Cited by 51Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health Research TopicsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Fusing Mobile Phone Sensing and Brain Imaging to Assess Depression in College Students

Open access
Huckins, Jeremy F., daSilva, Alex W., Wang, Rui, Wang, Weichen, Hedlund, Elin L., Murphy, Eilis I., Lopez, Richard B., Rogers, Courtney +6 more·2019·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

As smartphone usage has become increasingly prevalent in our society, so have rates of depression, particularly among young adults. Individual differences in smartphone usage patterns have been shown to reflect individual differences in underlying affective processes such as depression (Wang et al., 2018). In the current study, a positive relationship was identified between smartphone screen time (e.g., phone unlock duration) and resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) between the subgenual cingulate cortex (sgCC), a brain region implicated in depression and antidepressant treatment response, and regions of the ventromedial/orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), such that increased phone usage was related to stronger connectivity between these regions. This cluster was subsequently used to constrain subsequent analyses looking at individual differences in depressive symptoms in the same cohort and observed partial replication in a separate cohort. Similar analyses were subsequently performed on metrics of circadian rhythm consistency showing a negative relationship between connectivity of the sgCC and OFC. The data and analyses presented here provide relatively simplistic preliminary analyses which replicate and provide an initial step in combining functional brain activity and smartphone usage patterns to better understand issues related to mental health. Smartphones are a prevalent part of modern life and the usage of mobile sensing data from smartphones promises to be an important tool for mental health diagnostics and neuroscience research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2019.00248

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Huckins et al. found connections between mobile sensing and fMRI scans, including correlations between smartphone usage (unlock duration) and RSFC for the subgenual cingulate cortex.

    “Huckins et al. [44] present connections between mobile sensing technology and fMRI scans.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Talairach J. Tournoux P. (1988). Co-Planar Stereotaxis Atlas of the Human Brain. New York, N.Y: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc.
  2. Wang R. Wang W. DaSilva A. Huckins J. F. Kelley W. M. Heatherton T. F. (n.d.). Tracking depression dynamics in college students using mobile phone and wearable sensing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob.Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2: 43. PMC11501090 39449996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huckins, J. F., daSilva, A. W., Wang, R., Wang, W., Hedlund, E. L., Murphy, E. I., Lopez, R. B., Rogers, C., Holtzheimer, P. E., Kelley, W. M., Heatherton, T. F., Wagner, D. D., Haxby, J. V., & Campbell, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Huckins, Jeremy F.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2019-03-21
Volume
13
Pages
248-248
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924823958
Cited by
51
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH059282-12, 5R01DA022582-10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
depression, smartphone screen time, smartphone sensing, resting-state functional connectivity, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, university students, individual differences, psychiatric diagnosis, smartphone usage patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review