Cited by 68Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition and Health Studies

Assessment of habitual energy and macronutrient intake in adults: comparison of a seven day food record with a dietary history interview

Høidrup, S, Andreasen, AH, Osler, M, Pedersen, AN, Jørgensen, LM, Jørgensen, T, Schroll, M, Heitmann, BL·2002·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To examine the quantitative agreement between a 7 day food record and a diet history interview when these are conducted under the same conditions and to evaluate whether the two methods assess habitual diet intake differently among subgroups of age and body mass index (BMI). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Population study, Denmark. Subjects A total of 175 men and 173 women aged 30-60 y, selected randomly from a larger population sample of Danish adults. Interventions All subjects had habitual diet intake assessed by a diet history interview and completed a 7 day food record within 3 weeks following the interview. The diet history interview and coding of records were performed by the same trained dietician. Main outcome measure Median between-method difference in assessment of total energy intake, absolute intake of macronutrients, and nutrient energy percentages. Difference between reported energy intake from both methods and estimated energy expenditure in different subgroups. Results Energy and macronutrient intake was assessed slightly higher by the 7 day food record than by the diet history interview, but in absolute terms the differences were negligible. The between-method difference in assessment of total energy intake appeared to be stable over the range of age and BMI in both sexes. As compared to estimated total energy expenditure, both diet assessment methods underestimated energy intake by approximately 20%. For both methods the under-reporting increased by BMI in both sexes and by age in men. Conclusions Energy and macronutrient intake data collected under even conditions by either a 7 day food record or a diet history interview may be collapsed and analysed independent of the underlying diet method. Both diet methods, however, appear to underestimate energy intake dependent on age and BMI. Sponsorship Danish Medical Research Council, the FREJA programme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601292

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Høidrup, S., Andreasen, A., Osler, M., Pedersen, A., Jørgensen, L., Jørgensen, T., Schroll, M., & Heitmann, B.
Affiliations
Glostrup Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Høidrup, S
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
105-113
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W1979806455
Cited by
68
References
30
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
7-day food record, energy intake, macronutrient intake, energy expenditure, underreporting, body mass index, age differences, measurement agreement
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Diet Surveys, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Diet Records, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review