Cited by 325Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiet and metabolism studies

Efficacy of Commercial Weight-Loss Programs: An Updated Systematic Review

Open access
Gudzune, Kimberly A., Doshi, Ruchi S., Mehta, Ambereen K., Chaudhry, Zoobia W., Jacobs, David K., Vakil, Rachit M., Lee, Clare J., Bleich, Sara N. +1 more·2015·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Commercial and proprietary weight-loss programs are popular obesity treatment options, but their efficacy is unclear. PURPOSE: To compare weight loss, adherence, and harms of commercial or proprietary weight-loss programs versus control/education (no intervention, printed materials only, health education curriculum, or <3 sessions with a provider) or behavioral counseling among overweight and obese adults. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to November 2014; references identified by program staff. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 12 weeks' duration; prospective case series of at least 12 months' duration (harms only). DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted information on study design, population characteristics, interventions, and mean percentage of weight change and assessed risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 45 studies, 39 of which were RCTs. At 12 months, Weight Watchers participants achieved at least 2.6% greater weight loss than those assigned to control/education. Jenny Craig resulted in at least 4.9% greater weight loss at 12 months than control/education and counseling. Nutrisystem resulted in at least 3.8% greater weight loss at 3 months than control/education and counseling. Very-low-calorie programs (Health Management Resources, Medifast, and OPTIFAST) resulted in at least 4.0% greater short-term weight loss than counseling, but some attenuation of effect occurred beyond 6 months when reported. Atkins resulted in 0.1% to 2.9% greater weight loss at 12 months than counseling. Results for SlimFast were mixed. We found limited evidence to evaluate adherence or harms for all programs and weight outcomes for other commercial programs. LIMITATION: Many trials were short (<12 months), had high attrition, and lacked blinding. CONCLUSION: Clinicians could consider referring overweight or obese patients to Weight Watchers or Jenny Craig. Other popular programs, such as Nutrisystem, show promising weight-loss results; however, additional studies evaluating long-term outcomes are needed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. ( PROSPERO: CRD4201-4007155).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m14-2238

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Tsertsvadze A Maglione M Chou R Garritty C Coleman C Lux L Updating Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: Current Efforts in AHRQ’s Effective Health Care Program. Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC057-EF Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 7 2011 22091476

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gudzune, K. A., Doshi, R. S., Mehta, A. K., Chaudhry, Z. W., Jacobs, D. K., Vakil, R. M., Lee, C. J., Bleich, S. N., & Clark, J. M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2015-04-07
Volume
162
Issue
7
Pages
501-512
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2043731116
Cited by
325
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 15
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001077, TL1TR001078)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL116601, K01HL096409)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079637)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
commercial weight loss programs, obesity treatment, weight loss, Weight Watchers, very low calorie diet, Atkins diet, program adherence, overweight adults
MeSH terms
Counseling, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Caloric Restriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review