Cited by 130Protist diversity and phylogenyMitochondrial Function and PathologyOrigins and Evolution of Life

Metabolic integration during the evolutionary origin of mitochondria

Open access
SEARCY, Dennis G·2003·Cell Research

Abstract

Although mitochondria provide eukaryotic cells with certain metabolic advantages, in other ways they may be disadvantageous. For example, mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species that damage both nucleocytoplasm and mitochondria, resulting in mutations, diseases, and aging. The relationship of mitochondria to the cytoplasm is best understood in the context of evolutionary history. Although it is clear that mitochondria evolved from symbiotic bacteria, the exact nature of the initial symbiosis is a matter of continuing debate. The exchange of nutrients between host and symbiont may have differed from that between the cytoplasm and mitochondria in modern cells. Speculations about the initial relationships include the following. (1) The pre-mitochondrion may have been an invasive, parasitic bacterium. The host did not benefit. (2) The relationship was a nutritional syntrophy based upon transfer of organic acids from host to symbiont. (3) The relationship was a syntrophy based upon H2 transfer from symbiont to host, where the host was a methanogen. (4) There was a syntrophy based upon reciprocal exchange of sulfur compounds. The last conjecture receives support from our detection in eukaryotic cells of substantial H2S-oxidizing activity in mitochondria, and sulfur-reducing activity in the cytoplasm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.cr.7290168

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SEARCY, D. G.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
SEARCY, Dennis G
Venue
Cell Research
Published
2003-08
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
229-238
ISSN
  • 1001-0602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-7838
OpenAlex
W1969001691
Cited by
130
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
Keywords
mitochondrial evolution, endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria, metabolic integration, syntrophy, hydrogen transfer, methanogenic archaea, sulfur metabolism, hydrogen sulfide oxidation, reactive oxygen species, parasitic bacteria
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Eukaryotic Cells, Biological Evolution, Humans, Methane, Mitochondria, Phylogeny, Sulfur, Symbiosis, Reactive Oxygen Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review