Cited by 518Computational Drug Discovery MethodsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseasesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go

Open access

Moitessier, N, Englebienne, P, Lee, D, Lawandi, J, Corbeil, C R·2008·British Journal of Pharmacology

DOI 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515PMC PMC2268060

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Accelerating the drug discovery process requires predictive computational protocols capable of reducing or simplifying the synthetic and/or combinatorial challenge. Docking-based virtual screening methods have been developed and successfully applied to a number of pharmaceutical targets. In this review, we first present the current status of docking and scoring methods, with exhaustive lists of these. We next discuss reported comparative studies, outlining criteria for their interpretation. In the final section, we describe some of the remaining developments that would potentially lead to a universally applicable docking/scoring method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein−Ligand Complexes
Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., Halgren, T. A., Sanschagrin, P. C., & Mainz, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051256o · Cited by 7,012
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications
Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H. Y., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1549 · Cited by 4,354
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD
Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W., & Taylor, R. D. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10465 · Cited by 3,139
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836
MolDock: A New Technique for High-Accuracy Molecular Docking
Thomsen, R., & Christensen, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051197e · Cited by 2,381
Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
Sherman, W., Day, T., Jacobson, M. P., Friesner, R. A., & Farid, R. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050540c · Cited by 2,089

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 209 references

5 of the 209 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

Korb O, 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 247
Shoichet BK, 2002, Hits, leads and artifacts from virtual and high throughput screening, Molecular Informatics: Confronting Complexity May 13th–16th 2002
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1 <215::AID-PROT29>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1623::AID-JCC8>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1612::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 518

Adverse Drug Reaction Prediction Using Scores Produced by Large-Scale Drug-Protein Target Docking on High-Performance Computing Machines
Labute, M. X., Zhang, X., Lenderman, J., Bennion, B. J., Wong, S., & Lightstone, F. C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106298 · Cited by 66
Comparison of Computational Methods to Model DNA Minor Groove Binders
Srivastava, H. K., Chourasia, M., Kumar, D., & Sastry, G. N. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100474n · Cited by 65
The Flexible Pocketome Engine for Structural Chemogenomics
Abagyan, R. A., & Kufareva, I. (2009) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-274-2_11 · Cited by 64
Multiple ligand simultaneous docking (MLSD): A novel approach to study the effect of inhibitors on substrate binding to PPO
Raghavendra, S., Rao, S. J. A., Kumar, V., & Ramesh, C. K. (2015) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2015.09.008 · Cited by 64
Drug Effect Prediction by Polypharmacology-Based Interaction Profiling
Simon, Z., Peragovics, Á., Vigh-Smeller, M., Csukly, G., Tombor, L., Yang, Z., Zahoránszky-Köhalmi, G., Végner, L., Jelinek, B., Hári, P., et al. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci2002022 · Cited by 65
Molecular interactions of cholinesterases inhibitors using in silico methods: current status and future prospects
Khan, M. T. H. (2009) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2009.03.008 · Cited by 63
Established and Emerging Trends in Computational Drug Discovery in the Structural Genomics Era
Taboureau, O., Baell, J. B., Fernández‐Recio, J., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2012) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.12.007 · Cited by 63
Virtual screening: An in silico tool for interlacing the chemical universe with the proteome
Westermaier, Y., Barril, X., & Scapozza, L. (2014) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.08.001 · Cited by 67
Virtual Fragment Screening: Discovery of Histamine H3 Receptor Ligands Using Ligand-Based and Protein-Based Molecular Fingerprints
Sirci, F., Istyastono, E. P., Vischer, H. F., Kooistra, A. J., Nijmeijer, S., Kuijer, M., Wijtmans, M., Mannhold, R., Leurs, R., de Esch, I. J. P., et al. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci3004094 · Cited by 62
Effect of Input Differences on the Results of Docking Calculations
Feher, M., & Williams, C. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci9000629 · Cited by 59
Docking and Ligand Binding Affinity: Uses and Pitfalls
Yunta, M. J. R. (2016) · American Journal of Modeling and Optimization · doi:10.12691/ajmo-4-3-2 · Cited by 60
Structure-Based Drug Design for Cytochrome P450 Family 1 Inhibitors
Dutkiewicz, Z., & Mikstacka, R. (2018) · Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications · doi:10.1155/2018/3924608 · Cited by 59
REVIEW PAPER Virtual screening strategies in drug design – methods and applications
Bielska, E., Lucas, X., Czerwoniec, A., Kasprzak, J. M., Kaminska, K. H., & Bujnicki, J. M. (2014) · Biotechnologia · doi:10.5114/bta.2011.46542 · Cited by 58
Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 2. Development and Application of F itted 1.5 to the Virtual Screening of Potential HCV Polymerase Inhibitors
Corbeil, C. R., Englebienne, P., Yannopoulos, C. G., Chan, L. C., Das, S. K., Bilimoria, D., L’Heureux, L., & Moitessier, N. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci700398h · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Structure based virtual screening to discover putative drug candidates: Necessary considerations and successful case studies
Danishuddin, M., & Khan, A. U. (2014) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.10.019 · Cited by 60
Identification of novel inhibitors of the amino acid transporter B0AT1 (SLC6A19), a potential target to induce protein restriction and to treat type 2 diabetes
Cheng, Q., Shah, N., Bröer, A., Fairweather, S. J., Jiang, Y. Z., Schmoll, D., Corry, B., & Bröer, S. (2017) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.13711 · Cited by 59
Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) Simulations for Fragment-Based Drug Design
Faller, C. E., Raman, E. P., MacKerell, A. D., & Guvench, O. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2486-8_7 · Cited by 35
Predicting Ligand Binding Modes from Neural Networks Trained on Protein–Ligand Interaction Fingerprints
Chupakhin, V., Marcou, G., Baskin, I. I., Varnek, A. A., & Rognan, D. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300200r · Cited by 53
Adaptive molecular docking method based on information entropy genetic algorithm
Li, Z., Gu, J., Zhuang, H., Kang, L., Zhao, X., & Guo, Q. (2014) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.008 · Cited by 55
Rational design of protein–protein interaction inhibitors
Rognan, D. (2014) · MedChemComm · doi:10.1039/c4md00328d · Cited by 58
Comparing Neural-Network Scoring Functions and the State of the Art: Applications to Common Library Screening
Durrant, J. D., Friedman, A. J., Rogers, K. E., & McCammon, J. A. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400042y · Cited by 55
Receptor flexibility in small‐molecule docking calculations
Kokh, D. B., Wade, R. C., & Wenzel, W. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.29 · Cited by 57
Structure-Based Functional Design of Drugs: From Target to Lead Compound
Anderson, A. C. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-216-2_23 · Cited by 51
Free-Energy-Based Methods for Binding Profile Determination in a Congeneric Series of CDK2 Inhibitors
Fidelak, J., Juraszek, J., Branduardi, D., Bianciotto, M., & Gervasio, F. L. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp911689r · Cited by 55
Scoring Functions for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Interactions
Wang, J.-C., & Lin, J. (2013) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612811319120005 · Cited by 56
Structure-Based Prediction of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligand Function: A β-Adrenoceptor Case Study
Kooistra, A. J., Leurs, R., de Esch, I. J. P., & de Graaf, C. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00066 · Cited by 55
EnzyDock: Protein–Ligand Docking of Multiple Reactive States along a Reaction Coordinate in Enzymes
Das, S., Shimshi, M., Raz, K., Nitoker, N., Mhashal, A. R., Ansbacher, T., & Major, D. T. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00366 · Cited by 54
CSCORE: A SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE SCORING FUNCTION FOR PROTEIN–LIGAND BINDING AFFINITY PREDICTION USING MODIFIED CMAC LEARNING ARCHITECTURE
Ouyang, X., Handoko, S. D., & Kwoh, C. K. (2011) · Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1142/s021972001100577x · Cited by 51
ParaDockS : A Framework for Molecular Docking with Population-Based Metaheuristics
Meier, R., Pippel, M., Brandt, F., Sippl, W., & Baldauf, C. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900467x · Cited by 54
α subunits in GABAA receptors are dispensable for GABA and diazepam action
Wongsamitkul, N., Maldifassi, M. C., Simeone, X., Baur, R., Ernst, M., & Sigel, E. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15628-7 · Cited by 51
Allosteric Inhibition of the Hepatitis C Virus NS5B Polymerase: In Silico Strategies for Drug Discovery and Development
Barreca, M. L., Iraci, N., Manfroni, G., & Cecchetti, V. (2011) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.11.53 · Cited by 51
Advances in Molecular Modeling of Human Cytochrome P450 Polymorphism
Martiny, V. Y., & Miteva, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.010 · Cited by 55
From Heptahelical Bundle to Hits from the Haystack
Kooistra, A. J., Roumen, L., Leurs, R., de Esch, I. J. P., & de Graaf, C. (2013) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407865-9.00015-7 · Cited by 51
What in silico molecular docking can do for the ‘bench-working biologists’
Mihăşan, M. (2012) · Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12038-012-9273-8 · Cited by 51
Holo-like and Druggable Protein Conformations from Enhanced Sampling of Binding Pocket Volume and Shape
Basciu, A., Malloci, G., Pietrucci, F., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Vargiu, A. V. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00730 · Cited by 50
Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 6. Development and Application to the Docking of HDACs and other Zinc Metalloenzymes Inhibitors
Pottel, J., Therrien, E., Gleason, J. L., & Moitessier, N. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400550m · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Ensemble-based docking: From hit discovery to metabolism and toxicity predictions
Evangelista, W., Weir, R. L., Ellingson, S. R., Harris, J. B., Kapoor, K., Smith, J. C., & Baudry, J. Y. (2016) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2016.07.064 · Cited by 48
Newly synthesized (R)-carvone-derived 1,2,3-triazoles: structural, mechanistic, cytotoxic and molecular docking studies
Hachim, M. E., Oubella, A., Byadi, S., Fawzi, M., Laamari, Y., Bahsis, L., Aboulmouhajir, A., Morjani, H., Podlipnik, Č., Auhmani, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2021.1894984 · Cited by 48
The Potential Role of In Silico Approaches to Identify Novel Bioactive Molecules from Natural Resources
Olğaç, A., Orhan, İ. E., & Banoğlu, E. (2017) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2017-0124 · Cited by 49
Accelerating Molecular Docking Calculations Using Graphics Processing Units
Korb, O., Stützle, T., & Exner, T. E. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100459b · Cited by 47
Dynamic Docking of Conformationally Constrained Macrocycles: Methods and Applications
Allen, S. E., Dokholyan, N. V., & Bowers, A. A. (2015) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.5b00663 · Cited by 46
New drug design with covalent modifiers
Adeniyi, A. A., Ramesh, M., & Soliman, M. E. S. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2016.1115478 · Cited by 46
Other Related Techniques
Roy, K., Kar, S., & Das, R. N. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801505-6.00010-7 · Cited by 50
Ion‐dependent gating of kainate receptors
Bowie, D. (2009) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.178863 · Cited by 47
Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 7. Impact of Protein Flexibility and Water Molecules on Docking-Based Virtual Screening Accuracy
Therrien, É., Weill, N., Tomberg, A., Corbeil, C. R., Lee, D., & Moitessier, N. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500299h · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Discovery of NMDA Glycine Site Inhibitors from the Chemical Universe Database GDB
Nguyen, K. T., Syed, S., Urwyler, S., Bertrand, S., Bertrand, D., & Reymond, J. (2008) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200800198 · Cited by 42
Virtual Screening Strategies in Drug Design
Rodrigues, R. P., Mantoani, S. P., de Almeida, J. R., Pinsetta, F. R., Semighini, E. P., da Silva, V. B., & da Silva, C. H. T. P. (2012) · Revista Virtual de Química · doi:10.5935/1984-6835.20120055 · Cited by 43
In silico Driven Redesign of a Clinically Relevant Antibody for the Treatment of GD2 Positive Tumors
Ahmed, M., Goldgur, Y., Hu, J., Guo, H.-F., & Cheung, N. V. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063359 · Cited by 42
Discovery of novel triple helical DNA intercalators by an integrated virtual and actual screening platform
Holt, P. A., Ragazzon, P. A., Strękowski, L., Chaires, J. B., & Trent, J. O. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn1043 · Cited by 39
Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 5. Force-Field-Based Prediction of Binding Affinities of Ligands to Proteins
Englebienne, P., & Moitessier, N. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900251k · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Structure-Based Predictions of Activity Cliffs
Husby, J., Bottegoni, G., Kufareva, I., Abagyan, R. A., & Cavalli, A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500742b · Cited by 42
Fragment-Based Approaches and Computer-Aided Drug Discovery
Rognan, D. (2011) · Topics in current chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2011_182 · Cited by 38
A simple method for finding a protein’s ligand-binding pockets
Fathi, S. M. S., & Tuszyński, J. A. (2014) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-14-18 · Cited by 38
A comparison of various optimization algorithms of protein–ligand docking programs by fitness accuracy
Guo, L., Yan, Z., Zheng, X., Hu, L., Yang, Y., & Wang, J. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-014-2251-3 · Cited by 38
Predicting Drug-Target Interactions Via Dual-Stream Graph Neural Network
Li, Y., Liang, W., Li, P., Zhang, D., Cheng, Y., & Li, K. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2022.3204188 · Cited by 39
Beyond the Virtual Screening Paradigm: Structure-Based Searching for New Lead Compounds
Schlosser, J., & Rarey, M. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci9000212 · Cited by 37
Molecular docking: theoretical background, practical applications and perspectives
Novikov, F. N., & Chilov, G. G. (2009) · Mendeleev Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2009.09.001 · Cited by 38
Insighting the inhibitory potential of novel modafinil drug derivatives against estrogen alpha (ERα) of breast cancer through a triple hybrid computational methodology
Saba, A., Sarwar, F., Muhammad, S., Ilyas, M., Javed Iqbal, M., Al-Sehemi, A. G., Ayub, K., Gilani, M. A., & Adnan, M. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120234 · Cited by 36
Molecular Similarity and Xenobiotic Metabolism
Adams, S. (2010) · doi:10.17863/cam.16274 · Cited by 36
Docking compared to 3D-pharmacophores: the scoring function challenge
Hein, M., Zilian, D., & Sotriffer, C. (2010) · Drug Discovery Today Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2010.12.003 · Cited by 36
International Journal of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Dhani, P. R. (2014) · ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX · Cited by 36
Toward a computational tool predicting the stereochemical outcome of asymmetric reactions: Development of the molecular mechanics‐based program ACE and application to asymmetric epoxidation reactions
Weill, N., Corbeil, C. R., Schutter, J. W. D., & Moitessier, N. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21869 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Structure-based virtual screening for fragment-like ligands of the G protein-coupled histamine H 4 receptor
Istyastono, E. P., Kooistra, A. J., Vischer, H. F., Kuijer, M., Roumen, L., Nijmeijer, S., Smits, R. A., de Esch, I. J. P., Leurs, R., & de Graaf, C. (2015) · MedChemComm · doi:10.1039/c5md00022j · Cited by 34
Polarizable Water Networks in Ligand–Metalloprotein Recognition. Impact on the Relative Complexation Energies of Zn-Dependent Phosphomannose Isomerase with d -Mannose 6-Phosphate Surrogates
Gresh, N., de Courcy, B., Piquemal, J., Foret, J., Courtiol-Legourd, S., & Salmon, L. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp2024654 · Cited by 34
E-Novo: An Automated Workflow for Efficient Structure-Based Lead Optimization
Pearce, B. C., Langley, D. R., Kang, J., Huang, H., & Kulkarni, A. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900073k · Cited by 34
Computational Profiling of Bioactive Compounds Using a Target-Dependent Composite Workflow
Meslamani, J. E., Bhajun, R., Martz, F., & Rognan, D. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400303n · Cited by 32
Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein‐ligand Complexes
Pason, L. P., & Sotriffer, C. (2016) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201600048 · Cited by 36
Accurately Modeling the Conformational Preferences of Nucleosides
Patrascu, M. B., Malek-Adamian, E., Damha, M. J., & Moitessier, N. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b07436 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Exhaustive docking and solvated interaction energy scoring: lessons learned from the SAMPL4 challenge
Hogues, H., Sulea, T. I., & Purisima, E. O. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-014-9715-5 · Cited by 32
Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions in Drug Design: 2. Can the Knowledge Base Be Enriched?
Shen, Q., Xiong, B., Zheng, M., Luo, X., Luo, C., Liu, X., Du, Y., Li, J., Zhu, W., Shen, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100343j · Cited by 35
The Basic Concepts of Molecular Modeling
Saxena, A., Wong, D. Y., Diraviyam, K., & Sept, D. (2009) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(09)67012-9 · Cited by 32
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Cytosolic 5′-Nucleotidase II (cN-II) by Ribonucleoside 5′-Monophosphate Analogues
Gallier, F., Lallemand, P., Meurillon, M., Jordheim, L. P., Dumontet, C., Périgaud, C., Lionne, C., Peyrottes, S., & Chaloin, L. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002295 · Cited by 33
Acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) as template for hierarchical in silico screening procedures to identify structurally novel ligands for the nicotinic receptors
Akdemir, A., Rucktooa, P., Jongejan, A., van Elk, R., Bertrand, S., Sixma, T. K., Bertrand, D., Smit, A. B., Leurs, R., de Graaf, C., et al. (2011) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2011.08.028 · Cited by 31
From Three-Dimensional GPCR Structure to Rational Ligand Discovery
Kooistra, A. J., Leurs, R., de Esch, I. J. P., & de Graaf, C. (2013) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7423-0_7 · Cited by 31
Modern Tools and Techniques in Computer-Aided Drug Design
Anwar, T., Kumar, P., & Khan, A. U. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822312-3.00011-4 · Cited by 34
A Prospective Cross-Screening Study on G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Lessons Learned in Virtual Compound Library Design
Sanders, M. P. A., Roumen, L., van der Horst, E., Lane, J. R., Vischer, H. F., van Offenbeek, J., de Vries, H., Verhoeven, S., Chow, K. Y. C., Verkaar, F., et al. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300280e · Cited by 32
Implicit ligand theory: Rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking
Minh, D. D. L. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4751284 · Cited by 30
Docking and binding free energy calculations of sirtuin inhibitors
Karaman, B., & Sippl, W. (2015) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.02.045 · Cited by 30
Comparative binding energy analysis for binding affinity and target selectivity prediction
Henrich, S., Feierberg, I., Wang, T., Blomberg, N., & Wade, R. C. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22579 · Cited by 30
Homology modeling of human GABA-AT and devise some novel and potent inhibitors via computer-aided drug design techniques
Al-Obaidi, A., Elmezayen, A. D., & Yelekçi, K. (2020) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2020.1774417 · Cited by 31
In silico fragment-based drug design
Konteatis, Z. D. (2010) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2010.523697 · Cited by 29
A New Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method for Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction and De Novo Drug Design
Limbu, S., & Dakshanamurthy, S. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232213912 · Cited by 30
Conformational Sampling for Large-Scale Virtual Screening: Accuracy versus Ensemble Size
Griewel, A., Kayser, O., Schlosser, J., & Rarey, M. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci9002415 · Cited by 29
Polypharmacology and supercomputer-based docking: opportunities and challenges
Ellingson, S. R., Smith, J. C., & Baudry, J. Y. (2014) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2014.899699 · Cited by 30
Molecular docking: The role of noncovalent interactions in the formation of protein-nucleotide and protein-peptide complexes
Pyrkov, T. V., Ozerov, I. V., Balitskaya, E. D., & Efremov, R. G. (2010) · Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1134/s1068162010040023 · Cited by 29
Rigid Body Energy Minimization on Manifolds for Molecular Docking
Mirzaei, H., Beglov, D., Paschalidis, I. C., Vajda, S., Vakili, P., & Kozakov, D. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300272j · Cited by 28
Applications of the ArgusLab4/AScore protocol in the structure-based binding affinity prediction of various inhibitors of group-1 and group-2 influenza virus neuraminidases (NAs)
Mihajlović, M. L., & Mitrašinović, P. M. (2008) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927020802430752 · Cited by 28
The interprotein scoring noises in glide docking scores
Wang, W., Zhou, X. F., He, W., Yi, F., Chen, Y., & Chen, X. (2011) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.23173 · Cited by 28
Identification of new benzamide inhibitor againstα-subunit of tryptophan synthase fromMycobacterium tuberculosisthrough structure-based virtual screening, anti-tuberculosis activity and molecular dynamics simulations
Naz, S., Farooq, U., Ali, S., Sarwar, R., Khan, S., & Abagyan, R. A. (2018) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2018.1448303 · Cited by 27
LIBRUS: combined machine learning and homology information for sequence-based ligand-binding residue prediction
Kauffman, C., & Karypis, G. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp561 · Cited by 27
Computational drug design strategies applied to the modelling of human immunodeficiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors
Santos, L. H., Ferreira, R. S., & Caffarena, E. R. (2015) · Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · doi:10.1590/0074-02760150239 · Cited by 26
Genetic algorithm with a crossover elitist preservation mechanism for protein–ligand docking
Guan, B., Zhang, C., & Ning, J. (2017) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-017-0476-0 · Cited by 26
New Perspectives of CYP1B1 Inhibitors in the Light of Molecular Studies
Mikstacka, R., & Dutkiewicz, Z. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9050817 · Cited by 26
AI-Accelerated Design of Targeted Covalent Inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2
Joshi, R. P., Schultz, K., Wilson, J., Kruel, A., Varikoti, R. A., Thambiliya, C. J. K. N., Kneller, D. W., Galanie, S. S., Phillips, G., Zhang, Q., et al. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01377 · Cited by 27
GIaNt: Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction via Geometry-Aware Interactive Graph Neural Network
Li, S., Zhou, J., Xu, T., Huang, L., Wang, F., Xiong, H., Huang, W., Dou, D., & Xiong, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3314502 · Cited by 33
Noncovalent interactions between hydroxylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and DNA: Molecular docking and QSAR study
Li, F., Li, X., Liu, X., Zhang, L., You, L., Zhao, J., & Wu, H. (2011) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2011.08.001 · Cited by 26
Contact-based ligand-clustering approach for the identification of active compounds in virtual screening
Bertho, G., Mantsyzov, Bouvier, G., & Evrard-Todeschi (2012) · Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry · doi:10.2147/aabc.s30881 · Cited by 27
Identification of binding sites and favorable ligand binding moieties by virtual screening and self-organizing map analysis
Harigua‐Souiai, E., Cortés‐Ciriano, I., Desdouits, N., Malliavin, T. E., Guizani, I., Nilges, M., Blondel, A., & Bouvier, G. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0518-z · Cited by 27
Synergistic effect of potential alpha-amylase inhibitors from Egyptian propolis with acarbose using in silico and in vitro combination analysis
Nada, A. A., Metwally, A. M., Asaad, A. M., Çeli̇k, İ., Ibrahim, R. S., & Eldin, S. M. S. (2024) · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12906-024-04348-x · Cited by 25
Binding site feature description of 2-substituted benzothiazoles as potential AcrAB-TolC efflux pump inhibitors in E. coli
Yilmaz, S., Altinkanat-Gelmez, G., Bolelli, K., Guneser-Merdan, D., Hasdemir, U. O., Aki, E., & Yalçın, İ. (2015) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2015.1106581 · Cited by 25

Authors: Moitessier, N., Englebienne, P., Lee, D., Lawandi, J., & Corbeil, C. R.
Affiliations: McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author: Moitessier, N
ORCID: Moitessier, N
Corbeil, C R
Venue: British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2008-03
Volume: 153
Issue: S1
Pages: S7-26
ISSN: 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
1476-5381
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515
PMC: PMC2268060
OpenAlex: W2135817448
Cited by: 514
References: 209
Citations by year: 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 43
FWCI: 2.26
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 334 d)
Locations: British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics: Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords: molecular docking, scoring functions, virtual screening, drug discovery, binding affinity prediction, therapeutic target
MeSH terms: Algorithms, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Metals, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Nucleic Acids, Proteins, Stochastic Processes, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks