The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go
Open accessAbstract
Accelerating the drug discovery process requires predictive computational protocols capable of reducing or simplifying the synthetic and/or combinatorial challenge. Docking-based virtual screening methods have been developed and successfully applied to a number of pharmaceutical targets. In this review, we first present the current status of docking and scoring methods, with exhaustive lists of these. We next discuss reported comparative studies, outlining criteria for their interpretation. In the final section, we describe some of the remaining developments that would potentially lead to a universally applicable docking/scoring method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CS strategy could overcome to some extent the limitations faced by the single-scoring approach, for example, the inconsistent performances across different protein targets and chemical classes (Moitessier et al., 2009).”
From Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges (2018) · cites this paper as Moitessier et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Friesner, R. A., Murphy, R. B., Repasky, M. P., Frye, L. L., Greenwood, J. R., Halgren, T. A., Sanschagrin, P. C., & Mainz, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051256o · Cited by 7,012
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications
Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H. Y., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1549 · Cited by 4,354
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD
Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W., & Taylor, R. D. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10465 · Cited by 3,139
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836
MolDock: A New Technique for High-Accuracy Molecular Docking
Thomsen, R., & Christensen, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm051197e · Cited by 2,381
Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects
Sherman, W., Day, T., Jacobson, M. P., Friesner, R. A., & Farid, R. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050540c · Cited by 2,089
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 209 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Korb O, 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 247
- Shoichet BK, 2002, Hits, leads and artifacts from virtual and high throughput screening, Molecular Informatics: Confronting Complexity May 13th–16th 2002
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1 <215::AID-PROT29>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1623::AID-JCC8>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1612::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 518
Scoring Functions in Docking Experiments
Ambure, P. S., & Roy, K. (2016) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0115-2.ch003 · Cited by 2
Approaching Pharmacological Space: Events and Components
Vistoli, G., Pedretti, A., Mazzolari, A., & Testa, B. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_12 · Cited by 2
Prabu, S. L. (2018) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7326-5.ch001 · Cited by 2
Spiegel, J. D., & Senderowitz, H. (2022) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.202200034 · Cited by 2
Diago, L., & Moreno, E. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2009.31 · Cited by 2
Improving protein–ligand binding prediction by considering the bridging water molecules in Autodock
Lu, Q., Qi, L., & Liu, J. (2019) · Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1142/s0219633619500275 · Cited by 2
Chemoinformatic and Chemogenomic Approach to ADMET
Martiny, V. Y., Pajeva, I. K., Wiese, M., Davis, A. M., & Miteva, M. A. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118783344.ch7 · Cited by 2
Kim, J. B., Dang, N. N., Lee, S.-H., Hwang, S., & Breton, V. (2008) · IEEE International Conference on eScience · doi:10.1109/escience.2008.26 · Cited by 2
Huang, H. Y., Pinus, S., Zhang, X. C., Wang, G., Rueda, A. M., Yaouba, S., Huck, S., Huot, M. J., Vlaho, D., Pottel, J., et al. (2023) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-r0v7t · Cited by 1
Self-citationКапуста, К., Sizochenko, N., Anderson, M. L., Kołodziejczyk, W., Voronkov, E. O., Saloni, J., Leszczyński, J., & Hill, G. (2020) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2020.1719203 · Cited by 1
Pattar, S. V., Mirjankar, M. R., Kulkarni, S. S., Gai, P. B., Pujar, N. K., Premakshi, H. G., Mulla, S. I., Babu, R. L., & Kamanavalli, C. M. (2021) · Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics · doi:10.1186/s43042-021-00143-2 · Cited by 1
Hicham, A., Amal, B., Berrichi, A., & Ghalem, S. (2024) · Reaction Kinetics Mechanisms and Catalysis · doi:10.1007/s11144-024-02731-w · Cited by 1
In Silico Evaluation of Quercetin and CAPE as Potential Anti-Inflammatory Agents Targeting COX-2
Helmi, V. N., Anggraeni, F., Budiastuti, Widjiastuti, I., Ismiyatin, K., Irmawati, A., Surboyo, M. D. C., & Shariff, K. A. (2025) · Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research · doi:10.26538/tjnpr/v9i10.4 · Cited by 1
Ayuhastuti, A., Megantara, S., Syah, I. S. K., Fakih, T. M., & Chaerunisaa, A. Y. (2026) · Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews · doi:10.1080/17518253.2025.2607804 · Cited by 1
Ant Colony Optimisation for Ligand Docking
Korb, O., & Cole, J. C. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15461-4_7 · Cited by 1
Pyrkov, T. V., Chugunov, A. O., Krylov, N. A., Nolde, D. E., & Efremov, R. G. (2009) · NATO science for peace and security series. B, Physics and biophysics · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2368-1_2 · Cited by 1
Algorithmic challenges in structure-based drug design and NMR structural biology
Wang, L., Zou, S., & Wang, Y. (2012) · Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China · doi:10.1007/s11460-012-0193-z · Cited by 1
Șeclăman, E. P., Bora, A., Avram, S. I., Simon, Z., & Kurunczi, L. (2011) · Chemical Papers · doi:10.2478/s11696-011-0040-3 · Cited by 2
Docking features for predicting binding loss due to protein mutation
Goodacre, N., Edwards, N. J., Danielsen, M., Uetz, P., & Wu, C. H. (2014) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/2649387.2649397 · Cited by 1
Structure-Based Virtual Screening Using Index Technology
Schlosser, J. (2011) · Cited by 1
SCDL Applications to Drug Discovery
Hecht, D., Sheu, P. C. ‐., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2009) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) · doi:10.1109/bibe.2009.82 · Cited by 1
Predicting nsSNPs that Disrupt Protein-Protein Interactions Using Docking
Goodacre, N., Edwards, N. J., Danielsen, M., Uetz, P., & Wu, C. H. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2016.2520931 · Cited by 1
: The Pitfalls and Challenges of Predicting GPCR-Ligand Interactions.
Roumen, L., Mpa, S., Vroling, B., de Esch, I. J. P., de Vlieg, J., Leurs, R., Jpg, K., Nabuurs, S., & de Graaf, C. (2011) · Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law · Cited by 1
Computational Approaches for the Discovery of Novel Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A and NS5B Inhibitors
Thai, K., Dong, Q.-H., Nguyen, T.-T.-L., Le, D.-P., Le, M.-T., & Tran, T. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0549-5.ch017 · Cited by 1
Role of Molecular Docking in Computer-Aided Drug Design and Development
Agarwal, R., Singh, A., & Sen, S. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1762-7.ch026 · Cited by 1
Importance and Application of Computational Studies in Finding New Active Quinazoline Derivatives
Al-Madhagi, W. M. (2023) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1002314 · Cited by 1
PARADOCKS – a framework for molecular docking
Pippel, M., Meier, R., & Sippl, W. (2011) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-3-s1-p35 · Cited by 1
Supercomputers in Modeling of Biological Systems
Maples, R., Ramasahayam, S., & Dumancas, G. G. (2015) · Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-7461-5.ch008 · Cited by 1
Repurposing Potential of Diminazene Aceturate as an Inhibitor of the E. coli DNA Gyrase B
Dwivedi, V., Ayyagari, A., Chandran, R., Diwan, P., Gupta, S. M., & Gupta, V. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences · doi:10.37871/jbres1153 · Cited by 1
Water mapping: Analysis of binding site spaces to enhance binding
Silakari, O., & Singh, P. K. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820546-4.00008-8 · Cited by 1
Computational Approaches for Structure Based Drug Design and Protein Structure-Function Prediction
Vankayala, S. L. (2013) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 1
The Comparison of Docking Search Algorithms and Scoring Functions
Novič, M., Tibaut, T., Anderluh, M., Borišek, J., & Tomašič, T. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1762-7.ch032 · Cited by 1
Vidya, M., Bano, T., Velamakanni, R. P., Merugu, R., & Jayasree, D. (2022) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.588 · Cited by 1
A Pre-Docking Filter Based on Image RecognitionPreprint
Kiszka, E. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.8072 · Cited by 1
Target‐Based Virtual Screening to Address Protein–Protein Interfaces
Spérandio, O., Miteva, M. A., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2011) · Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527633326.ch16 · Cited by 1
Universal Optimizations of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening
Onodera, K., & Kamijo, S. (2010) · Chem-Bio Informatics Journal · doi:10.1273/cbij.10.85 · Cited by 1
Slynko, I., Rognan, D., & Kellenberger, E. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119161110.ch22 · Cited by 1
Prospects of Covalent Approaches in Drug Discovery: An Overview
Ramachandran, B., Saravanan, M., & Jeyakanthan, J. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119654803.ch15 · Cited by 1
In Silico Protein Design and Virtual Screening
Chavda, V. P., Patel, Z., Parmar, Y., & Chavda, D. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119654803.ch5 · Cited by 1
In Silico Design and Selection of CD44 Antagonists
Ruiz-Moreno, A. J. (2021) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.193912062 · Cited by 1
Muegge, I., & Oloff, S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471266949.bmc006.pub2 · Cited by 1
FLEXIBLE TOPOLOGY: A NEW METHOD FOR DYNAMIC DRUG DESIGNPreprint
Donyapour, N., Roussey, N. M., Bose, S., & Dickson, A. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-g7src · Cited by 1
A Novel Atom Pair Attention Methodology for MolecularRepresentation LearningPreprint
Sun, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, M., Xiao, X., Wan, X., Tang, M., Jin, X., Niu, Z., & Chen, H. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-3b0js · Cited by 1
Community Benchmarking Exercises for Docking and Scoring
Devi, B., Baidya, A. T. K., & Kumar, R. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527840748.ch20 · Cited by 1
Venkatachalam, R., & Vijayakumar, S. (2015) · Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease · doi:10.1016/s2222-1808(15)60855-6
Valadares, N. F. (2008) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.76.2008.tde-18122008-154730
Molecular Modeling in Nucleic Acid‐Targeted Drug Design
Sun, L., Jin, H., Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781118092804.ch6
Zottis, A. (2009) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.76.2009.tde-23042009-145454
Protein Kinase Inhibitors Highlight the Complexities of Drug-Target Non-Covalent Interactions
Engh, R. A. (2008) · Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment · doi:10.1080/13102818.2008.10817551
In silico target identification of biologically active compounds using an inverse docking simulation
Choi, Y. (2013) · TANG [HUMANITAS MEDICINE] · doi:10.5667/tang.2013.0008
Knowledge-based search and multi-objective filters
Hashmi, I., Veltri, D., Kabbani, N., & Shehu, A. (2014) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/2649387.2649391
Andersson, D. (2010) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Acceleration and Verification of Virtual High-throughput Multiconformer Docking
Ellingson, S. R. (2014)
CSCORE: A SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE SCORING FUNCTION
Ouyang, X., Handoko, S. D., & Kwoh, C. K. (2011)
Kang, L., Gu, J., Li, K., Wang, X., & Li, Z. (2014)
Integrative Systems Approaches Towards Brain Pharmacology and Polypharmacology
Bonn, R. F.-W.-U. (2013)
Merchant, C. E. (2011) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0105089
Sisay, M. T. (2010) · bonndoc (University of Bonn)
Akselsen, Ø. W. (2011) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Computational Approaches for the Discovery of Novel Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A and NS5B Inhibitors
Thai, K., Dong, Q.-H., Nguyen, T.-T.-L., Le, D.-P., Le, M.-T., & Tran, T. (2015) · Advances in chemical and materials engineering book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8136-1.ch009
Discovering Ligands for TRP Ion Channels Using Formal Concept Analysis
Sugiyama, M., Imajo, K., Otaki, K., & Yamamoto, A. (2014) · IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks · doi:10.1142/9781783265091_0007
Istyastono, E. P. (2016) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.4958512
Bioquímica e biofísica computacionais: simulações da reatividade e da estrutura de biomoléculas
Arantes, G. M. (2016) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.46.2016.tde-03082016-145527
Robust Search Methods for Rational Drug Design Applications
Sadjad, B. S. (2009) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
NMR, FT-IR spectroscopic studies and molecular docking study of 4-acetoxyphenethyl acrylate
Dıkmen, G., & Alver, Ö. (2017) · Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1142/s0219633617500250
Insights into the Development of Chemotherapeutics Targeting PFKFB Enzymes
Crochet, R. B. (2015) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.311
Nunes‐Alves, A. (2018) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.46.2018.tde-14122017-135400
Pranlukast; An Alternative Potential Leptin Stimulator: Structure-Based Virtual Screening Study
Alsafi, M. Y. B., Manalla, D. E. T., Abdulrahman, I. A., Ahmed, O. H., & El-Hadiyah, T. M. (2018) · Immunochemistry & Immunopathology · doi:10.4172/2469-9756.1000128
Structure-Based Drug Design with a Special Emphasis on Herbal Extracts
Velmurugan, D., Kutumbarao, N. H. V., Viswanathan, V., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2019) · Challenges and advances in computational chemistry and physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05282-9_9
Computer-Aided Design of Ligands at Multiple Protein Targets for Multifactorial Diseases
Kalash, L. N. (2018) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.38293
Virtual Screening for Chemists
Saha, I., & Harran, P. G. (2021) · ACS in focus · doi:10.1021/acsinfocus.7e5001
Drug Repurposing for COVID-19 Using Molecular Docking Tools
Öztaş, D. Y. (2021) · Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) · doi:10.36837/chapman.000286
Lianingsih, F. (2021) · Sasambo Journal of Pharmacy · doi:10.29303/sjp.v2i2.87
Current Incorporation and Impact of Computational Biology in Alzheimer's Disease
Naaz, S., Rani, S. G., & Pati, P. (2022) · International Journal of Health Sciences and Research · doi:10.52403/ijhsr.20220345
On the energy minimization of large molecules
Davey, J. (2011) · doi:10.22215/etd/2011-06738
Determining Stable ligand Orientation Using Particle Swarm Optimization
Ghosh, A., Talukdar, M., & Roy, U. K. (2015) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications · doi:10.5121/ijaia.2015.6508
Ramakrishnan, G. (2017) · Translational medicine research · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1045-7_1
Bajorath, J. (2012) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.14267089.15779222
Matalińska, J., & Lipiński, P. F. J. (2022) · Experimental and Molecular Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104849
A Novel Atom Pair Attention Methodology for Molecular Representation LearningPreprint
Sun, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, M., Xiao, X., Wan, X., Tang, M., Jin, X., Niu, Z., & Chen, H. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2418652/v1
Buckley, M. E. (2023) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.242134
Insights into In Silico Methods to Explore Plant Bioactive Substances in Combating SARS-CoV-2
Pramanik, S., Seth, D., & Debnath, S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3664-9_9
Comparative Analysis of Balanced Code Smell Detection Using Machine Learning
Sabharwal, M., Gupta, A., Gandhi, R., & Khan, I. U. (2023) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-5997-6_32
Structure-based Design for Medicinal Chemists
Blaney, J., & Davis, A. M. (2023) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788018982-00137
DoRIAT: A Bayesian framework for interpreting and annotating docking runsPreprint
Maniatis, C., Ouaray, Z., Xiao, C., Dixon, T. P. E., Naylor, C., Snowden, J., Teng, M. S., & Hurst, J. M. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.02.626325
In Silico Study of Bajakah Compounds (Spatholobus suberectus) to ProteaseSARS-CoV-2 Inhibitor
Norhayati, N., Andika, A., & Purwanto, A. (2025) · Jurnal Sains dan Kesehatan · doi:10.30872/jsk.v5i2.p78-89
Enzymes as Targets for Disease Control: From Discovery to Application
Brambila, B., Martelli, A. C. F. S., Rosa, A. E. M., Barcelos, M. P., Antão, S. C., Alexandrino, A. V., da Silva, C. H. T. D. P., & Novo‐Mansur, M. T. M. (2025) · Series in bioengineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07366-2_8
Siddiqui, A. J., Jahan, S., Saxena, J., Sachidanandan, M., Badraoui, R., & Adnan, M. (2025) · In Silico Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s40203-025-00477-4
Singh, R. D., Vaishali, Deshwal, R. K., Jain, K., & Basant, N. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-36372-6.00015-x
Metadata
- Authors
- Moitessier, N., Englebienne, P., Lee, D., Lawandi, J., & Corbeil, C. R.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Moitessier, N
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S7-26
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- PMC
- PMC2268060
- OpenAlex
- W2135817448
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 209
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- molecular docking, scoring functions, virtual screening, drug discovery, binding affinity prediction, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Metals, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Nucleic Acids, Proteins, Stochastic Processes, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review