Cited by 517Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Big food, food systems, and global health

Open access
Stuckler, David, Nestle, Marion·2012·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

Medicine series on Big Food that examines the activities and influence of the food and beverage

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001242

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The food and beverage and alcohol companies continue to be partners in government health processes, which makes their regulation more challenging.

    “The food and beverage and alcohol companies continue to be partners in government health processes (Stuckler & Nestle, 2012), which makes their regulation more challenging (Moodie, Stuckler, & Monteiro, 2013) and thus governments should be cautious of interagency arrangements that include industry representatives.”

    From Advancing progressive health policy to reduce NCDs amidst international commercial opposition: Tobacco standardised packaging in Australia (2018) · cites this paper as Stuckler & Nestle, 2012

    In “Public Health Response to Big Food: A Failure to Act,” the paper describes food companies’ strong ties to governments and says whether to view them as partners is under debate. “Engaging with Big Food—Three Views” reports a UK health minister calling the food and drinks industry part of the solution. These passages support the food-and-beverage aspect, but do not establish that alcohol companies are partners in government health processes. The regulation clause is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smoking and resultant physical morbidity plays a central role in the excess mortality of individuals with mental illness.

    “Smoking and resultant physical morbidity plays a central role in the excess mortality of individuals with mental illness 201,202 , therefore reducing smoking rates is a priority that cannot be underestimated.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [34]Acharya T Fuller AC Mensah GA Yahc D 2011 The current and future role of the food industry in the prevention and control of chronic diseases: The case of PepsiCo. Stuckler D Siegel K Sick Societies: Responding to the global challenge of chronic disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. [43]Lang T 2006 The food industry, diet, physical activity and health: A review of reported commitments and prctice of 25 of the world's largest food companies. London Oxford Health Alliance
  3. [45]Bonell C McKee M Fletcher A Haines A Wilkinson P 2011 The nudge smudge: misrepresentation of the “nudge” concept in England's public health White Paper. Lancet 377 2158 2159 21244864

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuckler, D., & Nestle, M.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2012-06-19
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e1001242
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2088547283
Cited by
516
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
Big Food, food systems, global health, food and beverage industry, industry influence, food industry lobbying
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Food, Humans, Public Health, Nicotiana, Food Industry, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review