Cited by 66Evacuation and Crowd DynamicsNoise Effects and ManagementUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

Coping with crowding.

de Waal, Frans B. M., Aureli, Filippo, Judge, Peter G.·2000·Scientific American

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/scientificamerican0500-76

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Waal, F. B. M., Aureli, F., & Judge, P. G.
Venue
Scientific American
Published
2000-05
Volume
282
Issue
5
Pages
76-81
ISSN
0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091823205
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientific American (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
crowding, coping, social density
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Pan troglodytes, Emotions, Female, Grooming, Homicide, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Male, Population Density, Primates, Rodentia, Rural Population, Territoriality, Urban Population, Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review