Cited by 77Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Comparison of a phone vs clinic approach to achieve 10% weight loss

Donnelly, J E, Smith, B K, Dunn, L, Mayo, M M, Jacobsen, D J, Stewart, E E, Gibson, C, Sullivan, D K·2007·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of a phone vs a traditional face-to-face clinic approach to achieve 10% weight loss and weight maintenance.Design Twenty-six week, randomized, controlled trial.Subjects Twenty-four men and 72 women, ages 25-68 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 33.2+/-3.8.Measurements Weight loss at 12 weeks and weight maintenance at 26 weeks were the primary outcomes. Attendance, meal replacements (MRs), fruits/vegetables (F/V), and physical activity (PA) were measured weekly for process evaluation.Results Median weight loss (range) from baseline at 12 weeks was significantly different for phone at 10.6 kg (16.6) or 10.4% and clinic at 12.7 kg (19.9) or 13.7%, and both were significantly different when compared with the control group with a weight loss of 0.25 kg (5.6) or 0.24%. Median weight loss at 26 weeks was 12.8 kg (23.4) or 13.0% from baseline for the phone group and 12.5 kg (35.2) or 12.6% from baseline for the clinic group (P>0.05).Conclusion The median weight loss for both phone and clinic groups at 12 and 26 weeks exceeded the NHLBI guideline of 10% weight loss from baseline. The phone approach may be a viable option to the traditional weight management clinic for both service providers and participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803568

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnelly, J. E., Smith, B. K., Dunn, L., Mayo, M. M., Jacobsen, D. J., Stewart, E. E., Gibson, C., & Sullivan, D. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • American Academy of Family Physicians (US)
Corresponding author
Donnelly, J E
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2007-02-27
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1270-1276
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W1967177451
Cited by
77
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
weight loss, weight maintenance, obesity, meal replacement, physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake, body mass index, overweight adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Obesity, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review