Cited by 1,775Research Data Management PracticesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesScientific Computing and Data Management

The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments

Open access
Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J., Auer, Tibor, Calhoun, Vince D., Craddock, R. Cameron, Das, Samir, Duff, Eugene P., Flandin, Guillaume, Ghosh, Satrajit S. +19 more·2016·Scientific Data

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques has defined modern neuroimaging. Since its inception, tens of thousands of studies using techniques such as functional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging have allowed for the non-invasive study of the brain. Despite the fact that MRI is routinely used to obtain data for neuroscience research, there has been no widely adopted standard for organizing and describing the data collected in an imaging experiment. This renders sharing and reusing data (within or between labs) difficult if not impossible and unnecessarily complicates the application of automatic pipelines and quality assurance protocols. To solve this problem, we have developed the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), a standard for organizing and describing MRI datasets. The BIDS standard uses file formats compatible with existing software, unifies the majority of practices already common in the field, and captures the metadata necessary for most common data processing operations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sdata.2016.44

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Keator D. B. et al. A General XML Schema and SPM Toolbox for Storage of Neuro-Imaging Results and Anatomical Labels. Neuroinformatics 4, 199– 211 (2006). 16845169
  2. Cox R. W. et al. A (Sort of) New Image Data Format Standard: NIfTI-1. in Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of Organisation of Human Brain Mapping (2003).
  3. Zhong H. et al. in Brain and Health Informatics 439– 449 (Springer International Publishing, 2013).
  4. Crockford D. JSON: The fat-free alternative to XML. in Proc. of XML 2006 (2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gorgolewski, K. J., Auer, T., Calhoun, V. D., Craddock, R. C., Das, S., Duff, E. P., Flandin, G., Ghosh, S. S., Glatard, T., Halchenko, Y. O., Handwerker, D. A., Hanke, M., Keator, D., Li, X., Michael, Z., Maumet, C., Nichols, B. N., Nichols, T. E., Pellman, J., Poline, J.-B., Rokem, A., Schaefer, G., Sochat, V., Triplett, W., Turner, J. A., Varoquaux, G., & Poldrack, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Mind Research Network (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • SRI International (US)
  • Child Mind Institute (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J.
Venue
Scientific Data
Published
2016-06-21
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
160044-160044
ISSN
2052-4463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951103577
Cited by
1,775
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 220 · 2025: 301 · 2024: 280 · 2023: 221 · 2022: 205 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 14 · 2013: 2
Type
data paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1429999, P20-GM103472)
  • Laura and John Arnold Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (100309/A/12/Z)
  • Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health (AA021697-04S1, AA021697)
  • Medical Research Council (MC-A060-53144)
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA021697, AA021697-04S1, AA021697)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103472)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB020407, P41EB019936, R01EB006841)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
BIDS, neuroimaging data standardization, metadata, data sharing, data reuse, functional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, quality assurance
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review