CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FOG‐1 recruits the NuRD repressor complex to mediate transcriptional repression by GATA‐1

Hong, Wei, Nakazawa, Minako, Chen, Ying‐Yu, Kori, Rajashree, Vakoc, Christopher R, Rakowski, Carrie, Blobel, Gerd A·2005·The EMBO Journal
DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600703
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600703

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Avram D, Fields A, Pretty On Top K, Nevrivy DJ, Ishmael JE, Leid M (2000) Isolation of a novel family of C(2)H(2) zinc finger proteins implicated in transcriptional repression mediated by chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor (COUP‐TF) orphan nuclear receptors. J Biol Chem 275: 10315–10322 · DOI
  2. Bowen NJ, Fujita N, Kajita M, Wade PA (2004) Mi‐2/NuRD: multiple complexes for many purposes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1677: 52–57 · DOI
  3. Brand M, Ranish JA, Kummer NT, Hamilton J, Igarashi K, Francastel C, Chi TH, Crabtree GR, Aebersold R, Groudine M (2004) Dynamic changes in transcription factor complexes during erythroid differentiation revealed by quantitative proteomics. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11: 73–80 · DOI
  4. Cantor AB, Katz SG, Orkin SH (2002) Distinct domains of the GATA‐1 cofactor FOG‐1 differentially influence erythroid versus megakaryocytic maturation. Mol Cell Biol 22: 4268–4279 · DOI
  5. Chang AN, Cantor AB, Fujiwara Y, Lodish MB, Droho S, Crispino JD, Orkin SH (2002) GATA‐factor dependence of the multitype zinc‐finger protein FOG‐1 for its essential role in megakaryopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 9237–9242 · DOI
  6. Crispino JD, Lodish MB, MacKay JP, Orkin SH (1999) Use of altered specificity mutants to probe a specific protein–protein interaction in differentiation: the GATA‐1:FOG complex. Mol Cell 3: 219–228 · DOI
  7. Deconinck AE, Mead PE, Tevosian SG, Crispino JD, Katz SG, Zon LI, Orkin SH (2000) FOG acts as a repressor of red blood cell development in Xenopus. Development 127: 2031–2040 · DOI
  8. Du J, Stankiewicz MJ, Liu Y, Xi Q, Schmitz JE, Lekstrom‐Himes JA, Ackerman SJ (2002) Novel combinatorial interactions of GATA‐1, PU.1, and C/EBPepsilon isoforms regulate transcription of the gene encoding eosinophil granule major basic protein. J Biol Chem 277: 43481–43494 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Feng Q, Zhang Y (2001) The MeCP1 complex represses transcription through preferential binding, remodeling, and deacetylating methylated nucleosomes. Genes Dev 15: 827–832
  10. Fox AH, Liew C, Holmes M, Kowalski K, Mackay J, Crossley M (1999) Transcriptional cofactors of the FOG family interact with GATA proteins by means of multiple zinc fingers. EMBO J 18: 2812–2822 · DOI
  11. Fujita N, Jaye DL, Geigerman C, Akyildiz A, Mooney MR, Boss JM, Wade PA (2004) MTA3 and the Mi‐2/NuRD complex regulate cell fate during B lymphocyte differentiation. Cell 119: 75–86 · DOI
  12. Fujiwara Y, Browne CP, Cunniff K, Goff SC, Orkin SH (1996) Arrested development of embryonic red cell precursors in mouse embryos lacking transcription factor GATA‐1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 12355–12358 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Grass JA, Boyer ME, Pal S, Wu J, Weiss MJ, Bresnick EH (2003) GATA‐1‐dependent transcriptional repression of GATA‐2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain‐wide chromatin remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8811–8816 · DOI
  14. Katz SG, Cantor AB, Orkin SH (2002) Interaction between FOG‐1 and the corepressor C‐terminal binding protein is dispensable for normal erythropoiesis in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 22: 3121–3128 · DOI
  15. Kowalski K, Liew CK, Matthews JM, Gell DA, Crossley M, Mackay JP (2002) Characterization of the conserved interaction between GATA and FOG family proteins. J Biol Chem 277: 35720–35729 · DOI
  16. Letting DL, Chen YY, Rakowski C, Reedy S, Blobel GA (2004) Context‐dependent regulation of GATA‐1 by friend of GATA‐1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 476–481 · DOI
  17. Letting DL, Rakowski C, Weiss MJ, Blobel GA (2003) Formation of a tissue‐specific histone acetylation pattern by the hematopoietic transcription factor GATA‐1. Mol Cell Biol 23: 1334–1340 · DOI
  18. Lin AC, Roche AE, Wilk J, Svensson EC (2004) The N termini of Friend of GATA (FOG) proteins define a novel transcriptional repression motif and a superfamily of transcriptional repressors. J Biol Chem 279: 55017–55023 · DOI
  19. Luo J, Su F, Chen D, Shiloh A, Gu W (2000) Deacetylation of p53 modulates its effect on cell growth and apoptosis. Nature 408: 377–381 · DOI
  20. Netzer C, Rieger L, Brero A, Zhang CD, Hinzke M, Kohlhase J, Bohlander SK (2001) SALL1, the gene mutated in Townes–Brocks syndrome, encodes a transcriptional repressor which interacts with TRF1/PIN2 and localizes to pericentromeric heterochromatin. Hum Mol Genet 10: 3017–3024 · DOI
  21. Ng HH, Zhang Y, Hendrich B, Johnson CA, Turner BM, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D, Bird A (1999) MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex. Nat Genet 23: 58–61 · DOI
  22. Nichols KE, Crispino JD, Poncz M, White JG, Orkin SH, Maris JM, Weiss MJ (2000) Familial dyserythropoietic anaemia and thrombocytopenia due to an inherited mutation in GATA1. Nat Genet 24: 266–270 · DOI
  23. Nishioka K, Chuikov S, Sarma K, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Allis CD, Tempst P, Reinberg D (2002) Set9, a novel histone H3 methyltransferase that facilitates transcription by precluding histone tail modifications required for heterochromatin formation. Genes Dev 16: 479–489 · DOI
  24. O'Neill DW, Schoetz SS, Lopez RA, Castle M, Rabinowitz L, Shor E, Krawchuk D, Goll MG, Renz M, Seelig HP, Han S, Seong RH, Park SD, Agalioti T, Munshi N, Thanos D, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Bank A (2000) An ikaros‐containing chromatin‐remodeling complex in adult‐type erythroid cells. Mol Cell Biol 20: 7572–7582 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Pal S, Cantor AB, Johnson KD, Moran TB, Boyer ME, Orkin SH, Bresnick EH (2004) Coregulator‐dependent facilitation of chromatin occupancy by GATA‐1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 980–985 · DOI
  26. Pear WS, Nolan GP, Scott ML, Baltimore D (1993) Production of high‐titer helper‐free retroviruses by transient transfection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 8392–8396 · DOI
  27. Rylski M, Welch JJ, Chen YY, Letting DL, Diehl JA, Chodosh LA, Blobel GA, Weiss MJ (2003) GATA‐1‐mediated proliferation arrest during erythroid maturation. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5031–5042 · DOI
  28. Schultz DC, Friedman JR, Rauscher III FJ (2001) Targeting histone deacetylase complexes via KRAB‐zinc finger proteins: the PHD and bromodomains of KAP‐1 form a cooperative unit that recruits a novel isoform of the Mi‐2alpha subunit of NuRD. Genes Dev 15: 428–443 · DOI
  29. Svensson EC, Huggins GS, Dardik FB, Polk CE, Leiden JM (2000) A functionally conserved N‐terminal domain of the friend of GATA‐2 (FOG‐2) protein represses GATA4‐dependent transcription. J Biol Chem 275: 20762–20769 · DOI
  30. Tsai RY, Reed RR (1997) Cloning and functional characterization of Roaz, a zinc finger protein that interacts with O/E‐1 to regulate gene expression: implications for olfactory neuronal development. J Neurosci 17: 4159–4169 · DOI
  31. Tsang AP, Visvader JE, Turner CA, Fujiwara Y, Yu C, Weiss MJ, Crossley M, Orkin SH (1997) FOG, a multitype zinc finger protein, acts as a cofactor for transcription factor GATA‐1 in erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation. Cell 90: 109–119 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Tsang AP, Fujiwara Y, Hom DB, Orkin SH (1998) Failure of megakaryopoiesis and arrested erythropoiesis in mice lacking the GATA‐1 transcriptional cofactor FOG. Genes Dev 12: 1176–1188 · DOI
  33. Wade PA, Jones PL, Vermaak D, Wolffe AP (1998) A multiple subunit Mi‐2 histone deacetylase from Xenopus laevis cofractionates with an associated Snf2 superfamily ATPase. Curr Biol 8: 843–846 · DOI
  34. Watamoto K, Towatari M, Ozawa Y, Miyata Y, Okamoto M, Abe A, Naoe T, Saito H (2003) Altered interaction of HDAC5 with GATA‐1 during MEL cell differentiation. Oncogene 22: 9176–9184 · DOI
  35. Wechsler J, Greene M, McDevitt MA, Anastasi J, Karp JE, Le Beau MM, Crispino JD (2002) Acquired mutations in GATA1 in the megakaryoblastic leukemia of Down syndrome. Nat Genet 32: 148–152 · DOI
  36. Weiss MJ, Yu C, Orkin SH (1997) Erythroid‐cell‐specific properties of transcription factor GATA‐1 revealed by phenotypic rescue of a gene targeted cell line. Mol Cell Biol 17: 1642–1651 · DOI
  37. Welch JJ, Watts JA, Vakoc CR, Yao Y, Wang H, Hardison RC, Blobel GA, Chodosh LA, Weiss MJ (2004) Global regulation of erythroid gene expression by transcription factor GATA‐1. Blood 104: 3136–3147 · DOI
  38. Williams CJ, Naito T, Arco PG, Seavitt JR, Cashman SM, De Souza B, Qi X, Keables P, Von Andrian UH, Georgopoulos K (2004) The chromatin remodeler Mi‐2beta is required for CD4 expression and T cell development. Immunity 20: 719–733 · DOI
  39. Xue Y, Wong J, Moreno GT, Young MK, Cote J, Wang W (1998) NURD, a novel complex with both ATP‐dependent chromatin‐remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol Cell 2: 851–861 · DOI
  40. Yao YL, Yang WM (2003) The metastasis‐associated proteins 1 and 2 form distinct protein complexes with histone deacetylase activity. J Biol Chem 278: 42560–42568 · DOI
  41. Zegerman P, Canas B, Pappin D, Kouzarides T (2002) Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation disrupts binding of nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) repressor complex. J Biol Chem 277: 11621–11624 · DOI
  42. Zhang Y, LeRoy G, Seelig HP, Lane WS, Reinberg D (1998) The dermatomyositis‐specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 95: 279–289 · DOI
  43. Zhang Y, Ng HH, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Bird A, Reinberg D (1999) Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation. Genes Dev 13: 1924–1935 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hong, W., Nakazawa, M., Chen, Y., Kori, R., Vakoc, C. R., Rakowski, C., & Blobel, G. A.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-05-26
Volume
24
Issue
13
Pages
2367-2378
ISSN
  • 0261-4189
  • 1460-2075
DOI
10.1038/sj.emboj.7600703
Cited by
253
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review