Cited by 359Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system

Clapp, Jennifer·2021·Nature Food

Abstract

What are the potential consequences when a relatively small number of large firms come to dominate markets within the global food system? This Perspective examines the implications of corporate concentration and power in the global seed and agrochemical industry, a sector that has become more consolidated in recent years. It outlines the pathways via which concentrated firms in this sector have the potential to exert power in food systems more broadly-both directly and indirectly-in ways that matter for food system outcomes. Specifically, concentrated firms can shape markets, shape technology and innovation agendas, and shape policy and governance frameworks. This Perspective makes the case that a range of measures are needed to ensure that corporate concentration and power do not undermine key goals for food systems, such as equitable livelihoods, sustainability and broad-based participation in food system governance. These include measures to strengthen competition policies, to bolster public sector support for diverse food systems, and to curb corporate influence in the policy process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43016-021-00297-7

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Meagher, M. Competition Is Killing Us: How Big Business Is Harming Our Society and Planet – and What to Do about It (Penguin, 2020).
  2. LeBaron, G. Combatting Modern Slavery: Why Labour Governance Is Failing and What We Can Do about It (Polity, 2020).
  3. Khan, L. & Vaheesan, S. Market power and inequality: the antitrust counterrevolution and its discontents. Harv. Law Policy Rev. 11, 235–294 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Clapp, J.
Venue
Nature Food
Published
2021-06-03
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
404-408
ISSN
2662-1355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3170531652
Cited by
359
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 17
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Food (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gouvernement du Canada | Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2020-0664)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
business concentration, market power, global food system, seed industry, agrochemical industry, industry consolidation, competition policy, food governance, corporate influence on policy, innovation agenda, sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review