Cited by 73Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Validation of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire parent version (DEBQ-P) in the Italian population: A screening tool to detect differences in eating behaviour among obese, overweight and normal-weight preadolescents

Caccialanza, R, Nicholls, D, Cena, H, Maccarini, L, Rezzani, C, Antonioli, L, Dieli, S, Roggi, C·2004·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To validate the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire Parent version (DEBQ-P) in the Italian population and investigate the differences in eating behaviour among Italian normal-weight, overweight and obese preadolescents.Design A cross-sectional validation study. Participants were measured and the approved translation of the questionnaire was administered to their parents.Setting : Three school communities in the province of Bergamo, Northern Italy.Subjects A total of 312 preadolescents (mean age 12.9 y; s.d. 0.8, both sexes) from three secondary schools of the province of Bergamo, Northern Italy, and their parents were invited to participate to the study. Informed written consent was obtained from each subject and their parents. Students were measured and their parents filled in the approved translation of the DEBQ-P. Recruitment was opportunistic and school based.Results Factor and internal consistency analysis confirmed the factor structure of the DEBQ-P and the high internal consistency of its three scales. Variance analysis showed that eating behaviour of Italian normal-weight, overweight and obese preadolescents differs significantly only in regards to the 'restrained eating' scale (F 19.29, P < 0.001), with overweight and obese scoring higher.Conclusions The DEBQ-P can be used for screening projects regarding eating behaviour in the Italian population. The association between restrained eating and weight status was confirmed for both sexes, but the relationship between external eating and emotional overeating and overweight requires further exploration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601949

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caccialanza, R., Nicholls, D., Cena, H., Maccarini, L., Rezzani, C., Antonioli, L., Dieli, S., & Roggi, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Caccialanza, R
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2004-03-31
Volume
58
Issue
9
Pages
1217-1222
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W1983340416
Cited by
73
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
eating behaviour, questionnaire validation, Italian adolescents, preadolescents, childhood obesity, overweight, weight status, dietary restraint, emotional overeating, external eating, screening tool
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Mass Screening, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review