The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Regulation of Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability
Open accessAbstract
The present study was designed to elucidate the effects of the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) on blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Experiments were conducted under in vitro conditions (coculture of brain endothelial cells and astrocytes) to study the cellular effects of MCP-1 and under in vivo conditions (intracerebral and intracerebroventricular administration of MCP-1) to study the potential contribution of MCP-1 to BBB disruption in vivo. Our results showed that MCP-1 induces a significant increase in the BBB permeability surface area product for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-albumin under in vivo conditions, particularly during prolonged (3 or 7 days) exposure (0.096±0.008 versus 0.031±0.005 μL/g min in controls at 3 days, P<0.001). Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 also enhanced (17-fold compared with control) the permeability of the in vitro BBB (coculture) model. At the cellular level, MCP-1 causes alteration of tight junction (TJ) proteins in endothelial cells (redistribution of TJ proteins determined by Western blotting and loss of immunostaining for occludin, claudin-5, ZO-1, ZO-2). Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1-induced alterations in BBB permeability are mostly realized through the CCR2 receptor. Absence of CCR2 diminishes any effect of MCP-1 on BBB permeability in vitro and in vivo. The permeability surface area product for FITC-albumin after 3 days exposure to MCP-1 was 0.096±0.006 and 0.032±0.007 μL/g min, in CCR2+/+ and CCR2−/− mice, respectively ( P<0.001). Monocytes/macrophages also participate in MCP-1-induced alterations in BBB permeability in vivo. Monocytes/macrophages depletion (by clodronate liposomes) reduced the effect of MCP-1 on BBB permeability in vivo ∼2 fold. Our results suggest that, besides its main function of recruiting leukocytes at sites of inflammation, MCP-1 also plays a role in ‘opening’ the BBB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stamatovic, S. M., Keep, R. F., Kunkel, S. L., & Andjelkovic, A. V. (2003) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.00755 · Cited by 381
Cited by
Blood–brain Barrier: Structural Components and Function Under Physiologic and Pathologic Conditions
Persidsky, Y., Ramirez, S. H., Haorah, J., & Kanmogne, G. D. (2006) · Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s11481-006-9025-3 · Cited by 922
Neuroinflammatory mechanisms of blood-brain barrier damage in ischemic stroke
Yang, C., Hawkins, K. E., Doré, S., & Candelario-Jalil, E. (2019) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00136.2018 · Cited by 871
Virus Infections in the Nervous System
Koyuncu, O. O., Hogue, I. B., & Enquist, L. W. (2013) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.010 · Cited by 594
The impact of microglial activation on blood-brain barrier in brain diseases
da Fonseca, A. C. C., Matias, D., Garcia, C., Amaral, R., Geraldo, L. H., Freitas, C., & Lima, F. R. S. (2014) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2014.00362 · Cited by 572
Disrupting the blood–brain barrier by focused ultrasound induces sterile inflammation
Kovacs, Z. I., Kim, S., Jikaria, N., Qureshi, F., Milo, B., Lewis, B. K., Bresler, M., Burks, S. R., & Frank, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614777114 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Stamatovic, S. M., Shakui, P., Keep, R. F., Moore, B. B., Kunkel, S. L., Van Rooijen, N., & Andjelkovic, A. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-606
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W1988551550
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.