The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go
Open accessAbstract
Accelerating the drug discovery process requires predictive computational protocols capable of reducing or simplifying the synthetic and/or combinatorial challenge. Docking-based virtual screening methods have been developed and successfully applied to a number of pharmaceutical targets. In this review, we first present the current status of docking and scoring methods, with exhaustive lists of these. We next discuss reported comparative studies, outlining criteria for their interpretation. In the final section, we describe some of the remaining developments that would potentially lead to a universally applicable docking/scoring method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CS strategy could overcome to some extent the limitations faced by the single-scoring approach, for example, the inconsistent performances across different protein targets and chemical classes (Moitessier et al., 2009).”
From Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges (2018) · cites this paper as Moitessier et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., Halgren, T. A., Sanschagrin, P. C., & Mainz, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051256o · Cited by 7,012
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications
Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H. Y., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1549 · Cited by 4,354
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD
Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W., & Taylor, R. D. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10465 · Cited by 3,139
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836
MolDock: A New Technique for High-Accuracy Molecular Docking
Thomsen, R., & Christensen, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051197e · Cited by 2,381
Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
Sherman, W., Day, T., Jacobson, M. P., Friesner, R. A., & Farid, R. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050540c · Cited by 2,089
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 209 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Korb O, 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 247
- Shoichet BK, 2002, Hits, leads and artifacts from virtual and high throughput screening, Molecular Informatics: Confronting Complexity May 13th–16th 2002
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1 <215::AID-PROT29>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1623::AID-JCC8>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1612::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 518
Molecular docking analysis: Basic technique to predict drug-receptor interactions
Silakari, O., & Singh, P. K. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820546-4.00006-4 · Cited by 30
Proteome-scale docking: myth and reality
Rognan, D. (2013) · Drug Discovery Today Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2013.01.003 · Cited by 25
Nunes-Alves, A., & Arantes, G. M. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500301s · Cited by 18
Docking Methods for Virtual Screening: Principles and Recent Advances
Rognan, D. (2011) · Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527633326.ch6 · Cited by 27
Revolutionizing drug discovery: an AI-powered transformation of molecular docking
Fadahunsi, A. A., Uzoeto, H. O., Okoro, N. O., Cosmas, S., Durojaye, O. A., & Odiba, A. S. (2024) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-024-03253-9 · Cited by 28
Huang, Q., Jin, H., Liu, Q., Wu, Q., Kang, H., Cao, Z., & Zhu, R. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041698 · Cited by 23
CrystalDock: A Novel Approach to Fragment-Based Drug Design
Durrant, J. D., Friedman, A. J., & McCammon, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200357y · Cited by 24
Aghajani, J., Farnia, P., Farnia, P., Ghanavi, J., & Velayati, A. A. (2022) · PubMed Central · Cited by 24
Wu, J., Chen, H., Cheng, M., & Xiong, H. (2023) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05503-w · Cited by 23
Pencheva, T., Soumana, O. S., Pajeva, I. K., & Miteva, M. A. (2010) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.12.025 · Cited by 24
Molecular docking study investigating the possible mode of binding of C.I. Acid Red 73 with DNA
Guo, Y., Yue, Q., & Gao, B. (2011) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.03.009 · Cited by 23
Bottegoni, G. (2011) · Frontiers in bioscience · doi:10.2741/3854 · Cited by 27
Chibale, K., Masimirembwa, C. M., & Davies-Coleman, M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28175-4 · Cited by 25
Huang, W., Blinov, N., Wishart, D. S., & Kovalenko, A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500520q · Cited by 24
C(X)CR in silico: Computer-aided prediction of chemokine receptor–ligand interactions
Roumen, L., Scholten, D. J., de Kruijf, P., de Esch, I. J. P., Leurs, R., & de Graaf, C. (2012) · Drug Discovery Today Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2012.05.002 · Cited by 23
Molecular modeling and in vitro study on pyrocatechol as potential pharmacophore of CD151 inhibitor
Akella, M., & Malla, R. R. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107681 · Cited by 22
Machine Learning Scoring Functions Based on Random Forest and Support Vector Regression
Ballester, P. J. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34123-6_2 · Cited by 22
Automated site preparation in physics‐based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes
Rapp, C. S., Schonbrun, C., Jacobson, M. P., Kalyanaraman, C., & Huang, N. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22415 · Cited by 22
Alpha-Glucosidase Folding During Urea Denaturation: Enzyme Kinetics and Computational Prediction
Wu, X.-Q., Wang, J., Lü, Z.-R., Tang, H., Park, D., Oh, S. H., Bhak, J., Shi, L., Park, Y., & Zou, F. (2009) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-009-8636-6 · Cited by 21
Some Trends in Chem(o)informatics
Warr, W. A. (2010) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_1 · Cited by 21
Khan, S., Bjij, I., Olotu, F. A., Agoni, C., Adeniji, E. A., & Soliman, M. E. S. (2018) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2017-0304 · Cited by 20
Persuy, M., Sanz, G., Tromelin, A., Thomas‐Danguin, T., Gibrat, J.-F., & Pajot-Augy, E. (2014) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2014.11.001 · Cited by 22
Ligand entry pathways in the ligand binding domain of PPARγ receptor
Aci‐Sèche, S., Genest, M., & Garnier, N. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.07.014 · Cited by 20
Khan, A., Waqas, M. S., Khan, M., Halim, S. A., Rehman, N. U., & Al‐Harrasi, A. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.001 · Cited by 20
Sulea, T. I., Hogues, H., & Purisima, E. O. (2011) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9529-7 · Cited by 20
MoDock: A multi-objective strategy improves the accuracy for molecular docking
Gu, J., Yang, X., Kang, L., Wu, J., & Wang, X. (2015) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/s13015-015-0034-8 · Cited by 21
New mimetic peptides inhibitors of Αβ aggregation. Molecular guidance for rational drug design
Barrera, E., Andújar, S. A., Hubin, E., Broersen, K., Kraan, I. M., Méndez, L., Delpiccolo, C. M. L., Masman, M. F., Rodríguez, A. M., & Enriz, R. D. (2015) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.03.042 · Cited by 20
Hou, J., Zou, Q. S., Wang, Y., Gao, Q., Yao, W., Yao, Q., & Zhang, J. (2018) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2018.1509019 · Cited by 20
Ramakrishnan, G., Chandra, N. R., & Srinivasan, N. (2015) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c5mb00476d · Cited by 19
Manoharan, P., Chennoju, K., & Ghoshal, N. (2015) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c5mb00088b · Cited by 19
Slynko, I., Silva, F. D., Bret, G., & Rognan, D. (2016) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9930-3 · Cited by 20
Interactions of ketoamide inhibitors on HCV NS3/4A protease target: molecular docking studies
Wadood, A., Riaz, M., Jamal, S. B., & Shah, M. (2013) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-013-2867-x · Cited by 19
In Silico Veritas: The Pitfalls and Challenges of Predicting GPCR-Ligand Interactions
Roumen, L., Sanders, M. P. A., Vroling, B., de Esch, I. J. P., de Vlieg, J., Leurs, R., Klomp, J. P. G., Nabuurs, S. B., & de Graaf, C. (2011) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph4091196 · Cited by 18
Robust optimization of scoring functions for a target class
Seifert, M. H. J. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-009-9276-1 · Cited by 18
Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge
Purisima, E. O., Corbeil, C. R., & Sulea, T. I. (2010) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-010-9341-9 · Cited by 18
Self-citationProtein Ligand Docking in Drug Discovery
Brás, N. F., Cerqueira, N. M. F. S. A., Sousa, S. F., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09976-7_11 · Cited by 20
Wei, W., Champion, C., Liu, Z., Barigye, S. J., Labute, P., & Moitessier, N. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00585 · Cited by 17
Self-citationBülbül, E. F., Melesina, J., Ibrahim, H. S., Abdelsalam, M. A. M., Vecchio, A., Robaa, D., Zessin, M., Schutkowski, M., & Sippl, W. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27082526 · Cited by 19
Wright, J. S., Anderson, J. M., Shadnia, H., Durst, T., & Katzenellenbogen, J. A. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-013-9670-6 · Cited by 17
Modeling Reality for Optimal Docking of Small Molecules to Biological Targets
Corbeil, C. R., Therrien, É., & Moitessier, N. (2009) · Current Computer - Aided Drug Design · doi:10.2174/157340909789577856 · Cited by 17
Self-citationBryce, R. A. (2011) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.11.30 · Cited by 17
Scoring Functions for Protein–Ligand Interactions
Sotriffer, C. (2012) · Protein‐Ligand Interactions · doi:10.1002/9783527645947.ch12 · Cited by 16
Customizable Generation of Synthetically Accessible, Local Chemical Subspaces
Pottel, J., & Moitessier, N. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00648 · Cited by 16
Self-citationAsoka, S. F., Batubara, I., Lestari, A. R., Wahyuni, W. T., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2022) · Cosmetics · doi:10.3390/cosmetics9060128 · Cited by 16
Venianakis, T., Primikyri, A., Opatz, T., Petry, S., Papamokos, G., & Gerothanassis, I. P. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28247991 · Cited by 16
Cancer and Biotechnology: A Matchup that Should Never Slowdown
Hrout, A. A., Baig, B., Hilal‐Alnaqbi, A., & Amin, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53880-8_3 · Cited by 16
The Challenge of Affinity Prediction: Scoring Functions for Structure‐Based Virtual Screening
Sotriffer, C., & Matter, H. (2011) · Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527633326.ch7 · Cited by 16
A Review on Artificial Intelligence Approaches and Rational Approaches in Drug Discovery
Srivathsa, A. V., Sadashivappa, N. M., Hegde, A. K., Radha, S., Mahesh, A. R., Ammunje, D. N., Sen, D., Theivendren, P., Saravanan, G., Kunjiappan, S., et al. (2023) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612829666230428110542 · Cited by 16
In Silico Docking: Protocols for Computational Exploration of Molecular Interactions
Mathur, N., Chandragiri, S. S., Sarita, S., Shandily, S., Santoki, K. M., Vadhavana, N. N., Shah, S., & Chandra, M. (2024) · Biomedical engineering · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1005527 · Cited by 17
EDGA: A Population Evolution Direction-Guided Genetic Algorithm for Protein–Ligand Docking
Guan, B., Zhang, C., & Ning, J. (2016) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2015.0190 · Cited by 15
Yadav, T. C., Srivastava, A., Dey, A., Kumar, N., Raghuwanshi, N., & Pruthi, V. (2018) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026619666181120142141 · Cited by 14
CRDOCK: An Ultrafast Multipurpose Protein–Ligand Docking Tool
Cortés-Cabrera, Á., Klett, J., Santos, H. G. D., Perona, A., Gil‐Redondo, R., Francis, S. M., Priego, E., Gago, F., & Morreale, A. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300194a · Cited by 15
Toward a Robust Search Method for the Protein-Drug Docking Problem
Sadjad, B. S., & Zsoldos, Z. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2010.70 · Cited by 15
May, B. H., Deng, S., Zhang, A. L., Lu, C., & Xue, C. C. (2015) · Archives of Dermatological Research · doi:10.1007/s00403-015-1577-8 · Cited by 15
Docking and scoring: applications to drug discovery in the interactomics era
Grosdidier, S., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460440903002067 · Cited by 15
Adaptive GPU-accelerated force calculation for interactive rigid molecular docking using haptics
Iakovou, G., Hayward, S., & Laycock, S. D. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2015.06.003 · Cited by 14
A real-time proximity querying algorithm for haptic-based molecular docking
Iakovou, G., Hayward, S., & Laycock, S. D. (2014) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/c3fd00123g · Cited by 14
Meena, N. C. K. (2015) · Virology & Mycology · doi:10.4172/2161-0517.1000141 · Cited by 14
An Efficient ABC_DE_Based Hybrid Algorithm for Protein–Ligand Docking
Guan, B., Zhang, C., & Zhao, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19041181 · Cited by 14
Bibi, S., Wang, Y., Tang, D., Kamal, M. A., & Yu, H. (2019) · Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1573406416666191227120425 · Cited by 14
Gil-Ley, A., Valiente, P. A., Pascutti, P. G., & Pons, T. (2011) · Journal of Tropical Medicine · doi:10.1155/2011/657483 · Cited by 14
Pharmacophore Identification and Pseudo-Receptor Modeling
Wolber, G., & Sippl, W. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417205-0.00021-3 · Cited by 14
CIFDock : A novel CHARMM ‐based flexible receptor–flexible ligand docking protocol
Vankayala, S. L., Warrensford, L. C., Pittman, A. R., Pollard, B. C., Kearns, F. L., Larkin, J. D., & Woodcock, H. L. (2021) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.26759 · Cited by 13
Optimization of molecular docking scores with support vector rank regression
Wang, W., He, W., Zhou, X. F., & Chen, X. (2013) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24282 · Cited by 13
Liu, Z., Pottel, J., Shahamat, M., Tomberg, A., Labute, P., & Moitessier, N. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00012 · Cited by 13
Self-citationA Novel Fireworks Algorithm for the Protein-Ligand Docking on the AutoDock
Liu, Z., Jiang, D., Zhang, C., Zhao, H., Zhao, Q., & Zhang, B. (2019) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-019-01412-6 · Cited by 13
Relating the shape of protein binding sites to binding affinity profiles: is there an association?
Simon, Z., Vigh-Smeller, M., Peragovics, Á., Csukly, G., Zahoránszky-Köhalmi, G., Rauscher, A. Á., Jelinek, B., Hári, P., Bitter, I., Málnási‐Csizmadia, A., et al. (2010) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-10-32 · Cited by 13
Issar, U., Kumari, T., & Kakkar, R. (2015) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2015.05.003 · Cited by 13
HopDock: a probabilistic search algorithm for decoy sampling in protein-protein docking
Hashmi, I., & Shehu, A. (2013) · Proteome Science · doi:10.1186/1477-5956-11-s1-s6 · Cited by 13
Importance of Computer-aided Drug Design in Modern Pharmaceutical Research
Agarwal, U., Tonk, R. K., & Paliwal, S. (2025) · Current Drug Discovery Technologies · doi:10.2174/0115701638361318241230073123 · Cited by 14
GUIDING PROTEIN DOCKING WITH GEOMETRIC AND EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION
Hashmi, I., Akbal-Delibas, B., Haspel, N., & Shehu, A. (2012) · Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219720012420085 · Cited by 12
He, G., SHI, J., Chen, Y., CHEN, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, M., & Liu, J. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1142/s0219633611006633 · Cited by 12
Virtual Environment for Studying the Docking Interactions of Rigid Biomolecules with Haptics
Iakovou, G., Hayward, S., & Laycock, S. D. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00051 · Cited by 12
Chem-bioinformatic approach for drug discovery
Ojha, H., Sethi, M., Kakkar, R., Sharma, M., Saini, M., & Pathak, M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821748-1.00005-1 · Cited by 13
Virtual Screening - models, methods and software systems
Lazarova, M. K. (2008) · Cited by 12
Theory of docking scores and its application to a customizable scoring function
Takahashi, O., Masuda, Y., Muroya, A., & Furuya, T. (2010) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2010.502299 · Cited by 12
Aki, E., Ertan‐Bolelli, T., Taşkın‐Tok, T., Öztürk, Ö., Ataei, S., Özen, Ç., Yıldız, İ., & Yalçın, İ. (2014) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2014.923039 · Cited by 12
The Comparison of Docking Search Algorithms and Scoring Functions
Novič, M., Tibaut, T., Anderluh, M., Borišek, J., & Tomašič, T. (2016) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0115-2.ch004 · Cited by 13
IMPECCABLE: Integrated Modeling PipelinE for COVID Cure by Assessing Better LEads
Al-Saadi, A., Alfè, D., Babuji, Y., Bhati, A. P., Blaiszik, B. J., Brace, A., Brettin, T. S., Chard, K., Chard, R., Clyde, A., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing · doi:10.1145/3472456.3473524 · Cited by 33
Novel computational pipelines in antiviral structure‑based drug design (Review)
Diakou, I., Papakonstantinou, E., Papageorgiou, L., Pierouli, K., Dragoumani, K., Spandidos, D. A., Bacopoulou, F., Chrousos, G. P., Eliopoulos, E., & Vlachakis, D. (2022) · Biomedical Reports · doi:10.3892/br.2022.1580 · Cited by 13
Deep Generation Model Guided by the Docking Score for Active Molecular Design
Yang, Y., Hsieh, C., Kang, Y., Hou, T., Liu, H., & Yao, X. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00572 · Cited by 13
Using Machine Learning Methods to Predict Experimental High Throughput Screening Data
Mballo, C., & Makarenkov, V. (2010) · Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening · doi:10.2174/138620710791292958 · Cited by 11
Performance of Protein–Ligand Docking with Simulated Chemical Shift Perturbations
ten Brink, T., Aguirre, C., Exner, T. E., & Krimm, I. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500446s · Cited by 11
Aloufi, B. H., Snoussi, M., & Sulieman, A. M. E. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27082401 · Cited by 11
Mahasenan, K. V., Pavlovicz, R. E., Henderson, B. J., González-Cestari, T. F., Yi, B., McKay, D. B., & Li, C. (2011) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/ml2001714 · Cited by 12
Rachmania, R. A., Hariyanti, H., Zikriah, R., & Sultan, A. (2018) · Jurnal Kimia VALENSI · doi:10.15408/jkv.v4i2.7686 · Cited by 11
IMPROVING HOMOLOGY MODELS FOR PROTEIN-LIGAND BINDING SITES
Kauffman, C., Rangwala, H., & Karypis, G. (2008) · IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference (CSB) · doi:10.1142/9781848162648_0019 · Cited by 11
Docking and Scoring in Drug Discovery
Spyrakis, F., Cozzini, P., & Kellogg, G. E. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471266949.bmc140 · Cited by 12
Structure‐Based Virtual Screening
Kolodzik, A., Schneider, N., & Rarey, M. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9783527806539.ch6h · Cited by 11
Mohammed, M., & Adnan, A. A. (2024) · Turkish computational and theoretical chemistry/Turkish computational and theoretical chemistry : · doi:10.33435/tcandtc.1355772 · Cited by 10
Improved Prediction of Ligand–Protein Binding Affinities by Meta-modeling
Lee, H., Emani, P. S., & Gerstein, M. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01116 · Cited by 12
Schultes, S., Engelhardt, H., Roumen, L., Zuiderveld, O. P., Haaksma, E. E. J., de Esch, I. J. P., Leurs, R., & de Graaf, C. (2012) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.201200412 · Cited by 10
Computational Chemistry to Repurposing Drugs for the Control of COVID-19
Hassanzadeganroudsari, M., Ahmadi, A., Rashidi, N., Hossain, M. M., Habib, A., & Apostolopoulos, V. (2021) · Biologics · doi:10.3390/biologics1020007 · Cited by 10
Kalathiya, U., Padariya, M., & Bagiński, M. (2015) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1432 · Cited by 10
Overview of Computational Methods Employed in Early-Stage Drug Discovery
Skjevik, Å. A., Teigen, K., & Martı́nez, A. (2009) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.09.7 · Cited by 10
Hecht, D., Cheung, M., & Fogel, G. B. (2009) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2009.4982957 · Cited by 10
In Silico Identification of JMJD3 Demethylase Inhibitors
Esposito, C., Wiedmer, L., & Caflisch, A. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00539 · Cited by 10
Sharma, V., Pattanaik, K. K., Jayprakash, V., Basu, A., & Mishra, N. (2009) · Bioinformation · doi:10.6026/97320630004084 · Cited by 10
Paglia, L. L., Vazzana, M., Mauro, M., Urso, A. M., Arizza, V., & Vizzini, A. (2023) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md22010006 · Cited by 10
Muhammad, S., Zahir, N., Bibi, S., Alshahrani, M. Y., Shafiq‐ur‐Rehman, Chaudhry, A. R., Sarwar, F., & Tousif, M. I. (2024) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108020 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Moitessier, N., Englebienne, P., Lee, D., Lawandi, J., & Corbeil, C. R.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Moitessier, N
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S7-26
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- PMC
- PMC2268060
- OpenAlex
- W2135817448
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 209
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- molecular docking, scoring functions, virtual screening, drug discovery, binding affinity prediction, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Metals, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Nucleic Acids, Proteins, Stochastic Processes, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review