The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system
Abstract
What are the potential consequences when a relatively small number of large firms come to dominate markets within the global food system? This Perspective examines the implications of corporate concentration and power in the global seed and agrochemical industry, a sector that has become more consolidated in recent years. It outlines the pathways via which concentrated firms in this sector have the potential to exert power in food systems more broadly-both directly and indirectly-in ways that matter for food system outcomes. Specifically, concentrated firms can shape markets, shape technology and innovation agendas, and shape policy and governance frameworks. This Perspective makes the case that a range of measures are needed to ensure that corporate concentration and power do not undermine key goals for food systems, such as equitable livelihoods, sustainability and broad-based participation in food system governance. These include measures to strengthen competition policies, to bolster public sector support for diverse food systems, and to curb corporate influence in the policy process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A growing body of research documents a high degree of corporate concentration all along global agrifood supply chains (e.g., ETC Group 2022; Clapp 2021; IPES-Food 2017; Hendrickson et al. 2020; Howard 2016; Deconinck 2021; Crespi and MacDonald 2022; Sexton and Xia 2018; Slater et al. 2024).”
From Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems (2025) · cites this paper as Clapp 2021
In the citing paper
“farmers' decisions to adopt GM crops hinge on the expected profits of adoption and the associated risks ( 31 ), the availability of the technology and its alternatives, marketing exposure ( 32 ) and farm characteristics including farm size and farmer education level ( 33 ).”
From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits
Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., de Vries, W., Vermeulen, S. J., Herrero, M., Carlson, K. M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0 · Cited by 3,380
The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report
Swinburn, B. A., Kraak, V. I., Allender, S., Atkins, V. J., Baker, P. I., Bogard, J. R., Brinsden, H., Calvillo, A., De Schutter, O., Devarajan, R., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32822-8 · Cited by 3,081
The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms*
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa004 · Cited by 2,206
Vanloqueren, G., & Baret, P. V. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008 · Cited by 608
Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years?
Duke, S. O. (2011) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.2333 · Cited by 581
Big food, food systems, and global health
Stuckler, D., & Nestle, M. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001242 · Cited by 516
Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance
(2009) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012751.001.0001 · Cited by 503
The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review
Rotz, S., Duncan, E., Small, M., Botschner, J. V., Dara, R. A., Mosby, I., Reed, M. S., & Fraser, E. (2019) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/soru.12233 · Cited by 488
Big Data in food and agriculture
Bronson, K., & Knežević, I. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716648174 · Cited by 456
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 · Cited by 390
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Meagher, M. Competition Is Killing Us: How Big Business Is Harming Our Society and Planet – and What to Do about It (Penguin, 2020).
- LeBaron, G. Combatting Modern Slavery: Why Labour Governance Is Failing and What We Can Do about It (Polity, 2020).
- Khan, L. & Vaheesan, S. Market power and inequality: the antitrust counterrevolution and its discontents. Harv. Law Policy Rev. 11, 235–294 (2017).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–357 of 357
Ultra-processed Food – Warum wir das NOVA-Konzept anders einordnen sollten
Bosy‐Westphal, A., Fedde, S., Braun, W., & Müller, M. (2026) · Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin · doi:10.1055/a-2753-0541
“…- tet sind [47], wird ein erheblicher Preisdruck auf die unteren Seg-mente der Wertschöpfungskette, insbesondere die Produzenten, begünstigt, was zu einer Konzentration von Marktmacht und Gewin-nen in den oberen Segmenten der Wertschöpfungskette, insbeson-dere im Lebensmittelhandel, führt [48, 49].”
Kenny, T., Sievert, K., Duffy, C. P., Sêrodio, P., Mialon, M., & Caraher, M. (2026) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-026-10859-9
“Corporate influence in academia (Proctor 2012 ) and food systems governance more broadly is well documented (IPES-Food, 2023; Clapp and Fuchs 2009; Clapp 2021 ; Slater et al. 2024).”
InfluentialGarton, K., da Cruz, G. L., & Swinburn, B. A. (2026) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-026-01203-1 · Cited by 1
“These agreements have undeniably shaped the design of food systems, including the degree of global integration and corporate concentration [1].”
Agrifood companies must take responsibility for nitrogen pollution
Witt, N., Graversgaard, M., & Thorsøe, M. H. (2026) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-026-01325-0
The Role of NGOs in Food Supply Chains: Case of Supporting Mechanisms for Dutch SFSC Stakeholders
Groothuismink, J., Burgess, P., & Sunmola, F. T. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.02.397
“Centralised supply chains dominate contemporary food systems, whilst decentralised and local alternatives remain marginal [1].”
Giua, C., Kaliji, S. A., Brunori, G., & Camanzi, L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6468682
Chakori, S., Frank, L., & Feola, G. (2026) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2026.100915
Durabilité bioéconomique des pêcheries côtières tropicales et des systèmes alimentaires halieutiques
Kersulec, C. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e5e1d569z2d00z43d8z830bz30df4d819393
Torres, I. C., & Cabrera, S. V. S. (2026) · Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES · doi:10.1177/22779760261434319
“A rapid expansion of global agri-food production chains occurs, where TA is assumed to be the dominant actor, controlling everything from the provision of inputs to the channels of distribution and sale of food (Clapp, 2021).”
Gómez, J. F. M. (2026) · Food Ethics · doi:10.1007/s41055-026-00213-4
“However, dominant food regimes marginalise cultural practices by imposing standardised agricultural models, ultra-processed foods and homogenised food standards (Clapp 2021; Monteiro et al. 2019).”
Influence and legitimacy in public policy: investigating the Canadian agricultural subsystem
Wilkes, J. (2026) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-026-10872-y · Cited by 1
“Largely absent from the news release topics, yet promi - nent in the academic literature, were issues such as farmer attrition (Earls and (Clapp 2021, 2022, 2025 ), and biodiversity loss (Mineau and McLaugh - lin 1996; Coristine and Kerr 2011).”
Bashokoh, M. I., Nigussie, K., Maina, C. W., & Tóth, G. (2026) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies14050165
“Beyond wage-setting mechanisms and employment flexibility, the literature suggests that corporate concentration also affects non-wage aspects of employment and the strength of institutional protections (Clapp, 2021, 2022; Hildebrandt, 2006).”
InfluentialTowards a Sustainable Food System: the role of Dietitians-Nutritionists
Muñoz-Martínez, J., Álvarez, E. C., Moñino, M., Baladía, E., & Russolillo, G. (2026) · Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética · doi:10.14306/renhyd.30.2.2446
Cultivating the power of participatory foresight for accelerating food systems transformation
Peters, B., Dengerink, J., & Woodhill, J. (2026) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2026.100922
BRICS and the New Geopolitical Arena of Food Security
Baran, B. (2026) · Sprawy Międzynarodowe · doi:10.35757/sm.2026.79.1.02
Situated transformations: how regional and translocal contexts shape urban food policy networks
Edwards, F., Arcuri, S., Behringer, J., Feenstra, L., Maffi, P., Oliveria, R., Pauw, I., & Sonnino, R. (2026) · Environmental Research Food Systems · doi:10.1088/2976-601x/ae728e · Cited by 1
Improving USDA’s public price and volume data for an equitable organic food value chain
Butterfield, K. L., Galt, R. E., & Wilson, H. (2026) · Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development · doi:10.5304/jafscd.2026.153.013
Urban Agriculture in South Africa: Opportunities for Sustainability
Malan, N. (2026) · Urban Forum · doi:10.1007/s12132-026-09558-9
“This is done in competition with rural commercial agriculture in a highly concentrated global food system (Clapp, 2021), emphasising the pervasiveness of markets for food provisioning, but also their failure in underserved settlements, where we may expect UA to emerge.”
The psychology of eating requires social context
Mata, J. (2026) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-026-00581-y · Cited by 1
“The food system is also shaped by profit orientation and the dominance of large corporate firms 222 .”
Seeds of struggle: resistance and agroecology in a territory of the Landless Workers’ Movement (MST)
Matheus, A. C., Brito, T. P., & de Souza-Esquerdo, V. F. (2026) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2026.2686740
Ala‐Hulkko, T., Toivanen, M., Poturalska, A., Magyar, M., Kinnunen, P., & Kotavaara, O. (2026) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148783
Material equality undermined by global trade
Ahamed, S. (2026) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-026-01838-3
Conceptualizing Corporate Political Activity for Sustainability Governance—The CPA Cube
Eberlein, B., & Grabs, J. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.71172
Górka, N., Palimąka, K., & Masłoń, A. A. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18136574
Corporate Concentration and Labour Conditions in Hungary’s Cereal Industry
Bashokoh, M. I., Maina, C. W., Zinati, A., & Szigeti, C. (2026) · Regional and Business Studies · doi:10.56617/rbs.6878
Calling plants to the rescue - mitigating the detrimental effects of warfare with phytotechnology
Haller, H., Simelton, E., & Englund, O. (2026) · npj Science of Plants · doi:10.1038/s44383-026-00033-9
Chen, S., & Bozzi, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30080-5_4
Competition, Power and Inequality in Agro-food Value Chains in Africa
das Nair, R., Roberts, S., & Ponte, S. (2026) · European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/s41287-026-00760-w
“Contributions to the food systems literature have also linked corporate concentration to issues of food security and sustainability (Clapp, 2021; Clapp et al., 2025; Shand & Wetter, 2019).”
Wyckhuys, K. A. G., Barrios, E., & Fonte, S. J. (2026) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-026-01386-1
“Those narrowly framed interventions—regularly advanced through hard-won public resources—not only represent technical shortcomings but can reflect deliberate actions intended to maximize profits or sustain the status quo at the expense of long-term systems-based solutions 6,13 .”
Abate, M. C., Liu, J., Cai, B., Zeng, R., Geremew, B. A., Derebe, Y., & Ambaye, B. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2026.1846887
Sustainability assessment of three alternative food networks in Mexico City
Nájera, L. B., Benítez, M., Merino, A. G. P., & Ibarrola‐Rivas, M. (2026) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2026.2702613
Soto, R. L., Rivera‐Ferre, M. G., Leitheiser, S., Dumont, B., Rossing, W. A. H., Tittonell, P. A., Blaix, C., & Oteros‐Rozas, E. (2026) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2026.2703206
Korale-Gedara, P. M., Hine, D. C., Ferreira, L. N., Farr, J., Moreira, B. R. D. A., Subedi, Y. R., Fyfe, S. A., & Nelson, R. (2026) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-026-01702-4
“The study assesses the dynamism of the Australian food system by segmenting the dataset into two distinct periods, (1992–2007) and (2008–2021), and constructing two sepa - rate networks at 0.3 threshold.”
InfluentialSeed, Intellectual Property, and Food Systems
Girard, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51703-7_258-1
Gerullis, M. K., Quinteros, G. H., von Plettenberg, L., Otter, V., & Hüttel, S. (2026) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/00307270261476235
de Garibay, D. R., & Azman, M. D. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10191040/v1
Wilde, B. C., Hüppi, R., Garland, G., Conz, R. F., Benabderrazik, K., Thompson, W. J., Hartmann, M., Vanlauwe, B., Kintché, K., Späth, L., et al. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.71415
When the advisor is an algorithm: governing agri-food knowledge in the age of AI and misinformation
Kabir, K. H. (2026) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104933
Beyond coordination: responsibility and the crisis of global food governance design
Carolan, M. (2026) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103166
Where do the winds blow? New political cartographies and extractivism in the Amazon
de Castro, E. M. R., & Rodrigues, J. C. (2026) · Ambiente & sociedade · doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc00091vu29l29oa
Para onde os ventos sopram? Novas cartografias políticas e extrativismo na Amazônia
de Castro, E. M. R., & Rodrigues, J. C. (2026) · Ambiente & sociedade · doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc00091vu29l29ao
Cantorani, J. R. H., de Oliveira, M. R., Pilatti, L. A., Ferreira, C. L., & Melo, I. C. (2026) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2026.2723738
Power and entitlement: Addressing the structural drivers of food insecurity and malnutrition
Walls, H., & McKee, M. (2026) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0007192
“Second, large corporations dominate much of the food supply chain, from processing raw agricultural products to their global distribution [13].”
InfluentialWas Covid‐19 a Game‐Changer? Inequality, Governance, and Urban Food Systems in Bengaluru, India
Patil, S., Joglekar, A., & Bharucha, Z. P. (2026) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.12659
“For a transformative agenda to succeed, governance must create public infrastructures that support the relational density of traditional markets while ensuring equity across all groups of actors (Battersby & Watson, 2018; Clapp, 2021).”
Transformationsdynamiken der Ernährungswende
Marx, J. (2026) · Metropolis-Verlag eBooks · doi:10.68143/57618885
Potential contribution of house gardening towards sustainable food systems in the EU
Matuštík, J., & Guillaume, A. (2026) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-026-08110-w
Unlocking the agroecological transition in intensive farming systems
Delandmeter, M., Bindelle, J., Schutter, O. D., van der Velde, M., Baret, P. V., & Dumont, B. (2026) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2026.100943
‘If We Had Known’: Whistleblowers, Animal Welfare Scandals and Agri-food Stakeholders’ Response
Boaitey, A. (2026) · Food Ethics · doi:10.1007/s41055-026-00231-2
“The issue of power pertaining to transnational food corporations has long been of interest (Clapp 2021 ; Clapp and Fuchs 2009 ; Fuchs 2007 ).”
Meat and meat Products as Functional Food
Latif, R., & Nawaz, T. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34071-0.00010-5
The juçara countermovement in Brazil: agroecology and the (en)countering of commodification
Neira, J., Farley, J., & Filho, A. L. S. (2026) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2026.2735864
Sigrist, M., Schneider, G., Thom, B., & Jacobi, J. (2026) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2026.2732972
Meena, M., & Chaturvedi, N. D. (2026) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2026.142634
Hekmatnia, M., & Ghaleno, N. D. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.71763
Overcoming barriers to sustainable agricultural intensification
Garrett, R. D. (2026) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.260775
“They create additional compliance costs that could detract from SI investments [40 ,41 ], but could also promote SI if the standards focus on good agricultural practices and closing yield gaps [29 ,37 ].”
Fahrudin, F. I. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-35717-5_828
Keegan, S., Reis, K., Roiko, A. H., & Desha, C. (2026) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-026-10961-y
“Sources: (Clapp 2021; FAO 2008; HLPE 2020) Fig.”
The Public Health Implications of Online Food Delivery Platforms: A Narrative Review
Gupta, A., Bennett, R., & Peeters, A. (2026) · Current Obesity Reports · doi:10.1007/s13679-026-00771-y
“This concentration may enable conditions where these platforms are able to control how the sector operates [50], potentially reducing competition, increasing consumer prices, and reinforcing asymmetries in access to consumer data and in decision-making power.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Clapp, J.
- ORCID
- Clapp, Jennifer
- Venue
- Nature Food
- Published
- 2021-06-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 404-408
- ISSN
- 2662-1355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3170531652
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 81 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 17
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Food (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Gouvernement du Canada | Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2020-0664)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- business concentration, market power, global food system, seed industry, agrochemical industry, industry consolidation, competition policy, food governance, corporate influence on policy, innovation agenda, sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
