Cited by 136Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Magnetic Seizure Therapy Improves Mood in Refractory Major Depression

Open access
Kosel, Markus, Frick, Caroline, Lisanby, Sarah H, Fisch, Hans-Ulrich, Schlaepfer, Thomas E·2003·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

This report describes the successful treatment of a patient suffering from an episode of drug-resistant major depression using magnetic seizure therapy (MST). The patient suffered from recurrent major depression since adolescence. MST is a novel brain stimulation method using transcranial magnetic stimulation at convulsive parameters in order to induce therapeutic seizures under general anesthesia in the same setting used for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The first use of therapeutic magnetic seizure induction in a psychiatric patient took place at the University Hospital in Bern, Switzerland, in May 2000. Results of a recent randomized, within-subject, double-masked trial comparing ECT and MST in 10 patients indicate that MST appears to have less subjective and objective side effects, is associated with faster recovery of orientation, and is superior to ECT on measures of attention, retrograde amnesia, and category fluency. ECT has an unparalleled and well-documented efficacy in severe depression but is associated with cognitive side effects. MST is currently under study in several centers with respect to its antidepressant efficacy. We report here on the treatment of a patient with refractory major depression (DSM IV-R), who underwent a series of 12 sessions of MST in an inpatient setting. Baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRSD-21) of 33 and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) of 40 decreased to 6 and 11 respectively, 1 week after completion of the MST trial. Measures of cognitive functions support the hypothesis that MST is associated with a less severe profile of cognitive side effects. [(99m)Tc]-HMPAO SPECT studies (baseline and 4 days after the completion of the MST trial) point to a raise of blood flow at baseline in the left fronto-parietal region and the brainstem. Our preliminary data support the prospect of antidepressant efficacy of MST and point to a benign cognitive side-effect profile in a patient suffering from severe treatment-resistant major depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300293

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MST shows robust antidepressant effects with shorter reorientation times (≈4-9 min) and fewer cognitive adverse effects than ECT.

    “Across studies, MST shows robust antidepressant effects with shorter reorientation times (≈4–9 min) and fewer cognitive adverse effects [132,133,134,135,136,137,138].”

    From The Heart’s Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart–Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies (2026) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Results report a mean reorientation time of 4.8 ± 2.9 minutes, shorter than the cited ECT times. The Discussion reports remission in one patient and cognitive measures suggesting fewer side effects than reported after ECT. But it calls the findings a case report needing confirmation, so this paper does not establish robust antidepressant effects across studies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. APA (2001). ECT Task Force of the American Psychiatric Association: The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kosel, M., Frick, C., Lisanby, S. H., Fisch, H.-U., & Schlaepfer, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Schlaepfer, Thomas E
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2003-07-18
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
2045-2048
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2018576168
Cited by
136
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
magnetic seizure therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, cognitive side effects, antidepressant efficacy, treatment-resistant depression
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Electromagnetic Fields, Female, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review