Cited by 117Cell death mechanisms and regulationAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Control of neuronal branching by the death receptor CD95 (Fas/Apo-1)

Zuliani, C, Kleber, S, Klussmann, S, Wenger, T, Kenzelmann, M, Schreglmann, N, Martinez, A, del Rio, J A +7 more·2006·Cell Death & Differentiation

Abstract

The CD95 (Apo-1/Fas)/CD95 ligand (CD95L) system is best characterized as a trigger of apoptosis. Nevertheless, despite broad expression of CD95L and CD95 in the developing brain, absence of functional CD95 (lpr mice) or CD95L (gld mice) does not alter neuronal numbers. Here, we report that in embryonic hippocampal and cortical neurons in vivo and in vitro CD95L does not induce apoptosis. Triggering of CD95 in cultured immature neurons substantially increases neurite branches by promoting their formation. The branching increase occurs in a caspase-independent and death domain-dependent manner and is paralleled by an increase in the nonphosphorylated form of Tau. Most importantly, lpr and gld mutants exhibit a reduced number of dendritic branches in vivo at the time when synapse formation takes place. These data reveal a novel function for the CD95 system and add to the picture of guidance molecules in the developing brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401720

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuliani, C., Kleber, S., Klussmann, S., Wenger, T., Kenzelmann, M., Schreglmann, N., Martinez, A., del Rio, J. A., Soriano, E., Vodrazka, P., Kuner, R., Groene, H.-J., Herr, I., Krammer, P. H., & Martin-Villalba, A.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Parc Científic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2005-07-08
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
31-40
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W1994416984
Cited by
117
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB405)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
Fas, Fas ligand, neuronal branching, neurite branching, dendritic branching, lpr mice, gld mice, death domain, tau phosphorylation, synaptogenesis, hippocampal neurons, cortical neurons, neuronal development, guidance molecules
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Membrane Glycoproteins, Mice, Inbred CBA, Mice, Mutant Strains, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Neurites, Apoptosis, fas Receptor, Caspases, Tumor Necrosis Factors, Mice, Fas Ligand Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review