a rough indicator of prediction difficulty and sampling utility. These results demonstrate that guided planning reshapes conformational exploration and enables more efficient and accurate structural inference.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
HelixFold-S1 (HF-S1) adds contact prediction and contact conditioning modules to HelixFold3 to guide conformational sampling toward high-probability, low-redundancy inter-chain contacts. Across protein-antibody, protein-protein, protein-ligand, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA benchmarks, it improves accuracy over unguided sampling and reaches comparable protein-antibody precision with an order of magnitude fewer samples.
Key findings
- HF-S1 consistently outperformed HF3 and HF3 w/ AFSample across all tested complex types; for protein-antibody complexes it achieved over 55% improvement relative to HF3 and 33% relative to HF3 w/ AFSample.
- On protein-antibody interfaces, HF-S1 achieved comparable precision to HF3 with AFSample using only 10 samples versus 1,000 samples, representing about 1% of the computational cost.
- The contact prediction module produced more accurate contact probabilities than HF3 across molecular types, with protein-antibody showing the lowest AUPRC and protein-ligand the highest; contact conditioning achieved satisfaction rates above 70% in most test cases.
- Target-level contact probability correlated with prediction difficulty and sampling utility: lower-probability targets were generally harder, while intermediate-probability targets benefited most from multiple sampling.
Methods
- HF-S1 builds on HelixFold3/AlphaFold3 architecture and adds a Contact Prediction Module and Contact Conditioning Module; contacts are defined as any atom pair between two tokens within 5 Å.
- Inference has three stages: contact prediction, contact sampling, and contact-guided structure prediction and ranking; redundant contact pruning removes already-satisfied contacts, and structures are ranked by confidence score.
- Evaluation used RCSB PDB complexes collected between 2022.01.01 and 2024.12.31: protein-antibody n=221, protein-protein n=198, protein-ligand n=238, protein-RNA n=177, and protein-DNA n=254; 25 structures were generated per target and ranked by each method’s confidence score. Extensive protein-antibody sampling used 74 complexes released after 2024 with fewer than 800 residues.
Limitations
- The paper states that current confidence scores do not always reliably identify the most accurate structures, with C-index scores generally between 0.5 and 0.7, where 0.5 is random ranking.
- The paper notes diminishing returns from greedy contact selection, the sequential nature of redundancy contact pruning, and the need for better diversity-preserving search strategies such as MCTS or reinforcement learning.
- The paper also states that Chai-1 supports contact constraints only for protein-protein complexes, that Protenix w/ S1 and Chai-1 w/ S1 were run without RCP, and that baseline models may not reach best performance because HF-S1 may use a different contact definition; AlphaFold3 was unavailable for commercial use and Boltz-2 was excluded due to benchmark overlap with its training set.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 3 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Across different folding models including HF3, Protenix, and Chai-1, incorporating HF-S1 guided sampling leads to consistent performance gains.
“Moreover, across different folding models, including HF3, Protenix, and Chai-1, incorporating the guided sampling strategy of HF-S1 leads to consistent performance gains, underscoring its broad effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
HF-S1 achieves comparable precision to HF3 with AFsample using only 10 samples.
“Importantly, HF-S1 achieves comparable precision to HF3 with AFsample using only 10 samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Guided sampling improves exploration of the conformational space, producing more diverse and higher-quality ensembles.
“Guided sampling also improves exploration of the conformational space, producing more diverse and higher-quality ensembles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across most test cases, HF-S1 achieved contact satisfaction rates above 70%.
“Across most test cases, HF-S1 achieved satisfaction rates above 70% (Fig. 2f)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For protein-protein and protein-RNA/DNA interfaces, HF-S1 provides moderate but clear improvements.
“For protein-protein and protein-RNA/DNA interfaces, HF-S1 provides moderate but clear improvements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
HF-S1 consistently generates a broader spectrum of structures, spanning a wide range of confidence levels and precision values, including a notable fraction of high-accuracy predictions.
“HF-S1 consistently generates a broader spectrum of structures, spanning a wide range of confidence levels and precision values, including a notable fraction of high-accuracy predictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
HF-S1 achieves comparable accuracy to traditional methods using an order of magnitude fewer sampling steps.
“Remarkably, it achieves comparable accuracy to traditional methods using an order of magnitude fewer sampling steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
HF-S1 exhibits a gradual decline in precision as sampling proceeds, reflecting its design to explore progressively less probable contact configurations.
“In contrast, HF-S1 exhibits a gradual decline in precision as sampling proceeds, reflecting its design to explore progressively less probable contact configurations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein-antibody complexes showed the lowest AUPRC.
“Protein-antibody complexes showed the lowest AUPRC, reflecting the difficulty of this prediction scenario”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
HF-S1 achieves markedly higher structural accuracy than traditional unguided methods across diverse biomolecular benchmarks.
“Across diverse biomolecular benchmarks, HelixFold-S1 achieves markedly higher structural accuracy than traditional unguided methods while reducing sampling requirements by an order of magnitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The first few conformations generated by HF-S1 already outperform those of HF3 across most interface types, except protein-DNA complexes.
“Notably, the first few conformations generated by HF-S1 already outperform those of HF3 across most interface types, except protein-DNA complexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein-antibody complexes cluster in the lower range of target-level contact probabilities, indicating greater structural uncertainty.
“while protein-antibody complexes cluster in the lower range, indicating greater structural uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Guided planning itself can exhibit diminishing returns, because greedily selecting contacts from highest to lowest probability may progressively sample less informative regions.
“Moreover, guided planning itself can exhibit diminishing returns, because greedily selecting contacts from highest to lowest probability may progressively sample less informative regions (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
HF3 tends to sample conformations within a narrower confidence and precision range, indicating more limited structural diversity and fewer high-quality candidates.
“In contrast, HF3 tends to sample conformations within a narrower confidence and precision range, indicating more limited structural diversity and fewer high-quality candidates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein-ligand complexes achieved the highest AUPRC.
“whereas protein-ligand complexes achieved the highest AUPRC, indicating a relatively simpler task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with HF3, HF-S1 consistently produced more accurate contact probabilities across diverse molecular types.
“Compared with HF3, HF-S1 consistently produced more accurate contact probabilities across diverse molecular types (Fig. 2e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein-protein targets typically show higher target-level contact probabilities.
“Protein-protein targets typically show higher target-level contact probabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Protein-ligand complexes did not follow the intermediate-contact-probability sampling-utility trend.
“As protein-ligand complexes consistently exhibit high target-level contact probabilities, they did not follow this trend.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The strategy of sequentially excluding contacts from previously sampled structures improves performance.
“Although this strategy improves performance (Fig. S4), further approaches are needed to anticipate which contacts to select in order to preserve diversity more efficiently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
HF-S1 reduces sampling requirements by an order of magnitude relative to traditional unguided methods.
“Across diverse biomolecular benchmarks, HelixFold-S1 achieves markedly higher structural accuracy than traditional unguided methods while reducing sampling requirements by an order of magnitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein-RNA and protein-DNA complexes display a broader distribution of contact probabilities, reflecting greater variability in prediction difficulty across these categories.
“In contrast, protein-RNA and protein-DNA complexes display a broader distribution, reflecting greater variability in prediction difficulty across these categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Top-1 precision on protein-antibody interfaces generally improves with increased sample size across all methods, particularly for those incorporating advanced strategies such as HF-S1 or AFsample.
“As shown in Fig. 2c, Top-1 precision on protein-antibody interfaces generally improves with increased sample size across all methods, particularly for those incorporating advanced strategies such as HF-S1 or AFsample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Although lower-probability targets did benefit from sampling, their improvements were generally smaller than those in the intermediate group.
“Notably, although lower-probability targets did benefit from sampling, their improvements were generally smaller than those in the intermediate group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
HF-S1's performance advantage over HF3 is consistently observed across different Top-K precisions of the sampled conformations.
“In Fig. 2b, we further demonstrate that the performance advantage of HF-S1 over HF3 is consistently observed across different Top-K precisions of the sampled conformations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
HF-S1 consistently outperforms HF3 across all evaluation metrics, including F1 score, precision, and recall, for epitope prediction on the protein-antibody 2024 dataset.
“As shown in Fig. S5, HF-S1 consistently outperforms HF3 across all evaluation metrics, including F1 score, precision, and recall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Under different K-value settings, methods incorporating S1 demonstrate a significant improvement in the top-K metrics compared to those without S1 integration.
“From the results depicted in Fig. S1, it is evident that, under different K-value settings, methods incorporating S1 demonstrate a significant improvement in the top-K metrics compared to those without S1 integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The results of HF-S1 without RCP still surpassed the levels of HF3 and HF3 with AFSample.
“Nevertheless, the results of HF-S1 without RCP still surpassed the levels of HF3 and HF3 with AFSample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In protein-antibody complexes, the highest predicted contact probability is markedly lower compared to other complex types.
“In protein-antibody complexes, the highest predicted contact probability is markedly lower compared to other complex types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The improvement in success rates from S1 integration becomes more pronounced as the K-value increases.
“Moreover, this improvement becomes more pronounced as the K-value increases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
S1-integrated models predominantly enhance the success rates at the medium and high accuracy levels.
“Additionally, the S1-integrated models predominantly enhance the success rates at the medium and high accuracy levels, indicating their capability to generate a greater number of medium-to high-quality conformations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The proportion of cases with a higher STD in HF-S1's prediction metrics (43.7%) significantly exceeded that of the group with a higher STD in HF-S1 without RCP (11.7%).
“Notably, the proportion of cases with a higher STD in HF-S1's prediction metrics (43.7%) significantly exceeded that of the group with a higher STD in HF-S1 without RCP (11.7%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is significant variation in the highest contact probability values among different complex types.
“A notable observation is the significant variation in the highest contact probability values among different complex types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The model integrated with S1 exhibits a significantly faster growth rate in its oracle DockQ metric compared to models without S1 integration.
“Notably, the model integrated with S1 exhibits a significantly faster growth rate in its oracle DockQ metric compared to models without S1 integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a correlation between target-level contact probability and structural precision across interface types.
“a, Correlation between target-level contact probability (maximum value in the predicted matrix) and structural precision across interface types, evaluated using the Top-5 of 25 sampled conformations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Structural improvement from single to extensive sampling by HF-S1 across contact probability groups shows larger gains for lower-probability interfaces.
“c, Structural improvement from single to extensive sampling by HF-S1 across contact probability groups, measured using the best-performing conformations, showing larger gains for lowerprobability interfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared to models without S1 integration, S1-integrated models generally exhibit a marked increase in overall success rates.
“The analysis reveals that, compared to models without S1 integration, S1-integrated models generally exhibit a marked increase in overall success rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The metrics of HF-S1 without RCP were lower than those of HF-S1 incorporating the RCP mechanism.
“As illustrated in Fig. S4a, the metrics of HF-S1 without RCP were lower than those of HF-S1 incorporating the RCP mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Relative Top-5 precision of HF-S1 compared with HF3 across contact probability levels indicates stronger benefits on lower-probability targets.
“d, Relative Top-5 precision (of 25 sampled conformations) of HF-S1 compared with HF3 across contact probability levels, indicating stronger benefits on lower-probability targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The curated dataset of 74 protein-antibody complexes released after 2024 with residues less than 800 ensures no overlap with Boltz-2's training data.
“we curated a dataset of 74 complexes released after 2024 and with residues less than 800 for efficiency, ensuring no overlap with Boltz-2's training data [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Wayment-Steele, H. K. et al. Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2. Nature 625, 832–839 (2024). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Test samples were selected to have low sequence identity to the training set to minimize overlap.
“To minimize overlap with the training data, all test samples were selected to have low sequence identity to the training set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Intermediate cases offer partial yet informative contact signals, enabling the model to better explore the structural landscape and refine its predictions through sampling.
“In contrast, intermediate cases offer partial yet informative contact signals, enabling the model to better explore the structural landscape and refine its predictions through sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For targets with high contact probabilities, accurate structures can often be recovered from a single sample, leaving limited room for further enhancement.
“This trend is intuitive: for targets with high contact probabilities, accurate structures can often be recovered from a single sample, leaving limited room for further enhancement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Predicted contact probabilities can serve as a proxy for estimating target difficulty.
“We first show that predicted contact probabilities can serve as a proxy for estimating target difficulty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Higher precision in early sampling stages arises from the use of higher-probability contacts as structural constraints, which guide the generation of more accurate conformations.
“The higher precision observed in the early sampling stages arises from the use of higher-probability contacts as structural constraints, which guide the generation of more accurate conformations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
HF-S1 can effectively incorporate contact priors into structure prediction.
“demonstrating its ability to effectively incorporate contact priors into structure prediction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The model learns to utilize the provided contact information to enhance structure prediction accuracy.
“The model learns to utilize the provided contact information to enhance structure prediction accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
S1-integrated models are capable of generating a greater number of medium- to high-quality conformations.
“Additionally, the S1-integrated models predominantly enhance the success rates at the medium and high accuracy levels, indicating their capability to generate a greater number of medium-to high-quality conformations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of guidance from multiple sequence alignment (MSA) in protein-antibody cases further exacerbates the uncertainty.
“Additionally, the lack of guidance from multiple sequence alignment (MSA) in these cases further exacerbates the uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Contact conditioning applied with 70% probability and no contact constraints in 30% of samples helps maintain the model's ability to predict structures without external guidance.
“Contact conditioning is applied with 70% probability: 1-10 token pairs are uniformly sampled from C and provided as binary contact constraints.In the remaining 30% of samples, no contact constraints are used, which helps maintain the model's ability to predict structures without external guidance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The S1 model optimizes the conformational search process, enabling it to explore and identify higher-quality conformations more efficiently.
“The observed phenomenon highlights the potential of the S1 model to optimize the conformational search process, enabling it to explore and identify higher-quality conformations more efficiently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The S1-integrated model demonstrates a superior ability to leverage additional computational resources (i.e., more sampling iterations) to achieve greater gains in accuracy.
“In essence, the S1-integrated model demonstrates a superior ability to leverage additional computational resources (i.e., more sampling iterations) to achieve greater gains in accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The S1 model amplifies the benefits derived from increased sampling efforts.
“This accelerated progression underscores the capacity of the S1 model to amplify the benefits derived from increased sampling efforts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The RCP mechanism contributes to further amplifying the advantages of HF-S1.
“This indicates that the RCP mechanism contributes to further amplifying the advantages of HF-S1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This pattern indicates a relatively high level of uncertainty in the model's estimation of the docking interface positions.
“This pattern indicates a relatively high level of uncertainty in the model's estimation of the docking interface positions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 34
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCompared with conventional unguided sampling, HF-S1 substantially improves prediction accuracy at equivalent sampling effort, with the largest gains for challenging protein-antibody complexes.
“Compared with conventional unguided sampling, HelixFold-S1 substantially improves prediction accuracy at equivalent sampling effort, with the largest gains observed for challenging protein-antibody complexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor HF3, precision remains nearly constant across sampling steps, as the order of sampled conformations is effectively random.
“For HF3, which performs aimless sampling, precision remains nearly constant across steps, as the order of sampled conformations is effectively random.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningHF-S1 can still improve predictions for protein-ligand binding sites, but the relative gains are smaller compared with other complex types.
“Finally, protein-ligand binding sites are highly constrained, so while HF-S1 can still improve predictions, the relative gains are smaller compared with other complex types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein-ligand binding sites are highly constrained.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataImprovements are pronounced for Top-1, Top-5, and Top-25, although Top-1 gains exhibit greater variability.
“The improvements are pronounced for Top-1, Top-5, and Top-25, underscoring HF-S1's robustness across multiple ranking thresholds, although the Top-1 gains exhibit greater variability, potentially reflecting sensitivity to the selection of conformations based on the confidence score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCurrent confidence scores do not always reliably identify the most accurate structures, as high-confidence predictions may not correspond to true structural accuracy while low-confidence predictions can still include near-native conformations.
“Current confidence scores do not always reliably identify the most accurate structures, as high-confidence predictions may not correspond to true structural accuracy while low-confidence predictions can still include near-native conformations (Fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross complex types, most targets fall into the HF-S1 std higher category, particularly protein-antibody, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA complexes, where the HF-S1 std higher category accounts for roughly twice as many targets as the HF3 std higher category.
“Across complex types, most targets fall into the HF-S1 std higher category, particularly protein-antibody, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA complexes, where the HF-S1 std higher category accounts for roughly twice as many targets as the HF3 std higher category.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenPredicted contact probabilities provide a rough indicator of prediction difficulty and sampling utility.
“Predicted contact probabilities also provide a rough indicator of prediction difficulty and sampling utility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningPolar or charged residues such as Asp, Glu, and Lys often exhibit lower contact probabilities.
“Conversely, polar or charged residues, such as Asp, Glu, and Lys, often exhibit lower probabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHF-S1 consistently outperforms both HF3 and HF3 w/ AFSample across all complex types, with the magnitude of improvement highest for protein-antibody complexes, followed by protein-protein and protein-RNA/DNA interfaces, and smallest for protein-ligand binding sites.
“HF-S1 consistently outperforms both HF3 and HF3 w/ AFSample across all complex types, with the magnitude of improvement highest for protein-antibody complexes, followed by protein-protein and protein-RNA/DNA interfaces, and smallest for protein-ligand binding sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor protein-antibody complexes, HF-S1 achieves over a 55% improvement relative to HF3 and 33% relative to HF3 w/ AFSample.
“The largest gains are observed for protein-antibody complexes, where HF-S1 achieves over a 55% improvement relative to HF3 and 33% relative to HF3 w/ AFSample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTargets with intermediate contact probabilities achieved the greatest improvements from multi-sample prediction relative to single-sample predictions, while those with low or high probabilities saw more modest gains.
“We found that targets with intermediate contact probabilities achieved the greatest improvements, while those with low or high probabilities saw more modest gains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProtein-ligand complexes consistently exhibit high contact probabilities, suggesting that HF-S1 can often localize ligand binding sites with high confidence.
“Protein-ligand complexes consistently exhibit high contact probabilities, suggesting that HF-S1 can often localize ligand binding sites with high confidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLower-probability targets consistently yielded poorer predictions, while higher-probability targets were predicted with high precision.
“Targets were stratified into high, medium, and low groups, revealing a strong correlation across datasets: lower-probability targets consistently yielded poorer predictions, while higher-probability targets were predicted with high precision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningHydrophobic pairs such as Leu-Leu and Met-Met tend to show higher predicted contact probabilities.
“Hydrophobic pairs such as Leu-Leu and Met-Met tend to show higher predicted probabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPredicted inter-chain contact probabilities correlate strongly with structural difficulty and provide a practical guide for allocating sampling effort across targets.
“Predicted inter-chain contact probabilities correlate strongly with structural difficulty and provide a practical guide for allocating sampling effort across targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe approach is generalizable to other folding models to enhance structural precision.
“The approach is generalizable to other folding models to enhance structural precision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataExtensive sampling progressively improves structural accuracy.
“c, Comparison of HF-S1 with various baseline models on protein-antibody complexes released in 2024 (n=74), showing that extensive sampling progressively improves structural accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe oracle DockQ values for all models show a consistent upward trend as the number of sampling iterations increases, aligning with the characteristics of a scaling law.
“The results reveal a consistent upward trend in the oracle DockQ values for all models as the number of sampling iterations increases, aligning with the characteristics of a scaling law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the Protein-DNA test set, the top-1 iLDDT score for the S1-integrated model does not show a statistically significant enhancement, but notable improvements are observed in the top-5, top-10, and top-25 iLDDT metrics.
“Specifically, on the Protein-DNA test set, while the top-1 iLDDT score for the model integrated with S1 does not show a statistically significant enhancement, notable improvements are observed in the top-5, top-10, and top-25 iLDDT metrics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenPredicted contact probabilities reflect residue physicochemical preferences.
“e, Predicted contact probabilities reflect residue physicochemical preferences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAs the rank number increases, the probability values decline at a slower rate, resulting in a more long-tailed distribution.
“Moreover, as the rank number increases, the probability values decline at a slower rate, resulting in a more long-tailed distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHF-S1 shows a broader distribution of structural precision, whereas HF3 predictions are more concentrated.
“HF-S1 shows a broader distribution of structural precision, whereas HF3 predictions are more concentrated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo inter-chain residue pairs (R43-N26 and V103-L28) selected from HF-S1's predicted contact map and applied as spatial restraints during folding yielded two distinct binding conformations that both satisfied the defined contact distances (R43-N26 approximately 3.1 Å; V103-L28 approximately 4.2 Å).
“Two inter-chain residue pairs (R43-N26 and V103-L28) were selected from HF-S1's predicted contact map and applied as spatial restraints during folding, yielding two distinct binding conformations that both satisfied the defined contact distances (R43-N26 ≈ 3.1 Å; V103-L28 ≈ 4.2 Å).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTarget-level standard deviation of structural precision among sampled conformations for HF3 and HF-S1; higher values indicate greater conformational diversity.
“a, Target-level standard deviation of structural precision among sampled conformations for HF3 and HF-S1.Each point represents a target; higher values indicate greater conformational diversity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGuided planning reshapes conformational exploration and enables more efficient and accurate structural inference.
“These results demonstrate that guided planning reshapes conformational exploration and enables more efficient and accurate structural inference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy enforcing constraints on individual interfacial contacts, guided sampling helps capture correct local interactions, although single-contact constraints alone are not sufficient to fully determine the global geometry of larger, more complex interfaces.
“By enforcing constraints on individual interfacial contacts, guided sampling helps capture correct local interactions, although single-contact constraints alone are not sufficient to fully determine the global geometry of these larger, more complex interfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe largest gains for protein-antibody complexes likely reflect the structural diversity of antigen-binding sites, which makes conventional sampling less effective at capturing native-like geometries, whereas HF-S1's guided sampling increases the likelihood of generating correct interfacial contacts.
“This likely reflects the structural diversity of antigen-binding sites, which makes conventional sampling less effective at capturing native-like geometries, whereas HF-S1's guided sampling strategy increases the likelihood of generating correct interfacial contacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningBecause HF-S1 may employ a distinct definition of contacts from those folding models, the baseline models may not reach their best performance under this evaluation.
“Because HF-S1 may employ a distinct definition of contacts from those folding models, the baseline models may not reach their best performance under this evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLeveraging contact probabilities as structural constraints improves efficiency and prioritizes structurally meaningful regions of the conformational landscape.
“This behavior highlights that leveraging contact probabilities as structural constraints not only improves efficiency but also prioritizes structurally meaningful regions of the conformational landscape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLow contact probability generally corresponds to more difficult targets, which often require additional sampling to achieve accurate predictions.
“This indicates that low contact probability generally corresponds to more difficult targets, which often require additional sampling to achieve accurate predictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenChai-1 currently supports contact constraints only for protein-protein complexes, so results are reported for protein-antibody and protein-protein systems only.
“Moreover, Chai-1 currently supports contact constraints only for protein-protein complexes, and results are therefore reported for protein-antibody and protein-protein systems only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationSequences were clustered by similarity, and one representative per cluster was randomly chosen to ensure diversity and reduce redundancy.
“Sequences were clustered by similarity [21], and one representative per cluster was randomly chosen to ensure diversity and reduce redundancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Silva, G., Cui, J. Y., Dalgarno, D. C., Lisi, G. P. & Rubenstein, B. M. High-throughput prediction of protein conformational distributions with subsampled AlphaFold2. Nat. Commun. 15, 2464 (2024). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningProtenix w/ S1 and Chai-1 w/ S1 were run without redundancy contact pruning, whereas HF-S1 fully applies RCP during sampling.
“To enable parallel evaluation, Protenix w/ S1 and Chai-1 w/ S1 were run without redundancy contact pruning (RCP), which requires sequential sampling, whereas HF-S1 fully applies RCP during sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor lower-probability targets, predicted contact maps are weak across the board, suggesting that a much larger number of samples may be needed to identify accurate structures.
“For lower-probability targets, the predicted contact maps are weak across the board, suggesting that a much larger number of samples may be needed to identify accurate structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningFor protein-ligand complexes, ligands that appeared in the training data were excluded.
“For protein-ligand complexes, any ligands that appeared in the training data were further excluded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy operating in the simplified space of contacts rather than directly in the high-dimensional structural space, the model achieves greater computational efficiency and facilitates the contact-conditioned structure prediction task.
“By operating in the simplified space of contacts-rather than directly in the complex, high-dimensional structural space-the model achieves greater computational efficiency and facilitates the contact-conditioned structure prediction task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningChai-1 w/ S1 is restricted to protein-protein/antibody datasets, as it only accepts residue-residue contact constraints as input.
“It should be noted that Chai-1 w/ S1 is restricted to protein-protein/antibody datasets, as it only accepts residue-residue contact constraints as input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExecuting the contact prediction task five times and averaging the resulting matrices reduces prediction variance.
“In the Contact Prediction stage, the contact prediction task is executed five times to reduce prediction variance, producing five contact probability matrices.These matrices are averaged element-wise to generate the final contact probability matrix”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRedundant contact pruning ensures that each newly sampled contact introduces novel constraints and helps maintain diversity among sampled structures.
“This ensures that each newly sampled contact introduces novel constraints and helps maintain diversity among sampled structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataHF-S1 facilitates an increase in the diversity of model prediction results, thereby enhancing the probability of the model achieving superior sampling.
“This suggests that HF-S1 facilitates an increase in the diversity of model prediction results, thereby enhancing the probability of the model achieving superior sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHF3 w/ AFsample adopts a more sophisticated multi-setting approach according to the AlphaFold settings used in AFsample.
“Notably, the inference configuration for HF3 w/ AFsample adopts a more sophisticated multi-setting approach, according to the AlphaFold settings used in AFsample [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Bryant, P. & Noé, F. Improved protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-multimer by denoising the MSA profile. PLoS Comput. Biol. 20, 1012253 (2024). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe uncertainty observed in protein-antibody complexes can be attributed to the inherent characteristics of these molecules.
“The uncertainty observed in protein-antibody complexes can be attributed to the inherent characteristics of these molecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Antigen-antibody interactions are diverse, with antibodies able to recognize and bind to a wide range of antigens with varying structures.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGuided exploration in planning-based sampling directs sampling toward more informative conformations.
“b, Guided exploration in planning-based sampling, directing sampling toward more informative conformations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe contact prediction task serves as a basis for generating contact constraints during inference.
“The contact prediction task aims to estimate the probability that each inter-chain token pair is in atomic contact, serving as a basis for generating contact constraints during inference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough the S1-integrated model is capable of identifying more accurate conformations, the precision limitations of the confidence score restrict the ability to fully reflect the effectiveness of its conformational search when solely comparing the highest-scoring conformation.
“This suggests that although the S1-integrated model is capable of identifying more accurate conformations, the precision limitations of the confidence score restrict the ability to fully reflect the effectiveness of its conformational search when solely comparing the highest-scoring conformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe long-tailed distribution suggests that there are numerous potential contacts with non-negligible probabilities, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact interaction sites.
“The long-tailed distribution suggests that there are numerous potential contacts with non-negligible probabilities, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact interaction sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataHF-S1 demonstrates clear improvements, reflecting its enhanced ability to accurately identify epitope regions through contact-guided sampling.
“Notably, HF-S1 demonstrates clear improvements, reflecting its enhanced ability to accurately identify epitope regions through contact-guided sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Generating large ensembles of candidate conformations is standard for improving biomolecular structure prediction.
“Generating large ensembles of candidate conformations is standard for improving biomolecular structure prediction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current sampling methods are largely unguided, leading to aimless exploration of conformational space.
“The main reason such massive sampling is needed is that current sampling methods are largely unguided, leading to aimless exploration of conformational space.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most sampled conformations provide little additional information, and overall sampling efficiency remains low.
“Consequently, most sampled conformations provide little additional information, and overall sampling efficiency remains low.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is often unclear whether additional sampling will meaningfully improve predictions.
“Moreover, it is often unclear whether additional sampling will meaningfully improve predictions, since simpler targets benefit less from extensive ensembling, rendering much of the computation redundant.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Protein-ligand binding sites are highly constrained.
“Finally, protein-ligand binding sites are highly constrained, so while HF-S1 can still improve predictions, the relative gains are smaller compared with other complex types.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Accurate prediction of biomolecular complexes remains challenging.
“Despite these advances, accurate prediction of biomolecular complexes remains challenging.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Antigen-antibody interactions are diverse, with antibodies able to recognize and bind to a wide range of antigens with varying structures.
“Antigen-antibody interactions are known for their diversity, as antibodies can recognize and bind to a wide range of antigens with varying structures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AlphaFold3 is not available for commercial use and thus could not be tested.
“AlphaFold3 is not available for commercial use and thus could not be tested.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Part of the benchmark overlaps with the Boltz-2 training set, and Boltz-2 was therefore excluded.
“In addition, part of our benchmark overlaps with the Boltz-2[22] training set, and Boltz-2 was therefore excluded.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The 74-complex dataset is dated both after and during 2024
MinorThe Results section describes the 74 complexes as released after 2024, but Methods says those 74 samples were selected from releases during 2024.
“we curated a dataset of 74 complexes released after 2024 and with residues less than 800 for efficiency, ensuring no overlap with Boltz-2's training data [22].”
“we exclusively selected samples released between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024, and filtered out those with over 800 residues, ultimately retaining 74 samples.”
Benchmark collection dates disagree
MinorThe Results section says the benchmark complexes were collected starting January 1, 2022, whereas Methods says the protein-protein, protein-ligand, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA evaluation sets start on May 1, 2022.
“protein-DNA (n=254) complexes, collected between 2022.01.01 and 2024.12.31 from the RCSB PDB [20].”
“Evaluation sets for protein-protein, protein-ligand, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA interfaces were constructed from all PDB entries released between May 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024, with each structure expanded to Biological Assembly 1.”
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…(HF-S1) builds upon that of HelixFold3 (HF3) [9], which reproduces the biomolecular structure prediction capabilities of AlphaFold3 (AF3) [3], and further extends its capacity to more intelligently explore conformational space through the addition of two contact-centric modules: the…”
InfluentialColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets
Steinegger, M., & Söding, J. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3988 · Cited by 4,840 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
Protein Data Bank (PDB): The Single Global Macromolecular Structure Archive
Burley, S. K., Berman, H. M., Kleywegt, G. J., Markley, J. L., Nakamura, H., & Velankar, S. S. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_26 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation
Zhou, H., & Pang, X. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00305 · Cited by 1,184 · see citing works
Protein Data Bank: the single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data
wwPDB consortium, Burley, S. K., Berman, H. M., Bhikadiya, C., Bi, C., Chen, L., Costanzo, L. D., Christie, C., Duarte, J. M., Dutta, S., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky949 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works
Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A., & Schwede, T. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
MMseqs2: sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data setsPreprint
Steinegger, M., & Söding, J. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/079681 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom
Krishna, R., Wang, J., Ahern, W., Sturmfels, P., Venkatesh, P., Kalvet, I., Lee, G. R., Morey-Burrows, F. S., Anishchenko, I., Humphreys, I. R., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adl2528 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model
Hayes, T., Rao, R., Akin, H., Sofroniew, N. J., Oktay, D., Lin, Z., Verkuil, R., Tran, V. Q., Deaton, J., Wiggert, M., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads0018 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model
(2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.01.600583 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity PredictionPreprint
Passaro, S., Corso, G., Wohlwend, J., Reveiz, M., Thaler, S., Somnath, V. R., Getz, N., Portnoi, T., Roy, J., Stark, H., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.14.659707 · Cited by 848 · see citing works
The Protein Data Bank and the challenge of structural genomics.
Berman, H. M., Bhat, T. N., Bourne, P. E., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G. L., Weissig, H., & Westbrook, J. (2000) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/80734 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2012) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Chai-1: Decoding the molecular interactions of life
Discovery, C., Boitreaud, J., Dent, J., McPartlon, M., Meier, J., Reis, V., Rogozhnikov, A., & Wu, K. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.10.615955 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models
Basu, S., & Wallner, B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
ANARCI: antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification
Dunbar, J., & Deane, C. M. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv552 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Addendum: Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08416-7 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
SPEACH_AF: Sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with Alphafold2
Stein, R. A., & Mchaourab, H. S. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010483 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Parasail: SIMD C library for global, semi-global, and local pairwise sequence alignments
Daily, J. A. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-0930-z · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Multi‐state modeling of G‐protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy
Heo, L., & Feig, M. (2022) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26382 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
High-throughput prediction of protein conformational distributions with subsampled AlphaFold2
Monteiro da Silva, G., Cui, J. Y., Dalgarno, D. C., Lisi, G. P., & Rubenstein, B. M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46715-9 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Characterization of Protein–Protein Interfaces
Yan, C., Wu, F., Jernigan, R. L., Dobbs, D. L., & Honavar, V. (2007) · The Protein Journal · doi:10.1007/s10930-007-9108-x · Cited by 191 · see citing works
AFsample: improving multimer prediction with AlphaFold using massive sampling
Wallner, B. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad573 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
SAbDab in the age of biotherapeutics: updates including SAbDab-nano, the nanobody structure tracker
Schneider, C., Raybould, M. I. J., & Deane, C. M. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1050 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Protenix - Advancing Structure Prediction Through a Comprehensive AlphaFold3 ReproductionPreprint
ByteDance AML AI4Science Team, Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Lu, C., Ma, W., Guan, J., Gong, C., Yang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.08.631967 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Protein structure prediction with in-cell photo-crosslinking mass spectrometry and deep learning
Stahl, K., Graziadei, A., Dau, T., Brock, O., & Rappsilber, J. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01704-z · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Yin, R., & Pierce, B. G. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4865 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Fang, X., Wang, F., Liu, L., He, J., Lin, D., Xiang, Y., Zhu, K., Zhang, X., Wu, H., Li, H., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00721-6 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralized Biomolecular Modeling and Design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom
Krishna, R., Wang, J., Ahern, W., Sturmfels, P., Venkatesh, P., Kalvet, I., Lee, G. R., Morey-Burrows, F. S., Anishchenko, I., Humphreys, I. R., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.09.561603 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Structure prediction of alternative protein conformations
Bryant, P., & Noé, F. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51507-2 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Structure prediction of alternative protein conformations
(2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.25.559256 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
AFsample2 predicts multiple conformations and ensembles with AlphaFold2
Kalakoti, Y., & Wallner, B. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07791-9 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Improved protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-multimer by denoising the MSA profile
Bryant, P., & Noé, F. (2024) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012253 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Unmasking AlphaFold to integrate experiments and predictions in multimeric complexes
Mirabello, C., Wallner, B., Nystedt, B., Azinas, S., & Carroni, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52951-w · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Mechanistic and evolutionary insights into a type V-M CRISPR–Cas effector enzyme
Omura, S. N., Nakagawa, R., Südfeld, C., Warren, R. V., Wu, W. Y., Hirano, H., Laffeber, C., Kusakizako, T., Kise, Y., Lebbink, J. H. G., et al. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01042-3 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Molecular basis for protein–protein interactions
Seychell, B. C., & Beck, T. (2021) · Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.3762/bjoc.17.1 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
AFsample: Improving Multimer Prediction with AlphaFold using Aggressive SamplingPreprint
Wallner, B. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.20.521205 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Technical Report of HelixFold3 for Biomolecular Structure PredictionPreprint
Liu, L., Zhang, S., Xue, Y., Ye, X., Zhu, K., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Gao, J., Zhao, W., Yu, H., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.16975 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationScaling down protein language modeling with MSA PairformerPreprint
Akiyama, Y., Zhang, Z., Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M., & Ovchinnikov, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.02.668173 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Redrado, S., Macías‐León, J., Castro-López, J., Sanz, A. B., Dolader, E., Arias, M. A., González‐Ramírez, A. M., Sánchez‐Navarro, D., Petryk, Y., Farkaš, V., et al. (2024) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202405823 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
HelixFold-Multimer: Elevating Protein Complex Structure Prediction to New HeightsPreprint
Fang, X., Gao, J., Hu, J., Liu, L., Xue, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhu, K. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.10260 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationRedrado, S., Macías‐León, J., Castro-López, J., Sanz, A. B., Dolader, E., Arias, M. A., González‐Ramírez, A. M., Sánchez‐Navarro, D., Petryk, Y., Farkaš, V., et al. (2024) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.202405823 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cheng, X., Xing, E., Zhang, J., & Wang, S. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6087969/v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Xiaoyao4573, Xiang, Y., WorldEditors, Xue, B., Zhang, S., Liu, L., Liu, Y., Nickyoungforu, Luohongyu, Hujing13, et al. (2021) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5781820 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationXing, E. (2025) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15091620
PaddlePaddle/PaddleHelix: v1.2.2
Xue, B., Kazadi, A., & Zhang, B. (2023) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8202943
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AlphaFold3 for Structure-guided Ligand DiscoveryPreprint
Menon, K. M., Davasam, A., Chen, G., Bryant, C., Deng, Z., Lam, B., Yang, C., Barcelos, D., Liu, F., Alon, A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.04.692352 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, L., Liu, Y., Ye, X., Zhang, S., Li, Y., Zhu, K., Xue, Y., Zhou, J., Zhang, X., & Fang, X.
- Affiliations
- Baidu (China) (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Fang, Xiaomin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2026-07-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1115-1126
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4414691604
- Semantic Scholar
- facf96752574828f9d2abcba42b632bcb37f3d8b
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science and Technology Major Project
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- guided sampling, conformational search, protein complexes, conformational ensembles, sampling efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-01.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review