Cited by 518Computational Drug Discovery MethodsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseasesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go

Open access

Moitessier, N, Englebienne, P, Lee, D, Lawandi, J, Corbeil, C R·2008·British Journal of Pharmacology

DOI 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515PMC PMC2268060

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Accelerating the drug discovery process requires predictive computational protocols capable of reducing or simplifying the synthetic and/or combinatorial challenge. Docking-based virtual screening methods have been developed and successfully applied to a number of pharmaceutical targets. In this review, we first present the current status of docking and scoring methods, with exhaustive lists of these. We next discuss reported comparative studies, outlining criteria for their interpretation. In the final section, we describe some of the remaining developments that would potentially lead to a universally applicable docking/scoring method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein−Ligand Complexes
Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., Halgren, T. A., Sanschagrin, P. C., & Mainz, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051256o · Cited by 7,012
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications
Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H. Y., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1549 · Cited by 4,354
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD
Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W., & Taylor, R. D. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10465 · Cited by 3,139
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836
MolDock: A New Technique for High-Accuracy Molecular Docking
Thomsen, R., & Christensen, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051197e · Cited by 2,381
Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
Sherman, W., Day, T., Jacobson, M. P., Friesner, R. A., & Farid, R. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050540c · Cited by 2,089

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 209 references

5 of the 209 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

Korb O, 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 247
Shoichet BK, 2002, Hits, leads and artifacts from virtual and high throughput screening, Molecular Informatics: Confronting Complexity May 13th–16th 2002
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1 <215::AID-PROT29>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1623::AID-JCC8>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1612::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 518

A basin hopping algorithm for protein-protein docking
Hashmi, I., & Shehu, A. (2012) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2012.6392725 · Cited by 9
Exploring Asphodelus microcarpus as a source of xanthine oxidase inhibitors: Insights from in silico and in vitro studies
Petrillo, A. D., Siguri, C., Delogu, G., Fais, A., Era, B., Floris, S., Pintus, F., Kumar, A., Fantini, M. C., & Olla, S. (2024) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2024.111087 · Cited by 9
Computational prediction and analysis of the DR6–NAPP interaction
Ponomarev, S. Y., & Audie, J. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22962 · Cited by 9
Potential Effect of Tobacco Consumption through Smoking and Chewing Tobacco on IL1beta Protein Expression in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: In Silico Molecular Docking Study
Majumder, P., Ray, P. P., Ghosh, S., & Dey, S. K. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2019.2894737 · Cited by 9
Muti-objective evolutionary approach of ligand design for protein-ligand docking problem
Rakshit, P., Konar, A., Chowdhury, A., Kim, E., & Nagar, A. K. (2013) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2013.6557576 · Cited by 9
Computational molecular biology approaches to ligand‐target interactions
Lupieri, P., Nguyen, C., Ghaemi, Z., Giorgetti, A., & Carloni, P. (2009) · HFSP journal · doi:10.2976/1.3092784 · Cited by 9
Structure based virtual screening of GSK-3β: Importance of protein flexibility and induced fit
Mishra, N., Basu, A., Jayaprakash, V., Sharon, A., Basu, M., & Pattanaik, K. K. (2009) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.08.042 · Cited by 10
Application of Conformational Clustering in Protein–Ligand Docking
Bottegoni, G., Rocchia, W., & Cavalli, A. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_12 · Cited by 9
Computational Biology and Chemistry in MTi: Emphasis on the Prediction of Some ADMET Properties
Miteva, M. A., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2017) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201700008 · Cited by 9
Virtual screening of small-molecule libraries
Li, Q. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818349-6.00004-2 · Cited by 10
Exploring Multiple Binding Modes Using Confined Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics
Anselmi, M., & Pisabarro, M. T. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00253 · Cited by 8
Protein docking with information on evolutionary conserved interfaces
Hashmi, I., Akbal-Delibas, B., Haspel, N., & Shehu, A. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW) · doi:10.1109/bibmw.2011.6112399 · Cited by 8
Compound Ranking Based on Fuzzy Three-Dimensional Similarity Improves the Performance of Docking into Homology Models of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
Anighoro, A., & Bajorath, J. (2017) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.7b00330 · Cited by 8
Computational Chemistry and Molecular Modeling of Reversible MAO Inhibitors
Yelekçi, K., & Erdem, S. S. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2643-6_17 · Cited by 8
Efficient protein-ligand docking using sustainable evolutionary algorithm
Atılgan, E., & Hu, J. (2010) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/1830483.1830521 · Cited by 8
Relative Enzymatic Activity Levels from In Silico Mutagenesis.
Mellot‐Draznieks, C., Valayannopoulos, V., Chrétien, D., Münnich, A., de Lonlay, P., & Toulhoat, H. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs300538z · Cited by 7
Computer-Aided Discovery of Glycogen Phosphorylase Inhibitors Exploiting Natural Products
Hayes, J. M. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809450-1.00002-8 · Cited by 8
Docking study of triphenylphosphonium cations as estrogen receptor alpha modulators
Salisbury, J. P., & Williams, J. C. (2009) · Bioinformation · doi:10.6026/97320630003303 · Cited by 8
On the Efficiency of Local Search Methods for the Molecular Docking Problem
Tavares, J., Mesmoudi, S., & Talbi, E. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01184-9_10 · Cited by 8
Consideration of Water and Solvation Effects in Virtual Screening
Kirchmair, J., Spitzer, G. M., & Liedl, K. R. (2011) · Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527633326.ch10 · Cited by 8
Extracting Molecular Information from African Natural Products to Facilitate Unique African-Led Drug-Discovery Efforts
Chibale, K., Guantai, E. M., & Masimirembwa, C. M. (2011) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.10.299 · Cited by 8
Anticancer Potential of Quercetin on Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Scoping Review and Molecular Docking
Afriza, D., Arma, U., Faslah, R., & Suriyah, W. H. (2024) · European Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1789016 · Cited by 7
HIGA: A Running History Information Guided Genetic Algorithm for Protein–Ligand Docking
Guan, B., Zhang, C., & Zhao, Y. (2017) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules22122233 · Cited by 7
Biomolecular Talks—Part 2: Applications and Challenges of Molecular Docking Approaches
Ramaswamy, A., Balasubramanian, S., & Rajagopalan, M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822312-3.00024-2 · Cited by 7
Binding propensity and selectivity of cationic, anionic, and neutral guests with model hydrophobic hosts: A first principles study
Kumar, Y. B., Pandey, A., Kumar, N., & Sastry, G. N. (2022) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.26977 · Cited by 7
Molecular Simulations Of Drug–Receptor Complexes In Anticancer Research
Gago, F. (2012) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.12.149 · Cited by 7
Structure-Based Design and Computational Studies of Sirtuin Inhibitors
Karaman, B., Jung, M., & Sippl, W. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802808-7.00011-3 · Cited by 7
VIRTUAL SCREENING STATEGIES IN DRUG DISCOVERY – A BRIEF OVERVIEW
Quân, P. M., & Pham, Q. L. (2021) · Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology/Science and Technology · doi:10.15625/2525-2518/59/4/16003 · Cited by 7
Key Aspects for Achieving Hits by Virtual Screening Studies
Federico, L. B., Barcelos, M. P., Silva, G. M., Francischini, I. A. G., Taft, C. A., & da Silva, C. H. T. D. P. (2021) · Engineering materials · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62226-8_16 · Cited by 7
The Influence of Mutation on Protein-Ligand Docking Optimization: A Locality Analysis
Tavares, J., Tantar, A., Melab, N., & Talbi, E. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87700-4_59 · Cited by 7
Efficient protein-ligand docking using sustainable evolutionary algorithms
Atılgan, E., & Hu, J. (2010) · International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS) · doi:10.1109/his.2010.5600082 · Cited by 7
Ligand‐Binding Residue Prediction
Kauffman, C., & Karypis, G. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9780470882207.ch16 · Cited by 7
Druggable exosites of the human kino-pocketome
Nicola, G., Kufareva, I., Ilatovskiy, A. V., & Abagyan, R. A. (2020) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-019-00276-y · Cited by 6
Molecular Docking and Virtual Screening to Investigate Lead Compounds for Veterinary Drug Development
Agrwal, A., Chadha, N., & Sahu, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-7395-4_12 · Cited by 6
Binding Free Energy Calculation and Scoring in Small-Molecule Docking
Cavasotto, C. N. (2012) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781849735377-00195 · Cited by 6
A Comparison between Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)-Based and Docking-Based Virtual Screening
Spiegel, J. D., & Senderowitz, H. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23010043 · Cited by 6
Solid-state zwitterionic tautomerization of 2-((5-methyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)methyl)-1H-benzimidazole: Synthesis, characterization, DFT calculation and docking studies
Foujji, L. E., Bourakadi, K. E., Essassi, E. M., Boeré, R. T., Qaiss, A. E. K., & Bouhfid, R. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130231 · Cited by 6
Protein-Ligand Docking Methodologies and Its Application in Drug Discovery
Rajkhowa, S., & Deka, R. C. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0549-5.ch035 · Cited by 6
Drug Discovery and Development: Computational Approaches
Li, H., Zheng, M., Luo, X., Zhu, W., & Jiang, H. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470048672.wecb098 · Cited by 7
Docking, Scoring, and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery
Spyrakis, F., Sarkar, A., & Kellogg, G. E. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471266949.bmc301 · Cited by 6
Biological Potential of Asphodelus microcarpus Extracts: α-Glucosidase and Antibiofilm Activities In Vitro
Floris, S., Pintus, F., Fais, A., Era, B., Raho, N., Siguri, C., Orrù, G., Fais, S., Tuberoso, C. I. G., Olla, S., et al. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29215063 · Cited by 5
A High Performance Cloud-Based Protein-Ligand Docking Prediction Algorithm
Chen, J.-L., Tsai, C., Chiang, M., & Yang, C. (2013) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2013/909717 · Cited by 5
idDock+: Integrating Machine Learning in Probabilistic Search for Protein–Protein Docking
Hashmi, I., & Shehu, A. (2015) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2015.0108 · Cited by 5
Theoretical prediction of drug-receptor interactions
Frecer, V. (2011) · Drug metabolism and drug interactions · doi:10.1515/dmdi.2011.014 · Cited by 5
Modeling of 2-Pyridin-3-yl-Benzo[d][1,3]Oxazin-4-one Derivatives by Several Conformational Searching Tools and Molecular Docking
Goodarzi, M., Bora, A., Borota, A., Funar‐Timofei, S., Avram, S. I., & Heyden, Y. V. (2013) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612811319120007 · Cited by 5
Machine learning approaches for customized docking scores: Modeling of inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis enoyl acyl carrier protein reductase
Fogel, G. B., Tran, J., Johnson, S. R., & Hecht, D. (2010) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) · doi:10.1109/cibcb.2010.5510700 · Cited by 5
Role of Molecular Docking in Computer-Aided Drug Design and Development
Agarwal, R., Singh, A., & Sen, S. (2016) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0362-0.ch001 · Cited by 5
Toward resistance‐compromised DHFR inhibitors part 1: Combined structure/ligand‐based virtual screenings and ADME‐Tox profiling
Gahtori, P., Pandey, R. K., Kumar, V. D., Ghosh, S. K., Das, A., Kalita, J. M., Sahu, S., Prakash, A., & Bhattacharyya, D. R. (2016) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.2814 · Cited by 5
Studi Hubungan Kuantitatif Struktur-Aktivitas, Fitur Farmakofor, dan Docking Molekuler Senyawa Turunan Pirazolo-[3,4-d]-pirimidin sebagai Inhibitor Mer Tirosin Kinase
Tjahjono, D. H., & Hamzah, N. (2013) · Acta Pharmaceutica Indonesia · doi:10.5614/api.v38i1.5197 · Cited by 5
Binary Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis to Increase the Predictive Ability of Structure-Based Virtual Screening Campaigns Targeting Cyclooxygenase-2
Istyastono, E. P. (2017) · Indonesian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.22146/ijc.24172 · Cited by 5
Syntheses and Binding Testing of N1-Alkylamino-Substituted 2-Aminobenzimidazole Analogues Targeting the Hepatitis C Virus Internal Ribosome Entry Site*
Schmit, D. J., Milewicz, U. A., Boerneke, M. A., Burley, S. D., Walsworth, K., Um, J. M., Hecht, D., Hermann, T., & Bergdahl, B. M. (2020) · Australian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1071/ch19526 · Cited by 5
An improved LGA for protein-ligand docking prediction
Tsai, C., Chen, J.-L., & Yang, C.-S. (2012) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2012.6256513 · Cited by 5
A computer-based approach for developing linamarase inhibitory agents
Paul, L., Mudogo, C. N., Mtei, K., Machunda, R. L., & Ntie‐Kang, F. (2020) · Physical Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1515/psr-2019-0098 · Cited by 5
Computer-Aided Discovery of Pentapeptide AEYTR as a Potent Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor
Istyastono, E. P., & Prasasty, V. D. (2020) · Indonesian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.22146/ijc.55447 · Cited by 5
Natural Product-Based Drug Discovery in Africa: The Need for Integration into Modern Drug Discovery Paradigms
Guantai, E. M., & Chibale, K. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28175-4_5 · Cited by 5
Determination of locked interfaces in biomolecular complexes using Haptimol_RD
Iakovou, G., Laycock, S. D., & Hayward, S. (2016) · Biophysics and Physicobiology · doi:10.2142/biophysico.13.0_97 · Cited by 5
Prospects of Modulating Protein–Protein Interactions
Zhong, S., Oashi, T., Yu, W., Shapiro, P., & MacKerell, A. D. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527645947.ch15 · Cited by 5
An Empirical Study on the Influence of Genetic Operators for Molecular Docking Optimization
Tavares, J., Melab, N., & Talbi, E. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 5
New potent N‐hydroxycinnamamide‐based histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress proliferation and trigger apoptosis in THP‐1 leukaemia cells
Onuščáková, M., Kauerová, T., Fialova, E., Pížová, H., Garaj, V., Kemka, M., Frecer, V., Kollár, P., & Bobáľ, P. (2025) · Archiv der Pharmazie · doi:10.1002/ardp.202400889 · Cited by 5
Designing of potent anti-diabetic molecules by targeting SIK2 using computational approaches
Jayaprakash, P., Biswal, J., Rangaswamy, R., & Jeyakanthan, J. (2022) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-022-10470-0 · Cited by 4
General Strategies for Rational Design and Discovery of Multitarget Drugs
Wang, Z., & Yang, B. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04998-9_18 · Cited by 4
Bioinformatics Approaches in Studying the Fungal Endophyte-Derived Bioactive Compounds with Pharmacological Relevance
Singh, S., Kumar, K., Rao, A., & Prajapati, V. K. (2024) · Fungal biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49112-2_9 · Cited by 5
Docking and Virtual Screening
Morris, G. M. (2012) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781849735377-00171 · Cited by 4
Virtual screening
Dhingra, A. K., Chopra, B., Bhardwaj, S., Grewal, A. S., & Guarve, K. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99137-7.00007-1 · Cited by 4
POTENSI DAUN ASAM JAWA (Tamarindus indica L.) SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF ANTIINFLAMASI: STUDI IN SILICO
Yunita, E., Fatimah, S., Yulianto, D., Trikuncahyo, V., & Khodijah, Z. (2019) · Jurnal Kefarmasian Akfarindo · doi:10.37089/jofar.v0i0.68 · Cited by 4
The Impact of Local Search on Protein-Ligand Docking Optimization
Tavares, J., Tantar, A., Melab, N., & Talbi, E. (2008) · International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS) · doi:10.1109/his.2008.14 · Cited by 4
Computational Analysis of Amiloride Analogue Inhibitors of Coxsackie Virus B3 RNA Polymerase
Holien, J. K. (2014) · Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.4172/jpb.s9-004 · Cited by 4
In Silico Screening
Rodrigues, T., & Schneider, G. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417205-0.00006-7 · Cited by 5
Recent Trends in Structure‐Based Drug Design and Energetics
Andricopulo, A. D., Guido, R. V. C., Trivella, D. B. B., Polikarpov, I., Leitão, A., & Montanari, C. A. (2010) · Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery · doi:10.1002/0471266949.bmc141 · Cited by 4
Deep learning advances high-throughput toxicity screening of chemicals at multi-biological levels
Wu, X., Zhu, Y., Hou, J., Zhang, J., Jiang, X., & Lin, D. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2025.09.045 · Cited by 4
Synthesis, Characterization, and Screening Anticancer—Antibiofilm Activities of Theophylline Derivatives Containing CF3/OCF3 Moiety
Düşünceli, S. D., Coşkun, K. A., Kaloğlu, M., Üstün, E., Çalışkan, R., & Tutar, Y. (2025) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology14091180 · Cited by 3
An Improved Weighted‐Residue Profile Based Method of Using Protein–Ligand Interaction Information in Increasing Hits Selection from Virtual Screening: A Study on Virtual Screening of Human GPCR A2A Receptor Antagonists
Shahid, M., Kasam, V., & Hofmann‐Apitius, M. (2010) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201000068 · Cited by 3
Prediction of Ligand Binding Affinity Using a Multiple-Conformations-Multiple-Protonation Scheme: Application to Estrogen Receptor .ALPHA.
Mizutani, M., Takamatsu, Y., Ichinose, T., & Itai, A. (2012) · Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · doi:10.1248/cpb.60.183 · Cited by 3
Prediction of kinase-inhibitor binding affinity using energetic parameters
Singaravelu, U., & Selvaraj, S. (2016) · Bioinformation · doi:10.6026/97320630012172 · Cited by 3
In vitro and in silico studies of the antifungal properties of the bulb and leaves extracts of Drimia delagoensis Baker (Jessop)
Ndaba, N., Fotsing, M. C. D., Anku, W. W., & Govender, P. P. (2019) · Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13596-019-00418-5 · Cited by 3
Entropy‐based lamarckian quantum‐behaved particle swarm optimization for flexible ligand docking
You, Q., Li, C., Sun, J., Palade, V., & Pan, F. (2022) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.202200080 · Cited by 3
In Silico Study of Bajakah Compounds (Spatholobus suberectus) to Protease SARS-CoV-2 Inhibitor
Norhayati, N., Andika, A., & Purwanto, A. (2023) · Jurnal Sains dan Kesehatan · doi:10.25026/jsk.v5i2.950 · Cited by 3
Molecular analysis of dUTPase of Helicobacter pylori for identification of novel inhibitors using in silico studies
Sisodia, R., Sarmadhikari, D., Mazumdar, P. A., Asthana, S., & Madhurantakam, C. (2023) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2247080 · Cited by 3
The Antioxidant Drug Edaravone Binds to the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) and Promotes the Downstream Signaling Pathway Activation
Veroni, C., Olla, S., Brignone, M. S., Siguri, C., Formato, A., Marra, M., Manzoli, R., Macario, M. C., Ambrosini, E., Moro, E., et al. (2024) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom14040443 · Cited by 5
Systematic Testing of Belief-Propagation Estimates for Absolute Free Energies in Atomistic Peptides and Proteins
Donovan-Maiye, R., LANGMEAD, C. J., & Zuckerman, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00775 · Cited by 3
Hierarchical analysis of the target-based scoring function modification for the example of selected class A GPCRs
Rzęsikowska, K., Kalinowska‐Tłuścik, J., & Krawczuk, A. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d2cp04671g · Cited by 3
Variable Genetic Operator Search for the Molecular Docking Problem
Mesmoudi, S., Tavares, J., Jourdan, L., & Talbi, E. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12211-8_1 · Cited by 3
Comprehending renin inhibitor’s binding affinity using structure-based approaches
Subramanian, G., & Rao, S. N. (2013) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.10.044 · Cited by 3
Drug design for cardiovascular disease: The effect of solvation energy on Rac1-ligand interactions
Maggi, N., Arrigo, P., & Ruggiero, C. (2011) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6090880 · Cited by 3
Informatics-driven Protein-protein Docking
Hashmi, I., & Shehu, A. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/2506583.2506709 · Cited by 3
Semantic Computing and Drug Discovery - A Preliminary Report
Wang, C. C. N., Hecht, D., Sheu, P. C. ‐., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2013.86 · Cited by 3
Stable Drug Designing by Minimizing Drug Protein Interaction Energy Using PSO
Ghosh, A., Talukdar, M., & Roy, U. K. (2015) · doi:10.5121/csit.2015.51306 · Cited by 3
Protein Docking Problem as Combinatorial Optimization Using Beta-Complex
Kim, D. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7997-1_69 · Cited by 3
Planejamento de ligantes da tubulina com propriedades antitumorais
Salum, L. D. B. (2011) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.76.2011.tde-06122011-112559 · Cited by 3
Computational Approaches to Drug Discovery and Development
Li, H., Zheng, M., Luo, X., Zhu, W., & Jiang, H. (2012) · Chemical biology · doi:10.1002/9781118435762.ch2 · Cited by 3
Structure-aware Interactive Graph Neural Networks for the Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding AffinityPreprint
Li, S., Zhou, J., Xu, T., Huang, L., Wang, F., Xiong, H., Huang, W., Dou, D., & Xiong, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.10670 · Cited by 3
Analysis of antimicrobial activity and biofilm inhibition of Ag-NHC complexes by in-vitro and molecular docking method
Şahin, N., Üstün, E., Tutar, U., & Çeli̇k, C. (2025) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1080/17568919.2025.2552635 · Cited by 2
In silico development of quorum sensing inhibitors
Magalhães, R. P., Vieira, T. F., Melo, A., & Sousa, S. F. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819497-3.00015-5 · Cited by 2
ARTEMISININ PROPHYLACTIC EFFECT AGAINST HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN SCHISTOSOMA MANSONI AND HEPATITIS C VIRUS CO-INFECTION: A REVIEW
Hussein, H. M. (2022) · Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology · doi:10.21608/jesp.2022.278385 · Cited by 2
In Silico Identification of Propolis Compounds Potential as COVID-19 Drug Candidates Against SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
Sahlan, M., Dewi, L. K., Pratamı, D. K., Lischer, K., & Hermansyah, H. (2023) · International Journal of Technology · doi:10.14716/ijtech.v14i2.5052 · Cited by 2
Protein-Ligand Docking Methodologies and Its Application in Drug Discovery
Rajkhowa, S., & Deka, R. C. (2016) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0115-2.ch008 · Cited by 3
Semi-Supervised Ligand Finding Using Formal Concept Analysis
Sugiyama, M., Imajo, K., Otaki, K., & Yamamoto, A. (2012) · IPSJ Online Transactions · doi:10.2197/ipsjtrans.5.114 · Cited by 2
How Important is to Account for Water When Modeling Biomolecular Complexes
Yunta, M. J. R. (2015) · American Journal of Modeling and Optimization · doi:10.12691/ajmo-3-3-2 · Cited by 2
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MEDICINES RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM: APPROACHES TO LEAD GENERATION
Jeffrey, P. L., Lock, R. N., & Witherington, J. J. (2009) · Cited by 2
Classifying Calpain Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cataracts: A Self Organising Map (SOM) ANN/KM Approach in Drug Discovery
Hudson, I. L., Leemaqz, S., Neffe, A. T., & Abell, A. D. (2016) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_9 · Cited by 2

Authors: Moitessier, N., Englebienne, P., Lee, D., Lawandi, J., & Corbeil, C. R.
Affiliations: McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author: Moitessier, N
ORCID: Moitessier, N
Corbeil, C R
Venue: British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2008-03
Volume: 153
Issue: S1
Pages: S7-26
ISSN: 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
1476-5381
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515
PMC: PMC2268060
OpenAlex: W2135817448
Cited by: 514
References: 209
Citations by year: 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 43
FWCI: 2.26
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 334 d)
Locations: British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics: Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords: molecular docking, scoring functions, virtual screening, drug discovery, binding affinity prediction, therapeutic target
MeSH terms: Algorithms, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Metals, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Nucleic Acids, Proteins, Stochastic Processes, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks