Cited by 130Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Italian version of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Psychometric proprieties and measurement invariance across sex, BMI-status and age

Dakanalis, Antonios, Zanetti, M. Assunta, Clerici, Massimo, Madeddu, Fabio, Riva, Giuseppe, Caccialanza, Riccardo·2013·Appetite

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the basic psychometric proprieties of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) and its measurement invariance across sex, BMI-status (normal weight/overweight), and age in a community sample of 990 Italian adults. The analysis of the dimensionality of the DEBQ using exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of three major factors - emotional, restrained and external eating. Single and multi-group confirmatory factor analyses replicated the three-factor structure, and this dimensional structure proved to be invariant across sex, BMI-status, and age. Findings upheld the criterion-related validity (e.g., via its associations with Eating Attitudes Test-26). The DEBQ's subscales displayed high internal consistency and test-retest reliability over a 4-week period. Statistically significant differences were found when sex, BMI and age groups are compared in the latent means of emotional, external and restrained eating and they are discussed with reference to theory, past and recent empirical findings. Overall, results support the measurement invariance of the DEBQ and suggest that the Italian version is a psychometrically reliable, valid and useful measurement instrument for assessing adult eating behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.010

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dakanalis, A., Zanetti, M. A., Clerici, M., Madeddu, F., Riva, G., & Caccialanza, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT)
Corresponding author
Dakanalis, Antonios
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
71
Pages
187-195
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973089075
Cited by
130
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, Italian translation, dietary habits, emotional eating, dietary restraint, external eating, measurement invariance, sex differences, body mass index, age differences, psychometric properties, Eating Attitudes Test-26, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Ethnicity, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Overweight, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review